Randomized clinical study comparing Compeed cold sore patch to acyclovir cream 5% in the treatment of herpes simplex labialis.

BACKGROUND: Hydrocolloid technology has been proven effective in treating dermal wounds. A previous study showed that a newly developed thin hydrocolloid patch [Compeed cold sore patch (CSP)] provided multiple wound-healing benefits across all stages of a herpes simplex labialis (HSL) outbreak. METHODS: An assessment of CSP efficacy and safety was conducted in an international, multicentre, assessor-blinded study, which enrolled 728 subjects with a history of recurrent HSL. Of these, 351 experienced an HSL outbreak and were randomized to use CSP (n = 179) or acyclovir cream 5% (n = 172) at the onset of symptoms until the lesion healed, for a maximum of 10 days. The primary end point was the subject's global assessment of therapy (SGAT; 0-10 scale; 0 = no response, 10 = excellent response). Multiple secondary end points included clinician-assessed healing time and subject assessment of lesion protection, noticeability and social embarrassment. RESULTS: CSP and acyclovir were highly effective (mean SGAT = 7.89 and 8.00, respectively), with no significant difference observed (P = 0.65). The difference in healing times between products was not significant (median, 7.57 days with CSP vs. 7.03 days with acyclovir, P = 0.37). Both treatments were well tolerated. CONCLUSION: CSP using hydrocolloid technology provides an efficacious and safe alternative to topical antivirals in treating HSL as a wound while affording additional immediate benefits of wound protection, discretion and relief of social embarrassment.

Topiramate placebo-controlled dose-ranging trial in refractory partial epilepsy using 600-, 800-, and 1,000-mg daily dosages. Topiramate YE Study Group.

We conducted a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, parallel, placebo-controlled trial in 190 patients to evaluate the safety and efficacy of three dosages of topiramate (600, 800, and 1,000 mg/day) as adjunctive therapy for patients with refractory partial epilepsy. During an 18-week double-blind treatment period, median percent reductions from baseline in average monthly seizure rates were 1% for placebo, 41% for topiramate 600 mg/day and topiramate 800 mg/day, and 38% for topiramate 1,000 mg/day. There was a 50% or greater reduction from baseline in seizure frequency in 9% of patients in the placebo group and in 44% for topiramate 600 mg/day, 40% for topiramate 800 mg/day, and 38% for topiramate 1,000 mg/day. No placebo patients were improved by 75 to 100% in seizure frequency, whereas 20% of the topiramate patients were improved to this degree. All intent-to-treat drug-placebo comparisons including seizure reduction, percent responders, and investigator and patient global evaluations significantly (p < or = 0.02) favored topiramate. Treatment-emergent adverse events consisted mainly of neurologic symptoms commonly observed during antiepileptic drug (AED) therapy. Sixteen percent of patients on topiramate discontinued therapy due to adverse events. Results of this study indicate that topiramate is a highly efficacious and generally well tolerated new AED. When large groups of patients are compared, incremental efficacy in the add-on setting is not observed at topiramate dosages above 600 mg/day; however, higher doses may prove beneficial to individual patients who tolerate them.

A double-blind, randomized trial of topiramate in Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. Topiramate YL Study Group.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of topiramate as adjunctive therapy for Lennox-Gastaut syndrome in a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. BACKGROUND: Conventional antiepileptic drugs are frequently ineffective against multiple-seizure types of Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. METHODS: Ninety-eight patients >1 year to <30 years of age, with slow spike-and-wave patterns on EEG, seizure types including drop attacks, and either a history of or active atypical absence seizures, were assigned to an 11-week, double-blind treatment phase with either topiramate or placebo. Topiramate was titrated to target doses of approximately 6 mg/kg/d. RESULTS: For drop attacks, the most severe seizures associated with this syndrome, the median percentage reduction from baseline in average monthly seizure rate was 14.8% for the topiramate group and -5.1% (an increase) for the placebo group (p = 0.041). Topiramate-treated patients demonstrated greater improvement in seizure severity than did placebo-treated patients based on parental global evaluations (p = 0.037). The percentage of patients with a > or = 50% reduction from baseline in major seizures (drop attacks and tonic-clonic seizures) was greater in the topiramate group (15/46 or 33%) than in the control group (4/50 or 8%; p = 0.002). The most common adverse events in both groups were CNS related; there were no discontinuations from topiramate therapy due to adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Topiramate adjunctive therapy was effective in reducing the number of drop attacks and major motor seizures and in improving seizure severity as determined by parental global evaluation.

A randomized, placebo-controlled study of topiramate in primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures. Topiramate YTC Study Group.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Topiramate is effective as adjunctive treatment of partial-onset seizures in adults. The efficacy and safety of topiramate as adjunctive therapy for the treatment of primary generalized tonic-clonic (PGTC) seizures were investigated in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. METHODS: Eighty patients, 3 to 59 years old, who experienced three or more PGTC seizures during an 8-week baseline phase were randomly assigned to treatment with either topiramate (n = 39) or placebo (n = 41). Topiramate was titrated to target doses of approximately 6 mg/kg/day over 8 weeks and maintained for another 12 weeks. RESULTS: The median percentage reduction from baseline in PGTC seizure rate was 56.7% for topiramate patients and 9.0% for placebo patients (p = 0.019). The proportion of patients with 50% or higher reduction in PGTC seizure rate was 22/39 (56%) and 8/40 (20%) for the topiramate and placebo groups, respectively (p = 0.001). The median percentage reduction in the rate of all generalized seizures was 42.1% for topiramate patients and 0.9% for placebo patients (p = 0.003). The proportions of patients with 50% or higher reductions in generalized seizure rate were 18/39 (46%) and 7/41 (17%) for the topiramate and placebo groups, respectively (p = 0.003). The most common adverse events were somnolence, fatigue, weight loss, difficulty with memory, and nervousness. Treatment-limiting adverse events occurred in one patient in the topiramate group (anorexia and weight loss) and one in the placebo group (granulocytopenia and thrombocytopenia). CONCLUSION: Topiramate is well-tolerated and effective for the adjunctive treatment of PGTC seizures.

A double-blind, randomized trial of topiramate as adjunctive therapy for partial-onset seizures in children. Topiramate YP Study Group.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of topiramate 6 mg/kg/day in children (age 2 to 16 years) as adjunctive therapy for uncontrolled partial-onset seizures with or without secondarily generalized seizures in a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. METHODS: Patients with at least six partial-onset seizures during the 8-week baseline phase were treated with either topiramate (n = 41) or placebo (n = 45) for 16 weeks. RESULTS: Topiramate-treated patients had a greater median percent reduction from baseline in average monthly partial-onset seizure rate than placebo-treated patients (33.1% versus 10.5%, p = 0.034), a greater proportion of treatment responders (i.e., patients with a > or = 50% seizure rate reduction; 16 of 41 [39%] versus 9 of 45 [20%], p = 0.080), and patients with a > or = 75% seizure rate reduction (7 of 41 [17%] versus 1 of 45 [2%], p = 0.019), and better parental global evaluations of improvement in seizure severity (p = 0.019). Emotional lability (12% versus 4%), fatigue (15% versus 7%), difficulty with concentration or attention (12% versus 2%), and forgetfulness/impaired memory (7% versus 0%) were more frequent among topiramate-treated than placebo-treated patients. Most treatment-emergent adverse events were mild or moderate in severity. No topiramate-treated patients discontinued the study due to adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Topiramate was safe and effective in the treatment of partial-onset seizures in children.

Topiramate placebo-controlled dose-ranging trial in refractory partial epilepsy using 200-, 400-, and 600-mg daily dosages. Topiramate YD Study Group.

We conducted a randomized double-blind comparison of three doses of the novel antiepileptic drug (AED) topiramate (200, 400, and 600 mg/day) and placebo as adjunctive therapy in patients with refractory partial onset epilepsy receiving one or two other AEDs at therapeutic concentrations. A total of 181 patients completed the 12-week baseline phase and were randomized to double-blind therapy. Median percent reductions from baseline in average monthly seizure rate, the principal efficacy evaluation, were 13% for placebo, 30% for topiramate 200 mg/day, 48% for topiramate 400 mg/day, and 45% for topiramate 600 mg/day. For the seizure rate comparison of active drug to placebo p values were: topiramate 200 mg/day, p = 0.051; topiramate 400 mg/day, p = 0.007; topiramate 600 mg/day, p < 0.001. Percent responders ( > or = 50% reduction in seizure rates) were 18% for placebo, 27% for topiramate 200 mg/day, 47% for topiramate 400 mg/day (p = 0.013), and 46% for topiramate 600 mg/day (p = 0.027). A significant (p = 0.003) reduction in secondarily generalized seizures compared with placebo treatment was also documented with topiramate. Topiramate plasma concentrations were closely related to dosage, and there were no significant interactions between topiramate and other AEDs. The minimal effective dose of topiramate in this study population was approximately 200 mg/day. Mild or moderate CNS symptoms were the primary treatment-emergent adverse events, but treatment-limiting adverse events occurred in only 9% of patients given topiramate compared with 7% given placebo. Results of this initial well-controlled study in patients indicate that topiramate is a very promising new AED.

Dezinamide for partial seizures: results of an n-of-1 design trial.

BACKGROUND: Dezinamide (DZM, ADD 94057) is a potential antiepileptic drug that binds to the voltage-sensitive sodium channel and showed preliminary evidence of efficacy and safety in an open-label study. METHODS: Our double-blind, placebo-controlled trial at two sites used an n-of-1 (single-patient) design. All 15 patients had medically intractable partial-onset seizures and were comedicated with phenytoin (PHT) only. Treatment was for six 5-week periods (three active paired with three placebo in random sequence). Assuming nonlinear kinetics, we used an initial pharmacokinetic profile to estimate dosages for reaching target plasma concentrations of DZM. RESULTS: Statistically significant seizure reduction was found by both a randomization test (p = 0.0025) and a signed rank test (p = 0.048). Median seizure frequency decreased 37.9%, and 40% of patients had > 50% seizure reduction, both compared with placebo. Pharmacokinetic predictions were not accurate; mean plasma concentrations fell well below target values. Plasma PHT concentrations increased (mean = 17.1%) during DZM treatment. The most common adverse experiences were fatigue, light-headedness, and abnormal gait; five patients required DZM dosage reductions. CONCLUSIONS: DZM showed minimal clinical toxicity and significant efficacy despite lower plasma concentrations than predicted by pharmacokinetics. This trial establishes the suitability of the n-of-1 design to investigational antiepileptic drug trials.

Felbamate for partial seizures: results of a controlled clinical trial.

Felbamate (2-phenyl-1,3-propanediol dicarbamate) has a favorable preclinical profile in animal models of epilepsy. We present the results of a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial in patients with partial seizures. Criteria for entry included a requirement for four or more partial seizures per month despite concomitant therapeutic blood levels of phenytoin and carbamazepine. Fifty-six patients (mean age, 31.4 years; 32 men, 24 women) completed the trial. The mean seizure frequencies for the 8-week periods analyzed were felbamate = 34.9, placebo = 40.2. Felbamate was statistically superior to placebo in seizure reduction, percent seizure reduction, and truncated percent seizure reduction. The mean felbamate dosage was 2,300 mg/d. Plasma felbamate concentrations ranged from 18.4 to 51.9 mg/l, mean = 32.5 mg/l. Adverse experiences during felbamate therapy were minor and consisted primarily of nausea and CNS effects. This trial indicates that felbamate is safe and effective in the treatment of comedicated patients with severely refractory epilepsy.

Flunarizine for treatment of partial seizures: results of a concentration-controlled trial.

The National Institutes of Health sponsored a randomized, double-blind, multicenter, placebo-controlled trial of flunarizine (FNR) in epileptic patients receiving concomitant phenytoin (PHT) or carbamazepine (CBZ). Because of FNR's long half-life (up to 7 weeks), a parallel rather than crossover design was used. Each patient received an individualized loading dose and maintenance dosage targeted at a 60-ng/ml plasma FNR concentration. Of 93 patients randomized, 92 provided seizure data for the full 25-week treatment period; one placebo-treated patient dropped out for personal reasons. Fifty-four patients received CBZ only, nine received PHT only, and 30 received both CBZ and PHT. Eighty-seven patients had a history of complex partial seizures, and 60 had secondarily generalized seizures. Eight patients discontinued FNR prematurely, all because of adverse neurologic or psychiatric signs or symptoms; depression was the specific cause in three cases. Calculated maintenance dosages, based on single-dose pharmacokinetic profiles, ranged from 7 to 138 mg/day (mean, 40 mg/day). Plasma FNR concentrations generally exceeded the target, with the highest concentrations observed immediately after loading; excluding the first three treatment weeks and all concentrations after a FNR dosage change, the median plasma FNR concentration was 71.7 ng/ml. The percent reduction from baseline seizure rate was statistically greater (p = 0.002) in the FNR-treated group (mean, 24.4%) than in the placebo-treated group (mean, 5.7%).

Evaluation of antiepileptic drug efficacy. A review of clinical trial design.

Up to 30% of patients with epilepsy are not adequately treated with currently available antiepileptic drugs. Despite a need for new agents, few were developed after valproic acid (sodium valproate), which appeared in the 1970s. This picture has changed recently. A number of new antiepileptic drugs have been approved for marketing, and additional approvals are expected soon. The evidence in the form of adequate and well controlled studies supporting the efficacy of each of these new drugs has included (and in some cases been wholly composed of) placebo-controlled add-on trials, showing the viability of that design. Add-on trials, which compare a new drug with placebo in the presence of a stable regimen of antiepileptic drug therapy, can be conducted as parallel or cross-over designs. These designs have been considered insensitive because they are conducted in patients refractory to available antiepileptic drugs, but add-on trials have proved able to identify effective new drugs. They also permit long term evaluation and provide information, including drug interaction data, in one of the major clinical contexts where a new antiepileptic drug may be used. New designs now allow the evaluation of antiepileptic effectiveness in other clinical contexts, including monotherapy, and provide alternatives when drug interactions obscure add-on trial interpretation. The key feature of this class of monotherapy designs is basing patients' trial duration on their seizure activity rather than on a fixed time period. This is accomplished by defining 'therapeutic failure' criteria which serve to assess efficacy of the test agent while protecting patient safety.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Proof of efficacy trials: choosing the dose.

It is apparent from current usage of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) and from retrospective review of their drug development programmes, that the doses currently used in clinical practice differ from those which were used in clinical trials. This raises the question of how dose and titration schedules are selected in early development. An integral component of a drug development programme should be an assessment of dose response. The International Council on Harmonization of Technical Requirements for the Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use [1994. Guidelines for industry: Dose-response information to support drug registration. ICH-E4. Federal Register] regulatory guidelines suggest that, at a minimum, three elements of dosing should be characterised: a maximum well tolerated dose, a minimum effective dose, and an appropriate rate of titration. Several specific designs can be utilised to assess dose response, which fall broadly into four categories, namely free titration, forced titration and dose escalation, parallel dose response, and dose reduction studies. In addition to these standard approaches, concentration-defined trials are an alternative in some circumstances and have been used with success in the development of newer AEDs. The designs chosen to address these elements are dependent upon the phase of development of the drug, and the severity of the disease, however, it is clear that conducting dose response studies earlier in the development programme may reduce the number of failed Phase 3 studies.

Monotherapy trials: presurgical studies.

Presurgical evaluation of patients with refractory partial seizures provides a unique opportunity to perform a placebo-controlled, monotherapy trial. Some patients undergoing presurgical evaluations must have all of their antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) tapered in order to induce seizures and therefore such patients are possible candidates for a placebo-controlled monotherapy trial. Often, EEG monitoring is continued throughout the trial period, thus patients either receiving placebo or whose seizures do not completely respond to the active drug are still evaluated to determine whether or not surgery is feasible, supporting the validity of a trial in this setting. In addition, all patients are, in general, eligible to receive the study drug after the blinded period of the trial, and can therefore be assured of the possible therapeutic benefits of the study. Presurgical inpatients studies have been carried out using felbamate, gabapentin and oxcarbazepine. All patients randomised in these trials were refractory to previous treatment and the studies themselves were short-term and placebo-controlled. These presurgical studies are designed to elucidate AED activity and show statistically significant differences between active and control treatments during short-term therapy, and are therefore of use in fulfilling regulatory requirements. However, these measures of efficacy are distinctly different from those determined during chronic treatment and are therefore not necessarily predictive of clinical usefulness.

Double-blind, placebo-controlled study of topiramate in patients with refractory partial epilepsy.

The efficacy and safety of topiramate 400 mg/day as adjunctive therapy to traditional antieleptic drugs for partial onset seizures with or without secondary generalization were assessed in a double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled trial. Forty-seven patients with at least one seizure per week during an 8 week baseline were randomly assigned to topiramate (N = 23) or placebo (N = 24) double-blind treatment for a 3 week titration and an 8 week stabilization period. Median percent reduction from baseline in monthly seizure frequency during the double-blind phase was not significantly greater in the topiramate group than in the placebo group (41% vs. 1%; P = 0.065). Nevertheless, other efficacy variables evidenced statistically significant differences in favor of topiramate: a greater number of treatment responders (> or = 50% reduction in seizures; 35% vs. 8%; P = 0.033); better investigator (P = 0.002) and patient (P = 0.021) global assessments; and greater reductions in secondarily generalized seizures compared to placebo (P = 0.002). The most commonly reported topiramate treatment-emergent adverse events were somnolence, fatigue, abnormal vision, weight decrease, and anxiety. Most adverse events were mild or moderate in severity. Among 7 withdrawals due to limiting adverse events, 6 were CNS-related (in 5 topiramate-treated patients). Results of this trial strongly suggest that topiramate 400 mg/day is effective and well tolerated in the treatment of refractory partial epilepsy.

Childhood deaths from intussusception in England and Wales, 1984-9.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the incidence of potentially avoidable factors contributing to death of children with intussusception. DESIGN: Review of children who died with intussusception in England and Wales between 1984 and 1989 from data of the Office of Population Censuses and Surveys, case notes, coroners' records, and necropsy reports. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Unambiguous objective criteria such as failure to diagnose intussusception within 24 hours of admission. RESULTS: 33 children died of acute intussusception in England and Wales between 1984 and 1989 compared with 67 in the previous six years. Their median age was 7 months (range 2 months to 12 years), and two thirds were boys. Half of the deaths occurred at home or soon after arrival at hospital but 15 patients had surgery. Potentially avoidable factors contributing to death were identified in 20 (61%) children, all but three of whom had ileocolic intussusception. These factors were excessive delay in diagnosis, inadequate intravenous fluid and antibiotic therapy, delay in recognising recurrent or residual intussusception after hydrostatic reduction, and surgical complications. Of the 13 patients in whom no avoidable factors were identified, there were nine of 11 children with isolated small bowel intussusception, who tended to have atypical presentations. CONCLUSION: Although the mortality from intussusception has declined, there remains ample opportunity for improved management.