Cell plasticity in wound healing: paracrine factors of M1/ M2 polarized macrophages influence the phenotypical state of dermal fibroblasts.

BACKGROUND: Macrophages and fibroblasts are two major players in tissue repair and fibrosis. Despite the relevance of macrophages and fibroblasts in tissue homeostasis, remarkably little is known whether macrophages are able to influence the properties of fibroblasts. Here we investigated the role of paracrine factors secreted by classically activated (M1) and alternatively activated (M2) human macrophages on human dermal fibroblasts (HDFs). RESULTS: HDFs stimulated with paracrine factors from M1 macrophages showed a 10 to > 100-fold increase in the expression of the inflammatory cytokines IL6, CCL2 and CCL7 and the matrix metalloproteinases MMP1 and MMP3. This indicates that factors produced by M1 macrophages induce a fibroblast phenotype with pro-inflammatory and extracellular matrix (ECM) degrading properties. HDFs stimulated with paracrine factors secreted by M2 macrophages displayed an increased proliferation rate. Interestingly, the M1-activated pro-inflammatory fibroblasts downregulated, after exposure to paracrine factors produced by M2 macrophages or non-conditioned media, the inflammatory markers as well as MMPs and upregulated their collagen production. CONCLUSIONS: Paracrine factors of M1 or M2 polarized macrophages induced different phenotypes of HDFs and the HDF phenotypes can in turn be reversed, pointing to a high dynamic plasticity of fibroblasts in the different phases of tissue repair.

Distribution pattern and marker profile show two subpopulations of reserve cells in the endocervical canal.

SUMMARY: A previous immunophenotyping study in the fetal uterine cervix provided evidence for the existence of 2 subpopulations of reserve cells, one giving rise to glandular epithelium and the other to squamous epithelium (5). In this study, we investigated whether the adult uterine cervix also harbors different populations of reserve cells on the basis of their marker profile and distribution pattern. Sagittal sections from 10 normal uteri, comprising the region from ectocervix to lower uterine cavity, were histologically examined and immunostained for p63, bcl-2 and cytokeratins (CKs) 5, 7, 8, and 17. The endocervical canal consists of three regions, that is, a part lined with squamous epithelium, a part lined with endocervical cells and a part lined with tubal type epithelial cells. Histologically, we found reserve cells in all 10 investigated cervices, with an abundancy in the area beneath the endocervical columnar epithelium close to the squamo-columnar junction, and high in the endocervical canal where the invaginations consist of tubal type epithelium. In between, an area lined with endocervical columnar cells without reserve cells was identified. No reserve cells were detected in the endometrial epithelium. We defined the end of the endocervix as the point where the surface of the cervical canal and the invaginations are completely lined with tubal type epithelium. From this point, reserve cells were no longer found. Reserve cells show strong expression for p63, CKs 5 and 7, and moderate expression for bcl-2. CK17 is strongly expressed in the reserve cells at the squamo-columnar junction and to a lesser extent in the reserve cells close to the endometrium. Endocervical columnar cells usually express CKs 7 and 8 and sporadically also p63 and CK5. CK17 was only found in endocervical cells in the vicinity of CK17-positive subcolumnar reserve cells. Tubal-type epithelium was present in all samples and contained bcl-2, along with CKs 5, 7, and 8. As a result, bcl-2 and CK5 expression distinguishes tubal epithelium from endocervical columnar cells. We conclude that reserve cells are present in all investigated cervices along the entire cervical canal. The concentration of subglandular reserve cells is highest close to the squamo-columnar junction and in the upper third of the cervix. The marker profile of reserve cells is the same in all parts of the cervix, except for CK17, which shows a decreasing gradient from distal to proximal, indicating a subpopulation of distal reserve cells as progenitor for squamous and columnar epithelium, and proximal reserve cells that can serve as progenitor cells for columnar epithelium.

Surgical treatment of spasticity in children: comparison of selective dorsal rhizotomy and intrathecal baclofen pump implantation.

INTRODUCTION: Neurosurgical treatments for spasticity in children include the traditional selective dorsal rhizotomy (SDR) and intrathecal baclofen pumps (ITBPs), which have been widely used in the past decade as an attractive alternative. The purpose of the study was to examine and compare the outcomes of these two procedures in the treatment of children with severe spasticity. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A consecutive series of 71 children who underwent SDR for treatment of spasticity was compared with a group of 71 children matched by age and preoperative score on the Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) who underwent ITBP placement. Change in GMFCS score, lower-extremity tone (based on the Modified Ashworth-Bohannon Scale), and lower-extremity passive range of movement (PROM) at 1 year as well as the need for subsequent orthopedic procedures and parents' satisfaction were selected as outcome measures. RESULTS: At 1 year, both SDR and ITBP decreased tone, increased PROM, and improved function. Both procedures resulted in a high degree of patient satisfaction. Compared with ITBP, SDR provided a larger magnitude of improvement in tone (-2.52 vs -1.23, p < 0.0001), PROM (-0.77 vs -0.39, p = 0.0138), and gross motor function (-0.66 vs -0.08, p < 0.0001). In addition, fewer patients in the SDR group required subsequent orthopedic procedures (19.1 vs 40.8%, p = 0.0106). CONCLUSIONS: For children with moderate to severe spasticity, SDR and ITBP are both effective surgical treatments. Our results indicate SDR is more effective in reducing the degree of spasticity and improving function than ITBP is in this group of patients.

3,4-Dihydroxy-L-Phenylalanine as a Novel Covalent Linker of Extracellular Matrix Proteins to Polyacrylamide Hydrogels with a Tunable Stiffness.

Cells acquire mechanical information from their surrounding and convert this into biochemical activity. The concept and mechanism behind this cellular mechanosensing and mechanotransduction are often studied by means of two-dimensional hydrogels. Polyacrylamide hydrogels (PAAMs) offer chemical, mechanical, and optical advantages but due to their inert surface do not allow protein and cell adherence. Several cross-linkers have been used to functionalize the surface of PAAMs with extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins to enable cell culture. However, the most commonly used cross-linkers are either unstable, expensive, or laborious and often show heterogeneous coating or require PAAM modification. Here, we introduce 3,4-dihydroxy-l-phenylalanine (L-DOPA) as a novel cross-linker that can functionalize PAAMs with ECM without the above-mentioned disadvantages. A homogenous collagen type I and fibronectin coating was observed after L-DOPA functionalization. Fibroblasts responded to differences in PAAMs' stiffness; morphology, cell area, and protein localization were all affected as expected, in accordance with literature where other cross-linkers were used. In conclusion, L-DOPA can be used as a cross-linker between PAAMs and ECM and represents a novel, straightforward, nonlaborious, and robust method to functionalize PAAMs for cell culture to study cell mechanosensing.

Macrophage phenotypes in the collagen-induced foreign body reaction in rats.

Implantation of biomaterials into the body elicits a material-dependent inflammatory response called the foreign body reaction (FBR). Macrophages play a pivotal role in the FBR by orchestrating the pro-inflammatory microenvironment around the biomaterials by secreting cytokines, chemokines and growth factors. When the biomaterial is porous or degradable, macrophages can migrate into the material and continue the generation of a pro-inflammatory microenvironment inside the materials. They also regulate the degradation of biomaterials by secreting proteolytic enzymes and by phagocytosis. We hypothesize that macrophages present in the different microenvironments of the FBR have different phenotypes. Fundamental knowledge of the phenotypes of macrophages and their dynamics during the FBR will contribute to our overall understanding of the mechanisms involved in the FBR, and may provide us with additional tools to modulate the FBR. To investigate the phenotype of macrophages in the FBR, we validated phenotype-specific markers for rat macrophages in vitro by stimulating them with IFNγ/LPS, IL4/IL13 or IL4/dexamethasone to induce classically activated macrophages (M1φ) or alternatively activated macrophages (M2φ). Gene expression analysis, Western blot and immunohistochemistry revealed that iNOS and CD206 are specifically expressed by M1φ and M2φ, respectively. Using these markers, we investigated the distribution of M1φ and M2φ in the FBR induced by subcutaneously implanted hexamethylenediisocyanate cross-linked dermal sheep collagen (HDSC) disks in AO rats. We found that part of the macrophages display an M2 phenotype, whereas the M1phenotype was not detected. Our data suggest that many macrophages in the FBR induced by HDSC do not fit into the classical M1 or M2 dichotomy.

Human macrophages primed with angiogenic factors show dynamic plasticity, irrespective of extracellular matrix components.

Macrophages are important in inflammation as well as in tissue repair processes. They can be activated by various stimuli and classified into two major groups: M1 (classically activated) or M2 (alternatively activated). Inflammation, angiogenesis and matrix remodeling play a major role in tissue repair. Here, we investigate the combined influence of a pro-angiogenic microenvironment and specific extracellular matrix (ECM) components or tissue culture polystyrene (TCPS) on the dynamics of human macrophage polarization. We established that human angiogenically primed macrophages cultured on different ECM components exhibit an M2-like polarization. These M2-like macrophages polarized to M1 and M2 macrophages with classical (LPS and IFNγ) stimuli and alternative (IL-4 and IL-13) stimuli respectively. Moreover, these M1 and M2 (primary) polarized macrophages rapidly underwent a secondary (re)polarization to M2 and M1 with conditioned media from M2 and M1 primary polarized macrophages respectively. In these initial priming and later (re)polarization processes the soluble factors had a dominant and orchestrating role, while the type of ECM (collagen I, fibronectin, versus tissue culture polystyrene) did not play a crucial role on the polarization of macrophages.