Evaluating the success of an inpatient PA and NP program through trends in ED consults.

OBJECTIVE: We investigated the effect of an inpatient physician associate/assistant (PA) and NP program on consult volume, length of stay (LOS), and ED returns. METHODS: A retrospective observational study of 4,118 orthopedic ED consults was conducted from January 2017 to March 2022. Univariate statistics were used to evaluate outcomes between cohorts and multivariate regression to evaluate the odds of an LOS of less than 24 hours. RESULTS: After implementation of the PA and NP program, surgeon consults steadily declined and orthopedic consults increased markedly. Statistically significant differences were found in LOS of less than 24 hours and ED arrival-to-discharge time. Adjusting for case mix, patients were 47% more likely to be discharged within 24 hours. Survey results noted that more than 80% of surgeons felt on-call workload, disruptions to clinic and surgical schedules decreased, and quality of care increased. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of an inpatient PA and NP program reduced orthopedic surgeon consults and hospital LOS while improving surgeon satisfaction with on-call workload, schedule disruptions, and quality of care.

Addressing the Challenge of Spine Patient Triage: Development of a Simple Algorithm for Identification of Potential Surgical Candidates.

INTRODUCTION: Given that most spine conditions do not require surgical intervention, using surgeons to manage the subset of patients potentially requiring surgery is the most efficient resource allocation strategy. The purpose of this study was to develop a simple algorithm for identifying patients most likely to require spine surgery that could be used to appropriately triage this population to surgeons. METHODS: A retrospective review of 5,886 consecutive new patients presenting to a multidisciplinary spine clinic from March 2021 to September 2022 was conducted. The primary outcome was whether a patient underwent spine surgery during the study period. A total of 64 independent variables were recorded from patient intake and the first visit. A gradient boosted model was generated to identify the independent variables most associated with undergoing surgery. The five most important variables were entered into a multiple logistic regression model, and a simplified decision support tool was generated and assessed. RESULTS: Overall, 440 of 5886 patients (7.5%) underwent surgery during the study period. The following variables were identified as the top five predictors of spine surgery: patient goal of interest in learning about spine surgery, history of spine injections, difficulty walking a mile, radicular symptoms greater than axial symptoms, and increased age. Each of these variables was confirmed to be independently associated with undergoing surgery (all P < 0.001). The decision support tool yielded a sensitivity of 60.0%, specificity of 76.6%, likelihood ratio of 2.56, positive predictive value of 17.2%, and negative predictive value of 96.0% for predicting surgery. An AUC of 0.683 was achieved. CONCLUSION: A simple 5-question algorithm incorporating patient demographics, symptoms, treatment history, physical function, and patient goals may improve the ability of practices to identify potential spine surgery candidates before their first visit. Prospective application and evaluation of the algorithm to evaluate whether it improves the triage of appropriate patients to spine surgeons is warranted.

Are We Considering the Whole Patient? The Impact of Physical and Mental Health on the Outcomes of Spine Care.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective, observational. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the influence of baseline health status on the physical and mental health (MH) outcomes of spine patients. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Spine conditions can have a significant burden on both the physical and MH of patients. To date, few studies have evaluated the outcomes of both dimensions of health, particularly in nonoperative populations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: At their first visit to a multidisciplinary spine clinic, 2668 nonoperative patients completed the Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-Global Health (PROMIS-GH) instrument and a questionnaire evaluating symptoms and goals of care. Patients were stratified by their baseline percentile score of the MH and physical health (PH) components of the PROMIS-GH. Four groups of patients were compared based on the presence or absence of bottom quartile PH or MH scores. The primary end point was the achievement of a minimal clinically important difference (MCID) on the MH or PH components at follow-up. Multivariate regression assessed the predictors of MCID achievement. RESULTS: After controlling for demographics, symptoms, and goals, each 1-point increase in baseline PROMIS-GH mental score reduced the odds of achieving MH MCID by 9.0% ( P <0.001). Conversely, each 1-point increase in baseline GH-physical score increased the odds of achieving MCID by 4.5% ( P =0.005). Each 1-point increase in baseline GH-physical score reduced the odds of achieving PH MCID by 12.5% ( P <0.001), whereas each 1-point increase in baseline GH-mental score increased the odds of achieving MCID by 5.0% ( P <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Spine patients presenting with the lowest levels of physical or MH were most likely to experience clinically significant improvement in those domains. However, lower levels of physical or mental health made it less likely that patients would experience significant improvement in the alternative domain. Physicians should evaluate and address the complex spine population holistically to maximize improvement in both physical and mental health status.

The Effect of Preoperative, Low-Dose Intrathecal Morphine on Patient Outcomes Following Lumbar Fusion Surgery: Can We Teach an Old Dog New Tricks?

BACKGROUND: Early pain control after lumbar fusion presents a challenge to patients and providers. Intrathecal morphine (ITM) has been used at the end of these procedures with limited benefit, but recent data suggest low-dose ITM at case initiation may be effective. This study aims to evaluate the use of preoperative ITM during lumbar fusion to determine whether there is a benefit for these patients. METHODS: One hundred and eighty lumbar fusion patients between 1 January 2018 and 31 May 2022 were evaluated. Patients were grouped by whether they received preoperative, low-dose ITM or not. Outcomes of interest included hospital narcotic consumption, pain scores, opioid-related complications, and complications within the first 90 days. RESULTS: Sixty-five study patients received 200 µg ITM at case initiation and 115 did not. No differences in length of stay, discharge disposition, or complications in the first 90 days were noted. ITM patients received fewer milligram morphine equivalents in the postanesthesia care unit (9.7 ± 31.23 vs 21.83 ± 21.07; P = 0.006) and on postoperative day 0 (18.60 ± 35.47 vs 35.47 ± 28.51; P = 0.001). Pain scores were lower in the ITM group both in the postanesthesia care unit and on postoperative day 0, with a decrease in extreme pain scores (>7; 35.4% vs 53.0%; P = 0.034). CONCLUSIONS: ITM appears to be safe and effective for reducing early pain and narcotic consumption on the day of surgery for lumbar fusion patients and may hold value for incorporation into rapid recovery protocols and for improving pain-related patient satisfaction. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: ITM appears to be safe and effective for reducing early pain and narcotic consumption on the day of surgery for lumbar fusion patients and may hold value for incorporation into rapid recovery protocols and for improving pain-related patient satisfaction.

Social Determinants of Health Influence Early Outcomes Following Lumbar Spine Surgery.

Background: Disparities among social determinants of health (SDoH) can impact overall well-being and surgical outcomes. The purpose of this study was to identify SDoH for patients who underwent lumbar spine surgery and evaluate their relationship to the postoperative outcomes of length of stay (LOS), discharge disposition, and readmissions. Methods: We conducted a retrospective observational study of patients who underwent lumbar spine surgery from July 2017 to January 2021. We used a self-reported SDoH survey in conjunction with the electronic medical record to gather patient information. Multivariate analysis was used to evaluate the relationships between patient demographics, SDoH, and postoperative outcomes. Results: A total of 951 patients underwent lumbar spine surgery: 484 (50.9%) had decompressive laminectomy alone without fusion, and 467 (49.1%) had decompressive laminectomy with instrumented posterolateral fusion. When controlling for age, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification, and surgery type, the SDoH of being currently married or having a life partner was associated with shorter LOS and decreased likelihood of discharge to a skilled nursing facility. Financial strain was associated with longer LOS, while attending church was associated with a decreased likelihood of 30-day emergency department (ED) return. Conclusion: This study identified various SDoH that may influence postoperative lumbar spine surgery outcomes of LOS, discharge disposition, 30-day ED return, and 30-day readmission. Patients at risk for suboptimal outcomes appear to be those with lower financial resources, less in-home support, and lower social connectivity. Routine screening of SDoH may enable care teams to effectively allocate resources for at-risk patients.

Patient Goal-directed Care in an Orthopaedic Spine Specialty Clinic.

INTRODUCTION: Using health-related goals to direct care could improve quality and reduce cost of medical care; however, the effect of these goals for patients with spinal pathologies is not well understood. The purpose of this study was to describe patient-reported goals by provider type and to evaluate the effect of patient-provider goal awareness on patient satisfaction and treatment pathway. METHODS: A pilot program was instituted in which all new or existing patients scheduled with either a single spine surgeon or a nonsurgical spine nurse practitioner were asked to complete a paper survey instrument regarding their goals of care before their visit. The patient goals were then discussed between the provider and the patient. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate relationships between patient goals, provider seen, diagnosis, and treatment recommendations. RESULTS: There were 703 respondents to the survey, of whom 416 were included for subgroup analysis. Patient-reported goals varied by provider type. When examining rates of recommended interventions by patient goals, notable differences were observed for 7 of the 13 goal categories. Significant differences in intervention recommendations by provider type existed for physical therapy, medications, MRI, and surgery (all P < 0.001). After controlling for other variables, seeing a surgeon, thoracolumbar pathology, and goals of "return to activity or social events I enjoy," and "learn about spine surgery" were significant independent predictors of recommendation for surgery (all odds ratio > 3 and P < 0.05). This model generated an area under the curve of 0.923 (95% confidence interval, 0.861 to 0.986), indicating outstanding discrimination in predicting recommendation for surgery. Patient satisfaction scores rose from 91.5% to 92.2%, but this difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.782). CONCLUSION: Specific patient-reported goals vary by provider type and are associated with specific diagnosis and treatment recommendations. Goal-directed care may improve the design of treatment pathways and the overall patient experience.