RESUMEN
Alere i RSV is a novel rapid test which applies a nicking enzyme amplification reaction to detect respiratory syncytial virus in point-of-care settings. In this study, we evaluated the Alere i RSV assay by using frozen nasopharyngeal swab samples that were collected in viral transport medium from children hospitalized with acute respiratory tract infection during the 2015-2016 winter season. Alere i RSV assay results were compared to those for Altona RealStar RSV real-time reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR). We found that the overall sensitivity and specificity of the Alere i RSV test was 100% (95% confidence intervals [CI], 93% to 100%) and 97% (95% CI, 89% to 100%), respectively. Positive samples were identified within 5 to 7 min from sample collection. Overall, the Alere i RSV test performed well compared to the RT-PCR assay and has the potential to facilitate the detection of RSV in point-of-care settings.
Asunto(s)
Hospitalización , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Molecular/métodos , Técnicas de Amplificación de Ácido Nucleico/métodos , Sistemas de Atención de Punto , Virus Sincitiales Respiratorios/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/diagnóstico , Adolescente , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Estudios Prospectivos , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a common cause of lower respiratory tract infection in young infants and a major cause of nosocomial infection in pediatric care. Currently available RSV point-of-care tests are of limited sensitivity and relatively expensive. We developed and evaluated a novel RSV rapid test for use at point-of-care, based on reverse-transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification (RT-LAMP) for direct testing of nasopharyngeal swab specimens. RT-LAMP can detect RSV within 30min, without the need for RNA extraction. The sensitivity of our RT-LAMP assay was 70-80% in comparison to RT-PCR. The RT-LAMP test sensitivity is at least equivalent to currently available rapid antigen detection tests (RADT), and the cost of RT-LAMP test reagents is only approximately 10% of that of commercially available RADT tests. RT-LAMP appears to be an attractive alternative to RADT, particularly in settings with limited financial resources. Future improvements could include lyophilization of test reagents and automated read-out of RT-LAMP results.