Coronary physiology before and after chronic total occlusion treatment: what does it tell us?

Studies performed in the last two decades demonstrate that after successful percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of a chronically occluded coronary artery, the physiology of the chronic total occlusion (CTO) vessel and dependent microvasculature does not normalise immediately but improves significantly over time. Generally, there is an increase in fractional flow reserve (FFR) in the CTO artery, a decrease in collateral blood supply and an increase in FFR in the donor artery accompanied by an increase in blood flow and decrease in microvascular resistance in the myocardium supplied by the CTO vessel. Analogous to these physiological changes, positive remodelling of the distal CTO artery also occurs over time, and intravascular imaging can be helpful for analysing distal vessel parameters. Follow-up coronary angiography with physiological measurements after several weeks to months can be helpful and informative in a subset of patients in order to decide upon the necessity for treatment of residual coronary artery stenosis in the vessel distal to the CTO or in the contralateral donor artery, as well as in deciding whether stent optimisation is indicated. We suggest that such physiological guidance of CTO procedures avoids unnecessary overtreatment during the initial procedure, guides interventions at follow-up, and improves our understanding of what PCI in CTO means.

Evaluation of bifurcation stenting techniques at Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven in 2013.

AIMS: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of bifurcation lesions can be performed using various techniques. The aim of this study was to analyse the outcome of various techniques of bifurcation stenting in all patients undergoing bifurcation stenting at one large intervention centre in 2013, taking into account that more complex lesions might more often warrant a two-stent technique. METHODS AND RESULTS: This retrospective study included 260 consecutive patients who underwent non-primary PCI of a bifurcation lesion at the Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, in 2013. Patients were classified into two groups: one-stent technique (provisional stenting), and two-stent techniques (culotte, crush and T­stenting). The primary endpoint was the rate of restenosis at 1 year. The secondary endpoints were procedural complications (side branch occlusion, periprocedural infarction, and death) and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 1 year. Periprocedural complications occurred in 15 patients (5.8 %) with no difference between the groups (p = 0.27). After 1 year, restenosis occurred in 3.2 % of the patients in the one-stent technique group and 7.3 % in the two-stent technique group (p = 0.20). MACE at 1 year did not differ between the groups at 11.9 % and 12.2 % respectively (p = 1.00). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that there is no significant difference between restenosis rate, or any other outcome parameter, with the different techniques of bifurcation stenting. Since provisional stenting is the simplest, most straightforward and cheapest approach, if technically feasible this technique has our preference as the initial approach, and an upgrade can be considered if the result is insufficient.

Classical determinants of coronary artery disease as predictors of complexity of coronary lesions, assessed with the SYNTAX score.

BACKGROUND: We need new biomarkers that can predict cardiovascular disease to improve both diagnosis and therapeutic strategies. The CIRCULATING CELLS study was designed to study the role of several cellular mediators of atherosclerosis as biomarkers of coronary artery disease (CAD). An objective and reproducible method for the quantification of CAD extension is required to establish relationships with these potential biomarkers. We sought to analyse the correlation of the SYNTAX score with known CAD risk factors to test it as a valid marker of CAD extension. METHODS AND RESULTS: A subgroup of 279 patients (67.4% males) were included in our analysis. Main exclusion criteria were a history of previous percutaneous coronary intervention or surgical revascularisation that prevent an accurate assessment of the SS. Diabetes mellitus, smoking, renal insufficiency, body mass index and a history of CAD and myocardial infarction were all positively and strongly associated with a higher SYNTAX score after adjustment for the non-modifiable biological factors (age and sex). In the multivariate model, age and male sex, along with smoking and renal insufficiency, remain statistical significantly associated with the SYNTAX score. CONCLUSION: In a selected cohort of revascularisation-naive patients with CAD undergoing coronary angiography, non-modifiable cardiovascular risk factors such as advanced age, male sex, as well as smoking and renal failure were independently associated with CAD complexity assessed by the SYNTAX score. The SYNTAX score may be a valid marker of CAD extension to establish relationships with potential novel biomarkers of coronary atherosclerosis.

Reduced number of cardiovascular events and increased cost-effectiveness by genotype-guided antiplatelet therapy in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions in the Netherlands.

AIM: This study explores clinical outcome in cytochrome P450 2C19 (CYP2C19)-related poor metaboliser patients treated with either clopidogrel or prasugrel after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and investigates whether this could be cost-effective. METHODS AND RESULTS: This single-centre, observational study included 3260 patients scheduled for elective PCI between October 2010 and June 2013 and followed for adverse cardiovascular events until October 2014. Post PCI, CYP2C19 poor metaboliser patients were treated with clopidogrel or prasugrel, in addition to aspirin. In total, 32 poor metabolisers were treated with clopidogrel and 41 with prasugrel. The number of adverse cardiovascular events, defined as death from cardiovascular cause, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, every second visit to the catheterisation room for re-PCI in the same artery, or stroke, within 1.5 years of PCI, was significantly higher in the CYP2C19 poor metaboliser group treated with clopidogrel (n = 10, 31 %) compared with the poor metaboliser group treated with prasugrel (n = 2, 5 %) (p = 0.003). Costs per gained quality-adjusted life years (QALY) were estimated, showing that genotype-guided post-PCI treatment with prasugrel could be cost-effective with less than € 10,000 per gained QALY. CONCLUSION: This study provides evidence that for CYP2C19-related poor metabolisers prasugrel may be more effective than clopidogrel to prevent major adverse cardiovascular events after PCI and this approach could be cost-effective.

Treatment variation in stent choice in patients with stable or unstable coronary artery disease.

AIM: Variations in treatment are the result of differences in demographic and clinical factors (e.g. anatomy), but physician and hospital factors may also contribute to treatment variation. The choice of treatment is considered important since it could lead to differences in long-term outcomes. This study explores the associations with stent choice: i.e. drug-eluting stent (DES) versus bare-metal stents (BMS) for Dutch patients diagnosed with stable or unstable coronary artery disease (CAD). METHODS & RESULTS: Associations with treatment decisions were based on a prospective cohort of 692 patients with stable or unstable CAD. Of those patients, 442 patients were treated with BMS or DES. Multiple logistic regression analyses were performed to identify variables associated with stent choice. Bivariate analyses showed that NYHA class, number of diseased vessels, previous percutaneous coronary intervention, smoking, diabetes, and the treating hospital were associated with stent type. After correcting for other associations the treating hospital remained significantly associated with stent type in the stable CAD population. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that several factors were associated with stent choice. While patients generally appear to receive the most optimal stent given their clinical characteristics, stent choice seems partially determined by the treating hospital, which may lead to differences in long-term outcomes.

Intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation in acute myocardial infarction: old and emerging indications.

BACKGROUND: Recent evidence questions the role of intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation (IABP) in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) complicated by cardiogenic shock (CS). An area of increasing interest is the use of IABP for persistent ischaemia (PI). We analysed the use of IABP in patients with AMI complicated by CS or PI. METHODS: From 2008 to 2010, a total of 4076 patients were admitted to our hospital for primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for AMI. Out of those, 239 patients received an IABP either because of CS or because of PI. Characteristics and outcome of those patients are investigated. RESULTS: The mean age of the study population was 64 ± 11 years; 75 % were male patients. Of the patients, 63 % had CS and 37 % had PI. Patients with CS had a 30-day mortality rate of 36 %; 1-year mortality was 41 %. Patients with PI had a 30-day mortality rate of 7 %; 1-year mortality was 11 %. CONCLUSIONS: Mortality in patients admitted for primary PCI because of AMI complicated by CS is high despite IABP use. Outcome in patients treated with IABP for PI is favourable and mandates further prospective studies.

Post-occlusional hyperemia for fractional flow reserve assessment and pull-back curve analysis.

Balloon occlusion is a potential method for inducing hyperemia to measure post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) fractional flow reserve (FFR). The objective of this study was to determine the clinical usefulness of post-occlusional hyperemia. FFRs measured using post-occlusional hyperemia caused by 30 (FFRoccl30) and 60 s (FFRoccl60) of balloon occlusion after PCI were compared in 60 lesions from 60 patients. The duration of hyperemia was also measured. There was a strong correlation between FFRoccl30 and FFRoccl60 (r = 0.969, p < 0.01). The duration of hyperemia was significantly longer with FFRoccl60 than with FFRoccl30 (68 ± 23 vs. 37 ± 15 s, p < 0.01). The time required for pullback curve analysis was around 45 s. However, in 7 (12%) cases, the duration of hyperemia with FFRoccl60 was < 45 s, which was not enough for pull-back curve analysis. To predict the duration of hyperemia with FFRoccl60 ≥ 45 s, the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed a cut-off value of 25 s of hyperemia with FFRoccl30. FFRoccl30 is sufficient for diagnostic purposes. FFRoccl60 is suitable for pull-back curve analysis in select cases based on predictions made using the duration of hyperemia with FFRoccl30.

Coronary thermodilution to assess flow reserve: experimental validation.

BACKGROUND: Fractional flow reserve (FFR) and coronary flow reserve (CFR) are indices of coronary stenosis severity that provide the clinician with complementary information on the contribution of epicardial arteries and microcirculation to total resistance to myocardial blood flow. At present, FFR and CFR can only be obtained by 2 separate guidewires. The present study tested the validity of the thermodilution principle in assessing CFR with one pressure-temperature sensor-tipped guidewire. METHODS AND RESULTS: In an in vitro model, absolute flow was compared with the inverse mean transit time (1/T(mn)) of a thermodilution curve obtained after a bolus injection of 3 mL of saline at room temperature. A very close correlation (r>0.95) was found between absolute flow and 1/T(mn) when the sensor was placed >/=6 cm from the injection site. In 6 chronically instrumented dogs (60 stenoses; FFR from 0.19 to 0.98), a significant linear relation was found between flow velocity and 1/T(mn). A significant correlation was found between CFR(Doppler), which was calculated from the ratio of hyperemic to resting flow velocities, and CFR(thermo), which was calculated from the ratio of resting to hyperemic T(mn) (r=0.76; SEE=0.24; P<0.001). CONCLUSION: The present findings demonstrate the validity of the thermodilution principle to assess CFR. Because the pressure-temperature sensor was mounted in a commercially available angioplasty guidewire, this technique permits simultaneous measurements of CFR and FFR.

Pressure-derived fractional flow reserve to assess serial epicardial stenoses: theoretical basis and animal validation.

Background-Fractional flow reserve (FFR) is an index of stenosis severity validated for isolated stenoses. This study develops the theoretical basis and experimentally validates equations for predicting FFR of sequential stenoses separately. Methods and Results-For 2 stenoses in series, equations were derived to predict FFR (FFR(pred)) of each stenosis separately (ie, as if the other one were removed) from arterial pressure (P(a)), pressure between the 2 stenoses (P(m)), distal coronary pressure (P(d)), and coronary occlusive pressure (P(w)). In 5 dogs with 2 stenoses of varying severity in the left circumflex coronary artery, FFR(pred) was compared with FFR(app) (ratio of the pressure just distal to that just proximal to each stenoses) and to FFR(true) (ratio of the pressures distal to proximal to each stenosis but after removal of the other one) in case of fixed distal and varying proximal stenoses (n=15) and in case of fixed proximal and varying distal stenoses (n=20). The overestimation of FFR(true) by FFR(app) was larger than that of FFR(true) by FFR(pred) (0.070+/-0.007 versus 0.029+/-0.004, P<0.01 for fixed distal stenoses, and 0.114+/-0.01 versus 0.036+/-0. 004, P<0.01 for fixed proximal stenoses). This overestimation of FFR(true) by FFR(app) was larger for fixed proximal than for fixed distal stenoses. Conclusions-The interaction between 2 stenoses is such that FFR of each lesion separately cannot be calculated by the equation for isolated stenoses (P(d)/P(a) during hyperemia) applied to each separately but can be predicted by more complete equations taking into account P(a), P(m), P(d), and P(w).

Comparison of quantitative coronary angiography, intravascular ultrasound, and coronary pressure measurement to assess optimum stent deployment.

BACKGROUND: Although intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) is the present standard for the evaluation of optimum stent deployment, this technique is expensive and not routinely feasible in most catheterization laboratories. Coronary pressure-derived myocardial fractional flow reserve (FFRmyo) is an easy, cheap, and rapidly obtainable index that is specific for the conductance of the epicardial coronary artery. In this study, we investigated the usefulness of coronary pressure measurement to predict optimum and suboptimum stent deployment. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 30 patients, a Wiktor-i stent was implanted at different inflation pressures, starting at 6 atm and increasing step by step to 8, 10, 12, and 14 atm, if necessary. After every step, stent deployment was evaluated by quantitative coronary angiography (QCA), IVUS, and coronary pressure measurement. If any of the 3 techniques did not yield an optimum result, the next inflation was performed, and all 3 investigational modalities were repeated until optimum stent deployment was present by all of them or until the treating physician decided to accept the result. Optimum deployment according to QCA was finally achieved in 24 patients, according to IVUS in 17 patients, and also according to coronary pressure measurement in 17 patients. During the step-up, a total of 81 paired IVUS and coronary pressure measurements were performed, of which 91% yielded concordant results (ie, either an optimum or a suboptimum expansion of the stent by both techniques, P<0.00001). On the contrary, QCA showed a low concordance rate with IVUS and FFRmyo (48% and 46%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, using a coil stent, both IVUS and coronary pressure measurement were of similar value with respect to the assessment of optimum stent deployment. Therefore, coronary pressure measurement can be used as a cheap and rapid alternative to IVUS for that purpose.

Coronary pressure measurement to assess the hemodynamic significance of serial stenoses within one coronary artery: validation in humans.

BACKGROUND: When several stenoses are present within 1 coronary artery, the hemodynamic significance of each stenosis is influenced by the presence of the other(s), and the calculation of coronary and fractional flow reserve (CFR and FFR) for each individual stenosis is confounded. Recently, we developed and experimentally validated a method to determine the true FFR of each stenosis as it would be after the removal of the other stenosis; the true FFR can be reliably predicted by coronary pressures measured before treatment at specific locations within the coronary artery using equations accounting for stenosis interaction. The aim of the present study was to test the validity of these equations in humans. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this study of 32 patients with 2 serial stenoses in 1 coronary artery, relevant pressures were measured before the intervention, after the treatment of 1 stenosis, and after the treatment of both stenoses. The true FFR of each stenosis (FFR(true)) was directly measured after the elimination of the other stenosis and compared with the value predicted (FFR(pred)) from the initial pressure measurements before treatment. Although the hyperemic gradient across 1 stenosis increased significantly (from 10+/-7 to 19+/-11 mm Hg after treatment of the other stenosis), FFR(pred) was close to FFR(true) in all patients (0.78+/-0.12 versus 0.78+/-0.11 mm Hg; r=0.92; Delta%=4+/-0%). Without accounting for stenosis interaction, the value of FFR for each stenosis would have been significantly overestimated (0.85+/-0.08; P:<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Coronary pressure measurements made by a pressure wire at maximum hyperemia provide a simple, practical method for assessing the individual hemodynamic significance of multiple stenoses within the same artery.

Fractional flow reserve in patients with prior myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: Fractional flow reserve (FFR), an index of coronary stenosis severity, can be calculated from the ratio of hyperemic distal to proximal coronary pressure. An FFR value of 0.75 can distinguish patients with normal and abnormal noninvasive stress testing in case of normal left ventricular function. The present study aimed at investigating the value of FFR in patients with a prior myocardial infarction. Methods and Results-- In 57 patients who had sustained a myocardial infarction >/=6 days earlier, myocardial perfusion single photon emission scintigraphy (SPECT) imaging and FFR were obtained before and after angioplasty. The sensitivity and specificity of the 0.75 value of FFR to detect flow maldistribution at SPECT imaging were 82% and 87%. The concordance between the FFR and SPECT imaging was 85% (P<0.001). When only truly positive and truly negative SPECT imaging were considered, the corresponding values were 87%, 100%, and 94% (P<0.001). Patients with positive SPECT imaging before angioplasty had a significantly lower FFR than patients with negative SPECT imaging (0.52+/-0.18 versus 0.67+/-0.16, P=0.0079) but a significantly higher left ventricular ejection fraction (63+/-10% versus 52+/-10%, P=0.0009) despite a similar degree of diameter stenosis (67+/-13% versus 68+/-16%, P=NS). A significant inverse correlation was found between LVEF and FFR (R=0.29, P=0.049). CONCLUSIONS: The present data indicate (1) that the 0.75 cutoff value of FFR to distinguish patients with positive from patients with negative SPECT imaging is valid after a myocardial infarction and (2) that for a similar degree of stenosis, the value of FFR depends on the mass of viable myocardium.

Abnormal epicardial coronary resistance in patients with diffuse atherosclerosis but "Normal" coronary angiography.

BACKGROUND: Coronary arteries without focal stenosis at angiography are generally considered non-flow-limiting. However, atherosclerosis is a diffuse process that often remains invisible at angiography. Accordingly, we hypothesized that in patients with coronary artery disease, nonstenotic coronary arteries induce a decrease in pressure along their length due to diffuse coronary atherosclerosis. METHODS AND RESULTS: Coronary pressure and fractional flow reserve (FFR), as indices of coronary conductance, were obtained from 37 arteries in 10 individuals without atherosclerosis (group I) and from 106 nonstenotic arteries in 62 patients with arteriographic stenoses in another coronary artery (group II). In group I, the pressure gradient between aorta and distal coronary artery was minimal at rest (1+/-1 mm Hg) and during maximal hyperemia (3+/-3 mm Hg). Corresponding values were significantly larger in group II (5+/-4 mm Hg and 10+/-8 mm Hg, respectively; both P<0.001). The FFR was near unity (0.97+/-0.02; range, 0.92 to 1) in group I, indicating no resistance to flow in truly normal coronary arteries, but it was significantly lower (0.89+/-0.08; range, 0.69 to 1) in group II, indicating a higher resistance to flow. In 57% of arteries in group II, FFR was lower than the lowest value in group I. In 8% of arteries in group II, FFR was <0.75, the threshold for inducible ischemia. CONCLUSION: Diffuse coronary atherosclerosis without focal stenosis at angiography causes a graded, continuous pressure fall along arterial length. This resistance to flow contributes to myocardial ischemia and has consequences for decision-making during percutaneous coronary interventions.

Fractional flow reserve to determine the appropriateness of angioplasty in moderate coronary stenosis: a randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: PTCA of a coronary stenosis without documented ischemia at noninvasive stress testing is often performed, but its benefit is unproven. Coronary pressure-derived fractional flow reserve (FFR) is an invasive index of stenosis severity that is a reliable substitute for noninvasive stress testing. A value of 0.75 identifies stenoses with hemodynamic significance. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 325 patients for whom PTCA was planned and who did not have documented ischemia, FFR of the stenosis was measured. If FFR was >0.75, patients were randomly assigned to deferral (deferral group; n=91) or performance (performance group; n=90) of PTCA. If FFR was <0.75, PTCA was performed as planned (reference group; n=144). Clinical follow-up was obtained at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months. Event-free survival was similar between the deferral and performance groups (92% versus 89% at 12 months and 89% versus 83% at 24 months) but was significantly lower in the reference group (80% at 12 months and 78% at 24 months). In addition, the percentage of patients free from angina was similar between the deferral and performance groups (49% versus 50% at 12 months and 70% versus 51% at 24 months) but was significantly higher in the reference group (67% at 12 and 80% at 24 months). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with a coronary stenosis without evidence of ischemia, coronary pressure-derived FFR identifies those who will benefit from PTCA.

Randomized comparison of primary stenting and provisional balloon angioplasty guided by flow velocity measurement. Doppler Endpoints Balloon Angioplasty Trial Europe (DEBATE) II Study Group.

BACKGROUND: Coronary stenting improves outcomes compared with balloon angioplasty, but it is costly and may have other disadvantages. Limiting stent use to patients with a suboptimal result after angioplasty (provisional angioplasty) may be as effective and less expensive. METHODS AND RESULTS: To analyze the cost-effectiveness of provisional angioplasty, patients scheduled for single-vessel angioplasty were first randomized to receive primary stenting (97 patients) or balloon angioplasty guided by Doppler flow velocity and angiography (523 patients). Patients in the latter group were further randomized after optimization to either additional stenting or termination of the procedure to further investigate what is "optimal." An optimal result was defined as a flow reserve >2.5 and a diameter stenosis <36%. Bailout stenting was needed in 129 patients (25%) who were randomized to balloon angioplasty, and an optimal result was obtained in 184 of the 523 patients (35%). There was no significant difference in event-free survival at 1 year between primary stenting (86.6%) and provisional angioplasty (85.6%). Costs after 1 year were significantly higher for provisional angioplasty (EUR 6573 versus EUR 5885; P:=0.014). Results after the second randomization showed that stenting was also more effective after optimal balloon angioplasty (1-year event free survival, 93.5% versus 84.1%; P:=0. 066). CONCLUSIONS: After 1 year of follow-up, provisional angioplasty was more expensive and without clinical benefit. The beneficial value of stenting is not limited to patients with a suboptimal result after balloon angioplasty.

From research to clinical practice: current role of intracoronary physiologically based decision making in the cardiac catheterization laboratory.

Decisions regarding coronary interventions should be combined with objective evidence of myocardial ischemia. The most common physiologic approach utilizes hospital facilities outside the catheterization laboratory, requiring additional time and cost. With the introduction of sensor-tipped angioplasty guide wires, distal coronary flow velocity and pressure can be obtained in the cardiac catheterization laboratory, facilitating physiologically based decisions regarding the need for intervention. In the catheterization laboratory, physiologically significant stenoses can be characterized as having impaired post-stenotic coronary flow reserve < 2.0 and pressure-derived fractional flow reserve < 0.75, both variables related strongly to positive ischemic perfusion imaging or stress testing results. Deferring coronary interventions on the basis of normal translesional physiology is safe and is associated with a low rate (< 10%) of lesion progression over a 10-month follow-up period. Preliminary data indicate that excellent physiologic and anatomic end points after balloon angioplasty are associated with low (< 20%) restenosis rates at 6-month follow-up. Clinically relevant relations of in-laboratory physiology support the insight that physiologic, as much as or more than anatomic variables, ultimately determine the functional status of a patient. Current data suggest that an intracoronary physiologic approach complements coronary lumenology and appears to have important clinical and economic implications for patients undergoing invasive evaluation and treatment of coronary artery disease.

Quantitative coronary angiography in predicting functional significance of stenoses in an unselected patient cohort.

OBJECTIVES: This study investigated the value of quantitative coronary angiography for predicting coronary flow reserve, as calculated from the transstenotic pressure gradient in a large, unselected patient cohort. BACKGROUND: In patients with extensive coronary artery disease, quantitative coronary angiographic findings fail to correlate with functional variables of coronary stenoses. New developments in pressure-monitoring wire technology permitted validation in humans of the concept of myocardial fractional flow reserve as assessed from coronary pressure measurements. METHODS: One hundred ten patients with normal left ventricular function were studied in the setting of coronary angioplasty. Quantitative coronary angiography was performed on-line using the ACA system. Myocardial and coronary fractional flow reserve were calculated from aortic and distal coronary pressures during maximal coronary hyperemia. RESULTS: When data before and after angioplasty were pooled, a curvilinear relation was found between myocardial fractional flow reserve and both diameter stenosis (r = 0.79) and minimal lumen diameter (r = 0.82), and a linear relation was found between myocardial fractional flow reserve and angiographic stenosis flow reserve (r = 0.78). Correlations between quantitative angiographic and pressure-derived indexes, although significant, were characterized by a large dispersion of the values of myocardial fractional flow reserve for a similar angiographic degree of stenosis. Nevertheless, the sensitivity and specificity of a minimal lumen diameter < 1.5 mm to predict myocardial fractional flow reserve < 0.72 were 96% and 89%, respectively. The corresponding values for a diameter stenosis > 50% were 93% and 85%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: 1) In an unselected patient cohort, geometric indexes of stenosis severity derived from quantitative coronary angiography correlate significantly with physiologic variables, although these relations are imprecise in individual patients. 2) Nevertheless, the diagnostic accuracy of quantitative coronary angiography in predicting myocardial fractional flow reserve < 0.72 is high and allows its use for clinical decision making in the individual patient during diagnostic or interventional procedures.

Long-term follow-up after deferral of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty of intermediate stenosis on the basis of coronary pressure measurement.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to determine the safety of deferral of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) of angiographically intermediate but functionally nonsignificant stenosis, as assessed by coronary pressure measurement and myocardial fractional flow reserve (FFRmyo). BACKGROUND: Decision making in patients with chest pain and intermediate coronary stenosis remains difficult. In these cases it is unclear whether the risk of an intervention and the potentially subsequent restenosis outweigh the future risk of an event if the lesion remains untreated. FFRmyo is a lesion-specific functional index of epicardial stenosis severity that accurately distinguishes stenoses associated with inducible ischemia. METHODS: Retrospective analysis and follow-up was performed in 100 consecutive patients referred to our centers for PTCA of an intermediate stenosis but in whom the planned intervention was deferred on the basis of an FFRmyo > or = 0.75. RESULTS: During a follow-up period of 18+/-13 months (mean +/- SD, range 3 to 42), two patients died of noncardiac causes. Ninety patients remained free of any coronary events, and their average Canadian Cardiovascular Society class decreased from 2.0+/-1.2 at baseline to 0.7+/-0.9 at follow-up (p < 0.0001). A coronary event occurred in eight patients and was target-vessel related in four. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with chest pain referred for PTCA of an intermediate stenosis, deferral of the intervention on the basis of an FFRmyo > or = 0.75 is safe and is associated with a much lower clinical event rate than if the procedure had been performed as initially planned in these patients.

Quantification of recruitable coronary collateral blood flow in conscious humans and its potential to predict future ischemic events.

OBJECTIVES: The present study was designed to evaluate the applicability of a pressure-flow equation for quantitative calculation of recruitable collateral blood flow at coronary artery occlusion in conscious patients and to investigate the value of that index to predict future ischemic events. BACKGROUND: Recent experimental studies have indicated that recruitable collateral blood flow at coronary artery occlusion can be expressed as a fraction of normal maximal myocardial blood flow by simultaneous recordings of mean arterial, coronary wedge and central venous pressures, respectively. This index is called the pressure-derived fractional collateral flow and is independent of hemodynamic loading conditions. METHODS: In 120 patients undergoing elective coronary angioplasty, mean arterial, coronary wedge and central venous pressures were measured at balloon inflations of 2 min. All patients had a recent exercise electrocardiogram (ECG) with positive findings showing clearly distinguishable, reversible ECG abnormalities, enabling recognition of ischemia at balloon inflation. Fractional collateral blood flow at angioplasty was calculated by coronary wedge pressure minus central venous pressure divided by mean arterial pressure minus central venous pressure and correlated to the presence or absence of ischemia at balloon inflation. Ischemic events were monitored during a follow-up period of 6 to 22 months. RESULTS: In 90 of the 120 patients, ischemia was present at balloon inflation, and in 82 of these patients, fractional collateral blood flow was < or = 23%. By contrast, in 29 patients, no ischemia was present, and fractional collateral blood flow was > 24% in all 29. During the follow-up period, 16 patients had an ischemic event. Fifteen of these 16 patients were in the group with insufficient collateral flow (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this study presents the first method for quantitative assessment of recruitable collateral blood flow in humans in the catheterization laboratory. Sufficient and insufficient collateral circulation can be reliably distinguished by this method. Use of this method can also help to provide more insight into the extent and behavior of the collateral circulation for investigational purposes and may have potential clinical implications.