RESUMEN
AIMS: To undertake a Priority Setting Partnership (PSP), identifying the most important unanswered questions in type 1 diabetes in Ireland and the United Kingdom and to compare these to priorities identified in a 2011 PSP. METHODS: A steering committee (including eight individuals with lived experience/charity representatives and six clinicians) designed a survey which asked stakeholders to list three questions about type 1 diabetes. This was disseminated through social media, direct email contact, and printed posters. Following analysis, a second survey asked participants to rank these priorities in order of importance. The top questions were then carried forward to an online, 2 days final workshop where the final top 10 were ranked. RESULTS: There were 1050 responses (64% female, 78% adults living with type 1 diabetes, 9% healthcare professionals, 9% family members) to the first survey and 2937 individual questions were submitted. Sixty-five summary questions were submitted into a second survey, completed by 497 individuals (76% adults living with type 1 diabetes, 9% healthcare professionals, and 11% family members). Nineteen questions from the interim survey progressed to a final workshop, which identified the top 10 priorities through group discussion. As in 2011, there was emphasis on psychological health, diabetes-related complications, and hypoglycaemia. New themes prioritised included artificial intelligence and women's health. CONCLUSIONS: The research priorities, which have been identified using a robust and proven methodology, highlight the key concerns of those living with type 1 diabetes, their families and representatives, as well as clinicians in Ireland and the UK.
RESUMEN
Metformin is best known as a foundational therapy for type 2 diabetes but is also used in other contexts in clinical medicine with a number of emerging and potential indications. Many of its beneficial effects may be mediated by modest effects on weight loss and insulin sensitivity, but it has multiple other known mechanisms of action. Current clinical uses beyond type 2 diabetes include: polycystic ovarian syndrome; diabetes in pregnancy/gestational diabetes; prevention of type 2 diabetes in prediabetes; and adjunct therapy in type 1 diabetes. As metformin has been in clinical use for almost 70 years, much of the underpinning evidence for its use in these conditions is, by definition, based on trials conducted before the advent of contemporary evidence-based medicine. As a result, some of the above-established uses are 'off-label' in many regulatory territories and their use varies accordingly in different countries. Going forward, several current 'repurposing' investigational uses of metformin are also being investigated: prevention of cancer (including in Li Fraumeni syndrome), renal protection, Alzheimer's disease, metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease and promotion of healthy ageing. Despite the longevity of metformin and its important current roles beyond type 2 diabetes in clinical medicine, it has further potential and much research is ongoing.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Diabetes Gestacional , Hipoglucemiantes , Metformina , Síndrome del Ovario Poliquístico , Estado Prediabético , Metformina/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Hipoglucemiantes/uso terapéutico , Embarazo , Femenino , Síndrome del Ovario Poliquístico/tratamiento farmacológico , Síndrome del Ovario Poliquístico/complicaciones , Estado Prediabético/tratamiento farmacológico , Diabetes Gestacional/tratamiento farmacológico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamiento farmacológico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicaciones , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/tratamiento farmacológico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/complicaciones , Neoplasias/prevención & control , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedad de Alzheimer/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedad de Alzheimer/prevención & control , Uso Fuera de lo Indicado , Embarazo en Diabéticas/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
AIM: To evaluate the effect of metformin on cancer incidence in subjects with overweight/obesity and/or prediabetes/diabetes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, Embase and CENTRAL for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in adults with overweight/obesity and/or prediabetes/diabetes that compared metformin to other interventions for ≥24 weeks. Independent reviewers selected and extracted data including population and intervention characteristics and new diagnoses of cancer. We used the RoB 2.0 risk-of-bias tool and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) framework to assess risk of bias and certainty of evidence. RESULTS: From 14 895 records after removal of duplicates, 27 trials were included, providing a total of 10 717 subjects in the metformin group and 10 003 in the control group, with 170 and 208 new cases of cancer, respectively. Using a random-effects model, the relative risk was 1.07 (95% confidence interval 0.87-1.31), with similar results in subgroup analyses by study duration or effect of control intervention on weight. Risk of bias in most studies was low, and no evidence of publication bias was found. Trial sequential analysis provided evidence that the cumulative sample size was large enough to exclude a significant effect of metformin on cancer incidence. CONCLUSIONS: Metformin did not reduce cancer incidence in RCTs involving subjects with overweight/obesity and/or prediabetes/diabetes.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Hipoglucemiantes , Metformina , Neoplasias , Obesidad , Estado Prediabético , Metformina/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Neoplasias/prevención & control , Neoplasias/epidemiología , Obesidad/complicaciones , Hipoglucemiantes/uso terapéutico , Estado Prediabético/complicaciones , Estado Prediabético/tratamiento farmacológico , Estado Prediabético/epidemiología , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicaciones , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamiento farmacológico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiología , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/prevención & control , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , IncidenciaRESUMEN
A major consequence of insulin binding its receptor on fat and muscle cells is the stimulation of glucose transport into these tissues. This is achieved through an increase in the exocytic trafficking rate of the facilitative glucose transporter GLUT4 from intracellular stores to the cell surface. Delivery of GLUT4 to the cell surface requires the formation of functional SNARE complexes containing Syntaxin 4, SNAP23, and VAMP2. Insulin stimulates the formation of these complexes and concomitantly causes phosphorylation of Syntaxin 4. Here, we use a combination of biochemistry and cell biological approaches to provide a mechanistic link between these observations. We present data to support the hypothesis that Tyr-115 and Tyr-251 of Syntaxin 4 are direct substrates of activated insulin receptors, and that these residues modulate the protein's conformation and thus regulate the rate at which Syntaxin 4 forms SNARE complexes that deliver GLUT4 to the cell surface. This report provides molecular details on how the cell regulates SNARE-mediated membrane traffic in response to an external stimulus.