Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
Asunto de la revista
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg ; 154(1): 24-32, 2016 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26459245

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To analyze existing tinnitus treatment trials with regard to eligibility criteria, outcome measures, study quality, and external validity and to recognize the effect of patient demographics, symptom duration, severity, and otologic comorbidity on research findings to help practitioners apply them to patient encounters. DATA SOURCES: Systematic literature search conducted by an information specialist for development of the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Foundation's tinnitus clinical practice guideline. REVIEW METHODS: Articles were assessed for eligibility with the PRISMA protocol (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) and data extracted by 2 independent investigators. Studies were assessed for methodological quality, inclusion and exclusion criteria, patient demographics, and outcome measures. RESULTS: A total of 147 randomized trials met inclusion criteria. Nearly all studies took place in a specialist setting. More than 50% did not explicitly define tinnitus, and 44% used a subjective severity threshold, such as "severely disturbing." Fifty-four percent required symptom duration of at least 6 months for study eligibility, and up to 33% excluded patients with "organic" hearing loss or otologic conditions. Mean age was 52.2 years, and median follow-up was 3 months. Only 20% had a low risk of bias. CONCLUSION: Randomized trials of tinnitus interventions are most applicable to older adults with tinnitus lasting ≥ 6 months who are evaluated in specialty settings. High risk of bias, short follow-up, and outcome reporting raise concerns about the validity of findings and may influence how clinicians apply trial results to individual patients and establish treatment expectations, thus demonstrating the need for further quality research in this field.


Asunto(s)
Selección de Paciente , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Acúfeno/terapia , Humanos , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
Ear Nose Throat J ; 92(12): E14-6, 2013 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24366708

RESUMEN

We report a case involving a patient with bilateral middle cranial fossa encephaloceles extending into the middle ear and causing conductive hearing loss. An obese, 47-year-old woman with a history of a seizure disorder presented with a slow-onset subjective hearing loss. Examination revealed opaque tympanic membranes, and audiometry showed a mixed hearing loss bilaterally. Myringotomy demonstrated soft tissue behind each tympanic membrane. Biopsy, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and mastoidectomy confirmed the diagnosis of bilateral middle cranial fossa encephaloceles. Bilateral encephaloceles are uncommon, and the resulting bilateral conductive hearing loss secondary to mechanical obstruction of ossicular vibration is even more rare. This patient's obesity and seizures perhaps contributed to her disease process.


Asunto(s)
Encefalocele/complicaciones , Encefalocele/diagnóstico , Pérdida Auditiva Conductiva/etiología , Biopsia , Fosa Craneal Media , Encefalocele/cirugía , Femenino , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tomografía por Rayos X
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA