Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
Tipo de estudio
Tipo del documento
Asunto de la revista
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Diabetes Sci Technol ; 6(4): 786-96, 2012 Jul 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22920803

RESUMEN

This review summarizes the clinical development of a family of ultra-rapid-acting recombinant human insulin formulations. These formulations use ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) to chelate zinc and thereby destabilize insulin hexamers. In addition, insulin monomer surface charges are chemically masked with citrate to prevent reaggregation. The first phase 1 trials were performed using BIOD-090, an acidic 25 unit U/ml insulin formulation, which contained disodium-EDTA (NaEDTA). When compared with regular human insulin (RHI) and/or insulin lispro in multiple phase 1 studies, BIOD-090 consistently showed more rapid absorption and/or onset of action. A standard meal challenge study also demonstrated improved postprandial glucose profiles associated with BIOD-090. However, increased patient exposure in larger phase 3 trials showed that this formulation was associated with an increased incidence of local injection site reactions, most commonly pain. A next generation formulation, BIOD-100, contained the same excipients as a standard insulin concentration of 100 U/ml. BIOD-100 maintained an ultra-rapid action profile and was associated with modest but significantly improved toleration when compared with BIOD-090. In order to further improve toleration, the hypothesis that NaEDTA contributed to discomfort by chelating endogenous calcium was tested by either substituting calcium-EDTA for NaEDTA or by adding calcium chloride to the NaEDTA formulation. These calcium formulations essentially eliminated the excess discomfort associated with BIOD-090 but were associated with less optimal pharmacokinetic profiles in humans. Recent efforts have succeeded in developing ultra-rapid-acting human insulin formulations with acceptable injection site toleration by optimizing concentrations of calcium (BIOD-125) and with the use of magnesium sulfate to mitigate discomfort (BIOD-123). Similar formulation technology has also been shown to accelerate absorption of insulin analogs in animal models.


Asunto(s)
Química Farmacéutica/métodos , Diabetes Mellitus/tratamiento farmacológico , Insulina de Acción Corta/administración & dosificación , Insulina de Acción Corta/síntesis química , Animales , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto/estadística & datos numéricos , Diseño de Fármacos , Humanos , Hipoglucemiantes/síntesis química , Hipoglucemiantes/farmacocinética , Insulina/análogos & derivados , Insulina/síntesis química , Insulina/farmacocinética , Insulina de Acción Corta/farmacocinética
2.
Diabetes Care ; 33(1): 116-20, 2010 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19808913

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Recent studies suggested an impact of prandial insulin delivery on postprandial regulation of tissue blood flow. This study compared the effect of VIAject with human regular insulin and insulin lispro on postprandial oxidative stress and endothelial function in patients with type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Fourteen patients (seven men; aged 61.5 +/- 1.8 years; duration of diabetes 6.6 +/- 4.6 years; A1C 7.2 +/- 0.5% [mean +/- SEM]) received a prandial injection of VIAject, human regular insulin, and insulin lispro. At baseline and after a standardized liquid meal test (Ensure Plus), the postprandial increases in asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA) and nitrotyrosine levels were investigated. In addition, the postprandial effects on microvascular blood flow, skin oxygenation, and vascular elasticity were measured. RESULTS: Treatment with VIAject resulted in a significant reduction in the peak postprandial generation of ADMA compared with human insulin and insulin lispro (VIAject -27.3 +/- 22.6, human insulin 97.7 +/- 24.4, and insulin lispro 66.9 +/- 33.9 nmol/l; P < 0.05, respectively). The postprandial increases in nitrotyrosine levels were significantly less after VIAject than after human regular insulin (VIAject -0.22 +/- 0.17 vs. human insulin 0.25 +/- 0.15 microg/ml; P < 0.05), whereas nitrotyrosine after insulin lispro was in between (insulin lispro 0.09 +/- 0.07 microg/ml; NS). In parallel, earlier and more pronounced increases in microvascular blood flow and skin oxygenation were obtained after VIAject compared with those after human insulin or insulin lispro (P < 0.05, respectively). All insulin formulations resulted in comparable improvements in central arterial elasticity. CONCLUSIONS; Treatment with VIAject reduced postprandial oxidative stress and improved endothelial function compared with human regular insulin or insulin lispro.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamiento farmacológico , Inyecciones Subcutáneas/métodos , Insulina/análogos & derivados , Insulina/administración & dosificación , Insulina/uso terapéutico , Arginina/análogos & derivados , Arginina/metabolismo , Glucemia/efectos de los fármacos , Vasos Sanguíneos/efectos de los fármacos , Femenino , Humanos , Hipoglucemiantes/administración & dosificación , Hipoglucemiantes/uso terapéutico , Insulina/metabolismo , Insulina Lispro , Masculino , Microcirculación/efectos de los fármacos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Periodo Posprandial , Tirosina/análogos & derivados , Tirosina/metabolismo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA