Unexplained hypothermia is associated with bacterial infection in the Emergency Department.

BACKGROUND: Early recognition and antibiotic therapy improve the prognosis of bacterial infections. Triage temperature in the Emergency department (ED) constitutes a diagnostic and prognostic marker of infection. The objective of this study was to assess the prevalence of community-acquired bacterial infections and the diagnostic ability of conventional biological markers in patients presenting to the ED with hypothermia. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective single-center study over a 1-year period before the COVID-19 pandemic. Consecutive adult patients admitted to the ED with hypothermia (body temperature < 36.0 °C) were eligible. Patients with evident cause of hypothermia and patients with viral infections were excluded. Diagnosis of infection was based on the presence of at least two among the three following pre-defined criteria: (i) the presence of a potential source of infection, (ii) microbiology data, and (iii) patient outcome under antibiotic therapy. The association between traditional biomarkers (white blood cells, lymphocytes, C-reactive protein [CRP], Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Count Ratio [NLCR]) and underlying bacterial infections was evaluated using a univariate and a multivariate (logistic regression) analysis. Receiver operating characteristic curves were built to determine threshold values yielding the best sensitivity and specificity for each biomarker. RESULTS: Of 490 patients admitted to the ED with hypothermia during the study period, 281 were excluded for circumstantial or viral origin, and 209 were finally studied (108 men; mean age: 73 ± 17 years). A bacterial infection was diagnosed in 59 patients (28%) and was mostly related to Gram-negative microorganisms (68%). The area under the curve (AUC) for the CRP level was 0.82 with a confidence interval (CI) ranging from 0.75 to 0.89. The AUC for the leukocyte, neutrophil and lymphocyte counts were 0.54 (CI: 0.45-0.64), 0.58 (CI: 0.48-0.68) and 0.74 (CI: 0.66-0.82), respectively. The AUC of NLCR and quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) reached 0.70 (CI: 0.61-0.79) and 0.61 (CI: 0.52-0.70), respectively. In the multivariate analysis, CRP ≥ 50 mg/L (OR: 9.39; 95% CI: 3.91-24.14; p < 0.01) and a NLCR ≥10 (OR: 2.73; 95% CI: 1.20-6.12; p = 0.02) were identified as independent variables associated with the diagnosis of underlying bacterial infection. CONCLUSION: Community-acquired bacterial infections represent one third of diagnoses in an unselected population presenting to the ED with unexplained hypothermia. CRP level and NLCR appear useful for the diagnosis of causative bacterial infection.

Benefits of Organized Mammographic Screening Programs in Women Aged 50 to 69 years: A Surgical Perspective.

BACKGROUND: The benefits of organized mammographic screening programs (OMSPs) in reducing breast cancer mortality have been addressed by several studies. This study was designed to specifically evaluate the advantages of OMPSs in terms of surgical management of patients with breast cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Surgical treatment of 201 patients with breast cancer aged 50 to 69 years coming from OMSPs was compared with that of 532 non-OMSP patients in same age group. The likelihood of receiving BCS was analyzed through a multivariable regression model. RESULTS: The mean tumor size was smaller in the OMSP patients (14 mm vs. 18 mm; P < .01). The proportion of patients having metastatic lymph nodes was higher in the non-OMSP group (33.3% vs. 17.9%; P < .01). Rates of breast-conserving surgery (BCS) were significantly higher in the OMSP group (89.1% vs. 59.1%; P < .01). Sentinel node biopsy was carried out in 84.1% and 62.5% of patients in the OMSP and non-OMSP groups, respectively (P < .01). Rates of axillary lymph node dissection were significantly different (24.9% in the OMSP group and 35.8% in the non-OMSP group; P = .02). Re-excisions for infiltrated margins after BCS were lower in the OMSP group (4.8% vs. 12.7%; P < .01). Hospital stay was shorter in the OMSP group (2.13 vs. 3.02 days; P < .01). OMPS women had a 3-fold higher probability of receiving BCS. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with breast cancer belonging to OMSPs had a higher probability to receive less invasive surgery and to have shorter hospital stay. Our results support the use of campaigns aimed at increasing adhesion to mammography screening.