Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
N Engl J Med ; 372(5): 426-35, 2015 Jan 29.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25629741

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Ruxolitinib, a Janus kinase (JAK) 1 and 2 inhibitor, was shown to have a clinical benefit in patients with polycythemia vera in a phase 2 study. We conducted a phase 3 open-label study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ruxolitinib versus standard therapy in patients with polycythemia vera who had an inadequate response to or had unacceptable side effects from hydroxyurea. METHODS: We randomly assigned phlebotomy-dependent patients with splenomegaly, in a 1:1 ratio, to receive ruxolitinib (110 patients) or standard therapy (112 patients). The primary end point was both hematocrit control through week 32 and at least a 35% reduction in spleen volume at week 32, as assessed by means of imaging. RESULTS: The primary end point was achieved in 21% of the patients in the ruxolitinib group versus 1% of those in the standard-therapy group (P<0.001). Hematocrit control was achieved in 60% of patients receiving ruxolitinib and 20% of those receiving standard therapy; 38% and 1% of patients in the two groups, respectively, had at least a 35% reduction in spleen volume. A complete hematologic remission was achieved in 24% of patients in the ruxolitinib group and 9% of those in the standard-therapy group (P=0.003); 49% versus 5% had at least a 50% reduction in the total symptom score at week 32. In the ruxolitinib group, grade 3 or 4 anemia occurred in 2% of patients, and grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia occurred in 5%; the corresponding percentages in the standard-therapy group were 0% and 4%. Herpes zoster infection was reported in 6% of patients in the ruxolitinib group and 0% of those in the standard-therapy group (grade 1 or 2 in all cases). Thromboembolic events occurred in one patient receiving ruxolitinib and in six patients receiving standard therapy. CONCLUSIONS: In patients who had an inadequate response to or had unacceptable side effects from hydroxyurea, ruxolitinib was superior to standard therapy in controlling the hematocrit, reducing the spleen volume, and improving symptoms associated with polycythemia vera. (Funded by Incyte and others; RESPONSE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01243944.).


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Quinasas Janus/antagonistas & inhibidores , Policitemia Vera/tratamiento farmacológico , Pirazoles/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Recuento de Células Sanguíneas , Femenino , Humanos , Hidroxiurea/efectos adversos , Hidroxiurea/uso terapéutico , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nitrilos , Tamaño de los Órganos/efectos de los fármacos , Pirazoles/efectos adversos , Pirazoles/farmacología , Pirimidinas , Inducción de Remisión , Bazo/efectos de los fármacos , Bazo/patología , Trombocitopenia/inducido químicamente
2.
J Heart Lung Transplant ; 25(4): 440-6, 2006 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16563975

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In this study we evaluated exposure, safety and efficacy data from an international trial of everolimus. We sought to identify a tolerated and efficacious range for blood levels of this agent in maintenance lung transplant recipients. METHODS: In a randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial, 213 maintenance lung transplant recipients received either everolimus 1.5 mg twice daily (n = 101) or azathioprine 1 to 3 mg/kg/day (n = 112) with cyclosporine and corticosteroids. At 15 visits over the first 2 years of the trial, we obtained 826 everolimus trough (C0) blood samples. We used median-effect analysis to assess relationships between everolimus C0 vs efficacy and safety responses. RESULTS: Everolimus administration began at 1.5 mg twice daily and was progressively lowered over the first 2 months to an average of 1.2 +/- 0.4 mg twice daily, which was maintained thereafter. This dose yielded median C0 levels of 6.6 ng/ml (10th to 90th percentiles: 2.8 to 11.8 ng/ml). Over this range of everolimus C0, freedom from a decline in pulmonary function with bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome and freedom from biopsy-proven acute rejection were both > or = 88%. The incidence of increased cholesterol (> 6.5 mmol/liter), increased triglycerides (> 2.9 mmol/liter) and transiently decreased platelet count (< 100 x 10(9)/liter) rose significantly with increasing C0. Infections and drug-related adverse events were not significantly related to exposure. CONCLUSIONS: A tolerated and efficacious concentration range for everolimus in maintenance lung transplantation appears to be 3 to 12 ng/ml when used in conjunction with cyclosporine and corticosteroids. This range should be prospectively assessed with possible refinement as more clinical experience is gained.


Asunto(s)
Inmunosupresores/farmacocinética , Trasplante de Pulmón/inmunología , Sirolimus/análogos & derivados , Adulto , Área Bajo la Curva , Azatioprina/uso terapéutico , Ciclosporina/uso terapéutico , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Método Doble Ciego , Monitoreo de Drogas , Quimioterapia Combinada , Everolimus , Femenino , Glucocorticoides/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Sirolimus/farmacocinética , Sirolimus/uso terapéutico , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA