[Using connected objects to favour patients' adherence to physical activity]. / Activité physique et objets connectés : comment favoriser l'adhésion des patients ?

A study explored the factors which can have an impact on the use of connected objects to improve patients' adherence to physical activity, when they suffer from chronic low back pain. The results can be used to adjust the development of an application aimed at patients with chronic low back pain.

Use of immersive virtual reality for stress reduction during botulinum toxin injection for spasticity (RVTOX): a study protocol of a randomised control trial.

INTRODUCTION: Botulinum toxin injection is a common way to help reduce spasticity in the body caused by central neurological damage such as cerebral stroke, multiple sclerosis or traumatic brain injury. The pain felt during the injection causes most patients to experience significant stress for further injections, the level of which is variable between patients.Immersive virtual reality is a digital technique that simulates the three-dimensional spatial and sound environment around a person said to be immersed in this virtualised world. The effectiveness of virtual reality comes from the intensity of this multisensory immersion, known as the feeling of presence (ie, subjective experience of being in one place or one environment, even when you are physically in another one).Only one research article in paediatrics has shown that immersive reality technique has a positive impact on the level of pain and agitation suffered during botulinum toxin injections. The purpose of this study is therefore to evaluate with sufficient assurance the following research hypothesis: virtual reality can help adults cope with the stress and pain of botulinum toxin treatment injection. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The research hypothesis will be tested using a randomised stepped-wedge method versus a non-invasive technique (headset with virtual reality session) to its control (headset with no image nor audio).The design leads to considering the injection as a statistical unit as all participants will undergo the standard condition, the control technique and virtual reality technique. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Patients will be fully and fairly informed in terms of their understanding of the objectives and constraints of the study and the possible risks involved. They will also be entitled to refuse the study and/or withdraw, and this refusal will have no impact on their follow-up as part of their pathology. Dissemination of the results of this study will be through peer-reviewed publications, and national and international conferences.Ethics were approved by the Comité de Protection des Personnes Nord-Ouest in January 2022. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05364203.

Smartphone applications are used for self-management, telerehabilitation, evaluation and data collection in low back pain healthcare: a scoping review.

Background: Smartphone use has grown in providing healthcare for patients with low back pain (LBP), but the literature lacks an analysis of the use of smartphone apps. This scoping review aimed to identify current areas of smartphone apps use for managing LBP. We also aimed to evaluate the current status of the effectiveness or scientific validity of such use and determine perspectives for their potential development. Methods: We searched PubMed, PEDro and Embase for articles published in English up to May 3 rd, 2021 that investigated smartphone use for LBP healthcare and their purpose. All types of study design were accepted. Studies concerning telemedicine or telerehabilitation but without use of a smartphone were not included. The same search strategy was performed by two researchers independently and a third researcher validated the synthesis of the included studies. Results: We included 43 articles: randomised controlled trials (RCTs) (n=12), study protocols (n=6), reliability/validity studies (n=6), systematic reviews (n=7), cohort studies (n=4), qualitative studies (n=6), and case series (n=1). The purposes of the smartphone app were for 1) evaluation, 2) telerehabilitation, 3) self-management, and 4) data collection. Self-management was the most-studied use, showing promising results derived from moderate- to good-quality RCTs for patients with chronic LBP and patients after spinal surgery. Promising results exist regarding evaluation and data collection use and contradictory results regarding measurement use. Conclusions: This scoping review revealed a notable interest in the scientific literatures regarding the use of smartphone apps for LBP patients. The identified purposes point to current scientific status and perspectives for further studies including RCTs and systematic reviews targeting specific usage.

Mixed qualitative and quantitative approach for validating an information booklet before total hip arthroplasty.

OBJECTIVE: Providing patients with validated information before total hip arthroplasty may help lessen discrepancies between patients' expectations and the surgical result. This study sought to validate an information booklet for candidates for hip arthroplasty by using a mixed qualitative and quantitative approach based on a panel of patients and a sample of healthcare professionals. METHODS: We developed a booklet in accordance with the standard methods and then conducted focus groups to collect the opinions of a sample of multidisciplinary experts involved in the care of patients with hip osteoarthritis. The number of focus groups and experts was determined according to the data saturation principle. A panel of patients awaiting hip arthroplasty or those in the immediate post-operative period assessed the booklet with self-reporting questionnaires (knowledge, beliefs, and expectations) and semi-structured interviews. RESULTS: All experts and both patient groups validated the booklet in terms of content and presentation. Semi-structured interviews were uninformative, especially for post-operative patients. Reading the booklet significantly (P<0.001) improved the knowledge scores in both groups, with no intergroup differences, but did not affect beliefs in either patient group. Only pre-operative patients significantly changed their expectations. CONCLUSION: Our mixed qualitative and quantitative approach allowed us to validate a booklet for patients awaiting hip arthroplasty, taking into account the opinions of both patients and healthcare professionals.