RESUMEN
SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Although cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is an important factor in the pathogenesis of kidney allograft rejection, previous studies have not determined the optimal CMV prevention strategy to avoid indirect effects of the virus. In this randomized trial involving 140 kidney transplant recipients, incidence of acute rejection at 12 months was not lower with valganciclovir prophylaxis (for at least 3 months) compared with preemptive therapy initiated after detection of CMV DNA in whole blood. However, prophylaxis was associated with a lower risk of subclinical rejection at 3 months. Although both regimens were effective in preventing CMV disease, the incidence of CMV DNAemia (including episodes with higher viral loads) was significantly higher with preemptive therapy. Further research with long-term follow-up is warranted to better compare the two approaches. BACKGROUND: The optimal regimen for preventing cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in kidney transplant recipients, primarily in reducing indirect CMV effects, has not been defined. METHODS: This open-label, single-center, randomized clinical trial of valganciclovir prophylaxis versus preemptive therapy included kidney transplant recipients recruited between June 2013 and May 2018. After excluding CMV-seronegative recipients with transplants from seronegative donors, we randomized 140 participants 1:1 to receive valganciclovir prophylaxis (900 mg, daily for 3 or 6 months for CMV-seronegative recipients who received a kidney from a CMV-seropositive donor) or preemptive therapy (valganciclovir, 900 mg, twice daily) that was initiated after detection of CMV DNA in whole blood (≥1000 IU/ml) and stopped after two consecutive negative tests (preemptive therapy patients received weekly CMV PCR tests for 4 months). The primary outcome was the incidence of biopsy-confirmed acute rejection at 12 months. Key secondary outcomes included subclinical rejection, CMV disease and DNAemia, and neutropenia. RESULTS: The incidence of acute rejection was lower with valganciclovir prophylaxis than with preemptive therapy (13%, 9/70 versus 23%, 16/70), but the difference was not statistically significant. Subclinical rejection at 3 months was lower in the prophylaxis group (13% versus 29%, P = 0.027). Both regimens prevented CMV disease (in 4% of patients in both groups). Compared with prophylaxis, preemptive therapy resulted in significantly higher rates of CMV DNAemia (44% versus 75%, P < 0.001) and a higher proportion of patients experiencing episodes with higher viral load (≥2000 IU/ml), but significantly lower valganciclovir exposure and neutropenia. CONCLUSION: Among kidney transplant recipients, the use of valganciclovir prophylaxis did not result in a significantly lower incidence of acute rejection compared with the use of preemptive therapy. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY NAME AND REGISTRATION NUMBER: Optimizing Valganciclovir Efficacy in Renal Transplantation (OVERT Study), ACTRN12613000554763 .
Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Citomegalovirus , Trasplante de Riñón , Neutropenia , Humanos , Valganciclovir/efectos adversos , Antivirales/efectos adversos , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Infecciones por Citomegalovirus/epidemiología , Citomegalovirus/genética , Neutropenia/inducido químicamente , Neutropenia/complicaciones , Receptores de TrasplantesRESUMEN
a-Methylacyl coenzyme A racemase (AMACR) is traditionally considered to be a marker of papillary renal cell carcinoma. However, AMACR expression can be seen in other renal tumors. The aim of this study was to investigate AMACR immunoreactivity within the spectrum of clear cell renal cell neoplasms. Fifty-three clear cell renal epithelial tumors were used in assembling the following four cohorts: low grade (LG) clear cell renal cell carcinoma (CCRCC), high grade (HG) CCRCC, CCRCC with cystic changes, and multilocular cystic renal neoplasm of low malignant potential (MCRNLMP). Representative blocks were stained for AMACR, using two different clones (SP52 and OV-TL12/30). There were at least some AMACR immunoreactivity in 77.8 % and 68.9 % of CCRCCs (using SP52 and OV-TL12/30 clone, respectively). Moderate to strong positivity, or positivity in more than one third of the tumor (even weak in intensity) was detected in 46.7 % of CCRCCs using SP52 and in 48.9 % of CCRCC using OV-TL12/30 clone. The highest AMACR reactivity was observed in HG CCRCC (60 % by SP52 and 66.7 % by OV-TL12/30). Strong and diffuse AMACR positivity was detected in 8.9 % of all CCRCCs. AMACR immunoreactivity in MCRNLMP was 37.5 % (SP52 clone) and 25 % (OV-TL12/30 clone). We demonstrated relatively high expression rate of AMACR in CCRCC, while very variable in intensity and distribution. This finding may have diagnostic implications especially in limited samples (i.e., core biopsies), as AMACR positivity does not exclude the diagnosis of CCRCC.
Asunto(s)
Biomarcadores de Tumor , Carcinoma de Células Renales , Neoplasias Renales , Racemasas y Epimerasas , Racemasas y Epimerasas/metabolismo , Humanos , Carcinoma de Células Renales/patología , Carcinoma de Células Renales/metabolismo , Carcinoma de Células Renales/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Renales/patología , Neoplasias Renales/metabolismo , Neoplasias Renales/diagnóstico , Biomarcadores de Tumor/metabolismo , Inmunohistoquímica/métodos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , AncianoRESUMEN
The reconstruction of oral tongue and floor of mouth defects after resections of squamous cell carcinoma is a challenging task in reconstructive surgery aiming for appropriate restoration of oral function and quality of life improvement. In this study, the authors introduce the innovative reconstruction technique of medium-sized defects consisting of tunnelized facial artery myomucosal island flap and submandibular gland flap as the local chimeric flap pedicled on facial vessels. A retrospective case series evaluation of 4 patients suffering from oral cavity cancer (stages III and IVa), who underwent transoral tumor excision with neck dissection and immediate reconstruction in the time period September 2020 to July 2021, was conducted. No flap losses or flap-related complications were identified. No recurrences occurred during the follow-up at 11.0±4.5 months (range: 6-16 mo, median=11 mo). Tunnelized facial artery myomucosal island flap and submandibular gland flap local chimeric flap expands the reconstruction options of medium-sized defects after ablative oral cancer surgery in carefully selected patients primarily not suitable for free flap reconstructions.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Escamosas , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello , Neoplasias de la Boca , Humanos , Neoplasias de la Boca/cirugía , Neoplasias de la Boca/patología , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/cirugía , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patología , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Cabeza y Cuello , Estudios Retrospectivos , Glándula Submandibular/cirugía , Glándula Submandibular/patología , Calidad de Vida , Colgajos Quirúrgicos/irrigación sanguínea , ArteriasRESUMEN
Background/Objective: Hormone receptor (HR) status is one of the key factors in determining the treatment of breast cancer. Previous studies suggested that HR status may change in metastatic tissue. However, available studies focused mainly on primary biopsies and there are only few trials comparing HR status in the primary tumour and the metastasis using material from complete resection. The aim of the study was to determine the frequency of HR alterations in metastatic breast cancer. Materials and methods: The study retrospectively examines a total of 50 patients who underwent brain, lung, or liver metastasectomy for metastatic breast cancer between January 2000 and January 2019. Results: HR conversion was observed in a total of 30 cases (60.0%), while HER-2/neu (human epidermal growth factor receptor 2) discrepancy surprisingly occurred only in one case (2.0%). A change in immunophenotype occurred in 28% of cases. Triple-negativity was more frequent in brain metastases (p = 0.039). Conclusions: We have confirmed that HR conversion between the primary tumour and its metastases occurs in a significant number of cases, which has important implications for further treatment decisions.
RESUMEN
A distinct renal tumor has recently been described as "high-grade oncocytic renal tumor" and "sporadic renal cell carcinoma with eosinophilic and vacuolated cytoplasm". The Genitourinary Pathology Society (GUPS) consensus proposed a unifying name "eosinophilic vacuolated tumor" (EVT) for this emerging entity. In this multi-institutional study, we evaluated 19 EVTs, particularly their molecular features and mutation profile, using next-generation sequencing. All cases were sporadic and none of the patients had a tuberous sclerosis complex. There were 8 men and 11 women, with a mean age of 47 years (median 50; range 15-72 years). Average tumor size was 4.3 cm (median 3.8 cm; range 1.5-11.5 cm). All patients with available follow-up data (18/19) were alive and without evidence of disease recurrence or progression during the follow-up, ranging from 12 to 198 months (mean 56.3, median 41.5 months). The tumors were well circumscribed, but lacked a well-formed capsule, had nested to solid growth, focal tubular architecture, and showed ubiquitous, large intracytoplasmic vacuoles, round to oval nuclei, and prominent nucleoli. Immunohistochemically, cathepsin K, CD117, CD10, and antimitochondrial antigen were expressed in all cases. Other positive stains included: PAX8, AE1/AE3 and CK18. CK7 was typically restricted only to rare scattered cells. Vimentin, HMB45, melan-A, and TFE3 were negative in all cases. All tumors showed retained SDHB. All cases (19/19) showed non-overlapping mutations of the mTOR pathway genes: TSC1 (4), TSC2 (7), and MTOR (8); one case with MTOR mutation showed a coexistent RICTOR missense mutation. Low mutational rates were found in all samples (ranged from 0 to 6 mutations/Mbp). Microsatellite instability and copy number variations were not found in any of the 17 analyzable cases. EVT represents an emerging renal entity that shows a characteristic and readily identifiable morphology, consistent immunohistochemical profile, indolent behavior, and mutations in either TSC1, TSC2, or MTOR genes.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Renales , Neoplasias Renales , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto Joven , Biomarcadores de Tumor/genética , Biomarcadores de Tumor/metabolismo , Carcinoma de Células Renales/patología , Variaciones en el Número de Copia de ADN , Secuenciación de Nucleótidos de Alto Rendimiento , Riñón/patología , Neoplasias Renales/patología , Mutación , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Serina-Treonina Quinasas TOR/genéticaRESUMEN
Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (CCRCC) is well known for intratumor heterogeneity. An accurate mapping of the tumor is crucial for assessing prognosis, and perhaps this can be linked to potential success/failure of targeted therapies. We assembled a cohort of 7 CCRCCs with prominent vasculature and microvascular hyperplasia (ccRCCPV), resembling those seen in high grade gliomas. A control group of classic CCRCC with no variant morphologies was also included. Both groups were analyzed for clinicopathologic, morphologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular genetic features. No statistically significant differences in mRNA expression of studied genes between the two groups were found. Using NGS panel Trusight Oncology 500 (TSO500), only one clinically significant gene mutation, VHL c.263G > A, p. (Trp88Ter), was found. TMB (Tumor Mutation Burden) and MSI (MicroSatellite Instability) were low, and no copy number variations (CNVs) were detected in the study cohort. Prominent microvascular hyperplasia in CCRCC is a rare phenomenon. From molecular genetic point of view, these tumors do not appear to be different from classic CCRCC. Prognostically, they also demonstrated similar clinical behaviors.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Renales/patología , Neoplasias Renales/patología , Anciano , Biomarcadores de Tumor , Carcinoma de Células Renales/genética , Femenino , Humanos , Hiperplasia/genética , Hiperplasia/patología , Neoplasias Renales/genética , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mutación , PronósticoRESUMEN
Predicting the clinical behavior and trajectory of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (ChRCC) by histologic features has so far proven to be challenging. It is known that ChRCC represents a heterogeneous group of neoplasms demonstrating variable, yet distinctive morphologic and genetic profiles. In this international multi-institutional study, we aimed to assess the impact of histologic diversity in ChRCC (classic/eosinophilic versus rare subtypes) on survival outcome. This is an international multi-institutional matched case-control study including 14 institutions, examining the impact of histologic subtypes of ChRCC on survival outcome. The study group (cases) included 89 rare subtypes of ChRCC. The control group consisted of 70 cases of ChRCC including classic and eosinophilic features, age- and tumor size-matched. Most of the rare subtypes were adenomatoid cystic/pigmented ChRCC (66/89, 74.2%), followed by multicystic ChRCC (10/89, 11.2%), and papillary ChRCC (9/89, 10.1%). In the control group, there were 62 (88.6%) classic and 8 (11.4%) eosinophilic ChRCC. There were no statistically significant differences between the study and control groups for age at diagnosis, gender distribution, tumor size, presence of tumor necrosis, presence of sarcomatoid differentiation, and adverse outcomes. No statistically significant differences were found in clinical outcome between the rare subtypes and classic/eosinophilic groups by tumor size, necrosis, and sarcomatoid differentiation. Further, no statistically significant differences were found in clinical outcome between the two groups, stratified by tumor size, necrosis, and sarcomatoid differentiation. Our findings corroborated previous studies that both sarcomatoid differentiation and tumor necrosis were significantly associated with poor clinical outcome in classic/eosinophilic ChRCC, and this was proven to be true for ChRCC with rare histologic subtypes as well. This study suggests that rare morphologic patterns in ChRCC without other aggressive features play no role in determining the clinical behavior of the tumor.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Renales , Neoplasias Renales , Humanos , Biomarcadores de Tumor , Carcinoma de Células Renales/patología , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Neoplasias Renales/patología , NecrosisRESUMEN
The 5th edition of WHO classification of adult renal tumors introduced a couple of changes in existing, well established entities, as well as some new distinct renal tumors. Papillary renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is no longer divided into type 1 and type 2. Type 1 is now called “classic” variant and type 2 doesn´t exist anymore. There were long discussion about problematic type 2. According to WHO 2022 the correct name is papillary RCC (and subtype/variant should be mentioned in the description). Another important change came for clear cell papillary RCC. Because there is no convincing evidence that genuine clear cell papillary RCC can produce recurrences or metastases, it is now termed as clear cell papillary tumor. All previously reported aggressive cases are now considered misclassified clear cell RCC (mostly) or other entities. In less typical cases, genetic support of diagnosis with complex analysis of VHL gene should be added. New category “other oncocytic tumors” emerged for tumors from gray zone between renal oncocytoma and chromophobe RCC. Term hybrid oncocytic tumor should be reserved for those with hereditary Birth-Hogg-Dubé syndrome. Emerging entities, like eosinophilic vacuolated tumor (EVT) and oncocytic low-grade tumor (LOT) are mentioned, however, more work is needed for better establishment of the criteria. There is a new category of “molecularly defined renal carcinomas”, where MITf translocation RCCs are divided into TFE3 rearranged RCC with fusion partner dependent morphologic variability, and to TFEB rearranged RCC. In this group, indolent TFEB translocated RCCs are recognized, as well as potentionally aggressive RCC with TFEB gene amplification. In WHO 2016, ALK rearranged RCC was considered as emerging entity. In WHO 2022 it is listed among “molecularly defined RCC” as a distinct renal tumor with broad morphologic spectrum dependent partly on fusion partners. ELOC (TCEB1) mutated RCC is renal tumor composed of clear cell elements and huge fibromyomatous stroma. Diagnostic approach should be complex with support of immunohistochemistry (including CK7) and molecular genetic approach. However, there is overlap with MTOR pathway genes mutated RCC with fibromyomatous stroma. SMARCB1 deficient renal medullary carcinoma is high-grade invasive adenocarcinoma in patients with clinically proved sickle-cell trait and SMARCB1 deficiency.
Asunto(s)
Adenoma Oxifílico , Carcinoma de Células Renales , Neoplasias Renales , Humanos , Adulto , Carcinoma de Células Renales/diagnóstico , Carcinoma de Células Renales/genética , Carcinoma de Células Renales/patología , Neoplasias Renales/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Renales/genética , Neoplasias Renales/patología , Adenoma Oxifílico/genética , Adenoma Oxifílico/patología , Translocación Genética , Organización Mundial de la Salud , Biomarcadores de TumorRESUMEN
The 5th edition of WHO classification of the urinary tract tumors is only mildly edited version of the previous WHO classification (from year 2016). The most prominent changes are represented by modifications in the structure and concept of chapters and there are minor alterations in the nomenclature of some entities. Histological characteristics are still the gold standard for classification of urothelial tract neoplasms.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Urológicas , Humanos , Neoplasias Urológicas/diagnóstico , Organización Mundial de la SaludRESUMEN
So-called oncocytic papillary renal cell carcinoma (OPRCC) is a poorly defined variant of papillary renal cell carcinoma. Since its first description, several studies were published with conflicting results, and thus precise definition is lacking. A cohort of 39 PRCCs composed of oncocytic cells were analyzed. Cases were divided into 3 groups based on copy number variation (CNV) pattern. The first group consisted of 23 cases with CNV equal to renal oncocytoma. The second group consisted of 7 cases with polysomy of chromosomes 7 and 17 and the last group of 9 cases included those with variable CNV. Epidemiologic, morphologic and immunohistochemical features varied among the groups. There were not any particular histomorphologic features correlating with any of the genetic subgroups. Further, a combination of morphologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular-genetic features did not allow to precisely predict biologic behavior. Owing to variable CNV pattern in OPRCC, strict adherence to morphology and immunohistochemical profile is recommended, particularly in limited samples (i.e., core biopsy). Applying CNV pattern as a part of a diagnostic algorithm can be potentially misleading. OPRCC is a highly variable group of tumors, which might be misdiagnosed as renal oncocytoma. Using the term OPRCC as a distinct diagnostic entity is, thanks to its high heterogeneity, questionable.
Asunto(s)
Adenoma Oxifílico/genética , Carcinoma de Células Renales/genética , Carcinoma de Células Renales/patología , Neoplasias Renales/genética , Células Oxífilas/metabolismo , Adenoma Oxifílico/diagnóstico , Adenoma Oxifílico/patología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Biomarcadores de Tumor/metabolismo , Biopsia con Aguja Gruesa/normas , Carcinoma de Células Renales/epidemiología , Aberraciones Cromosómicas , Variaciones en el Número de Copia de ADN/genética , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Errores Diagnósticos , Femenino , Genes Sobrepuestos/genética , Humanos , Inmunohistoquímica/métodos , Hibridación Fluorescente in Situ/métodos , Neoplasias Renales/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Renales/patología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias/métodos , Células Oxífilas/patologíaRESUMEN
The diagnosis of primary adenocarcinoma of the urinary bladder may be challenging in routine practice. These tumors may morphologically and immunohistochemically overlap with urachal adenocarcinoma and colorectal adenocarcinoma. Further, their genetic background is poorly understood. We systematically searched the PubMed database for results of complex genetic evaluation of primary bladder adenocarcinoma subtypes. Subsequently, we designed our own series of bladder lesions. We evaluated 36 cases: 16 primary enteric-type adenocarcinomas, 7 urachal enteric adenocarcinomas, 3 primary mucinous/colloid adenocarcinomas, and 10 intestinal-type metaplasia/villous adenoma. Detailed clinical data were collected, and all cases were examined using targeted next-generation sequencing. On the basis of the literature, the first mutated gene in these tumors was reported to be KRAS in 11.3% of cases, followed by TERT promoter mutations in 28.5%. In addition to KRAS and TERT, other genes were also found to be frequently mutated in primary bladder adenocarcinoma, including TP53, PIK3CA, CTNNB1, APC, FBXW7, IDH2, and RB1. In our series, the most frequent gene mutations in primary enteric-type adenocarcinomas were as follows: TP53 (56%); BRCA2, KMT2B (both 33%); NOTCH2, KDR, ARID1B, POLE, PTEN, KRAS (all 28%); in urachal enteric adenocarcinoma they were as follows: TP53 (86%); PTEN, NOTCH (both 43%); in primary mucinous/colloid adenocarcinomas they were as follows: KRAS, GRIN2A, AURKB (all 67%); and, in intestinal-type metaplasia/villous adenoma, they were as follows: APC, PRKDC (both 60%); ROS1, ATM, KMT2D (all 50%). No specific mutational pattern was identified using cluster analysis for any of the groups. Herein, we describe the pathologic features and immunohistochemical staining patterns traditionally used in the differential diagnoses of glandular lesions of the bladder in routine surgical pathology. We outline the mutational landscape of these lesions as an aggregate of published data with additional data from our cohort. Although diagnostically not discriminatory, we document that the most common genetic alterations shared between these glandular neoplasms include TP53, APC (in the Wnt pathway), and KRAS (in the MAPK pathway) mutations.
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma Mucinoso/genética , Adenocarcinoma/genética , Adenoma/genética , Neoplasias Intestinales/genética , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/genética , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Adenocarcinoma Mucinoso/patología , Adenoma/patología , Biomarcadores de Tumor/genética , Secuenciación de Nucleótidos de Alto Rendimiento , Humanos , Neoplasias Intestinales/patología , Metaplasia/genética , Metaplasia/metabolismo , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/patologíaRESUMEN
NKX3.1 is considered a reliable immunohistochemical marker of prostatic origin with high specificity and sensitivity. However, NKX3.1 positivity has been described in other neoplastic and non-neoplastic tissues, such as mesenchymal chondrosarcoma, sex-cord stromal tumors, rete testis adenocarcinoma, lobular and ductal carcinoma of the breast, salivary glands, peribronchial submucosal glands, and Sertoli cells. We analyzed expression of two antibodies (mono and polyclonal) of NKX3.1 in a total of 63 non-neoplastic seminal vesicles. We used 52 resection materials (12 seminal vesicles without prostatic adenocarcinoma, 26 seminal vesicles with prostatic adenocarcinoma infiltration, and 14 cases of seminal vesicles infiltrated by urothelial carcinoma) and 11 prostatic core needle biopsies with incidentally sampled fragment of seminal vesicles. In all cases, tissues from seminal vesicles were completely negative for NKX3.1, despite using polyclonal and monoclonal NKX3.1 antibodies, and regardless of the detection system utilized (diaminobenzidine (DAB) versus alkaline phosphatase (AF)). However, prostatic adenocarcinoma was negative in several cases (n = 6), when AF detection system was used. Reaction with DAB was strong and robust in all cases. Based on our data, we can recommend NKX3.1 as a negative immunohistochemical marker of seminal vesicles.
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/diagnóstico , Biomarcadores de Tumor/análisis , Proteínas de Homeodominio/metabolismo , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico , Vesículas Seminales/patología , Factores de Transcripción/metabolismo , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Biomarcadores de Tumor/metabolismo , Biopsia con Aguja , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Proteínas de Homeodominio/análisis , Humanos , Inmunohistoquímica , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Próstata/metabolismo , Vesículas Seminales/metabolismo , Factores de Transcripción/análisisRESUMEN
Papillary renal cell carcinoma (PRCC) is currently a well-studied type of RCC. In addition to PRCC type 1, there are a number of other subtypes and variants of PRCCs which have been reported. We describe a series of 6 PRCCs with papillary, micropapillary and/or tubulopapillary architecture and prominent spindle cell stroma, resembling stroma in mixed epithelial and stromal tumor of the kidney (MESTK) or sarcomatoid RCC. Clinicopathologic, morphologic, immunohistochemical and molecular features were analyzed. All patients were males with an age range of 44-98 years (mean 65.3, median 65.5 years). Tumor size ranged from 2.4-11.4 cm (mean 5.8, median 4.5 cm). Follow-up data were available for 4 patients, ranging from 3 to 96 months (mean 42.75, median 36 months). Epithelial cells were mostly cylindrical with eosinophilic cytoplasm, showing nuclear grade 2 and 3 (ISUP/WHO). In all cases, loose to compact prominent stroma composed of spindle cells, without malignant mesenchymal heterologous elements was detected. No atypical mitoses were found, while typical mitoses were rare in both epithelial and stromal components. Epithelial cells were positive for CK7, AMACR, and vimentin in all cases, while negative for TFE3, HMB45, desmin, CD34, and actin. The stroma was positive for vimentin, actin and focally for CD34, while negative for CK7, AMACR, TFE3, HMB45, and desmin. Estrogen and progesterone receptors were completely negative. FH and SDHB expression was retained in all analyzable cases. Proliferative index was barely detectable in stromal component and low in epithelial component, ranging 0 to 5% positive stained cells/high power field. Copy number variation was variable with no distinct pattern. No mutations in CDKN2A, BAP1, MET were detected. PRCC with MESTK-like features is a distinct variant of PRCC mimicking MESTK. Our findings add to the body of literature on ever expanding variants of PRCCs. Both epithelial and stromal components lacked true Müllerian features, which was also proven by immunohistochemistry.
Asunto(s)
Biomarcadores de Tumor/metabolismo , Carcinoma Papilar/patología , Carcinoma de Células Renales/patología , Variaciones en el Número de Copia de ADN , Neoplasias Renales/patología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Carcinoma Papilar/metabolismo , Carcinoma de Células Renales/metabolismo , Células Epiteliales/patología , Humanos , Inmunohistoquímica , Neoplasias Renales/metabolismo , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Células del Estroma/patologíaRESUMEN
Although typically arranged in solid alveolar fashion, chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (RCC) may also show several other architectural growth patterns. We include in this series 8 chromophobe RCC cases with prominent papillary growth, a pattern very rarely reported or only mentioned as a feature of chromophobe RCC, which is lacking wider recognition The differential diagnosis of such cases significantly varies from the typical chromophobe RCC with its usual morphology, particularly its distinction from papillary RCC and other relevant and clinically important entities. Of 972 chromophobe RCCs in our files, we identified 8 chromophobe RCCs with papillary growth. We performed immunohistochemistry and array Comparative Genomic Hybridisation (aCGH) to investigate for possible chromosomal aberrations. Patients were 3 males and 5 females with age ranging from 30 to 84 years (mean 57.5, median 60 years). Tumor size was variable and ranged from 2 to 14 cm (mean 7.5, median 6.6 cm). Follow-up was available for 7 of 8 patients, ranging from 1 to 61 months (mean 20.1, median 12 months). Six patients were alive with no signs of aggressive behavior, and one died of the disease. Histologically, all cases were composed of dual cell population consisting of variable proportions of leaf-like cells with pale cytoplasm and eosinophilic cells. The extent of papillary component ranged from 15 to 100% of the tumor volume (mean 51%, median 50%). Sarcomatoid differentiation was identified only in the case with fatal outcome. Immunohistochemically, all tumors were positive for CK7, CD117 and Hale's Colloidal Iron. PAX8 was positive in 5 of 8 cases, TFE3 was focally positive 3 of 8 tumors, and Cathepsin K was focally positive in 2 of 8 tumors. All cases were negative for vimentin, AMACR and HMB45. Fumarate hydratase staining was retained in all tested cases. The proliferative activity was low (up to 1% in 7, up to 5% in one case). Three cases were successfully analyzed by aCGH and all showed a variable copy number variation profile with multiple chromosomal gains and losses. CONCLUSIONS: Chromophobe RCC demonstrating papillary architecture is an exceptionally rare carcinoma. The diagnosis can be challenging, although the cytologic features are consistent with the classic chromophobe RCC. Given the prognostic and therapeutic implications of accurately diagnosis other RCCs with papillary architecture (i.e., Xp11.2 translocation RCC, FH-deficient RCC), it is crucial to differentiate these cases from chromophobe RCC with papillary architecture. Based on this limited series, the presence of papillary architecture does not appear to have negative prognostic impact. However, its wider recognition may allow in depth studies on additional examples of this rare morphologic variant.
Asunto(s)
Biomarcadores de Tumor/genética , Carcinoma Papilar/diagnóstico , Carcinoma de Células Renales/diagnóstico , Variaciones en el Número de Copia de ADN , Neoplasias Renales/diagnóstico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Carcinoma Papilar/genética , Carcinoma Papilar/patología , Carcinoma de Células Renales/genética , Carcinoma de Células Renales/patología , Aberraciones Cromosómicas , Hibridación Genómica Comparativa , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunohistoquímica , Neoplasias Renales/genética , Neoplasias Renales/patología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , PronósticoRESUMEN
The diagnosis of prostatic adenocarcinoma is based on a combination of histological features, none of which is absolutely sensitive and specific. Immunohistochemical examination is therefore sometimes necessary in difficult cases for confirmation of the diagnosis and distinction of mimickers. The second major indication of immunohistochemical staining in prostatic pathology is metastatic prostatic adenocarcinoma.
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Neoplasias de la Próstata , Biomarcadores de Tumor , Humanos , Inmunohistoquímica , Masculino , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnósticoRESUMEN
Tento přehledový článek stručně shrnuje možnosti využití imunohistochemie při vyšetřování především renálních karcinomů a základní molekulárně genetické znaky vybraných neoplázií. Článek však v žádném případě nelze brát jako univerzální návod pro diagnostiku renálních tumorů. Renální karcinomy dokážou mít velmi variabilní morfologický vzhled a to i v rámci jedné léze (nádorová heterogenita) a často velmi nepředvídatelný a neuniformní imunohistochemický profil. Některé renální neoplázie jsou diagnostikovány striktně na podkladě molekulárně-genetických vlastností, bez ohledu na morfologický vzhled.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Renales , Neoplasias Renales , Carcinoma de Células Renales/diagnóstico , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Humanos , Inmunohistoquímica , Neoplasias Renales/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Renales/genéticaRESUMEN
There is no ideal marker or established immunohistochemistry panel to confirm urothelial differentiation. Immunohistochemistry must be always indicated in concrete differential diagnostic consideration. In this review article, immunohistochemistry will be discussed in the three different settings - distinction of benign and malignant changes of urothelium, the most frequent pitfalls and non-urothelial neoplasms of urinary tract.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria , Biomarcadores de Tumor , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Humanos , Inmunohistoquímica , Neoplasias de la Vejiga Urinaria/diagnóstico , UrotelioRESUMEN
Polyomavirus BK (BKV) is the cause of polyomavirus-associated nephropathy resulting in premature graft loss. There are limited data regarding the role of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection and its prevention in developing BKV viremia and PVAN. In a prospective study, we analyzed 207 consecutive renal transplant recipients previously enrolled in 2 randomized trials evaluating different CMV prevention regimens with routine screening for BKV and CMV. Of these, 59 received valganciclovir and 100 valacyclovir prophylaxis; 48 patients were managed by preemptive therapy. At 3 years, the incidence of BKV viremia and PVAN was 28% and 5%, respectively. CMV DNAemia developed in 55% and CMV disease in 6%. Both BKV viremia (42% vs 23% vs 21%, P = .006) and PVAN (12% vs 2% vs 2%, P = .011) were increased in patients treated with valganciclovir prophylaxis compared to valacyclovir and preemptive therapy. Using multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression, valganciclovir prophylaxis was independent predictor of BKV viremia (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.38, P = .002) and PVAN (HR = 4.73, P = .026). In contrast, the risk of subsequent BKV viremia was lower in patients with antecedent CMV DNAemia (HR = 0.50, P = .018). These data suggest valganciclovir prophylaxis may be associated with increased risk of BKV viremia and PVAN. CMV DNAemia did not represent a risk for BKV.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Citomegalovirus/prevención & control , Fallo Renal Crónico/cirugía , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Infecciones por Polyomavirus/virología , Infecciones Tumorales por Virus/prevención & control , Viremia/etiología , Adulto , Virus BK , Citomegalovirus , Femenino , Supervivencia de Injerto , Humanos , Fallo Renal Crónico/complicaciones , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Premedicación , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estudios Prospectivos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Valaciclovir/uso terapéutico , Valganciclovir/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
AIMS: Primary renal well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumour (NET) (hereafter referred to as renal NET) is rare, with ~100 cases having been reported in the literature. There are also limited data on the molecular-genetic background of primary renal NETs. METHODS AND RESULTS: We analysed 11 renal NETs by using next-generation sequencing (NGS) to identify characteristic genetic aberrations. All tumours were positive for synaptophysin, and also expressed insulinoma-associated protein 1 (10/11), chromogranin-A (8/11), and CD56 (3/11). Cytoplasmic positivity of CD99 was present in eight of 11 cases, and strong nuclear expression of α-thalassaemia/mental retardation syndrome X-linked (ATRX) was retained in all 11 cases. Molecular-genetic analysis of aberration of VHL gave negative results in all cases. Loss of heterozygosity on chromosome 3p21 was found in three of nine analysable cases. NGS was successful in nine cases, showing a total of 56 variants being left after the updated filtering process, representing an average of five variants per sample. All analysable cases were negative for ATRX and DAXX (death-domain associated protein X) mutations. The most frequently mutated genes were CDH1 and TET2, with three mutations in two cases. Mutations in AKT3, ROS1, PIK3R2, BCR and MYC were found in two cases. The remaining 41 genes were found to be mutated only in individual cases. In four cases, the mutations affected a subset of genes related to angiogenesis. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the mutation profile of primary renal NETs is variable, and none of the studied genes or affected pathways seems to be specific for renal NET.
Asunto(s)
Tumor Carcinoide/genética , Tumor Carcinoide/patología , Neoplasias Renales/genética , Neoplasias Renales/patología , Tumores Neuroendocrinos/genética , Tumores Neuroendocrinos/patología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antígenos CD/genética , Biomarcadores de Tumor/genética , Biomarcadores de Tumor/metabolismo , Cadherinas/genética , Tumor Carcinoide/metabolismo , Diferenciación Celular , Proteínas de Unión al ADN/genética , Dioxigenasas , Femenino , Secuenciación de Nucleótidos de Alto Rendimiento , Humanos , Inmunohistoquímica , Neoplasias Renales/metabolismo , Pérdida de Heterocigocidad , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mutación , Tumores Neuroendocrinos/metabolismo , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas/genéticaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Polyomavirus BK (BKV) infection of the renal allograft causes destructive tissue injury with inflammation and subsequent fibrosis. METHODS: Using a prospective cohort of patients after kidney transplantation performed between 2003 and 2012, we investigated the role of BKV viraemia in the development and progression of interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (IFTA). The primary outcome was moderate-to-severe IFTA assessed by protocol biopsy at 36 months. RESULTS: A total of 207 consecutive recipients were enrolled. Of these, 57 (28%) developed BKV viraemia with 10 (5%) cases of polyomavirus-associated nephropathy (PVAN). Transient (<3 months) BKV viraemia occurred in 70% of patients, and persistent (≥3 months) BKV viraemia in 30%. A high viral load (≥10 000 copies/mL) was detected in 18% and a low viral load (<10 000 copies/mL) in 61%, while the viral load could not be determined in 21%. Moderate-to-severe IFTA was significantly increased in high [71%; odds ratio (OR) = 12.1; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.62-90.0; P = 0.015] or persistent BKV viraemia (67%; OR = 6.33; 95% CI 1.19-33.7; P = 0.031) with corresponding rise in 'interstitial fibrosis + tubular atrophy' scores. Only patients with transient low BKV viraemia showed similar incidence and progression of IFTA to the no-BKV group. Persistent low BKV viraemia was uncommon yet the progression of fibrosis was significant. Only recipients with PVAN experienced inferior graft survival at 5 years. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that only transient low BKV viraemia does not negatively affect the progression of allograft fibrosis in contrast to excessive risk of severe fibrosis after high or persistent BKV viraemia.