Rolling a trauma patient onto the right side increases sensitivity of FAST examination.

PURPOSE: Hemoperitoneum in the hypotensive trauma patient is an indication for emergent laparotomy. Focused assessment sonography in trauma (FAST) is a widely used tool for detecting hemoperitoneum. The usefulness of FAST is currently limited by low sensitivity. We hypothesize rolling patients onto their right side will pool small volumes of fluid into the right upper quadrant of the abdomen leading to increased sensitivity. METHODS: Peritoneal dialysis patients were recruited for voluntary participation in a small pilot prospective clinical trial. Each participant first underwent a supine FAST followed by a 30-second roll onto the right side. Once back in the supine position, the FAST was repeated (FASTeR or FAST examination after right-sided roll). About 50 mL aliquots of dialysate were sequentially infused into the abdomen and the imaging sequence repeated until a positive finding was obtained. RESULTS: Seven patients were consented for the study. One patient was found to have an equivocal examination secondary to renal cysts. All six remaining participants converted to a positive FASTeR at an intra-abdominal fluid volume at which standard FAST was negative. CONCLUSIONS: Rolling patients to the right side increased FAST sensitivity, converting false-negative to true positives examinations. A larger study is needed to validate our preliminary data.

Using Right-Sided Roll to Improve Reliability of Focused Assessment with Sonography in Trauma: An Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma Multicenter Prospective Study.

BACKGROUND: The Focused Assessment Sonography in Trauma (FAST) examination is the standard of care for detecting hemoperitoneum in hypotensive blunt trauma patients. A pilot study demonstrated earlier identification of intra-abdominal fluid via FAST after right-sided roll (FASTeR) when compared with the standard FAST. The purpose of this study was to evaluate this phenomenon prospectively in hypotensive blunt trauma patients. STUDY DESIGN: An Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma-approved multicenter prospective trial was performed June 2016 to October 2020 at 8 designated trauma centers. Hypotensive adult blunt trauma patients were included. A traditional FAST examination was performed. After this, the secondary survey logroll for back examination was standardized to the patient's right side. A repeat supine right upper quadrant ultrasound view was obtained. The presence or absence of hemoperitoneum was confirmed by CT scan or intraoperative findings. FAST and FASTeR were compared using receiver operating characteristics. The area under the curve was calculated. RESULTS: A total of 182 patients met inclusion criteria. A total of 65 patients (35.7%) had hemoperitoneum on CT scan or intraoperative findings. The sensitivity of FASTeR was 47.7%, and of FAST was 40.0% (p = 0.019). The receiver operating characteristics area under the curve of the FASTeR examination was 0.717 vs 0.687 for the FAST examination (p = 0.091). CONCLUSIONS: Addition of a right upper quadrant view after right-sided roll does improve the sensitivity of the FAST examination while maintaining the standard positive predictive value. We demonstrate a trend that does not reach statistical significance about the overall accuracy. This multicenter prospective trial was underpowered to reveal a statistically significant difference in the overall accuracy as measured by the receiver operating characteristics area under the curve.

Clinical Diagnosis of Infection in Surgical Intensive Care Unit: You're Not as Good as You Think!

Background: Because of the everincreasing costs and the complexity of institutional medical reimbursement policies, the necessity for extensive laboratory work-up of potentially infected patients has come into question. We hypothesized that intensivists are able to differentiate between infected and non-infected patients clinically, without the need to pan-culture, and are able to identify the location of the infection clinically in order to administer timely and appropriate treatment. Methods: Data collected prospectively on critically ill patients suspected of having an infection in the surgical intensive care unit (SICU) was obtained over a six-month period in a single tertiary academic medical center. Objective evidence of infection derived from laboratory or imaging data was compared with the subjective answers of the three most senior physicians' clinical diagnoses. Results: Thirty-nine critically ill surgical patients received 52 work-ups for suspected infections on the basis of signs and symptoms (e.g., fever, altered mental status). Thirty patients were found to be infected. Clinical diagnosis differentiated infected and non-infected patients with only 61.5% accuracy (sensitivity 60.3%; specificity 64.4%; p = 0.0049). Concordance between physicians was poor (κ = 0.33). Providers were able to predict the infectious source correctly only 60% of the time. Utilization of culture/objective data and SICU antibiotic protocols led to overall 78% appropriate initiation of antibiotics compared with 48% when treatment was based on clinical evaluation alone. Conclusion: Clinical diagnosis of infection is difficult, inaccurate, and unreliable in the absence of culture and sensitivity data. Infection suspected on the basis of signs and symptoms should be confirmed via objective and thorough work-up.

Outcomes in patients with gunshot wounds to the brain.

INTRODUCTION: Gunshot wounds to the brain (GSWB) confer high lethality and uncertain recovery. It is unclear which patients benefit from aggressive resuscitation, and furthermore whether patients with GSWB undergoing cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) have potential for survival or organ donation. Therefore, we sought to determine the rates of survival and organ donation, as well as identify factors associated with both outcomes in patients with GSWB undergoing CPR. METHODS: We performed a retrospective, multicenter study at 25 US trauma centers including dates between June 1, 2011 and December 31, 2017. Patients were included if they suffered isolated GSWB and required CPR at a referring hospital, in the field, or in the trauma resuscitation room. Patients were excluded for significant torso or extremity injuries, or if pregnant. Binomial regression models were used to determine predictors of survival/organ donation. RESULTS: 825 patients met study criteria; the majority were male (87.6%) with a mean age of 36.5 years. Most (67%) underwent CPR in the field and 2.1% (n=17) survived to discharge. Of the non-survivors, 17.5% (n=141) were considered eligible donors, with a donation rate of 58.9% (n=83) in this group. Regression models found several predictors of survival. Hormone replacement was predictive of both survival and organ donation. CONCLUSION: We found that GSWB requiring CPR during trauma resuscitation was associated with a 2.1% survival rate and overall organ donation rate of 10.3%. Several factors appear to be favorably associated with survival, although predictions are uncertain due to the low number of survivors in this patient population. Hormone replacement was predictive of both survival and organ donation. These results are a starting point for determining appropriate treatment algorithms for this devastating clinical condition. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.

Trauma Systems: Origins, Evolution, and Current Challenges.

Trauma is the leading cause of death among patients 46 years or younger, and having a system in place for the care of the injured is of paramount importance to the health of a community. The growth and development of civilian trauma systems has not been an easy process. The concept of regionalized health care that the trauma system models has been emulated by other specialized and time-sensitive areas of medicine, notably stroke and acute cardiac events. Continued process improvement, public education, support and involvement, a sound infrastructure, and integrated technology should remain our focus.