Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 58
Filtrar
Más filtros

País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Breast Cancer Res Treat ; 200(3): 355-362, 2023 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37273150

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Elevated pre-treatment baseline inflammation has been associated with cancer therapy-related cardiac dysfunction (CTRCD) in patients with breast cancer. Monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio and systemic immune-inflammation index (NLR × platelets) have emerged in clinical context as markers of disease-related inflammation. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate development of CTRCD according to pre-treatment blood inflammatory biomarkers in patients with breast cancer. METHODS: Pilot cohort study including consecutive female patients ≥ 18 years with HER2-positive early breast cancer who consulted at the institution's breast oncology outpatient clinic between march/2019 and march/2022. CTRCD: absolute reduction in LVEF > 10% to below 53% (2D-echocardiogram). Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier curves, compared by the log-rank test, and discrimination ability was evaluated through AUC-ROC. RESULTS: Forty-nine patients (53.3 ± 13.3 y) were included and followed-up for a median of 13.2 months. CTRCD was observed in 6 (12.2%) patients. Patients with high blood inflammatory biomarkers had lower CTRCD-free survival (P < 0.050 for all). MLR showed statistically significant AUC (0.802; P = 0.017). CTRCD was observed in 27.8% of patients with high MLR versus 3.2% with low MLR (P = 0.020); negative predictive value was 96.8% (95%CI 83.3-99.4%). CONCLUSION: In patients with breast cancer, elevated pre-treatment inflammatory markers were associated with increased risk of cardiotoxicity. Among these markers, MLR had good discriminatory performance and high negative predictive value. The incorporation of MLR might improve risk evaluation and selection of patients for follow-up during cancer therapy.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Cardiopatías , Humanos , Femenino , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Monocitos , Cardiotoxicidad/diagnóstico , Cardiotoxicidad/etiología , Proyectos Piloto , Linfocitos , Neutrófilos , Estudios de Cohortes , Inflamación , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos
2.
Arq Bras Cardiol ; 120(12): e20230441, 2024.
Artículo en Portugués, Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38451614

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Central Illustration : Performance of the SHARPEN Score and the Charlson Comorbidity Index for In-Hospital and Post-Discharge Mortality Prediction in Infective Endocarditis. BACKGROUND: SHARPEN was the first dedicated score for in-hospital mortality prediction in infective endocarditis (IE) regardless of cardiac surgery. OBJECTIVES: To analyze the ability of the SHARPEN score to predict in-hospital and post-discharge mortality and compare it with that of the Charlson comorbidity index (CCI). METHODS: Retrospective cohort study including definite IE (Duke modified criteria) admissions from 2000 to 2016. The area under the ROC curve (AUC-ROC) was calculated to assess predictive ability. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression was performed. P-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: We studied 179 hospital admissions. In-hospital mortality was 22.3%; 68 (38.0%) had cardiac surgery. Median (interquartile range, IQR) SHARPEN and CCI scores were 9(7-11) and 3(2-6), respectively. SHARPEN had better in-hospital mortality prediction than CCI in non-operated patients (AUC-ROC 0.77 vs. 0.62, p = 0.003); there was no difference in overall (p = 0.26) and in operated patients (p = 0.41). SHARPEN > 10 at admission was associated with decreased in-hospital survival in the overall (HR 3.87; p < 0.001), in non-operated (HR 3.46; p = 0.006) and operated (HR 6.86; p < 0.001) patients. CCI > 3 at admission was associated with worse in-hospital survival in the overall (HR 3.0; p = 0.002), and in operated patients (HR 5.57; p = 0.005), but not in non-operated patients (HR 2.13; p = 0.119). Post-discharge survival was worse in patients with SHARPEN > 10 (HR 3.11; p < 0.001) and CCI > 3 (HR 2.63; p < 0.001) at admission; however, there was no difference in predictive ability between these groups. CONCLUSION: SHARPEN was superior to CCI in predicting in-hospital mortality in non-operated patients. There was no difference between the scores regarding post-discharge mortality.


Asunto(s)
Endocarditis , Alta del Paciente , Humanos , Cuidados Posteriores , Estudios Retrospectivos , Hospitales , Comorbilidad
3.
Qual Manag Health Care ; 32(1): 30-34, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35383714

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Predictive models to identify patients at high risk of readmission have gained the attention of health care teams, which have focused the strategies to reduce unnecessary readmissions on the "at-risk" patients. The HOSPITAL score includes 7 predictor variables with a C-statistic of 0.70 or more when applied to international datasets. Its simplified version retains a C-statistic at around the same level, but only incipient external validation has been attempted to date. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the prognostic accuracy of the simplified HOSPITAL score to predict nonelective hospital readmissions in a tertiary care public teaching hospital in Brazil. METHODS: We used a retrospective cohort that included all patients discharged from the internal medicine service of a Brazilian tertiary care public teaching hospital in 2018. We excluded patients who died before index discharge, were transferred to another institution, left against medical advice, or were readmitted electively. We calculated the simplified HOSPITAL score for each admission, and admissions were divided into low (0-4 points) or high risk (≥ 5 points) of nonelective 30-day readmission. We estimated accuracy, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), and observed/expected (O/E) readmission ratio; the latter using the mid-P exact test with Miettinen's modification at a 95% confidence interval (CI). A P value < .05 was considered significant. RESULTS: A total of 4472 hospital discharges were analyzed during the study period after application of the exclusion criteria. The nonelective 30-day readmission rate was 14.0% (n = 625). Of all patients discharged, 3173 (71.0%) were considered to be at low risk and 1299 (29.0%) at high risk of readmission according to the simplified HOSPITAL score. The AUC was 0.68 (95% CI: 0.66-0.71; P < .001). The nonelective 30-day readmission rate was 9.2% in the low-risk group (expected: 9.2%; O/E: 1.0 [95% CI: 0.89-1.12]) and 25.7% in the high-risk group (expected: 27.2%; O/E: 0.95 [95% CI: 0.85-1.05]) ( P < .001). At a cut-off of 5 points, the score had a sensitivity of 53.4%, specificity of 74.9%, positive predictive value of 25.7%, and negative predictive value (NPV) of 90.8%. CONCLUSIONS: The parameters of the score were almost identical to the original study, with better applicability to exclude low-risk patients given its high NPV. Additional adjustments are still needed for better applicability in daily clinical practice.


Asunto(s)
Hospitales de Enseñanza , Readmisión del Paciente , Humanos , Brasil , Estudios Retrospectivos , Atención Terciaria de Salud , Factores de Riesgo
4.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34783929

RESUMEN

Cardiotoxicity (CDT) is the main adverse effect related to trastuzumab (TTZ). The role of the right ventricle (RV) in this context is not clear. We aimed to evaluate the longitudinal changes in RV function during TTZ therapy and to determine RV function changes associated with subclinical CDT. Breast cancer patients underwent echocardiograms at the beginning of TTZ treatment (Exam 1) and every 3 months during the first year (Exams 2, 3, and 4). Subclinical CDT was defined as ≥ 12% relative reduction of left ventricle global longitudinal strain (LV GLS). Twenty-five women (52.1 ± 13.1 y-o) were included. We found a decrease in LV ejection fraction between the first and fourth exams (Ex1: 64.1% ± 4.9 vs Ex4: 60.9% ± 4.9, p = 0.003) and the LV GLS gradually decreased during follow-up (Ex1: - 20.6% ± 2.0; Ex2: - 19.4% ± 2.1; Ex3: - 19.2% ± 1.8; Ex4: - 19.0% ± 2.1, all p < 0.05). RV GLS changed from baseline to 3 month and to 6 month (Ex1: - 23.9% ± 1.6; Ex2: - 22.5% ± 2.1; Ex3: - 22.5% ± 2.3, all p < 0.05), and the RV Fractional Area Change was lower in the third exam (Ex1: 44.3% ± 6.6 vs Ex3: 39.9% ± 6.0, p = 0.004). We found subclinical CDT in 13 patients (52%); worsening in RV parameters did not differ between those with and without subclinical CDT. In this sample, the RV function decreased during TTZ therapy and the decrease was not associated to the observed LV cardiotoxicity.

5.
J Invasive Cardiol ; 33(5): E403-E404, 2021 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33932288

RESUMEN

Coronary intravascular ultrasound assessment demonstrated severe stent underexpansion and circumferential superficial calcification. Following a failed attempt to predilate the in-stent restenosis, rotational atherectomy was performed.


Asunto(s)
Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón , Aterectomía Coronaria , Calcinosis , Aterectomía Coronaria/efectos adversos , Angiografía Coronaria , Humanos , Stents/efectos adversos
6.
Braz J Cardiovasc Surg ; 36(4): 476-483, 2021 08 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34236815

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Mitral valvuloplasty including ring/band support is widely performed despite potential drawbacks of rings. Unsupported valvuloplasty is performed in only a few centers. This study aimed to report long-term outcomes of patients undergoing unsupported valvuloplasty for degenerative mitral regurgitation (MR) and to identify predictive factors for outcomes. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort including patients undergoing mitral valve repair for degenerative MR from 2000 to 2018. The main techniques were Wooler annuloplasty and quadrangular resection. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression models were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: One hundred fifty-eight patients were included (median age: 64.0 years). In-hospital mortality was 2.5%. Maximum followup was 19.6 years, with a median of 4.7 years (992 patient-years). Overall survival at 5, 10, and 15 years was 91.0% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 85.7-96.3), 87.6% (95% CI: 80.7-94.5), and 78.1% (95% CI: 65.9-90.3), respectively. The European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (EuroSCORE) II was an independent predictor of late death (hazard ratio [HR] 1.42; P=0.016). Freedom from mitral reoperation at 5, 10, and 15 years was 88.1% (95% CI: 82.0-94.2), 82.4% (95% CI: 74.6-90.2), and 75.7% (95% CI: 64.1-87.3), respectively. Left atrial diameter > 56 mm was associated with late reintervention in univariate analysis (HR 1.06; P=0.049). CONCLUSION: Degenerative MR can be successfully treated with repair techniques without annular support, thus avoiding the technical and logistical drawbacks of ring/band implantation while maintaining good long-term results. EuroSCORE II was a risk factor for late death, and larger left atrium was associated with late reoperation.


Asunto(s)
Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas , Anuloplastia de la Válvula Mitral , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Mitral , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Válvula Mitral/cirugía , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Mitral/cirugía , Reoperación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento
7.
Qual Manag Health Care ; 29(2): 76-80, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32224791

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Data on mortality associated with hospital readmission are imprecise and highly variable. This study aimed to describe the rate of nonelective 30-day readmission and associated hospital mortality of patients discharged from the Internal Medicine Unit of a Brazilian tertiary public hospital. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included all patients discharged from the Internal Medicine Unit of our institution between September and November 2017 who were nonelectively readmitted within 30 days. RESULTS: A total of 1047 hospital discharges were analyzed. The rate of nonelective 30-day readmission was 13.7%. Of these, 41 (28.5%) were early readmissions (0-7 days) and 103 (71.5%) were late readmissions (8-30 days). The hospital mortality rate during readmission was 27.8%, being significantly higher during early readmissions (41.5% vs 22.3%; P = .035). Early (as compared with late) readmission was associated with mortality during readmission (relative risk [RR] 1.95; 95% confidence interval, 1.18-3.22; P = .002), regardless of age and Charlson comorbidity index. CONCLUSION: The Readmission rate was 13.7%, with an associated mortality of 27.8%. Early readmission was an independent predictor of mortality (RR 1.95) in relation to late readmission. Larger studies are needed to better identify this group of patients with an aim to adopt preventive measures.


Asunto(s)
Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Brasil/epidemiología , Femenino , Hospitales Públicos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Centros de Atención Terciaria
8.
Arq Bras Cardiol ; 114(3): 518-524, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés, Portugués | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32267324

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Risk scores are available for use in daily clinical practice, but knowing which one to choose is still fraught with uncertainty. OBJECTIVES: To assess the logistic EuroSCORE, EuroSCORE II, and the infective endocarditis (IE)-specific scores STS-IE, PALSUSE, AEPEI, EndoSCORE and RISK-E, as predictors of hospital mortality in patients undergoing cardiac surgery for active IE at a tertiary teaching hospital in Southern Brazil. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study including all patients aged ≥ 18 years who underwent cardiac surgery for active IE at the study facility from 2007-2016. The scores were assessed by calibration evaluation (observed/expected [O/E] mortality ratio) and discrimination (area under the ROC curve [AUC]). Comparison of AUC was performed by the DeLong test. A p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: A total of 107 patients were included. Overall hospital mortality was 29.0% (95%CI: 20.4-37.6%). The best O/E mortality ratio was achieved by the PALSUSE score (1.01, 95%CI: 0.70-1.42), followed by the logistic EuroSCORE (1.3, 95%CI: 0.92-1.87). The logistic EuroSCORE had the highest discriminatory power (AUC 0.77), which was significantly superior to EuroSCORE II (p = 0.03), STS-IE (p = 0.03), PALSUSE (p = 0.03), AEPEI (p = 0.03), and RISK-E (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Despite the availability of recent IE-specific scores, and considering the trade-off between the indexes, the logistic EuroSCORE seemed to be the best predictor of mortality risk in our cohort, taking calibration (O/E mortality ratio: 1.3) and discrimination (AUC 0.77) into account. Local validation of IE-specific scores is needed to better assess preoperative surgical risk. (Arq Bras Cardiol. 2020; 114(3):518-524).


FUNDAMENTO: Escores de risco estão disponíveis para uso na prática clínica diária, mas saber qual deles escolher é ainda incerto. OBJETIVOS: Avaliar o EuroSCORE logístico, o EuroSCORE II e os escores específicos para endocardite infecciosa STS-IE, PALSUSE, AEPEI, EndoSCORE e RISK-E na predição de mortalidade hospitalar de pacientes submetidos à cirurgia cardíaca por endocardite ativa em um hospital terciário de ensino do sul do Brasil. MÉTODOS: Estudo de coorte retrospectivo incluindo todos os pacientes com idade ≥ 18 anos submetidos à cirurgia cardíaca por endocardite ativa no centro do estudo entre 2007 e 2016. Foram realizadas análises de calibração (razão de mortalidade observada/esperada, O/E) e de discriminação (área sob a curva ROC, ASC), sendo a comparação das ASC realizada pelo teste de DeLong. P < 0,05 foi considerado estatisticamente significativo. RESULTADOS: Foram incluídos 107 pacientes, sendo a mortalidade hospitalar de 29,0% (IC95%: 20.4-37.6%). A melhor razão de mortalidade O/E foi obtida pelo escore PALSUSE (1,01, IC95%: 0,70-1,42), seguido pelo EuroSCORE logístico (1,3, IC95%: 0,92-1,87). O EuroSCORE logístico apresentou o maior poder discriminatório (ASC 0,77), significativamente superior ao EuroSCORE II (p = 0,03), STS-IE (p = 0,03), PALSUSE (p = 0,03), AEPEI (p = 0,03) e RISK-E (p = 0,02). CONCLUSÕES: Apesar da disponibilidade dos recentes escores específicos, o EuroSCORE logístico foi o melhor preditor de mortalidade em nossa coorte, considerando-se análise de calibração (mortalidade O/E: 1,3) e de discriminação (ASC 0,77). A validação local dos escores específicos é necessária para uma melhor avaliação do risco cirúrgico. (Arq Bras Cardiol. 2020; 114(3):518-524).


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos , Endocarditis , Brasil , Endocarditis/cirugía , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Curva ROC , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo
9.
Open Heart ; 7(1): e001181, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32153790

RESUMEN

Objective: As a parallel to the radial approach for left heart catheterisation, forearm veins may be considered for the performance of right heart catheterisation. However, data regarding the application of this technique under ultrasound guidance are scarce. The current study aims to demonstrate the feasibility of right heart catheterisation through ultrasound-guided antecubital venous approach in the highly heterogeneous population usually referred for right heart catheterisation. Methods: Data from consecutive right heart catheterisations performed at an academic centre in Brazil, between January 2016 and March 2017 were prospectively collected. Results: Among 152 performed right heart catheterisations, ultrasound-guided antecubital venous approach was attempted in 127 (84%) cases and it was made feasible in 92.1% of those. Yet, there was no immediate vascular complication with the antecubital venous approach in this prospective series. Conclusions: Ultrasound-guided antecubital venous approach for the performance of right heart catheterisation was feasible in the vast majority of cases in our study, without occurrence of vascular complications.


Asunto(s)
Cateterismo Cardíaco , Cateterismo Periférico , Antebrazo/irrigación sanguínea , Ultrasonografía Intervencional , Venas/diagnóstico por imagen , Adulto , Anciano , Brasil , Cateterismo Cardíaco/efectos adversos , Cateterismo Periférico/efectos adversos , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Punciones , Centros de Atención Terciaria , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/efectos adversos
10.
Rev Port Cir Cardiotorac Vasc ; 16(2): 83-9, 2009.
Artículo en Portugués | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19823705

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Some investigators consider octogenarians as high risk patients for carotid endarterectomy (CEA). The objective of our study was determine the results of CEA in the octogenarians patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 1998 and May 2008, 755 CEAs were performed by the first author. Of these, 73 (9.7%) were performed in 69 octogenarians (40 men, 29 women) with a median age of 83 years (range, 80 to 90 years ). Before the procedures, 46 patients (63%) were asymptomatic and 27 (37%) had a severe (>70%) asymptomatic stenosis. Hypertension (68.1%), tobacco history (47.8%) and ischemic cardiopathy (39.1%) were the most prevalent comorbidities. Surgical data and perioperative results such as ocurrence of stroke, transitory ischemic atacks, need for re-operation and death as a long term survival estimate by Kaplan Meier method were analysed. RESULTS: Of all 73 operations, there was two early (<30 days( postoperative deaths (2.7%) due to pulmonary sepsis in a patient submitted to myocardial revascularization simultaneously and due to a fatal stroke in another patient. There was one non-fatal stroke (1.4%) due to early (eighth post-operative day) carotid thrombosis; and one non-fatal myocardial infarction (1.4%). Another four patients (5.5%) were submitted to early reoperation due to neck hematoma. Of patients that have been discharged (n=67), late information was available in 55 patients (82.1%) and the Kaplan-Meier estimated 5-year survival rate was 60.6%. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that CEA may be performed in selected octogenarians patients to treat carotid occlusive disease with good results. Therefore, age alone should not be considered as a prohibitive risk factor for patients candidates for CEA.


Asunto(s)
Endarterectomía Carotidea , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
11.
Int. j. cardiovasc. sci. (Impr.) ; 36: e20230061, jun.2023. tab, graf
Artículo en Inglés | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1521008

RESUMEN

Abstract Background The SHARPEN score was developed to predict in-hospital mortality in patients hospitalized for infective endocarditis (IE), undergoing or not undergoing cardiac surgery. A comparison with other available scores has not yet been carried out. Objective To evaluate the performance of the SHARPEN score in predicting in-hospital mortality in patients hospitalized for IE undergoing cardiac surgery and compare it with that of both nonspecific and IE-specific surgical scores. Methods Retrospective cohort study including all admissions of patients ≥18 years who underwent cardiac surgery due to active IE (modified Duke criteria) at a tertiary care university hospital between 2007 and 2016. The SHARPEN score was compared to the EuroSCORE, EuroSCORE II, STS-IE, PALSUSE, AEPEI, EndoSCORE and RISK-E scores. Differences P<0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results A total of 105 hospitalizations of 101 patients (mean age 57.4±14.6 years; 75.2% male) were included. The median SHARPEN score was 11 (9-13) points. The observed in-hospital mortality was 29.5%. There was no statistically significant difference in observed vs. estimated mortality (P = 0.147), with an area under the ROC curve of 0.66 (P = 0.008). In comparison with the other scores, no difference was observed in discriminative ability. The statistics of the SHARPEN score at a cutoff >10 points — positive predictive value (PPV): 38.1%, 95%CI:30.4-46.6; negative predictive value (NPV): 80.0%, 95%CI:69.8-87.4; and accuracy: 58.1%, 95%CI:48.1-67.6 — showed overlapping 95%CIs, indicating no significant difference between scores. Conclusions The SHARPEN score did not present parameters with a significant difference in relation to the other scores analyzed; despite the easy obtainment of its few variables, it has limited applicability in clinical practice, like other existing scores.

12.
Cardiovasc Interv Ther ; 33(3): 224-231, 2018 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28540634

RESUMEN

Contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI) is a common event after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Presently, the main strategy to avoid CI-AKI lies in saline hydration, since to date none pharmacologic prophylaxis proved beneficial. Our aim was to determine if a low complexity mortality risk model is able to predict CI-AKI in patients undergoing PCI after ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). We have included patients with STEMI submitted to primary PCI in a tertiary hospital. The definition of CI-AKI was a raise of 0.3 mg/dL or 50% in post procedure (24-72 h) serum creatinine compared to baseline. Age, glomerular filtration and ejection fraction were used to calculate ACEF-MDRD score. We have included 347 patients with mean age of 60 years. In univariate analysis, age, diabetes, previous ASA use, Killip 3 or 4 at admission, ACEF-MDRD and Mehran scores were predictors of CI-AKI. After multivariate adjustment, only ACEF-MDRD score and diabetes remained CI-AKI predictors. Areas under the ROC curve of ACEF-MDRD and Mehran scores were 0.733 (0.68-0.78) and 0.649 (0.59-0.70), respectively. When we compared both scores with DeLong test ACEF-MDRDs AUC was greater than Mehran's (P = 0.03). An ACEF-MDRD score of 2.33 or lower has a negative predictive value of 92.6% for development of CI-AKI. ACEF-MDRD score is a user-friendly tool that has an excellent CI-AKI predictive accuracy in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Moreover, a low ACEF-MDRD score has a very good negative predictive value for CI-AKI, which makes this complication unlikely in patients with an ACEF-MDRD score of <2.33.


Asunto(s)
Lesión Renal Aguda/inducido químicamente , Medios de Contraste/efectos adversos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversos , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/cirugía , Lesión Renal Aguda/diagnóstico , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Brasil , Creatinina/sangre , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/métodos , Curva ROC , Sistema de Registros , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Volumen Sistólico/fisiología
13.
Arq. bras. cardiol ; 120(12): e20230441, dez. 2023. tab, graf
Artículo en Portugués | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1533716

RESUMEN

Resumo Fundamento O SHARPEN foi o primeiro escore desenvolvido especificamente para a predição de mortalidade hospitalar em pacientes com endocardite infecciosa (EI), independentemente da realização de cirurgia cardíaca. Objetivos Analisar a capacidade do escore SHARPEN na predição de mortalidade hospitalar e mortalidade após a alta e compará-la à do Índice de Comorbidade de Charlson (ICC). Métodos Estudo retrospectivo do tipo coorte incluindo internações por EI (segundo os critérios de Duke modificados) entre 2000 e 2016. A área sob a curva ROC (AUC-ROC) foi calculada para avaliar a capacidade preditiva. Curvas de Kaplan-Meier e regressão de Cox foram realizadas. Um valor de p < 0,05 foi considerado estatisticamente significativo. Resultados Estudamos 179 internações hospitalares. A mortalidade hospitalar foi 22,3%; 68 (38,0%) foram submetidos à cirurgia cardíaca. Os escores SHARPEN e ICC (mediana e intervalo interquartil) foram, respectivamente, 9(7-11) e 3(2-6). O escore SHARPEN mostrou melhor predição de mortalidade hospitalar em comparação ao ICC nos pacientes não operados (AUC-ROC 0,77 vs. 0,62, p = 0,003); não foi observada diferença no grupo total (p=0,26) ou nos pacientes operados (p=0,41). Escore SHARPEN >10 na admissão foi associado a uma menor sobrevida hospitalar no grupo total (HR 3,87; p < 0,001), nos pacientes não operados (HR 3,46; p = 0,006) e de pacientes operados (HR 6,86; p < 0,001) patients. ICC > 3 na admissão foi associada a pior sobrevida hospitalar nos grupos total (HR 3,0; p = 0,002), de pacientes operados (HR 5,57; p = 0,005), mas não nos pacientes não operados (HR 2,13; p = 0,119). A sobrevida após a alta foi pior nos pacientes com SHARPEN > 10 (HR 3,11; p < 0,001) e ICC > 3 (HR 2,63; p < 0,001) na internação; contudo, não houve diferença na capacidade preditiva entre esses grupos. Conclusão O SHARPEN escore foi superior ao ICC na predição de mortalidade hospitalar nos pacientes não operados. Não houve diferença entre os escores quanto à mortalidade após a alta.


Abstract Background SHARPEN was the first dedicated score for in-hospital mortality prediction in infective endocarditis (IE) regardless of cardiac surgery. Objectives To analyze the ability of the SHARPEN score to predict in-hospital and post-discharge mortality and compare it with that of the Charlson comorbidity index (CCI). Methods Retrospective cohort study including definite IE (Duke modified criteria) admissions from 2000 to 2016. The area under the ROC curve (AUC-ROC) was calculated to assess predictive ability. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression was performed. P-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results We studied 179 hospital admissions. In-hospital mortality was 22.3%; 68 (38.0%) had cardiac surgery. Median (interquartile range, IQR) SHARPEN and CCI scores were 9(7-11) and 3(2-6), respectively. SHARPEN had better in-hospital mortality prediction than CCI in non-operated patients (AUC-ROC 0.77 vs. 0.62, p = 0.003); there was no difference in overall (p = 0.26) and in operated patients (p = 0.41). SHARPEN > 10 at admission was associated with decreased in-hospital survival in the overall (HR 3.87; p < 0.001), in non-operated (HR 3.46; p = 0.006) and operated (HR 6.86; p < 0.001) patients. CCI > 3 at admission was associated with worse in-hospital survival in the overall (HR 3.0; p = 0.002), and in operated patients (HR 5.57; p = 0.005), but not in non-operated patients (HR 2.13; p = 0.119). Post-discharge survival was worse in patients with SHARPEN > 10 (HR 3.11; p < 0.001) and CCI > 3 (HR 2.63; p < 0.001) at admission; however, there was no difference in predictive ability between these groups. Conclusion SHARPEN was superior to CCI in predicting in-hospital mortality in non-operated patients. There was no difference between the scores regarding post-discharge mortality.

14.
Clin Case Rep ; 5(7): 1176-1180, 2017 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28680621

RESUMEN

Syncopal spells in heart failure patient with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIED) require multiple assessments. T-wave oversensing is a well-described phenomenon that remains significant in modern implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) systems. It can lead to inappropriate therapies and loss of biventricular pacing in those with cardiac resynchronization devices. Strategies to overcome this problem are important.

15.
Braz J Cardiovasc Surg ; 32(5): 372-377, 2017.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29211216

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The outcomes of Jehovah's Witness (JW) patients submitted to open heart surgery may vary across countries and communities. The aim of this study was to describe the morbidity and mortality of JW patients undergoing cardiac surgery in a tertiary hospital center in Southern Brazil. METHODS: A case-control study was conducted including all JW patients submitted to cardiac surgery from 2008 to 2016. Three consecutive surgical non-JW controls were matched to each selected JW patient. The preoperative risk of death was estimated through the mean EuroSCORE II. RESULTS: We studied 16 JW patients with a mean age of 60.6±12.1 years. The non-JW group included 48 patients with a mean age of 63.3±11.1 years (P=0.416). Isolated coronary artery bypass graft surgery was the most frequent surgery performed in both groups. Median EuroSCORE II was 1.29 (IQR: 0.66-3.08) and 1.43 (IQR: 0.72-2.63), respectively (P=0.988). The mortality tended to be higher in JW patients (18.8% vs. 4.2%, P=0.095), and there was a higher difference between the predicted and observed mortality in JW patients compared with controls (4.1 and 18.8% vs. 2.1 and 4.2%). More JW patients needed hemodialysis in the postoperative period (20.0 vs. 2.1%, P=0.039). CONCLUSION: We showed a high rate of in-hospital mortality in JW patients submitted to cardiac surgery. The EuroSCORE II may underestimate the surgical risk in these patients.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos/estadística & datos numéricos , Testigos de Jehová , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos/mortalidad , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Centros de Atención Terciaria , Resultado del Tratamiento , Negativa del Paciente al Tratamiento
16.
Braz J Infect Dis ; 21(3): 349-352, 2017.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28238625

RESUMEN

In the antibiotic era, aortic aneurysm is a rare complication of syphilis, what makes the diagnostic assumption even more difficult. Nonetheless, this condition should be suspected in patients with aortic aneurysm. Reports of aortic dissection complicating syphilitic aortitis have been distinctly rare in the literature, and their cause-effect relationship has not been definitely established. In this case report, we present a 62-year-old woman with aortic aneurysm and dissection associated with an unexpected diagnosis of syphilitic aortitis.


Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta/diagnóstico , Sífilis Cardiovascular/diagnóstico , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad
18.
Arq Bras Cardiol ; 108(4): 290-296, 2017 04.
Artículo en Inglés, Portugués | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28538758

RESUMEN

Background: The SAMe-TT2R2 score was developed to predict which patients on oral anticoagulation with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) will reach an adequate time in therapeutic range (TTR) (> 65%-70%). Studies have reported a relationship between this score and the occurrence of adverse events. Objective: To describe the TTR according to the score, in addition to relating the score obtained with the occurrence of adverse events in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF) on oral anticoagulation with VKAs. Methods: Retrospective cohort study including patients with nonvalvular AF attending an outpatient anticoagulation clinic of a tertiary hospital. Visits to the outpatient clinic and emergency, as well as hospital admissions to the institution, during 2014 were evaluated. The TTR was calculated through the Rosendaal´s method. Results: We analyzed 263 patients (median TTR, 62.5%). The low-risk group (score 0-1) had a better median TTR as compared with the high-risk group (score ≥ 2): 69.2% vs. 56.3%, p = 0.002. Similarly, the percentage of patients with TTR ≥ 60%, 65% or 70% was higher in the low-risk group (p < 0.001, p = 0.001 and p = 0.003, respectively). The high-risk group had a higher percentage of adverse events (11.2% vs. 7.2%), although not significant (p = 0.369). Conclusions: The SAMe-TT2R2 score proved to be effective to predict patients with a better TTR, but was not associated with adverse events. Fundamento: O escore SAMe-TT2R2 foi desenvolvido visando predizer quais pacientes em anticoagulação oral com antagonistas da vitamina K (AVKs) atingirão um tempo na faixa terapêutica (TFT) adequado (> 65%-70%) no seguimento. Estudos também o relacionaram com a ocorrência de eventos adversos. Objetivos: Descrever o TFT de acordo com o escore, além de relacionar a pontuação obtida com a ocorrência de eventos adversos adversos em pacientes com fibrilação atrial (FA) não valvar em anticoagulação oral com AVKs. Métodos: Estudo de coorte retrospectivo incluindo pacientes com FA não valvar em acompanhamento em ambulatório de anticoagulação de um hospital terciário. Foi realizada uma avaliação retrospectiva de consultas ambulatoriais, visitas a emergência e internações hospitalares na instituição no período de janeiro-dezembro/2014. O TFT foi calculado aplicando-se o método de Rosendaal. Resultados: Foram analisados 263 pacientes com TFT mediano de 62,5%. O grupo de baixo risco (0-1 ponto) obteve um TFT mediano maior em comparação com o grupo de alto risco (≥ 2 pontos): 69,2% vs. 56,3%, p = 0,002. Da mesma forma, o percentual de pacientes com TFT ≥ 60%, 65% ou 70% foi superior nos pacientes de baixo risco (p < 0,001, p = 0,001 e p = 0,003, respectivamente). Os pacientes de alto risco tiveram um percentual maior de eventos adversos (11,2% vs. 7,2%), embora não significativo (p = 0,369). Conclusões: O escore SAMe-TT2R2 foi uma ferramenta eficaz na predição do TFT em pacientes com FA em uso de AVKs para anticoagulação, porém não se associou à ocorrência de eventos adversos.


Asunto(s)
Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Fibrilación Atrial/complicaciones , Hemorragia/inducido químicamente , Accidente Cerebrovascular/prevención & control , Tromboembolia/prevención & control , Vitamina K/antagonistas & inhibidores , Warfarina/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Anticoagulantes/efectos adversos , Técnicas de Apoyo para la Decisión , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Relación Normalizada Internacional , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Tiempo de Protrombina , Estudios Retrospectivos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Accidente Cerebrovascular/etiología , Tromboembolia/etiología , Warfarina/efectos adversos
20.
Rev. bras. cir. cardiovasc ; 36(4): 476-483, July-Aug. 2021. tab, graf
Artículo en Inglés | LILACS | ID: biblio-1347159

RESUMEN

Abstract Introduction: Mitral valvuloplasty including ring/band support is widely performed despite potential drawbacks of rings. Unsupported valvuloplasty is performed in only a few centers. This study aimed to report long-term outcomes of patients undergoing unsupported valvuloplasty for degenerative mitral regurgitation (MR) and to identify predictive factors for outcomes. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort including patients undergoing mitral valve repair for degenerative MR from 2000 to 2018. The main techniques were Wooler annuloplasty and quadrangular resection. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression models were used for statistical analysis. Results: One hundred fifty-eight patients were included (median age: 64.0 years). In-hospital mortality was 2.5%. Maximum follow-up was 19.6 years, with a median of 4.7 years (992 patient-years). Overall survival at 5, 10, and 15 years was 91.0% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 85.7-96.3), 87.6% (95% CI: 80.7-94.5), and 78.1% (95% CI: 65.9-90.3), respectively. The European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (EuroSCORE) II was an independent predictor of late death (hazard ratio [HR] 1.42; P=0.016). Freedom from mitral reoperation at 5, 10, and 15 years was 88.1% (95% CI: 82.0-94.2), 82.4% (95% CI: 74.6-90.2), and 75.7% (95% CI: 64.1-87.3), respectively. Left atrial diameter > 56 mm was associated with late reintervention in univariate analysis (HR 1.06; P=0.049). Conclusion: Degenerative MR can be successfully treated with repair techniques without annular support, thus avoiding the technical and logistical drawbacks of ring/band implantation while maintaining good long-term results. EuroSCORE II was a risk factor for late death, and larger left atrium was associated with late reoperation.


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas , Anuloplastia de la Válvula Mitral , Insuficiencia de la Válvula Mitral/cirugía , Reoperación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Persona de Mediana Edad , Válvula Mitral/cirugía
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA