Interoperability and Considerations for Standards-Based Exchange of Medical Images: HIMSS-SIIM Collaborative White Paper.

This white paper explores the considerations of standards-based interoperability of medical images between organizations, patients, and providers. In this paper, we will look at three different standards-based image exchange implementations that have been deployed to facilitate exchange of images between provider organizations. The paper will describe how each implementation uses applicable technology and standards; the image types that are included; and the governance policies that define participation, access, and trust. Limitations of the solution or non-standard approaches to solve challenges will also be identified. Much can be learned from successes elsewhere, and those learnings will point to recommendations of best practices to facilitate the adoption of image exchange.

A Foundation for Enterprise Imaging: HIMSS-SIIM Collaborative White Paper.

Care providers today routinely obtain valuable clinical multimedia with mobile devices, scope cameras, ultrasound, and many other modalities at the point of care. Image capture and storage workflows may be heterogeneous across an enterprise, and as a result, they often are not well incorporated in the electronic health record. Enterprise Imaging refers to a set of strategies, initiatives, and workflows implemented across a healthcare enterprise to consistently and optimally capture, index, manage, store, distribute, view, exchange, and analyze all clinical imaging and multimedia content to enhance the electronic health record. This paper is intended to introduce Enterprise Imaging as an important initiative to clinical and informatics leadership, and outline its key elements of governance, strategy, infrastructure, common multimedia content, acquisition workflows, enterprise image viewers, and image exchange services.

Technical Challenges of Enterprise Imaging: HIMSS-SIIM Collaborative White Paper.

This white paper explores the technical challenges and solutions for acquiring (capturing) and managing enterprise images, particularly those involving visible light applications. The types of acquisition devices used for various general-purpose photography and specialized applications including dermatology, endoscopy, and anatomic pathology are reviewed. The formats and standards used, and the associated metadata requirements and communication protocols for transfer and workflow are considered. Particular emphasis is placed on the importance of metadata capture in both order- and encounter-based workflow. The benefits of using DICOM to provide a standard means of recording and accessing both metadata and image and video data are considered, as is the role of IHE and FHIR.

Considerations for Exchanging and Sharing Medical Images for Improved Collaboration and Patient Care: HIMSS-SIIM Collaborative White Paper.

The need for providers and patients to exchange and share imaging has never been more apparent, yet many organizations are only now, as a part of a larger enterprise imaging initiative, taking steps to streamline an important process that has historically been facilitated with the use of CDs or insecure methods of communication. This paper will provide an introduction to concepts and common-use cases for image exchange, outline challenges that have hindered adoption to date, and describe standards for image exchange that show increasing promise of being adopted by vendors and providers.

Implementing a radiology-information technology project: mobile image viewing use case and a general guideline for radiologist-information technology team collaboration.

OBJECTIVE: This article illustrates the importance of radiologist engagement in the successful implementation of radiology-information technology (IT) projects through the example of establishing a mobile image viewing solution for health care professionals. CONCLUSION: With an understanding of the types of decisions that benefit from radiologist input, this article outlines an overall project framework to provide a context for how radiologists might engage in the project cycle.

Evaluation of irreversible JPEG compression for a clinical ultrasound practice.

A prior ultrasound study indicated that images with low to moderate levels of JPEG and wavelet compression were acceptable for diagnostic purposes. The purpose of this study is to validate this prior finding using the Joint Photographic Experts Group (JPEG) baseline compression algorithm, at a compression ratio of approximately 10:1, on a sufficiently large number of grayscale and color ultrasound images to attain a statistically significant result. The practical goal of this study is to determine if it is feasible for radiologists to use irreversibly compressed images as an integral part of the day to day ultrasound practice (ie, perform primary diagnosis with, and store irreversibly compressed images in the ultrasound PACS archive). In this study, 5 Radiologists were asked to review 300 grayscale and color static ultrasound images selected from 4 major anatomic groups. Each image was compressed and decompressed using the JPEG baseline compression algorithm at a fixed quality factor resulting in an average compression ratio of approximately 9:1. The images were presented in pairs (original and compressed) in a blinded fashion on a PACS workstation in the ultrasound reading areas, and radiologists were asked to pick which image they preferred in terms of diagnostic utility and their degree of certainty (on a scale from 1 to 4). Of the 1499 total readings, 50.17% (95% confidence intervals at 47.6%, and 52.7%) indicated a preference for the original image in the pair, and 49.83% (95% confidence intervals at 47.3%, and 52.0%) indicated a preference for the compressed image. These findings led the authors to conclude that static color and gray-scale ultrasound images compressed with JPEG at approximately 9:1 are statistically indistinguishable from the originals for primary diagnostic purposes. Based on the authors laboratory experience with compression and the results of this and other prior studies, JPEG compression is now being applied to all ultrasound images in the authors' radiology practice before reading. No image quality-related issues have been encountered after 12 months of operation (approximately 48000 examinations).