Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Cardiovasc Drugs Ther ; 35(1): 11-20, 2021 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33034806

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are a high-risk subset of patients, whose optimal antithrombotic treatment strategy, involving a combination of anticoagulant and antiplatelet agents, has not been well defined. Our study aims to investigate contemporary "real-world" trends of antithrombotic treatment strategies in AF patients undergoing PCI, as well as identify factors affecting decision-making at hospital discharge. METHODS: "Real-world" data were retrieved from the GReek-AntiPlatElet Atrial Fibrillation (GRAPE-AF) registry, a contemporary, nationwide, multicenter, observational study of AF patients undergoing PCI. Characteristics of patients discharged on triple antithrombotic therapy (TAT) or dual antithrombotic therapy (DAT) were compared in order to identify factors that could influence treatment decisions. RESULTS: A total of 654 patients were enrolled (42% with stable coronary artery disease, 58% with acute coronary syndrome). TAT was adopted in 49.9% and DAT in 49.2% of patients at discharge. Regarding anticoagulants, the vast majority of patients (92.9%) received non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) and only 7.1% received vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). Dyslipidemia, insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, prior myocardial infarction, acute coronary syndrome at presentation, and regional variations were predictive of TAT adoption, whereas the use of NOACs or ticagrelor was predictive of DAT adoption. CONCLUSION: Contemporary "real-world" data concerning antithrombotic treatment in AF patients undergoing PCI indicate a strong shift towards the use of NOACs instead of VKAs, along with a large subset of patients adopting an aspirin-free strategy early after index PCI, with clinical as well as treatment characteristics affecting decision-making. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03362788 (First Posted: December 5, 2017).


Asunto(s)
Anticoagulantes/administración & dosificación , Fibrilación Atrial/cirugía , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/métodos , Administración Oral , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Anticoagulantes/efectos adversos , Comorbilidad , Quimioterapia Combinada , Terapia Antiplaquetaria Doble/métodos , Inhibidores del Factor Xa/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores del Factor Xa/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Características de la Residencia , Factores Sociodemográficos , Vitamina K/antagonistas & inhibidores
2.
Case Rep Cardiol ; 2020: 9493519, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32509355

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: While complete revascularization in coronary artery disease is of high priority, the method of implementation in patients with complex coronary lesions and multiple comorbidities is not directed by published guidelines. Case Presentation. A 53-year-old female with a chronic total occlusion of the right coronary artery and a bifurcation lesion of the left anterior descending artery and the first diagonal branch, presented with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction. Her past medical history concerned thymectomy and prior chest radiation for thymoma, myasthenia gravis, peripheral artery disease, and cervical cancer treated with surgery and radiation. Although SYNTAX score II favored surgical revascularization, the interventional pathway was finally successfully followed. However, it was complicated with vessel perforation and tamponade managed with pericardiocentesis. CONCLUSION: Comorbidities are not all involved in common risk models and require individualization until more evidence comes to light.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA