Medication review and deprescribing in different healthcare settings: a position statement from an Italian scientific consortium.

Recent medical advancements have increased life expectancy, leading to a surge in patients affected by multiple chronic diseases and consequent polypharmacy, especially among older adults. This scenario increases the risk of drug interactions and adverse drug reactions, highlighting the need for medication review and deprescribing to reduce inappropriate medications and optimize therapeutic regimens, with the ultimate goal to improving patients' health and quality of life. This position statement from the Italian Scientific Consortium on medication review and deprescribing aims to describe key elements, strategies, tools, timing, and healthcare professionals to be involved, for the implementation of medication review and deprescribing in different healthcare settings (i.e., primary care, hospital, long-term care facilities, and palliative care). Challenges and potential solutions for the implementation of medication review and deprescribing are also discussed.

Clinically important drug-drug interactions in poly-treated elderly outpatients: a campaign to improve appropriateness in general practice.

AIMS: The aim was to assess the impact of a campaign for general practitioners (GPs) to reduce clinically-important drug-drug interactions (DDIs) in poly-treated elderly patients. METHODS: We compiled a list of 53 DDIs and analyzed reimbursed prescriptions dispensed to poly-treated (≥four drugs) elderly (>65 years) patients in the Emilia Romagna region during January 2011-June 2011 (first pre-intervention period), January 2012-June 2012 (second pre-intervention period) and January 2013-June 2013 (post-intervention period). Educational initiatives to GPs were completed in July 2012-December 2012. Pre-test/post-test analysis (2013 vs. 2012) was performed, also using predicted 2013 data (P < 0.01 for statistical significance). RESULTS: Despite the slight increase in poly-therapy rate (16% in 2013, +1.5% from 2011), we found a stable or slightly declining number of potential DDIs for each elderly poly-treated patient (~1.5). In 2013, 11 DDIs exceeded 5% of prevalence rate: antidiabetics-ß-adrenoceptor blockers ranked first (20.3%), followed by ACE Inhibitors (ACEIs)/sartans-non steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) (16.4%), diuretics-NSAIDs (13.6%), selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors (SSRIs)-NSAIDs/acetyl salicylic acid (ASA) (12.7%) and corticosteroids-NSAIDs/ASA (9.7%). A remarkable reduction emerged for NSAID-related DDIs (diuretics-NSAIDs peaked -14.5%; P < 0.01), whereas prevalence of antidiabetics-ß-adrenoceptor blockers increased (+7.9%; P < 0.01). When using predicted values, the statistical significance disappeared for antidiabetics-ß-adrenoceptor blockers (+1.3%; P = 0.04), whereas it persisted for almost all NSAIDs-related DDIs: ACEIs/sartans-NSAIDs (-3.0%), diuretics-NSAIDs (-6.0%), SSRIs-NSAIDs/ASA (-5.9%). CONCLUSIONS: This campaign contained the burden of DDIs in poly-treated elderly patients by 1) reducing most prevalent DDIs, especially NSAIDs-related DDIs and 2) balancing the observed rise in poly-therapy rate with stable rate in overall prescriptions of potentially interacting drugs per patient.

The Impact of GLP-1 RAs and DPP-4is on Hospitalisation and Mortality in the COVID-19 Era: A Two-Year Observational Study.

Novel antidiabetic drugs have the ability to produce anti-inflammatory effects regardless of their glucose-lowering action. For this reason, these molecules (including GLP-1 RAs and DPP-4is) were hypothesized to be effective against COVID-19, which is characterized by cytokines hyperactivity and multiorgan inflammation. The aim of our work is to explore the potential protective role of GLP-1 RAs and DPP-4is in COVID-19 (with the disease intended to be a model of an acute stressor) and non-COVID-19 patients over a two-year observation period. Retrospective and one-versus-one analyses were conducted to assess the impact of antidiabetic drugs on the need for hospitalization (in both COVID-19- and non-COVID-19-related cases), in-hospital mortality, and two-year mortality. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify the variables associated with these outcomes. Additionally, log-rank tests were used to plot survival curves for each group of subjects, based on their antidiabetic treatment. The performed analyses revealed that despite similar hospitalization rates, subjects undergoing home therapy with GLP-1 RAs exhibited significantly lower mortality rates, even over a two-year period. These individuals demonstrated improved survival estimates both within hospital and non-hospital settings, even during a longer observation period.

Blockage of interleukin-1ß with canakinumab in patients with Covid-19.

There is the urgent need to study the effects of immunomodulating agents as therapy for Covid-19. An observational, cohort, prospective study with 30 days of observation was carried out to assess clinical outcomes in 88 patients hospitalized for Covid-19 pneumonia and treated with canakinumab (300 mg sc). Median time from diagnosis of Covid-19 by viral swab to administration of canakinumab was 7.5 days (range 0-30, IQR 4-11). Median PaO2/FiO2 increased from 160 (range 53-409, IQR 122-210) at baseline to 237 (range 72-533, IQR 158-331) at day 7 after treatment with canakinumab (p < 0.0001). Improvement of oxygen support category was observed in 61.4% of cases. Median duration of hospitalization following administration of canakinumab was 6 days (range 0-30, IQR 4-11). At 7 days, 58% of patients had been discharged and 12 (13.6%) had died. Significant differences between baseline and 7 days were observed for absolute lymphocyte counts (mean 0.60 vs 1.11 × 109/L, respectively, p < 0.0001) and C-reactive protein (mean 31.5 vs 5.8 mg/L, respectively, p < 0.0001).Overall survival at 1 month was 79.5% (95% CI 68.7-90.3). Oxygen-support requirements improved and overall mortality was 13.6%. Confirmation of the efficacy of canakinumab for Covid-19 warrants further study in randomized controlled trials.

Comparing the Prevalence of Polypharmacy and Potential Drug-Drug Interactions in Nursing Homes and in the Community Dwelling Elderly of Emilia Romagna Region.

Backround: We aimed at assessing the prevalence of polypharmacy and potential drug-drug interactions (DDIs) with clinical relevance in elderly patient on Emilia Romagna area. Both outpatients and residents in nursing homes were assessed, with only partially overlapping strategies. Methods: We defined a list of 190 pairs of potentially interacting drugs, based on literature appraisal and availability of therapeutic alternatives. January-June 2018 data on drug use in patients over 65 years-old were collected from nine Local Health Authorities of Emilia Romagna: data on community-dwelling subjects were extracted from archives of reimbursed prescriptions, while drug use in a sample of nursing homes was recorded from clinical charts in one index day within the same semester. The frequency of polypharmacy (at least five or at least 10 concurrent drugs) and of each DDI was calculated. Results: In line with different rates of polypharmacy (80% vs 16%), the risk of exposure to at least one interaction was 53.7% in nursing homes and 26.4% in outpatients. Among DDIs, in nursing homes antidepressants-anxiolytics (11.9%) ranked first, followed by antidepressants-aspirin (7.4%). In outpatients, ACE-inhibitors-non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) reached 7.2% followed by the calcium channel blockers-α-blockers (2.4%). Discussion: Polypharmacy and risk of DDIs appeared very different in the two settings, due to both technical and clinical reasons. In order to reduce use of benzodiazepines, NSAIDs, antidepressants and relevant DDIs, 1) defining alternative options for pain relief in elderly outpatients, and 2) implementing non-pharmacological management of insomnia and anxiety in nursing homes should be prioritized.