Pre-operative imaging workup for surgical intervention in primary hyperparathyroidism: A tertiary referral center experience.

PURPOSE: Preoperative imaging in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism provides important localization information, allowing the surgeon to perform a focused surgery. However there are no evidence-based guidelines suggesting which preoperative imaging should be used, resulting in a risk of excessive prescription of exams and waste of economic resources. The main purpose of this study was to describe our experience on the performance of various imaging techniques for the preoperative localization of abnormal parathyroid gland/s, with a focus on the sensitivity and specificity of each technique. Secondly, we carried out an analysis of the cost utility of each technique in order to determine the most clinical and cost-effective combination of localization studies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Records of 336 patients who underwent parathyroidectomy were retrospectively examined comparing imaging and intraoperative/histopathologic findings to evaluate the accuracy in parathyroid detection of each imaging technique. Costs were determined by regional health system reimbursement. RESULTS: We found that the sensitivity of color Doppler US was significantly higher than SPECT (p 0,023), while the sensitivity of 4D-CT was significantly better than US (p 0,029) and SPECT (p 0,0002). CONCLUSIONS: In experienced hands color Doppler US is a highly sensitive technique especially in patients with no thyroid diseases. In patients with concomitant thyroid pathology, the combination of US and 4D-CT represents a reliable localization technique.

Acute renal failure in a young woman with Fisher-Evans' syndrome.

A young female with Fisher-Evans' syndrome and a previous melanoma developed acute renal failure with generalized lymphoadenopathy and fever. The appearance of renal lesions is common in the course of several hematological disorders, but is unusual in Fisher-Evans' syndrome. Fisher-Evans' syndrome, defined as Coombs' positive hemolytic anemia and immune thrombocytopenia, is more frequently associated with the other autoimmune diseases, but not with renal involvement. In our case report, having excluded amyloidosis, myeloma, interstitial nephritis and sepsis, the rapid involvement of renal function with enlarged renal size seemed to suggest renal lymphoma. However, the lack of a monoclonal T-lymphocyte population in the renal tissue and peripheral blood, along with a clinical course characterized by a rapid reversibility of acute renal failure made this diagnosis rather an unlikely one. Polyclonal lymphocyte infiltration in a patient with a persistent autoimmune disease made us suspect a hyperimmune reaction. This syndrome is a non-neoplastic proliferation of B-cells involving an exaggeration of lymphocyte transformation. However, the clinical course is progressive and fatal, and can trigger a lymphoproliferative systemic disease. In our patient, two elements led us to suspect it was not a typical hyperimmune syndrome: first, polyclonal lymphocytes had massively infiltrated the kidney and, secondly, the clinical outcome was extremely favorable. Therefore, we were faced with an "atypical" and "singular" hyperimmune reaction with renal involvement, polyclonal proliferation of T-lymphocytes that had exhausted itself over time. Infective or toxic agents or drugs such as cyprofloxacin could have triggered the phenomenon, in the presence of a favorable condition such as Fisher-Evans' syndrome.

Repeat biopsy in patients with initial diagnosis of PIN.

PURPOSE: Prostatic intra-epithelial neoplasia (PIN) is considered a pre-malignant lesion and the main precursor of invasive prostatic adenocarcinoma. A PIN diagnosis established by prostate needle biopsy poses a difficult clinical management problem. We retrospectively reviewed our three-year experience in order to identify criteria for referring patients to repeat biopsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed the repeat biopsy records of 72 patients in whom PIN had been detected on initial US-guided needle biopsy of the prostate. All the patients had a minimum of 6 biopsy cores taken, and they all had PSA > 4 ng/ml. RESULTS: Adenocarcinoma was detected in 15 patients out of 50 (30%) with an initial diagnosis of low-grade PIN and in 10 patients out of 22 (45.4%) with high grade PIN, in 7 out of 18 (39%) in whom PSA levels had decreased during the observation interval, in 16 patients out of 46 (35%) in whom the PSA had increased and in 2 patients out of 8 (25%) with stable PSA. CONCLUSIONS: Our results seem to confirm that PIN can be considered a precursor of prostatic adenocarcinoma or a histological alteration often associated with it. Patients with low-grade PIN and particularly those with high-grade PIN should be regularly subjected to repeat biopsy at short intervals due to the high frequency of the final diagnosis of carcinoma. No agreement has been reached on the time interval between the first and the second biopsy. The PSA changes during the observation period are not a statistically significant parameter to suggest the repetition of prostatic biopsy.