Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Contact Dermatitis ; 91(3): 212-221, 2024 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38956835

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Isocyanates are used as starting materials of polyurethane (PU) products. They are relatively important occupational skin sensitizers. OBJECTIVES: To analyse results of a large isocyanate patch test series of 19 isocyanate test substances and 4,4'-diaminodiphenylmethane (MDA), a marker of 4,4'-diphenylmethane diisocyanate (MDI) hypersensitivity. METHODS: Test files were screened for positive reactions in the isocyanate series. Patients with positive reactions were analysed for occupation, exposure and diagnosis. RESULTS: In 2010-2019, 53 patients had positive reactions in the series (16% of 338 patients tested). MDA, the well-established screening substance for MDI allergy, was positive in 30 patients, an in-house monomeric MDI test substance in 23 patients and 3 different polymeric MDI test substances in 19-21 patients. We diagnosed 16 cases of occupational allergic contact dermatitis (OACD) from MDI including 3 pipe reliners. Hexamethylene-1,6-diisocyanate (HDI) oligomers in paint hardeners caused 5 cases of OACD, more cases than 2,4-toluene diisocyanate (TDI; n = 3) and isophorone diisocyanate (IPDI; n = 1) put together. CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to previous studies, polymeric MDI test substances were not superior to a monomeric MDI. Pipe reliners may get sensitised not only by epoxy products and acrylates but also by MDI in hardeners of PU pipe coatings. HDI oligomers were the second most important causes of OACD after MDI.


Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto , Dermatitis Profesional , Isocianatos , Pruebas del Parche , Humanos , Isocianatos/efectos adversos , Pruebas del Parche/métodos , Dermatitis Profesional/diagnóstico , Dermatitis Profesional/etiología , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/diagnóstico , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/etiología , Femenino , Masculino , Adulto , Poliuretanos/efectos adversos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Compuestos de Anilina
2.
Contact Dermatitis ; 91(1): 45-53, 2024 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38602297

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) from rubber glove usage is usually caused by rubber additives such as the accelerators. However, in analyses of the suspected gloves, ordinary rubber allergens are not always found. Accelerator-free rubber gloves are available, but some patients with accelerator allergy do not tolerate them and might also be patch test positive to them. OBJECTIVES: To identify and chemically characterize a new allergen, 2-cyanoethyl dimethyldithiocarbamate (CEDMC), in rubber gloves. We describe two patient cases: patient 1 that led us to the identification of CEDMC and patient 2 with occupational ACD caused by CEDMC. METHODS: The patients were examined with patch testing including baseline and rubber series, and their own rubber gloves. High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) was used for chemical analysis of rubber gloves. The allergen was synthesized and identified by nuclear magnetic resonance, mass spectrometry and infrared spectrometry, and tested on patient 2. RESULTS: CEDMC was identified by HPLC in a nitrile glove associated with hand eczema in patient 1. Patient 2 whose nitrile gloves contained CEDMC was patch test positive to CEDMC. CONCLUSIONS: CEDMC is a new contact allergen in nitrile gloves and probably forms during vulcanization from residual monomer acrylonitrile and rubber additives.


Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto , Dermatitis Profesional , Guantes Protectores , Nitrilos , Pruebas del Parche , Humanos , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/etiología , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/diagnóstico , Guantes Protectores/efectos adversos , Dermatitis Profesional/etiología , Dermatitis Profesional/diagnóstico , Nitrilos/efectos adversos , Dimetilditiocarbamato/efectos adversos , Masculino , Dermatosis de la Mano/inducido químicamente , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Alérgenos/efectos adversos , Alérgenos/análisis , Adulto , Cromatografía Líquida de Alta Presión , Ditiocarba/efectos adversos , Ditiocarba/química
3.
Contact Dermatitis ; 91(2): 91-103, 2024 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38812248

RESUMEN

Patch testing is the only clinically applicable diagnostic method for Type IV allergy. The availability of Type IV patch test (PT) allergens in Europe, however, is currently scarce. This severely compromises adequate diagnostics of contact allergy, leading to serious consequences for the affected patients. Against this background, the European Society of Contact Dermatitis (ESCD) has created a task force (TF) (i) to explore the current availability of PT substances in different member states, (ii) to highlight some of the unique characteristics of Type IV vs. other allergens and (iii) to suggest ways forward to promote and ensure availability of high-quality patch testing substances for the diagnosis of Type IV allergies throughout Europe. The suggestions of the TF on how to improve the availability of PT allergens are supported by the ESCD, the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, and the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology and intend to provide potential means to resolve the present medical crisis.


Asunto(s)
Alérgenos , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto , Dermatitis Profesional , Pruebas del Parche , Humanos , Pruebas del Parche/métodos , Europa (Continente) , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/diagnóstico , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/etiología , Alérgenos/efectos adversos , Dermatitis Profesional/diagnóstico , Dermatitis Profesional/etiología , Sociedades Médicas , Comités Consultivos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA