RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: With the availability of vaccines against SARS-COV-2, recommendations for vaccination of transplant candidates are widespread. At our institution, patients may receive liver transplant (LTx) regardless of vaccine status. The purpose of this study is to compare post-LTx outcomes between vaccinated (VAX) and unvaccinated (UNVAX) LTx recipients. METHODS: This is a retrospective, single-center study of LTx from January 1, 2021-March 30, 2022. The primary outcome is incidence of post-LTx COVID-19. Secondary outcomes include graft function, mortality, graft loss, and COVID-19 treatment. RESULTS: One hundred and seventy-seven LTx recipients were included, 57% [101/177] VAX and 43% [76/177] UNVAX. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. Overall, 28 (36.8%) UNVAX and 34 (33.7%) VAX tested COVID-19 positive during the study period (p = .193) at a mean of 312.6 [255.4-369.8] days for UNVAX versus 254.6 [215.2-293.9] days for VAX (p = .084). COVID-19 treatment was administered in 15 (53.6%) of the UNVAX compared to 22 (64.7%) in the VAX (p = .374), although eight (28.6%) of UNVAX required hospital admission for treatment compared with two (5.9%) of VAX (p = .016). There were no statistically significant differences in death, and no COVID-19 related death or graft loss. There were no statistically significant differences in liver function tests at 3- and 12-months post LTx. CONCLUSION: In a series with a large percentage of UNVAX patients, LTx appears to be safe, with no difference in the rate of COVID-19 or transplant-related outcomes compared to VAX. While we encourage vaccination to prevent severe COVID, based on our results, vaccine status should not be reason to deny lifesaving transplant.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Trasplante de Hígado , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , SARS-CoV-2 , Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19 , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , Estudios Retrospectivos , Vacunación , Receptores de TrasplantesRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: We assessed differences in the post-transplant outcomes between COVID-19 vaccinated and unvaccinated Kidney transplant (KTx) recipients. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, single-center study of 400 KTx from 2/1/2021 to 4/30/2022 with 6-21 months follow-up. Primary outcomes included differences in the incidence of post-transplant COVID-19, ICU admission for COVID-19, death, and graft failure between the two groups. Secondary outcomes were inpatient floor admission, outpatient-management, length of hospital stay during COVID-19 admission. We also reported rejection, DGF, CMV needing treatment, and BK PCR >10 000 in baseline characteristics. RESULT: 70.5% (282/400) were fully vaccinated, and 29.5% (118/400) were unvaccinated. 33% (92/282) of vaccinated and 39% (46/118) of unvaccinated patients developed COVID-19 (p-value .03). In both groups, 16% received outpatient treatments for COVID-19. 3% (12/282) of the vaccinated and 8% (11/118) unvaccinated were admitted to the general floors (p-value .06), and 1% (3/282) of the vaccinated and 3.3% (4/118) of the unvaccinated patients needed admission to the ICU (p-value .2). The length of stay was 12 days in both groups. 13/282 (4.6%) vaccinated patients and 7/118 (5.93%) unvaccinated patients died during the follow-up period (p-value = .3). COVID-19 was deemed the etiology of death in 5/13 cases in the vaccinated and 3/7 in the unvaccinated. DGF, rejection, CMV requiring treatment, and BK PCR >10 000 were comparable between groups. CONCLUSION: The incidence of COVID-19 was higher in unvaccinated than in vaccinated KTx. The two groups were not statistically different for other primary outcomes, including the need for hospital admissions (outpatient, general floor, ICU), length of hospital stay, death, and graft failure.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Infecciones por Citomegalovirus , Trasplante de Riñón , Humanos , Tabú , COVID-19/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Receptores de TrasplantesRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: There is limited literature describing the real-world practice of delayed initiation and shortened duration direct-acting antiviral (DAA) in kidney transplant recipients. We compared Hepatitis C virus (HCV) cure rates among kidney transplant recipients who received an HCV nucleic acid test positive (NAT +) kidney and were treated with sofosbuvir/velpatasvir (SOF/VEL) for 12 weeks or glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (G/P) for 8 weeks, a duration that is 4 weeks shorter than the guideline recommendation for treatment delay beyond 1-week post-transplant. METHODS: Retrospective study of HCV-negative adult patients who received a kidney transplant from an HCV NAT+ donor between April 2019 and April 2022 treated with either SOF/VEL for 12 weeks or G/P for 8 weeks. The primary outcome was sustained virologic response 12 weeks after completion of therapy (SVR12). Secondary outcomes included time to DAA initiation, renal function, graft loss, patient death, liver function tests, and opportunistic infections. RESULTS: 102 kidney transplant recipients were included with 36 treated with G/P and 66 treated with SOF/VEL. All 36 (100%) treated with G/P achieved SVR12. One patient in the SOF/VEL group failed to achieve SVR12 but received additional therapy and was cured. Time to DAA initiation was similar with a mean of 4 weeks. There was no difference in AST/ALT > 3x ULN or renal function. One rejection occurred in each group. No patient death or graft loss was observed. There was no difference in cytomegalovirus and BK viremia between groups. CONCLUSION: Delayed initiation of DAA therapy with 12 weeks of SOF/VEL or 8 weeks of G/P achieves SVR12 in kidney transplant recipients without significant adverse effects.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Kidney transplantation from HCV-viremic donors into uninfected recipients is associated with excellent short-term outcomes. However, concerns regarding an increased risk for the development of de novo donor specific antibodies (DSA) and acute rejection have been raised in single center reports. METHODS: A retrospective study of HCV-negative kidney-only transplant recipients between 2018 and 2020. Patients were grouped based on the donor HCV status into group 1; HCV-viremic donors, and group 2; HCV-negative donors. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW), with weights derived from the propensity score, were used to estimate the effect of donors' HCV-viremia on the recipients. The primary objective was to compare the 1-year incidence of de novo DSA. Secondary outcomes included group comparison of the incidence of biopsy proven acute rejection (BPAR), 1-year patient and allograft survival, and 1-year renal allograft function. RESULTS: A total of 71 patients were included in the HCV NAT+ group, and 440 in the HCV- negative group. One-year incidence of de novo DSA was higher in the HCV NAT+ group in the IPTW weighted analysis (19% vs. 9%, p = .02). In the unweighted analysis, BPAR occurred in 7% of recipients in the HCV NAT+ group, compared to 3% in the control group (p = .06). However, due to the low event rate in the in the IPTW weighted groups, a statistical significance test could not be performed. Average estimated GFR was higher in the HCV-viremic group at 3 months (61 vs. 53 ml/min/1.73 m2 p = .002), but comparable at 6 (59 vs. 56 ml/min/1.73 m2 , p = .31) and 12 months (60 vs. 55 ml/min/1.73 m2 , p = .07). Patient and allograft survival were comparable between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Kidney transplant from HCV-viremic donors was associated with an increased risk for the development of post-transplant de novo DSA in the first year after transplantation, but no difference in patient and graft survival.
Asunto(s)
Hepatitis C , Trasplante de Riñón , Humanos , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Viremia/etiología , Donantes de Tejidos , Anticuerpos , Receptores de Trasplantes , Supervivencia de Injerto , Hepatitis C/etiología , Rechazo de Injerto/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common complication after lung transplantation (LT) and is associated with higher cost and mortality. We sought to evaluate the incidence of postoperative AKI, defined as AKI within 14 days of transplant, and identify associated perioperative factors. METHODS: We conducted a single-center, retrospective review of 153 lung transplant recipients. Postoperative AKI was determined using the RIFLE (Risk, Injury, Failure, Loss, End Stage) criteria. Perioperative covariates and their association with postoperative AKI were analyzed using Cox proportional hazards. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were constructed to evaluate patient survival at 1 year and data finalization. A sub-analysis was performed evaluating factors associated with early AKI (within 48 h of transplant) and late AKI. RESULTS: Postoperative AKI occurred in 36.6% of patients with 51.8% of cases occurring within 48 h of LT. Recipient race, transplant type, cardiopulmonary support, and red blood cell administration were associated with postoperative AKI. Survival was significantly lower in patients with postoperative AKI following LT. CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative AKI within 2 weeks of lung transplant is associated with lower short- and long-term survival. Perioperative factors associated with postoperative AKI may be potential points of intervention to minimize AKI development in the future.
Asunto(s)
Lesión Renal Aguda , Trasplante de Pulmón , Humanos , Incidencia , Trasplante de Pulmón/efectos adversos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: kidney transplantation from Hepatitis C virus (HCV) viremic donors to uninfected recipients is associated with excellent short-term outcomes. However, HCV viremia might be associated with an increased risk for post-transplant viral complications. METHODS: We designed a retrospective study of HCV-negative kidney-only transplant recipients between 2018 and 2020. Recipients were grouped into group 1; HCV-negative donors, and group 2; HCV-viremic donors. Patients were matched 1:1 using propensity score. The primary objectives were to compare the incidence of cytomegalovirus (CMV) viremia ≥ 200 ml/IU, and BK viremia ≥1000 copies/ml between the groups. Secondary outcomes included group comparison of CMV disease, BK viremia ≥10 000 copies/ml, and 1-year patient and allograft survival. RESULTS: The study included 634 patients in group 1, and 71 patients in group 2. Sixty-five pairs of patients were matched. Incidence of CMV viremia (33.3% vs. 40.0%, p = .4675), and BK viremia (15.9% vs. 27.7%, p = .1353) did not differ significantly between groups in the matched cohort. Incidence of CMV disease (81.0% vs. 76.9%, p = 1.000), and BK viremia ≥10 000 copies/ml (9.5% vs. 16.9%, p = .2987) were comparable between groups. There was no difference in the 1-year patient or allograft survival between groups. CONCLUSION: kidney transplant from HCV-viremic donors is not associated with increased risk for BK or CMV viremia.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Citomegalovirus , Hepatitis C , Trasplante de Riñón , Antivirales/uso terapéutico , Infecciones por Citomegalovirus/tratamiento farmacológico , Hepacivirus , Hepatitis C/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Donantes de Tejidos , Receptores de Trasplantes , Viremia/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
The safety and efficacy of direct-acting antiviral therapies have allowed the transplantation of organs from hepatitis C virus (HCV)-viremic donors into uninfected recipients. This novel strategy contrasts with the previous standard-of-care practice of limiting the transplantation of HCV infected-donor organs to HCV-infected recipients, or all too often, discarding viable organs. In this review, we summarize the published literature about the safety and feasibility of transplanting organs from HCV-viremic donors, the challenges that hinder wider adoption of this strategy, and future research needs.
Asunto(s)
Hepatitis C Crónica , Hepatitis C , Trasplante de Riñón , Antivirales/uso terapéutico , Hepacivirus , Hepatitis C/tratamiento farmacológico , Hepatitis C Crónica/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Donantes de TejidosRESUMEN
The management of a kidney transplant program has evolved significantly in the last decades to become a highly specialized, multidisciplinary standard of care for end-stage kidney disease. Transplant center job descriptions have similarly morphed with increasing responsibilities to address a more complex patient mix, increasing medical and surgical therapeutic options, and increasing regulatory burden in the face of an ever-increasing organ shortage. Within this evolution, the role of the Kidney Transplant Medical Director (KTMD) has expanded beyond the basic requirements described in the United Network for Organ Sharing bylaws. Without a clear job description, transplant nephrology trainees may be inadequately trained and practicing transplant nephrologists may face opaque expectations for the roles and responsibilities of Medical Director. To address this gap and clarify the key areas in which the KTMD interfaces with the kidney transplant program, American Society of Transplantation (AST) formed a Task Force of 14 AST KTMDs to review and define the role of the KTMD in key aspects of administrative, regulatory, budgetary, and educational oversight of a kidney transplant program.
Asunto(s)
Fallo Renal Crónico , Trasplante de Riñón , Tutoría , Nefrología , Ejecutivos Médicos , Obtención de Tejidos y Órganos , Humanos , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Currently, there is limited literature evaluating rATG induction dosing and incidence of opportunistic viral infections when using steroid-free maintenance immunosuppression. METHODS: This single-center, retrospective, study compared high rATG (>4.5 mg/kg) versus low (<4.5 mg/kg) induction dosing and the overall incidence of early opportunistic viral infection at 180 days in the setting of maintenance immunosuppression consisting of tacrolimus, mycophenolate, rapid steroid withdrawal, and a tiered antiviral prevention strategy based on donor-recipient Cytomegalovirus (CMV) serostatus. RESULTS: A total of 209 patients were included; 76 patients received low-dose and 133 patients received high-dose rATG. Incidence of overall opportunistic viral infection occurred more frequently in patients who received high compared to low dose (29.8% vs 25% p = .030). Incidence of CMV infection was also significantly increased in the high-dose group (31.6% vs 18.4% p = .039). In a multivariable model, rATG dose, as a continuous variable, remained a significant independent predictor of infection along with CMV risk (OR 1.46, 95% CI 1.02-2.09) controlling for age and CMV risk. There were no differences in graft-related outcomes at 180 days. CONCLUSION: Higher cumulative rATG induction dose was associated with increased incidence of opportunistic viral infections, in the setting of a steroid-free maintenance immunosuppression in the early post-transplant period.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Citomegalovirus , Rechazo de Injerto , Suero Antilinfocítico , Infecciones por Citomegalovirus/epidemiología , Rechazo de Injerto/epidemiología , Rechazo de Injerto/etiología , Rechazo de Injerto/prevención & control , Humanos , Terapia de Inmunosupresión , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Incidencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , EsteroidesRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has negatively impacted organ donation and transplantation across the globe. METHODS: This study analyzed transplant outcomes during the pre-pandemic [PPE, 1/2019-2/2020] and pandemic era [PE, 3/2020-8/2020] based on changes in induction immunosuppression. During PPE, high immunological risk patients received 4-6 mg/kg, moderate risk 2-4 mg/kg, and low risk 1-2 mg/kg of ATG. During PE, ATG doses were reduced to 3-4 mg/kg for high risk, 1-2 mg/kg for moderate, and low changed to basiliximab. Primary outcomes are as follows: biopsy-proven rejection [BPAR], de-novo donor-specific antibody [DSA], delayed graft function [DGF], infection rates, graft loss, and all-cause of mortality. RESULTS: During PPE, 224 kidney transplants [KTx] and 14 kidney/pancreas transplants [KP] were included, while 180 KTx and 5 KP were included for PE. Basiliximab use increased by 30% in the PE. The odds of DGF were statistically significant between PE vs PPE, OR 1.7 [1.05, 2.8, p-value = .042]. The odds of developing DSAs and BPAR during the PE vs. PPE were 0.34 [0.16, 0.71, p-value = .004] and OR 0.34 (0.1 to 1.1, p-value, .104)], respectively. Cytomegalovirus [19% in PE, 37% in PPE] and BK virus [5.4% PE vs. 16% PPE] incidence reduced during PE vs. PPE. COVID-19, graft loss, and mortality were comparable between groups. CONCLUSION: KTx and KP transplants were performed safely during the COVID-19 pandemic with a reduction of induction immunosuppression.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Trasplante de Riñón , Humanos , Terapia de Inmunosupresión , Pandemias , Estudios Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2RESUMEN
The current American Society of Transplantation (AST) accredited transplant fellowship programs in the United States provide no structured formal training in leadership and administration which is essential for successfully running a transplant program. We conducted a survey of medical directors of active adult kidney and kidney-pancreas transplant programs in the United States about their demographics, training pathways, and roles and responsibilities. The survey was emailed to 183 medical directors, and 123 (67.2%) completed the survey. A majority of respondents were older than 50 years (61%), males (80%), and holding that position for more than 10 years (47%). Only 51% of current medical directors had taken that position after completing a one-year transplant fellowship, and 58% took on the role with no prior administrative or leadership experience. The medical directors reported spending a median 50%-75% of time in clinical responsibilities, 25%-50% of time in administration, and 0%-25% time in research. The survey also captured various administrative roles of medical directors vis-à-vis other transplant leaders. The study, designed to be the starting point of an improvement initiative of the AST, provided important insight into the demographics, training pathways, roles and responsibilities, job satisfaction, education needs, and training gaps of current medical directors.
Asunto(s)
Internado y Residencia , Ejecutivos Médicos , Adulto , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina , Becas , Humanos , Riñón , Masculino , Páncreas , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
The advent of direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapies has allowed kidney transplantation from hepatitis C (HCV)-viremic donors into negative recipients. We evaluated the safety and feasibility of such practice when utilizing a patient's health plan to cover the cost for DAAs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a prospective, non-randomized, pilot clinical study. 30 HCV-negative participants received kidney transplant from HCV-viremic deceased donors. HCV polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was checked on day 3 post transplant, and a request for pan-genotypic DAA therapy was sent once viremia was confirmed. Primary outcomes were the percentage of patients achieving sustained virologic response defined as undetectable HCV PCR 12 weeks after therapy completion, and the percentage of patients receiving DAAs via patient's health plan. RESULTS: HCV viremia occurred in all 30 recipients. Sustained viral response was achieved in 93% of the patients. Two patients failed first-line DAAs, 1 patient due to non-compliance with the prescribed regimen while the other due to NS5A mutation. DAA therapy was successfully obtained via patient's health plan in 28/30 patients. There was no significant liver-related complication, patient death, or graft loss. CONCLUSION: Kidney transplantation from HCV-viremic donors appears to be safe. However, challenges with obtaining DAA coverage in the United States persist.
Asunto(s)
Hepatitis C Crónica , Hepatitis C , Antivirales/uso terapéutico , Hepatitis C/diagnóstico , Hepatitis C/tratamiento farmacológico , Hepatitis C Crónica/diagnóstico , Hepatitis C Crónica/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Riñón , Estudios Prospectivos , Donantes de Tejidos , ViremiaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: The success of direct-acting antivirals (DAA) has transformed the management of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and has led to the expansion of the deceased donor organ pool for liver transplantation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We present a single center retrospective review of liver transplantations performed on HCV-seronegative recipients from HCV-seropositive organs from 11/2017 to 05/2020. HCV nucleic acid testing (NAT) was performed on HCV-seropositive donors to assess active HCV infection. RESULTS: 42 HCV-seronegative recipients underwent a liver transplant from a HCV-seropositive donor, including 21 NAT negative (20 liver, 1 simultaneous liver kidney transplant) and 21 NAT positive liver transplants. Two (9.5%) HCV antibody positive/NAT negative recipients developed HCV viremia and achieved sustained virologic response with DAA therapy. The remaining patients with available data (19 patients) remained polymerase chain reaction (PCR) negative at 6 months. 20 (95%) of HCV antibody positive/NAT positive recipients had a confirmed HCV viremia. 100% of patients with available data (15 patients) achieved SVR. Observed events include 1 mortality and graft loss and equivalent rates of post-transplant complications between NAT positive and NAT negative recipients. CONCLUSIONS: HCV-seropositive organs can be safely transplanted into HCV-seronegative patients with minimal complications post-transplant.
Asunto(s)
Selección de Donante , Hepacivirus/aislamiento & purificación , Hepatitis C/diagnóstico , Hepatopatías/cirugía , Hepatopatías/virología , Trasplante de Hígado , Adulto , Anciano , Antivirales/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Hepatitis C/epidemiología , Hepatitis C/terapia , Humanos , Hepatopatías/diagnóstico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Respuesta Virológica Sostenida , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
While there have been numerous studies of living kidney donors, most have been retrospective without suitable controls and have yielded conflicting results. To clarify this we studied 205 living donor candidates and 203 controls having no medical conditions precluding donation. Before and at six months, one, two, three, six, and nine years after donation we measured iohexol glomerular filtration rate, clinic blood pressure, urine protein excretion and metabolic parameters reported to be affected by kidney function. We measured 24 hour ambulatory blood pressure at three, six, and nine years and at six and nine years blood pressure after treadmill exercise, carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity and arterial elasticity. Between six months and nine years, the mean (95% confidence interval) change in glomerular filtration rate was significantly different among 133 donors 0·02 (-0·16-0·20) mL/min/1·73m2/year versus -1·26 (-1·52--1·00) mL/min/1·73m2/year in 113 healthy controls. Blood pressure, urine protein, urine albumin, glucose, hemoglobin A1c, insulin, and lipoproteins were not different in controls versus donors; but parathyroid hormone, homocysteine and uric acid remained higher at nine years. At six and nine years carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity was not different, but the mean small artery elasticity was significantly lower in 141 donors 6·1 mL/mmHg x100, versus 113 controls 7·1 mL/mmHg x100, and 6·1 mL/mmHg x100 in 137 donors versus 7·6 mL/mmHg x100 in 112 controls at six and nine years, respectively [significant adjusted difference of 1·1 mL/mmHg x100]. Thus, donors remain healthy with stable kidney function for the first nine years, but differences in metabolic and vascular parameters could be harbingers of adverse outcomes requiring future interventions.
Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Riñón , Nefrectomía , Monitoreo Ambulatorio de la Presión Arterial , Estudios de Seguimiento , Tasa de Filtración Glomerular , Riñón , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Donadores Vivos , Estudios Prospectivos , Análisis de la Onda del Pulso , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) are gaining popularity in the management of diabetes in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients. There are no studies available comparing the two GLP-1RAs dulaglutide and liraglutide in SOT. We performed a retrospective chart review to assess the safety and effectiveness of these agents in adult SOT with diabetes at 6, 12 and 24 months. There were 63 and 25 recipients on dulaglutide and liraglutide, respectively. There was a sustained reduction in primary endpoints of weight, BMI and insulin requirement with dulaglutide when compared to liraglutide. Decrease in weight was 2%, 4% and 5.2% with dulaglutide and 0.09%, 0.87% and 0.89% with liraglutide at 6, 12 and 24 months respectively. BMI reduction followed the same trend in the two groups. The percentage reduction for insulin was 26% with dulaglutide and 3.6% with liraglutide. There was a 10% reduction in creatinine and a 15% increase in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at the end of 24 months with dulaglutide. However, there was an increase in creatinine by 7% and an 8% decrease in eGFR at the end of 24 months with liraglutide.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Trasplante de Órganos , Adulto , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamiento farmacológico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiología , Glucagón , Receptor del Péptido 1 Similar al Glucagón , Péptidos Similares al Glucagón/efectos adversos , Péptidos Similares al Glucagón/análogos & derivados , Hemoglobina Glucada/análisis , Humanos , Hipoglucemiantes/uso terapéutico , Fragmentos Fc de Inmunoglobulinas/efectos adversos , Liraglutida/uso terapéutico , Proteínas Recombinantes de Fusión , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is common and overall graft survival is suboptimal among kidney transplant recipients. Although albuminuria is a known risk factor for adverse outcomes among persons with native chronic kidney disease, the relationship of albuminuria with cardiovascular and kidney outcomes in transplant recipients is uncertain. STUDY DESIGN: Post hoc longitudinal cohort analysis of the Folic Acid for Vascular Outcomes Reduction in Transplantation (FAVORIT) Trial. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Stable kidney transplant recipients with elevated homocysteine levels from 30 sites in the United States, Canada, and Brazil. PREDICTOR: Urine albumin-creatinine ratio (ACR) at randomization. OUTCOMES: Allograft failure, CVD, and all-cause death. ANALYTICAL APPROACH: Multivariable Cox models adjusted for age; sex; race; randomized treatment allocation; country; systolic and diastolic blood pressure; history of CVD, diabetes, and hypertension; smoking; cholesterol; body mass index; estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR); donor type; transplant vintage; medications; and immunosuppression. RESULTS: Among 3,511 participants with complete data, median ACR was 24 (Q1-Q3, 9-98) mg/g, mean eGFR was 49±18 (standard deviation) mL/min/1.73m2, mean age was 52±9 years, and median graft vintage was 4.1 (Q1-Q3, 1.7-7.4) years. There were 1,017 (29%) with ACR < 10mg/g, 912 (26%) with ACR of 10 to 29mg/g, 1,134 (32%) with ACR of 30 to 299mg/g, and 448 (13%) with ACR ≥ 300mg/g. During approximately 4 years, 282 allograft failure events, 497 CVD events, and 407 deaths occurred. Event rates were higher at both lower eGFRs and higher ACR. ACR of 30 to 299 and ≥300mg/g relative to ACR < 10mg/g were independently associated with graft failure (HRs of 3.40 [95% CI, 2.19-5.30] and 9.96 [95% CI, 6.35-15.62], respectively), CVD events (HRs of 1.25 [95% CI, 0.96-1.61] and 1.55 [95% CI, 1.13-2.11], respectively), and all-cause death (HRs of 1.65 [95% CI, 1.23-2.21] and 2.07 [95% CI, 1.46-2.94], respectively). LIMITATIONS: No data for rejection; single ACR assessment. CONCLUSIONS: In a large population of stable kidney transplant recipients, elevated baseline ACR is independently associated with allograft failure, CVD, and death. Future studies are needed to evaluate whether reducing albuminuria improves these outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Albuminuria/epidemiología , Albuminuria/orina , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/orina , Creatinina/orina , Trasplante de Riñón , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/orina , Causas de Muerte , Estudios de Cohortes , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Supervivencia de Injerto , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Medición de Riesgo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Published data regarding the approach to management of diabetes mellitus in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients are limited. We performed a retrospective chart review of SOT recipients with diabetes, above 18 years of age, who were usisng dulaglutide. There was a sustained, statistically significant reduction in the primary endpoints of weight, body mass index (BMI) and insulin requirement in 63 SOT recipients at 6, 12 and 24 months, respectively. A total of 59, 50 and 13 recipients were followed during 6, 12 and 24 months, with a mean paired difference for weight reduction of 2.07 (P value <0.003), 4.007 (P value <0.001) and 5.23 (P value <0.034) kgs and a BMI reduction of 0.80 (P value <0.001), 1.35 (P value <0.005) and 2.015 (P value <0.045) kg/m2 , respectively. The mean paired difference for insulin reduction before and after dulaglutide treatment was 5.94 units (P value <0.0002). There was no increased risk of malignancy, cardiovascular morbidity, graft-failure or all-cause mortality. Gastrointestinal manifestations were rare, even in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD), and required no change in immunosuppressive agents. Thus, dulaglutide may be considered an important option for diabetes management in SOT.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamiento farmacológico , Péptidos Similares al Glucagón/análogos & derivados , Hipoglucemiantes/uso terapéutico , Fragmentos Fc de Inmunoglobulinas/uso terapéutico , Trasplante de Órganos , Proteínas Recombinantes de Fusión/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Anciano , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/metabolismo , Femenino , Péptidos Similares al Glucagón/uso terapéutico , Hemoglobina Glucada/metabolismo , Rechazo de Injerto/prevención & control , Supervivencia de Injerto , Trasplante de Corazón , Humanos , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Incretinas/uso terapéutico , Insulina/uso terapéutico , Trasplante de Riñón , Trasplante de Hígado , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Receptores de TrasplantesRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Elevated uric acid concentration is associated with higher rates of cardiovascular (CV) morbidity and mortality in the general population. It is not known whether hyperuricemia increases the risk for CV death or transplant failure in kidney transplant recipients. STUDY DESIGN: Post hoc cohort analysis of the FAVORIT Study, a randomized controlled trial that examined the effect of homocysteine-lowering vitamins on CV disease in kidney transplantation. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Adult recipients of kidney transplants in the United States, Canada, or Brazil participating in the FAVORIT Study, with hyperhomocysteinemia, stable kidney function, and no known history of CV disease. PREDICTOR: Uric acid concentration. OUTCOMES: The primary end point was a composite of CV events. Secondary end points were all-cause mortality and transplant failure. Risk factors included in statistical models were age, sex, race, country, treatment assignment, smoking history, body mass index, presence of diabetes mellitus, history of CV disease, blood pressure, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), donor type, transplant vintage, lipid concentrations, albumin-creatinine ratio, and uric acid concentration. Cox proportional hazards models were fit to examine the association of uric acid concentration with study end points after risk adjustment. RESULTS: 3,512 of 4,110 FAVORIT participants with baseline uric acid concentrations were studied. Median follow-up was 3.9 (IQR, 3.0-5.3) years. 503 patients had a primary CV event, 401 died, and 287 had transplant failure. In unadjusted analyses, uric acid concentration was significantly related to each outcome. Uric acid concentration was also strongly associated with eGFR. The relationship between uric acid concentration and study end points was no longer significant in fully adjusted multivariable models (P=0.5 for CV events; P=0.09 for death, and P=0.1 for transplant failure). LIMITATIONS: Unknown use of uric acid-lowering agents among study participants. CONCLUSIONS: Following kidney transplantation, uric acid concentrations are not independently associated with CV events, mortality, or transplant failure. The strong association between uric acid concentrations with traditional risk factors and eGFR is a possible explanation.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/mortalidad , Hiperhomocisteinemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Hiperuricemia/epidemiología , Fallo Renal Crónico/epidemiología , Trasplante de Riñón , Vitaminas/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Brasil , Canadá , Causas de Muerte , Femenino , Tasa de Filtración Glomerular , Humanos , Fallo Renal Crónico/cirugía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mortalidad , Análisis Multivariante , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Factores de Riesgo , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Mild hyperphosphatemia is a putative risk factor for cardiovascular disease [CVD], loss of kidney function, and mortality. Very limited data are available from sizable multicenter kidney transplant recipient (KTR) cohorts assessing the potential relationships between serum phosphorus levels and the development of CVD outcomes, transplant failure, or all-cause mortality. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: The Folic Acid for Vascular Outcome Reduction in Transplantation (FAVORIT) Trial, a large, multicenter, multiethnic, controlled clinical trial that provided definitive evidence that high-dose vitamin B-based lowering of plasma homocysteine levels did not reduce CVD events, transplant failure, or total mortality in stable KTRs. PREDICTOR: Serum phosphorus levels were determined in 3,138 FAVORIT trial participants at randomization. RESULTS: During a median follow-up of 4.0 years, the cohort had 436 CVD events, 238 transplant failures, and 348 deaths. Proportional hazards modeling revealed that each 1-mg/dL higher serum phosphorus level was not associated with a significant increase in CVD risk (HR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.92-1.22), but increased transplant failure (HR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.15-1.62) and total mortality risk associations (HR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.04-1.40) when adjusted for treatment allocation, traditional CVD risk factors, kidney measures, type of kidney transplant, transplant vintage, and use of calcineurin inhibitors, steroids, or lipid-lowering drugs. These associations were strengthened in models without kidney measures: CVD (HR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.00-1.31), transplant failure (HR, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.46-2.01), and mortality (HR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.15-1.54). LIMITATIONS: We lacked data for concentrations of parathyroid hormone, fibroblast growth factor 23, or vitamin D metabolites. CONCLUSIONS: Serum phosphorus level is marginally associated with CVD and more strongly associated with transplant failure and total mortality in long-term KTRs. A randomized controlled clinical trial in KTRs that assesses the potential impact of phosphorus-lowering therapy on these hard outcomes may be warranted.