Reframing the Three Delays framework: factors influencing referrals to facilities by matrones in rural Haiti.

In Haiti, there has been limited research on the experiences of traditional birth attendants/matrones when they decide to refer and accompany pregnant women to the facility for giving birth. Understanding this contextualised experience could help to strengthen programming aimed at improving maternal, neonatal, and child health (MNCH) outcomes in rural Haiti. This paper describes the qualitative findings from seven focus group discussions (FGDs) with matrones regarding their experience of referring pregnant women to facilities in Haiti's Central Plateau. Each FGD was conducted in Haitian Kreyol and audio recorded. Recordings were transcribed, translated to English, and thematically analysed. A conceptual model visualising factors influencing matrone decision-making was then developed using an adapted version of the Three Delays framework. Findings from this study show that matrones face a complex, multilayered web of intertwining factors related to attitudes and beliefs around their role, resource availability, and perceptions around quality of care and treatment. Each factor corresponds to a delay in the Three Delays framework. The factors can occur at the same time or each can occur individually at different times, and influence the decision to refer. The complexity of factors identified reflects the need to reassess the Three Delays framework so that it accounts for the intertwining, cyclical complexities faced by those trying to access the facility amidst the backdrop of both time and the community/social contexts. Results further reflect the need for strengthened health systems that better facilitate matrone facility-based referrals, improving outcomes for all parties involved and bridging the gap between homes/ communities and facilities. This calls for better integration of the matrones into the formal health system to systematically strengthen the continuum of MNCH health services provided from home to facility.

Attitudes toward COVID-19 Vaccination: Staff and Patient Perspectives at Six Health Facilities in Sierra Leone.

Sierra Leone is a West African country with a population of over 8 million. With more than half of Sierra Leone's population living in rural areas, it is important to understand rural populations' access to and attitudes toward the COVID-19 vaccine. In November 2021, the rate of vaccination coverage in Sierra Leone was only 7% for one dose and 4% for two doses. Understanding perspectives of health facility staff and patients can help strengthen future vaccine campaigns. We conducted a cross-sectional study, between March 2022 and May 2022, of clinical staff, non-clinical staff, and adult (>18 years) patients/caregivers attending six Ministry of Health and Sanitation (MoHS) facilities supported by Partners In Health, four in the Kono district and two in the Western Urban Area district, the capital of Sierra Leone. We assessed the opportunity to vaccinate, vaccine uptake, and intention to vaccinate. Out of the 2015 participants, 11.4% were clinical staff, 18.8% were non-clinical staff, and 69.8% were patients/caregivers. Less than half of the patients/caregivers had the opportunity to be vaccinated (42%), and 22% of patients/caregivers were fully vaccinated. Among the unvaccinated population, 44% would refuse a vaccine if offered to them at no cost. Lack of access to COVID-19 vaccines and to official education messaging, especially for patients and caregivers, is still an underlying problem in Sierra Leone for vaccine uptake, rather than a lack of willingness to be vaccinated.