Emergency department utilization among patients who receive outpatient specialty care for headache: A retrospective cohort study analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To compare clinical characteristics among outpatient headache clinic patients who do and do not self-report visiting the emergency department for headache. BACKGROUND: Headache is the fourth most common reason for emergency department visits, compromising 1%-3% of visits. Limited data exist about patients who are seen in an outpatient headache clinic but still opt to frequent the emergency department. Clinical characteristics may differ between patients who self-report emergency department use and those who do not. Understanding these differences may help identify which patients are at greatest risk for emergency department overutilization. METHODS: This observational cohort study included adults treated at the Cleveland Clinic Headache Center between October 12, 2015 and September 11, 2019, who completed self-reported questionnaires. Associations between self-reported emergency department utilization and demographics, clinical characteristics, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs: Headache Impact Test [HIT-6], headache days per month, current headache/face pain, Patient Health Questionnaire-9 [PHQ-9], Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System [PROMIS] Global Health [GH]) were evaluated. RESULTS: Of the 10,073 patients (mean age 44.7 ± 14.9, 78.1% [7872/10,073] female, 80.3% [8087/10,073] White patients) included in the study, 34.5% (3478/10,073) reported visiting the emergency department at least once during the study period. Characteristics significantly associated with self-reported emergency department utilization included younger age (odds ratio = 0.81 [95% CI = 0.78-0.85] per decade), Black patients (vs. White patients) (1.47 [1.26-1.71]), Medicaid (vs. private insurance) (1.50 [1.29-1.74]), and worse area deprivation index (1.04 [1.02-1.07]). Additionally, worse PROMs were associated with greater odds of emergency department utilization: higher (worse) HIT-6 (1.35 [1.30-1.41] per 5-point increase), higher (worse) PHQ-9 (1.14 [1.09-1.20] per 5-point increase), and lower (worse) PROMIS-GH Physical Health T-scores (0.93 [0.88-0.97]) per 5-point increase. CONCLUSION: Our study identified several characteristics associated with self-reported emergency department utilization for headache. Worse PROM scores may be helpful in identifying which patients are at greater risk for utilizing the emergency department.

Evaluation of missed influenza vaccination opportunities in the emergency department.

BACKGROUND: Seasonal influenza is associated with significant healthcare resource utilization. An estimated 490,000 hospitalizations and 34,000 deaths were attributed to influenza during the 2018-2019 season. Despite robust influenza vaccination programs in both the inpatient and outpatient setting, the emergency department (ED) represents a missed opportunity to vaccinate patients at high risk for influenza who do not have access to routine preventive care. Feasibility and implementation of ED-based influenza vaccination programs have been previously described but have stopped short of describing the predicted health resource impact. The goal of our study was to describe the potential impact of an influenza vaccination program in an urban adult emergency department population using historic patient data. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of all encounters within a tertiary care hospital-based ED and three freestanding EDs during influenza season (defined as October 1 - April 30) over a two-years, 2018-2020. Data was obtained from the electronic medical record (EPIC®). All ED encounters during the study period were screened for inclusion using ICD 10 codes. Patients with a confirmed positive influenza test and no documented influenza vaccine for the current season were reviewed for any ED encounter at least 14 days prior to the influenza-positive encounter and during the concurrent influenza season. These ED visits were deemed a missed opportunity to provide vaccination and potentially prevent the influenza-positive encounter. Healthcare resource utilization, including subsequent ED encounters and inpatient admissions, were evaluated for patients with a missed vaccination opportunity. RESULTS: A total of 116,140 ED encounters occurred during the study and were screened for inclusion. Of these, 2115 were influenza-positive encounters, which represented 1963 unique patients. There were 418 patients (21.3%) that had a missed opportunity to be vaccinated during an ED encounter at least 14 days prior to the influenza-positive encounter. Of those with a missed vaccination opportunity, 60 patients (14.4%) had subsequent influenza-related encounters, including 69 ED visits and 7 inpatient admissions. CONCLUSION: Patients presenting to the ED with influenza frequently had opportunities to be vaccinated during prior ED encounters. An ED-based influenza vaccination program could potentially reduce influenza-related burden on healthcare resources by preventing future influenza-related ED encounters and hospitalizations.

Cotesting for Human Immunodeficiency Virus and Sexually Transmitted Infections in the Emergency Department.

BACKGROUND: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) guidelines recommend screening for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) in patients aged 15 to 65 years, as well as those at increased risk. Patients screened in the emergency department (ED) for gonorrhea (GC) and/or chlamydia represent an increased-risk population. Our aim was to assess compliance with CDC and USPSTF guidelines for HIV testing in a national sample of EDs. METHODS: We examined data from the 2010 to 2018 Nationwide Emergency Department Sample, which can be used to create national estimates of ED care to query tests for GC, chlamydia, HIV, and syphilis testing. Weighted proportions and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were reported, and Rao-Scott χ 2 tests were used. RESULTS: We identified 13,443,831 (weighted n = 3,094,214) high-risk encounters in which GC/chlamydia testing was performed. HIV screening was performed in 3.9% (95% CI, 3.4-4.3) of such visits, and syphilis testing was performed in 2.9% (95% CI, 2.7-3.2). Only 1.5% of patients with increased risk encounters received both HIV and syphilis cotesting. CONCLUSIONS: Despite CDC and USPSTF recommendations for HIV and syphilis screening in patients undergoing STI evaluation, only a small proportion of patients are being tested. Further studies exploring the barriers to HIV screening in patients undergoing STI assessment in the ED may help inform future projects aimed at increasing guidance compliance.

Characterization of ophthalmic presentations to emergency departments in the United States: 2010-2018.

BACKGROUND: Both traumatic and nontraumatic ocular issues often present to the emergency department. Understanding the epidemiology of ocular presentations to the emergency department not only informs current resource allocation, but also provides opportunities to evaluate the efficacy of prior healthcare access interventions. PURPOSE: To characterize emergency department utilization in the United States for ophthalmic encounters between 2010 and 2018. METHODS: Cross-sectional analysis of the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey database, a nationally representative sample of United States emergency department visits. 4284 deidentified emergency department patient encounters with an ICD-10 ophthalmic diagnosis from 2010 to 2018 were analyzed. The main outcome measures were the composition and characteristics of ophthalmic emergency department encounters over time. MAIN FINDINGS: 4284 ophthalmic visits were identified which represented an estimated 23.1 million visits (95% CI, 20.8 million-25.5 million). 31.6% (95% CI, 29.6-33.8) of ophthalmic visits were traumatic. Conjunctivitis was the most common non-traumatic diagnosis (32.8%, 95% CI, 30.7-35.0), while superficial injury of the cornea was the most common traumatic diagnosis (13.9%, 95% CI, 12.5-15.3). A greater proportion of emergency department visits involving the sclera and cornea were made by men (58.7%, 95% CI, 53.7%-63.6%; P = 0.02), whereas more women visited for visual disturbances (57.8%, 95% CI, 51.3%-64.4%; P = 0.01). Longitudinal trends of ophthalmic visits revealed an increase in public insurance payers in 2014, which corresponds to Medicaid expansion and implementation of mandated coverage for pediatric vision care. After stratification, this increase continued to be present in nontraumatic visits, but not traumatic ones. CONCLUSIONS: Ophthalmic emergency department visits in the United States between 2010 and 2018 were typically for non-traumatic eye issues. Diagnoses varied greatly by patient demographics, such as age and gender. Understanding these variations is valuable for preparing emergency departments for ocular presentations and providing guidance for future practice.

Management of migraine in the emergency department: Findings from the 2010-2017 National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Surveys.

OBJECTIVE: The study objective was to describe trends in the medical management of migraine in the emergency department (ED) using the 2010-2017 National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS) datasets. METHODS: Using the 2010-2017 NHAMCS datasets, we analyzed visits with a discharge diagnosis of migraine. Drug prescription frequencies between years were compared with the Rao-Scott chi-squared test. Adjusted odds ratios of opioid administration from 2010 to 2017 were calculated using weighted multivariable logistic regression with sex, age, race/ethnicity, pain-score, primary expected source of payment, and year as predictor variables. RESULTS: Our analysis captured 1846 ED visits with a diagnosis of migraine from 2010 to 2017, representing a weighted average of 1.2 million US ED visits per year. Parenteral opioids were prescribed in 49% (95% CI: 40, 58) of visits in 2010 and 28% (95% CI: 15, 45) of visits in 2017 (p = 0.03). From 2010 to 2017, there was a 10% yearly decrease in opioid prescriptions. Metoclopramide and ketorolac were prescribed more frequently in years 2015 through 2017 than in 2010. Increased opioid administration was associated with female sex, older age, white race, higher pain score, and having Medicare or private insurance as the primary expected source of payment for all years. CONCLUSION: Opioid administration for migraine in EDs across the US declined 10% annually between 2010 and 2017, demonstrating improved adherence to migraine guidelines recommending against opioids. We identified several factors associated with opioid administration for migraine, identifying groups at higher risk for unnecessary opioids in the ED setting.

Emergency Nurses' Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Related to Blood Sample Hemolysis Prevention: An Exploratory Descriptive Study.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of the study was to identify emergency nurses' knowledge, attitudes, and practices related to blood sample hemolysis prevention and explore associations between these factors and demographic characteristics. The current state is unknown. Understanding baseline knowledge, attitudes, and practices addresses a gap in the literature. METHOD: An exploratory, descriptive design with cross-sectional survey methodology employing a study-specific instrument was used. RESULTS: Request for participation email was sent to a random sample of 5000 Emergency Nurses Association members, and 427 usable surveys were returned (response rate = 8.5%). Mean years in nursing was 13.85 (standard deviation = 10.78), and 226 (52.9%) were certified emergency nurses. Only 85 participants (19.9%) answered all 3 knowledge questions correctly. Answering the 3 knowledge questions correctly was significantly associated with being a certified emergency nurse (χ2 = 7.15, P < .01). Participant responses to attitude items about the sequelae of blood sample hemolysis were skewed toward agreement, and most attitude items were associated with whom participants reported as being primarily responsible for phlebotomy. Emergency nurses remain primarily responsible for phlebotomy as well as addressing hemolyzed samples, but few reported that blood sample hemolysis was addressed at a departmental level. DISCUSSION: Findings suggest that emergency nurses lack some knowledge related to blood sample hemolysis prevention best practices. Attitudes toward phlebotomy practices may be 1 reason practice has not changed. Every effort should be made to prevent hemolyzed blood samples to decrease delays and costs in emergency care.

Chief complaint-based performance measures: a new focus for acute care quality measurement.

Performance measures are increasingly important to guide meaningful quality improvement efforts and value-based reimbursement. Populations included in most current hospital performance measures are defined by recorded diagnoses using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes in administrative claims data. Although the diagnosis-centric approach allows the assessment of disease-specific quality, it fails to measure one of the primary functions of emergency department (ED) care, which involves diagnosing, risk stratifying, and treating patients' potentially life-threatening conditions according to symptoms (ie, chief complaints). In this article, we propose chief complaint-based quality measures as a means to enhance the evaluation of quality and value in emergency care. We discuss the potential benefits of chief complaint-based measures, describe opportunities to mitigate challenges, propose an example measure set, and present several recommendations to advance this paradigm in ED-based performance measurement.

Tips and Troubleshooting for Use of the GlideScope Video Laryngoscope for Emergency Endotracheal Intubation.

Video laryngoscopy (VL) is still a relatively novel advancement in airway management that offers many potential benefits over direct laryngoscopy. These advantages include decreased time to intubation in difficulty airways, unique opportunities in teaching as the video screen allows for real time teaching points, increased first pass success, particularly with novice operators, and decreased cervical spine motion during intubation. Despite the advantages, the intubation procedure itself has some subtle but significant differences from direct laryngoscopy that change the expected motion as well as troubleshooting techniques, which might discourage the use of the GlideScope by practitioners less familiar with the product. With the hope of generating confidence in the video laryngoscopy procedure, we have compiled some basic tips that we have found helpful when intubating with the GlideScope. These tips include inserting the blade to the left of midline to improve space allowed for the endotracheal tube itself, backing the scope up a small amount to improve the view, holding the tube close to the connector to improve maneuverability, and withdrawing the tube with your thumb to improve advancement through the cords. We hope that, with these tips, in conjunction with ample practice, clinicians can gain comfort and experience with all the tools at our disposal in an effort to provide the best possible care for our patients.

Quality and safety implications of emergency department information systems.

The Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act of 2009 and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services "meaningful use" incentive programs, in tandem with the boundless additional requirements for detailed reporting of quality metrics, have galvanized hospital efforts to implement hospital-based electronic health records. As such, emergency department information systems (EDISs) are an important and unique component of most hospitals' electronic health records. System functionality varies greatly and affects physician decisionmaking, clinician workflow, communication, and, ultimately, the overall quality of care and patient safety. This article is a joint effort by members of the Quality Improvement and Patient Safety Section and the Informatics Section of the American College of Emergency Physicians. The aim of this effort is to examine the benefits and potential threats to quality and patient safety that could result from the choice of a particular EDIS, its implementation and optimization, and the hospital's or physician group's approach to continuous improvement of the EDIS. Specifically, we explored the following areas of potential EDIS safety concerns: communication failure, wrong order-wrong patient errors, poor data display, and alert fatigue. Case studies are presented that illustrate the potential harm that could befall patients from an inferior EDIS product or suboptimal execution of such a product in the clinical environment. The authors have developed 7 recommendations to improve patient safety with respect to the deployment of EDISs. These include ensuring that emergency providers actively participate in selection of the EDIS product, in the design of processes related to EDIS implementation and optimization, and in the monitoring of the system's ongoing success or failure. Our recommendations apply to emergency departments using any type of EDIS: custom-developed systems, best-of-breed vendor systems, or enterprise systems.

Emergency Department Co-testing for Human Immunodeficiency Virus When Testing for Gonorrhea and Chlamydia: A Readily Available, Missed Opportunity for Targeted HIV Testing in Emergency Departments.

OBJECTIVES: Conducting human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) testing in emergency departments (EDs) can be an effective approach to testing and reaching populations at highest risk of contracting HIV. METHODS: All gonorrhea and chlamydia (G/C) and HIV tests ordered in the Cleveland Clinic Health System's 14 EDs were included in the analysis. Data were collected from electronic health records. Descriptive statistics, with medians and means, were computed. RESULTS: From January 1, 2019, to December 31, 2021, we reviewed ED visits for the purpose of sexually transmitted infection (STI) screening, with an emphasis on G/C screening. In October 2019, both HIV rapid testing and G/C testing began across all 14 Cleveland Clinic EDs. The overall rate of co-testing for HIV when obtaining a G/C test for STI evaluation increased overall to around 30% for our health system EDs, with some individual EDs approaching 60%. CONCLUSIONS: The approach the Cleveland Clinic implemented is an effective way to test for HIV in the ED. Local health departments and stakeholders in HIV communities should support and collaborate with EDs in their jurisdictions to accelerate HIV testing initiatives by using an HIV plus G/C co-testing metric.

Antemortem Health System Utilization in People Experiencing Homelessness Who Died in the Emergency Department.

People experiencing homelessness (PEH) have high rates of mortality, medical and psychiatric comorbidities, and emergency department utilization. In this study, a health system's emergency department encounters were evaluated to identify PEH who died in the emergency department. Patient demographics, medical history, prehospital and emergency department characteristics, and health care utilization patterns were collected. Descriptive statistics were calculated. We identified 48 PEH pronounced dead in the emergency department; mean age at death was 46.5. Forty-four (92%) decedents presented in cardiac arrest, 12 (25%) of which were substance use-related; 4 (8%) presented with trauma. Out of 44 patients presenting in cardiac arrest, (20.5%) had bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) performed before arrival of emergency medical services. In the year prior to death, 15 (32%) decedents had no documented health care utilization, while 16 (33%) had 10 or more emergency department/outpatient visits. Our study is the first to characterize PEH who died in the emergency department, analyzing the pre-hospital and in-hospital characteristics and antemortem health system utilization in this population. A sizeable proportion of deceased PEH had no health system contact in the 12 months prior to death, suggesting that those with high mortality risk may underutilize health services. Conversely, a similar proportion of decedents had extensive (more than 10) health system utilization in the year prior to death, representing possible opportunities to reduce mortality.

Cancer Diagnoses and Use of Radiation Therapy Among Persons Experiencing Homelessness.

PURPOSE: Persons experiencing homelessness (PEH) have low rates of cancer screening and worse cancer mortality compared with persons not experiencing homelessness. Data regarding cancer diagnosis and treatment in PEH are limited. We investigated cancer prevalence and use of radiation therapy (RT) in PEH. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients presenting between January 1, 2014, and September 27, 2021, at a large metropolitan hospital system were assessed for homelessness via intake screening or chart search. PEH data were cross-referenced with the institution's cancer database to identify PEH with cancer diagnoses. Demographic, clinical, and treatment variables were abstracted. RESULTS: Of a total of 9654 (9250 evaluable) PEH with a median age of 42 years, 81 patients (0.88%) had at least 1 cancer diagnosis and 5 had multiple diagnoses, for a total of 87 PEH with at least 1 cancer diagnosis. The median age at diagnosis was 60 years. In total, 43% were female and 51% were Black, and 43% presented with advanced or metastatic disease. Lung (17%), prostate (15%), leukemia/lymphoma (13%), and head/neck (9%) were the most common diagnoses. In total, 17% of patients underwent surgery alone, 13% received chemotherapy alone, 14% received RT alone, and 6% received hormone therapy alone. A total of 8% of patients underwent no treatment, and 43% underwent multimodality therapy. In total, 58% of treated patients never achieved disease-free status. Of the 31 patients who received RT, 87% received external beam RT. Most patients (70%) received hypofractionated regimens. For patients who had multifraction treatment, the treatment completion rate was 85%, significantly lower than the departmental completion rate of 98% (P < .00001). CONCLUSIONS: In a large cohort of PEH in a metropolitan setting, cancer diagnoses were uncommon and were frequently in advanced stages. Most patients underwent single-modality treatment or no treatment at all. Despite the use of hypofractionation, the RT completion rate was low, likely reflecting complex barriers to care. Further interventions to optimize cancer diagnosis and treatment in PEH are urgently needed.

Emergency department evaluation of nurse triage questions about safe-at-home and abuse or neglect in traumatic ocular injuries.

OBJECTIVES: Approximately 10 million Americans experience acts of physical violence by an intimate partner (IPV). Ocular injuries can present as a symptom of IPV in the emergency department, but IPV remains underreported in the literature. Understanding the incidence and trends in IPV-associated ocular injuries in the emergency department could increase the detection of at-risk patients otherwise overlooked. DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. PARTICIPANTS: Emergency department patients evaluated for traumatic ocular injuries between January 2018 and April 2023 at a large tertiary care health system. METHODS: The study population was identified by ICD-10 code and their responses to being screened at triage for home safety and any nursing concerns for abuse or neglect. Patient screening consisted of a 2-part questionnaire inquiring first about whether the patient feels safe at home ("Yes" or "No") and second regarding nurses' concerns for abuse, neglect, domestic violence, sexual assault, or human trafficking. RESULTS: There were 2,653,993 emergency department visits and 16,737 traumatic ocular injuries in the study period. Of them, 1.1% of patients (154 of 14,457) responded "No" to feeling safe at home. In only 0.6% of patients (82 of 14,457), a nursing concern was documented. Patients responding "No" to feeling safe at home presented with more severe ocular injuries such as maxillary fractures. On regression analysis, married, divorced, and widowed patients as well as patients on private insurance were less likely to report feeling unsafe at home than single patients on public insurance (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Traumatic ocular injuries in emergency departments should raise concerns about IPV. Opportunity exists to improve education, screening, and management of these patients.

A survey of the use of time-out protocols in emergency medicine.

BACKGROUND: Time-outs, as one of the elements of the Joint Commission Universal Protocol for Preventing Wrong Site, Wrong Procedure, and Wrong Person Surgery has been in effect since July 1, 2004. Time-outs are required by The Joint Commission for all hospital procedures regardless of location, including emergency departments (EDs). Attitudes about ED time-outs were assessed for a sample of senior emergency physicians serving in leadership roles for a national professional society. METHODS: A survey questionnaire was administered to members of the American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP) Council at the October 2009 ACEP Council meeting on the use of time-outs in the ED. A total of 225 (72%) of the 331 councilors present filled out the survey. RESULTS: Twenty-nine (13%) of respondents were unaware of a formal time-out policy in their ED, 79 (35%) reported that ED time-outs were warranted, and 5 (2%) reported they knew of an instance where a time-out may have prevented an error. Chest tubes (167 respondents [74%]) and the use of sedation (142 respondents [63%]) were most commonly identified as ED procedures that necessitated a time-out. Episodes of any wrong-site error in their EDs were reported by 16 (7%) of the respondents. Wrong patient (9 respondents [4%]) and wrong procedure (2 respondents [1%]) errors were less common. CONCLUSIONS: Although the time-out requirement has been in effect since 2004, more than 1 in 10 of ED physicians in this sample ofED physician leaders were unaware of it. According to the respondents, medical errors preventable by time-outs were rare; however, time-outs may be useful for certain procedures, particularly when there is a risk of wrong-site, wrong-patient, or wrong-procedure medical errors.

Methicillin-resistant Staphyloccocus aureus heel abscess: an uncommon emergency department diagnosis.

Heel abscesses present as heel pain that progressively worsens, with associated tenderness and fullness at the heel pad. Radiological studies like computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, or ultrasound can help correctly diagnose a heel pad abscess. Generally, these patients require i.v. antibiotics and operative management to adequately drain the abscess. It is recommended to avoid incising the plantar aspect of the heel to minimize chronic post-drainage heel pain.

The Hidden Cost of Hemolyzed Blood Samples in the Emergency Department.

BACKGROUND: On average, patients with hemolyzed potassium samples spend about 1 h longer in the emergency department (ED), regardless of acuity level or disposition. We aimed to quantify the direct expenses associated with poor-quality preanalytic blood samples collected in the ED. METHODS: We created a simple table with a range of direct expenses (i.e., costs) and rates of hemolyzed sample draws, allowing for identification of potential high-level cost-of-care impact analysis. We included a range of costs informed by review of literature on the topic. Those costs range from $600 to $3000 per bed-hour. This amount was inflation adjusted from 1996 to 2020 (1.68 × [direct cost per visit] × [100 000 visits per year/365 days/24 h]). We provided a range of hemolysis incidence based on previously reported data. RESULTS: We showed that for an ED with 100 000 annual visits, a 40% draw rate for routine chemistries (including potassium), and a 10% hemolysis incidence, the direct cost impact of hemolysis waste is approximately $4 million/year as a result of the 1 h of added length of stay on average for a patient with a hemolyzed blood sample. This amount represents an annualized estimated cost of caring for a patient in the ED with an avoidable extended length of stay. CONCLUSIONS: The financial burden of poor-quality blood samples can be estimated using cost per bed-hour and rate of sample failure. Similar methodology may identify additional QC issues with previously invisible financial implications.

Improving handoffs in the emergency department.

Patient handoffs at shift change are a ubiquitous and potentially hazardous process in emergency care. As crowding and lengthy evaluations become the standard for an increasing proportion of emergency departments (EDs), the number of patients handed off will likely increase. It is critical now more than ever before to ensure that handoffs supply valid and useful shared understandings between providers at transitions of care. The purpose of this article is to provide the most up-to-date evidence and collective thinking about the process and safety of handoffs between physicians in the ED. It offers perspectives from other disciplines, provides a conceptual framework for handoffs, and categorizes models of existing practices. Legal and risk management issues are also addressed. A proposal for the development of handoff quality measures is outlined. Practical strategies are suggested to improve ED handoffs. Finally, a research agenda is proposed to provide a roadmap to future work that may increase knowledge in this area.

A pilot study to examine research subjects' perception of participating in research in the emergency department.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: The emergency department (ED) provides an arena for patient enrollment into a variety of research studies even for non-critically ill patients. Given the types of illness, time constraints and sense of urgency that exists in the ED environment, concern exists about whether research subjects in the ED can provide full consent for participation. We sought to identify enrolled research subjects' perspectives on the informed consent process for research conducted in the ED. METHODS: This was a prospective, observational study of ED subjects, 18 years or older, who had been approached to participate in research in the ED and who were judged to have decision-making capacity. Exclusions were critical illness and refusal to participate. Subjective were followed up within 1 week after enrolling using structured phone interviews by trained interviewers. RESULTS: During the study period, 229 eligible patients were approached to participate in both a target study and this study. Of these, 66% (150/229) agreed to participate in this study, at least to the extent of allowing us access to their demographic data. The study participant group was similar in terms of gender to this particular ED's patient population but had significantly more African-Americans and persons older than 45. CONCLUSION: Despite rigorous time constraints and rapid throughput times, the majority of subjects who consented to research participation in the ED felt that they were sufficiently informed and had adequate time to decide to participate.