Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 39
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Med Care ; 62(2): 117-124, 2024 Feb 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38079225

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) can be applied to medico-administrative datasets to determine the risks of 30-day mortality and long length of stay (LOS) in hospitalized older patients. The objective of this study was to compare the HFRS with Charlson and Elixhauser comorbidity indices, used separately or combined. DESIGN: A retrospective analysis of the French medical information database. The HFRS, Charlson index, and Elixhauser index were calculated for each patient based on the index stay and hospitalizations over the preceding 2 years. Different constructions of the HFRS were considered based on overlapping diagnostic codes with either Charlson or Elixhauser indices. We used mixed logistic regression models to investigate the association between outcomes, different constructions of HFRS, and associations with comorbidity indices. SETTING: 743 hospitals in France. PARTICIPANTS: All patients aged 75 years or older hospitalized as an emergency in 2017 (n=1,042,234).Main outcome measures: 30-day inpatient mortality and LOS >10 days. RESULTS: The HFRS, Charlson, and Elixhauser indices were comparably associated with an increased risk of 30-day inpatient mortality and long LOS. The combined model with the highest c-statistic was obtained when associating the HFRS with standard adjustment and Charlson for 30-day inpatient mortality (adjusted c-statistics: HFRS=0.654; HFRS + Charlson = 0.676) and with Elixhauser for long LOS (adjusted c-statistics: HFRS= 0.672; HFRS + Elixhauser =0.698). CONCLUSIONS: Combining comorbidity indices and HFRS may improve discrimination for predicting long LOS in hospitalized older people, but adds little to Charlson's 30-day inpatient mortality risk.


Asunto(s)
Fragilidad , Multimorbilidad , Humanos , Anciano , Estudios Retrospectivos , Comorbilidad , Fragilidad/epidemiología , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Factores de Riesgo , Hospitales
2.
Med Care ; 62(4): 225-234, 2024 Apr 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38345863

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Length of stay (LOS) is an important metric for the organization and scheduling of care activities. This study sought to propose a LOS prediction method based on deep learning using widely available administrative data from acute and emergency care and compare it with other methods. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All admissions between January 1, 2011 and December 31, 2019, at 6 university hospitals of the Hospices Civils de Lyon metropolis were included, leading to a cohort of 1,140,100 stays of 515,199 patients. Data included demographics, primary and associated diagnoses, medical procedures, the medical unit, the admission type, socio-economic factors, and temporal information. A model based on embeddings and a Feed-Forward Neural Network (FFNN) was developed to provide fine-grained LOS predictions per hospitalization step. Performances were compared with random forest and logistic regression, with the accuracy, Cohen kappa, and a Bland-Altman plot, through a 5-fold cross-validation. RESULTS: The FFNN achieved an accuracy of 0.944 (CI: 0.937, 0.950) and a kappa of 0.943 (CI: 0.935, 0.950). For the same metrics, random forest yielded 0.574 (CI: 0.573, 0.575) and 0.602 (CI: 0.601, 0.603), respectively, and 0.352 (CI: 0.346, 0.358) and 0.414 (CI: 0.408, 0.422) for the logistic regression. The FFNN had a limit of agreement ranging from -2.73 to 2.67, which was better than random forest (-6.72 to 6.83) or logistic regression (-7.60 to 9.20). CONCLUSION: The FFNN was better at predicting LOS than random forest or logistic regression. Implementing the FFNN model for routine acute care could be useful for improving the quality of patients' care.


Asunto(s)
Servicios Médicos de Urgencia , Hospitalización , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Hospitales , Redes Neurales de la Computación , Estudios Retrospectivos
3.
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf ; 33(7): e5866, 2024 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39013832

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Teriflunomide is a disease-modifying therapy (DMT) for multiple sclerosis (MS). This post authorisation safety study assessed risks of adverse events of special interest (AESI) associated with teriflunomide use. METHODS: Secondary use of individual data from the Danish MS Registry (DMSR), the French National Health Data System (SNDS), the Belgian national database of health care claims (AIM-IMA) and the Belgian Treatments in MS Registry (Beltrims). We included patients treated with a DMT at the date of teriflunomide reimbursement or initiating another DMT. Adjusted hazard rates (aHR) and 95% confidence intervals were derived from Cox models with time-dependent exposure comparing teriflunomide treatment with another DMT. RESULTS: Of 81 620 patients (72% women) included in the cohort, 22 324 (27%) were treated with teriflunomide. After a median follow-up of 4 years, teriflunomide use compared to other DMT was not associated with a risk of all-cause mortality, severe infection, pneumoniae, herpes zoster reactivation, pancreatitis, cardiovascular condition and cancers. For opportunistic infections, aHR for teriflunomide versus other DMT was 2.4 (1.2-4.8) in SNDS, which was not bound to a particular opportunistic agent. The aHR was 2.0 (1.1-3.7) for renal failures in the SNDS, but no association was found in other data sources. A total of 187 SNDS patients had a history of renal failure prior to cohort entry. None of these patients (0%) had a renal failure recurrence when treated with teriflunomide for 19 (13%) recurrences reported for patients on another DMT. DISCUSSION: We found no evidence that teriflunomide use would be associated with an increased risk of AESI. Trial Registration EUPAS register: EU PAS 19610.


Asunto(s)
Crotonatos , Hidroxibutiratos , Esclerosis Múltiple , Nitrilos , Toluidinas , Humanos , Toluidinas/efectos adversos , Toluidinas/administración & dosificación , Crotonatos/efectos adversos , Crotonatos/uso terapéutico , Nitrilos/efectos adversos , Femenino , Masculino , Adulto , Estudios Prospectivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Esclerosis Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Esclerosis Múltiple/epidemiología , Sistema de Registros/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios de Seguimiento , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Factores de Tiempo , Bases de Datos Factuales/estadística & datos numéricos , Francia/epidemiología
4.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med ; 207(8): 1022-1029, 2023 04 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36219472

RESUMEN

Rationale: Nurse-to-nurse familiarity at work should strengthen the components of teamwork and enhance its efficiency. However, its impact on patient outcomes in critical care remains poorly investigated. Objectives: To explore the role of nurse-to-nurse familiarity on inpatient deaths during ICU stay. Methods: This was a retrospective observational study in eight adult academic ICUs between January 1, 2011 and December 31, 2016. Measurements and Main Results: Nurse-to-nurse familiarity was measured across day and night 12-hour daily shifts as the mean number of previous collaborations between each nursing team member during previous shifts within the given ICU (suboptimal if <50). Primary outcome was a shift with at least one inpatient death, excluding death of patients with a decision to forego life-sustaining therapy. A multiple modified Poisson regression was computed to identify the determinants of mortality per shift, taking into account ICU, patient characteristics, patient-to-nurse and patient-to-assistant nurse ratios, nurse experience length, and workload. A total of 43,479 patients were admitted, of whom 3,311 (8%) died. The adjusted model showed a lower risk of a shift with mortality when nurse-to-nurse familiarity increased in the shift (relative risk, 0.90; 95% confidence interval per 10 shifts, 0.82-0.98; P = 0.012). Low nurse-to-nurse familiarity during the shift combined with suboptimal patient-to-nurse and patient-to-assistant nurse ratios (suboptimal if >2.5 and >4, respectively) were associated with increased risk of shift with mortality (relative risk, 1.84; 95% confidence interval, 1.15-2.96; P < 0.001). Conclusions: Shifts with low nurse-to-nurse familiarity were associated with an increased risk of patient deaths.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Crítica , Admisión y Programación de Personal , Adulto , Humanos , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Carga de Trabajo , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos
5.
Value Health ; 26(8): 1175-1182, 2023 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36921898

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Thyroid cancer incidence in France has increased rapidly in recent decades. Most of this increase has been attributed to overdiagnosis, the major consequence of which is overtreatment. We aimed to estimate the cost of thyroid cancer management in France and the corresponding cost proportion attributable to the treatment of overdiagnosed cases. METHODS: Multiple data sources were integrated: the mean cost per patient with thyroid cancer was estimated by using the Echantillon Généraliste des Bénéficiaires data set; thyroid cancer cases attributable to overdiagnosis were estimated for 21 departments using data from the French network of cancer registries and extrapolated to the whole country; medical records from 6 departments were used to refine the diagnosis and care pathway. RESULTS: Between 2011 and 2015, 33 911 women and 10 846 men in France were estimated to be diagnosed of thyroid cancer, with mean cost per capita of €6248. Among those treated, 8114 to 14 925 women and 1465 to 3626 men were due to overdiagnosis. The total cost of thyroid cancer patient management was €203.5 million (€154.3 million for women and €49.3 million for men), of which between €59.9 million (or 29.4% of the total cost, lower bound) and €115.9 million (or 56.9% of the total cost, upper bound) attributable to treatment of overdiagnosed cases. CONCLUSIONS: The management of thyroid cancer represents not only a relevant clinical and public health problem in France but also a potentially important economic burden. Overdiagnosis and corresponding associated treatments play an important role on the total costs of thyroid cancer management.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Tiroides , Masculino , Humanos , Femenino , Neoplasias de la Tiroides/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de la Tiroides/epidemiología , Neoplasias de la Tiroides/terapia , Incidencia , Francia/epidemiología
6.
Crit Care Med ; 50(1): 138-143, 2022 01 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34374505

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: We investigated whether the risk of death among noncoronavirus disease 2019 critically ill patients increased when numerous coronavirus disease 2019 cases were admitted concomitantly to the same hospital units. DESIGN: We performed a nationwide observational study based on the medical information system from all public and private hospitals in France. SETTING: Information pertaining to every adult admitted to ICUs or intermediate care units from 641 hospitals between January 1, 2020, and June 30, 2020 was analyzed. PATIENTS: A total of 454,502 patients (428,687 noncoronavirus disease 2019 and 25,815 coronavirus disease 2019 patients) were included. INTERVENTIONS: For each noncoronavirus disease 2019 patient, pandemic exposure during their stay was calculated per day using the proportion of coronavirus disease 2019 patients among all patients treated in ICU. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We computed a multivariable logistic regression model to estimate the influence of pandemic exposure (low, moderate, and high exposure) on noncoronavirus disease 2019 patient mortality during ICU stay. We adjusted on patient and hospital confounders. The risk of death among noncoronavirus disease 2019 critically ill patients increased in case of moderate (adjusted odds ratio, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.05-1.19; p < 0.001) and high pandemic exposures (1.52; 95% CI, 1.33-1.74; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In hospital units with moderate or high levels of coronavirus disease 2019 critically ill patients, noncoronavirus disease deaths were at higher levels.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/epidemiología , Enfermedad Crítica/mortalidad , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Mortalidad/tendencias , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Francia/epidemiología , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2
7.
Age Ageing ; 51(1)2022 01 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34185827

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) has made it possible internationally to identify subgroups of patients with characteristics of frailty from routinely collected hospital data. OBJECTIVE: To externally validate the HFRS in France. DESIGN: A retrospective analysis of the French medical information database. SETTING: 743 hospitals in Metropolitan France. SUBJECTS: All patients aged 75 years or older hospitalised as an emergency in 2017 (n = 1,042,234). METHODS: The HFRS was calculated for each patient based on the index stay and hospitalisations over the preceding 2 years. Main outcome measures were 30-day in-patient mortality, length of stay (LOS) >10 days and 30-day readmissions. Mixed logistic regression models were used to investigate the association between outcomes and HFRS score. RESULTS: Patients with high HFRS risk were associated with increased risk of mortality and prolonged LOS (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.38 [1.35-1.42] and 3.27 [3.22-3.32], c-statistics = 0.676 and 0.684, respectively), while it appeared less predictive of readmissions (aOR = 1.00 [0.98-1.02], c-statistic = 0.600). Model calibration was excellent. Restricting the score to data prior to index admission reduced discrimination of HFRS substantially. CONCLUSIONS: HFRS can be used in France to determine risks of 30-day in-patient mortality and prolonged LOS, but not 30-day readmissions. Trial registration: Reference ID on clinicaltrials.gov: ID: NCT03905629.


Asunto(s)
Fragilidad , Anciano , Fragilidad/diagnóstico , Fragilidad/epidemiología , Hospitales , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo
8.
Ann Surg ; 272(1): 105-112, 2020 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30676380

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to investigate whether patients who undergo surgery in hospitals experiencing significant length of stay (LOS) reductions over time are exposed to a higher risk of severe adverse events in the postoperative period. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Surgical care innovation has encouraged hospitals to shorten LOS under financial pressures with uncertain impact on patient outcomes. METHODS: We selected all patients who underwent elective colectomy or urgent hip fracture repair in French hospitals between 2013 and 2016. For each procedure, hospitals were categorized into 3 groups according to variations in their median LOS as follows: major decrease, moderate decrease, and no decrease. These groups were matched using propensity scores based on patients' and hospitals' potential confounders. Potentially avoidable readmission for severe adverse events and death at 6 months were compared between groups using Cox regressions. RESULTS: We considered 98,713 patients in 540 hospitals for colectomy and 206,812 patients in 414 hospitals for hip fracture repair before matching. After colectomy, patient outcomes were not negatively impacted when hospitals reduced their LOS [hazard ratio (95% confidence interval): 0.93 (0.78-1.10)]. After hip fracture repair, patients in hospitals with major decreases in LOS had a higher risk of severe adverse events [1.22 (1.11-1.34)] and death [1.17 (1.04-1.32)]. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who underwent surgical procedures in hospitals experiencing major decreases in LOS were demonstrated worse postoperative outcomes after urgent hip fracture repair and not after elective colectomy. Development of care bundles to enhance recovery after emergency surgeries may allow better control of LOS reduction and patient outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Colectomía , Fracturas de Cadera/cirugía , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/terapia , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Francia/epidemiología , Humanos , Masculino , Puntaje de Propensión , Factores de Riesgo
9.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 20(1): 274, 2020 Apr 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32238160

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The "practice makes perfect" concept considers the more frequent a hospital performs a procedure, the better the outcome of the procedure. We aimed to study this concept by investigating whether patient outcomes improve in hospitals with a significantly increased volume of high-risk surgery over time and whether a learning effect existed at the individual hospital level. METHODS: We included all patients who underwent one of 10 digestive, cardiovascular and orthopaedic procedures between 2010 and 2014 from the French nationwide hospitals database. For each procedure, we identified three groups of hospitals according to volume trend (increased, decreased, or no change). In-hospital mortality, reoperation, and unplanned hospital readmission within 30 days were compared between groups using Cox regressions, taking into account clustering of patients within hospitals and potential confounders. Individual hospital learning effect was investigated by considering the interaction between hospital groups and procedure year. RESULTS: Over 5 years, 759,928 patients from 694 hospitals were analysed. Patients' mortality in hospitals with procedure volume increase or decrease over time did not clearly differ from those in hospitals with unchanged volume across the studied procedures (e.g., Hazard Ratios [95%] of 1.04 [0.93-1.17] and 1.08 [0.97-1.21] respectively for colectomy). Furthermore, patient outcomes did not improve or deteriorate in hospitals with increased or decreased volume of procedures over time (e.g., 1.01 [0.95-1.08] and 0.99 [0.92-1.05] respectively for colectomy). CONCLUSIONS: Trend in hospital volume over time did not appear to influence patient outcomes based on real-world data. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02788331, June 2, 2016.


Asunto(s)
Utilización de Instalaciones y Servicios/tendencias , Hospitales/estadística & datos numéricos , Evaluación del Resultado de la Atención al Paciente , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Francia , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Medición de Riesgo
10.
BMC Med Educ ; 16: 126, 2016 Apr 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27117188

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: As the medicine practiced in hospital settings has become more specialized, training in primary care is becoming increasingly essential for medical students, especially for future general practitioners (GPs). Only a few limited studies have investigated the representativeness of medical practices delivering this training. The aim of this study was to assess the representativeness of French GP trainers in terms of socio-demographics, patients and activities. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study covering all private GPs practicing in the Rhône-Alpes region of France in 2011. This population consisted of 4992 GPs, including 623 trainers and 4369 non-trainers, managing 8,198,684 individual patients. Data from 2011 to 2012 were provided by the Regional Health Care Insurance (RHCI). We compared GP trainers with non-trainers using the Pearson chi-square test for qualitative variables and the Student t-test for quantitative variables RESULTS: GP trainers do not differ from non-trainers for gender, but they tend to be younger, more frequently in mid-career, and more likely to practice in a rural area. Their patients are broadly representative of patients attending general practice for age (with the exception of a higher consultation rate for infants), but patients with medical fee exemption status relating to low income are underrepresented. GP trainers have a heavier workload in terms of office visits and on-call duties. They prescribe a higher proportion of generic drugs, perform more electrocardiograms and cervical smears, and fewer plaster casts. GP trainers show better performance in diabetes follow-up, and to a lesser extent for seasonal flu vaccination and mammograms. CONCLUSIONS: GPs and patients of training practices are globally representative, which is particularly critical in countries such as France, where the length of specialty training in a general practice setting is still limited to a few months. In addition, GP trainers tend to have better clinical performance, which conforms to their teaching modelling role and may encourage other GPs to become trainers.


Asunto(s)
Medicina General/educación , Atención Primaria de Salud , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Francia , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Factores Socioeconómicos , Carga de Trabajo , Adulto Joven
11.
Crit Care Med ; 43(8): 1587-94, 2015 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25867907

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Matching healthcare staff resources to patient needs in the ICU is a key factor for quality of care. We aimed to assess the impact of the staffing-to-patient ratio and workload on ICU mortality. DESIGN: We performed a multicenter longitudinal study using routinely collected hospital data. SETTING: Information pertaining to every patient in eight ICUs from four university hospitals from January to December 2013 was analyzed. PATIENTS: A total of 5,718 inpatient stays were included. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We used a shift-by-shift varying measure of the patient-to-caregiver ratio in combination with workload to establish their relationships with ICU mortality over time, excluding patients with decision to forego life-sustaining therapy. Using a multilevel Poisson regression, we quantified ICU mortality-relative risk, adjusted for patient turnover, severity, and staffing levels. The risk of death was increased by 3.5 (95% CI, 1.3-9.1) when the patient-to-nurse ratio was greater than 2.5, and it was increased by 2.0 (95% CI, 1.3-3.2) when the patient-to-physician ratio exceeded 14. The highest ratios occurred more frequently during the weekend for nurse staffing and during the night for physicians (p < 0.001). High patient turnover (adjusted relative risk, 5.6 [2.0-15.0]) and the volume of life-sustaining procedures performed by staff (adjusted relative risk, 5.9 [4.3-7.9]) were also associated with increased mortality. CONCLUSIONS: This study proposes evidence-based thresholds for patient-to-caregiver ratios, above which patient safety may be endangered in the ICU. Real-time monitoring of staffing levels and workload is feasible for adjusting caregivers' resources to patients' needs.


Asunto(s)
Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Cuerpo Médico de Hospitales/estadística & datos numéricos , Personal de Enfermería en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Admisión y Programación de Personal/estadística & datos numéricos , Carga de Trabajo/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Femenino , Hospitales Universitarios , Humanos , Revisión de Utilización de Seguros , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Recursos Humanos
12.
PLoS One ; 19(5): e0303543, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38748637

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Statistical Process Control (SPC) tools providing feedback to surgical teams can improve patient outcomes over time. However, the quality of routinely available hospital data used to build these tools does not permit full capture of the influence of patient case-mix. We aimed to demonstrate the value of considering time-related variables in addition to patient case-mix for detection of special cause variations when monitoring surgical outcomes with control charts. METHODS: A retrospective analysis from the French nationwide hospital database of 151,588 patients aged 18 and older admitted for colorectal surgery between January 1st, 2014, and December 31st, 2018. GEE multilevel logistic regression models were fitted from the training dataset to predict surgical outcomes (in-patient mortality, intensive care stay and reoperation within 30-day of procedure) and applied on the testing dataset to build control charts. Surgical outcomes were adjusted on patient case-mix only for the classical chart, and additionally on secular (yearly) and seasonal (quarterly) trends for the enhanced control chart. The detection of special cause variations was compared between those charts using the Cohen's Kappa agreement statistic, as well as sensitivity and positive predictive value with the enhanced chart as the reference. RESULTS: Within the 5-years monitoring period, 18.9% (28/148) of hospitals detected at least one special cause variation using the classical chart and 19.6% (29/148) using the enhanced chart. 59 special cause variations were detected overall, among which 19 (32.2%) discordances were observed between classical and enhanced charts. The observed Kappa agreement between those charts was 0.89 (95% Confidence Interval [95% CI], 0.78 to 1.00) for detecting mortality variations, 0.83 (95% CI, 0.70 to 0.96) for intensive care stay and 0.67 (95% CI, 0.46 to 0.87) for reoperation. Depending on surgical outcomes, the sensitivity of classical versus enhanced charts in detecting special causes variations ranged from 0.75 to 0.89 and the positive predictive value from 0.60 to 0.89. CONCLUSION: Seasonal and secular trends can be controlled as potential confounders to improve signal detection in surgical outcomes monitoring over time.


Asunto(s)
Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Estudios Retrospectivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Francia , Reoperación/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Tiempo de Internación , Bases de Datos Factuales , Resultado del Tratamiento
13.
Stroke ; 44(7): 1770-4, 2013 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23735951

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Because acute ischemic strokes (ISs) are mainly hospitalized, hospital discharge data could be used to routinely follow their incidence management. We aimed to assess sensitivity and positive predictive value of the French hospital discharge database (HDD) to identify patients with acute IS using a prospective and exhaustive cohort (AVC69) of acute IS cases. METHODS: A selection algorithm based on IS diagnosis coded with the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10) and cerebral imaging codes was used to identify all hospital stays with the primary diagnosis of IS in the HDD of the university hospitals of the Rhône area. Cases identified through HDD search were compared with IS cases identified through an exhaustive cohort study conducted in the Rhône district and confirmed on medical records review. RESULTS: There were 465 confirmed cases of IS hospitalized in 1 of the 4 university hospitals during the study period. The HDD search identified 313 among those (true-positive cases) but missed 152 cases (false-negative cases). The sensitivity of the HDD search was 67.3% (95% confidence interval, 63.1-71.5), and the positive predictive value was 95.1% (95% confidence interval, 92.8-97.4). Additionally, HDD search retrieved 16 cases, which were not eventually IS (false positives). Sensitivity was better when patients were hospitalized in neurological departments. CONCLUSIONS: The lack of sensitivity to identify acute IS patients through HDD search does not seem to be accurate enough to validate the use of these data for incidence estimates. Efforts have to be made to improve the coding quality.


Asunto(s)
Isquemia Encefálica/epidemiología , Sistemas de Información en Hospital/normas , Alta del Paciente/normas , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Incidencia , Clasificación Internacional de Enfermedades , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Alta del Paciente/tendencias , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas
14.
Med Care ; 51(12): 1085-93, 2013 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24231784

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Surgical mortality varies widely across hospitals, but the degree of temporal variation within individual hospitals remains unexplored and may reflect unsafe care. OBJECTIVES: To add a longitudinal dimension to large-scale profiling efforts for interpreting surgical mortality variations over time within individual hospitals. DESIGN: Longitudinal analysis of the French nationwide hospital database using statistical process control methodology. SUBJECTS: A total of 9,474,879 inpatient stays linked with open surgery from 2006 through 2010 in 699 hospitals. MEASURES: For each hospital, a control chart was designed to monitor inpatient mortality within 30 days of admission and mortality trend was determined. Aggregated funnel plots were also used for comparisons across hospitals. RESULTS: Over 20 successive quarters, 52 hospitals (7.4%) experienced the detection of at least 1 potential safety issue reflected by a substantial increase in mortality momentarily. Mortality variation was higher among these institutions compared with other hospitals (7.4 vs. 5.0 small variation signals, P<0.001). Also, over the 5-year period, 119 (17.0%) hospitals reduced and 36 (5.2%) increased their mortality rate. Hospitals with improved outcomes had better control of mortality variation over time than those with deteriorating trends (5.2 vs. 6.3 signals, P=0.04). Funnel plots did not match with hospitals experiencing mortality variations over time. CONCLUSIONS: Dynamic monitoring of outcomes within every hospital may detect safety issues earlier than traditional benchmarking and guide efforts to improve the value of surgical care nationwide.


Asunto(s)
Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/mortalidad , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos/mortalidad , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Francia/epidemiología , Hospitales de Alto Volumen/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud , Propiedad/estadística & datos numéricos , Seguridad del Paciente , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo
15.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 13: 107, 2013 Mar 22.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23517767

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Hospital malnutrition is an underestimated problem and as many as half of malnourished patients do not receive appropriate treatment. In order to extend the management of malnutrition in health care facilities, multidisciplinary teams focusing on clinical nutrition were established in France. The establishment of such teams within hospital facilities remains nonetheless difficult. We have consequently developed a multifaceted intervention coordinated by a Nutritional Support Team (NST). Our study aims to evaluate the impact of this multifaceted intervention coordinated by a NST, in adherence to recommended practices for the care of malnourished children, among health care workers of a paediatric university hospital. METHODS/DESIGN: We carried out 1) a six-month observational phase focusing on the medical care procedures relative to malnourished children followed by 2) a cluster randomised controlled trial phase to evaluate the impact of a multidisciplinary nutrition team over an 18 month time frame.Based on power analyses and assuming a conservative intracluster correlation coefficient, 1289 children were needed to detect a 25% difference in rates between the two groups of the cluster trial.The implementation of our intervention was coordinated by the NST and had three major components: a) access to a computerised malnutrition screening system associated with an automatic alert system, b) an awareness campaign directed toward the health care workers and c) a leadership based strategy.Main outcomes included the number of daily weighings during hospitalisation, the investigation of malnutrition etiology and the management of malnutrition by a dietician and/or the NST.Due to the clustered nature of the data with children nested in departments, a generalized estimated equations approach will be used to analyse the impact of the multifaceted intervention on primary and secondary outcomes. DISCUSSION: Our results will provide an overall response regarding the effectiveness of our multifaceted intervention and we should be able to suggest an organization and mode of operation of NST. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01081587.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos de la Nutrición del Niño/dietoterapia , Trastornos de la Nutrición del Niño/diagnóstico , Hospitalización , Tamizaje Masivo/normas , Grupo de Atención al Paciente , Adolescente , Niño , Preescolar , Análisis por Conglomerados , Sistemas de Apoyo a Decisiones Clínicas , Femenino , Francia , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Cuerpo Médico de Hospitales
16.
BMJ Qual Saf ; 2023 Aug 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37553238

RESUMEN

IMPORTANCE: Surgical complications represent a considerable proportion of hospital expenses. Therefore, interventions that improve surgical outcomes could reduce healthcare costs. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the effects of implementing surgical outcome monitoring using control charts to reduce hospital bed-days within 30 days following surgery, and hospital costs reimbursed for this care by the insurer. DESIGN: National, parallel, cluster-randomised SHEWHART trial using a difference-in-difference approach. SETTING: 40 surgical departments from distinct hospitals across France. PARTICIPANTS: 155 362 patients over the age of 18 years, who underwent hernia repair, cholecystectomy, appendectomy, bariatric, colorectal, hepatopancreatic or oesophageal and gastric surgery were included in analyses. INTERVENTION: After the baseline assessment period (2014-2015), hospitals were randomly allocated to the intervention or control groups. In 2017-2018, the 20 hospitals assigned to the intervention were provided quarterly with control charts for monitoring their surgical outcomes (inpatient death, intensive care stay, reoperation and severe complications). At each site, pairs, consisting of one surgeon and a collaborator (surgeon, anaesthesiologist or nurse), were trained to conduct control chart team meetings, display posters in operating rooms, maintain logbooks and design improvement plans. MAIN OUTCOMES: Number of hospital bed-days per patient within 30 days following surgery, including the index stay and any acute care readmissions related to the occurrence of major adverse events, and hospital costs reimbursed for this care per patient by the insurer. RESULTS: Postintervention, hospital bed-days per patient within 30 days following surgery decreased at an adjusted ratio of rate ratio (RRR) of 0.97 (95% CI 0.95 to 0.98; p<0.001), corresponding to a 3.3% reduction (95% CI 2.1% to 4.6%) for intervention hospitals versus control hospitals. Hospital costs reimbursed for this care per patient by the insurer significantly decreased at an adjusted ratio of cost ratio (RCR) of 0.99 (95% CI 0.98 to 1.00; p=0.01), corresponding to a 1.3% decrease (95% CI 0.0% to 2.6%). The consumption of a total of 8910 hospital bed-days (95% CI 5611 to 12 634 bed-days) and €2 615 524 (95% CI €32 366 to €5 405 528) was avoided in the intervention hospitals postintervention. CONCLUSIONS: Using control charts paired with indicator feedback to surgical teams was associated with significant reductions in hospital bed-days within 30 days following surgery, and hospital costs reimbursed for this care by the insurer. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02569450.

17.
Int J Cardiol ; 380: 14-19, 2023 06 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36940821

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: We aimed to analyze the impact of timing of implantation (strategy-outcome relationship) and volume of procedures (volume-outcome relationship) on survival of veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA ECMO) for cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction (AMI). METHODS: We conducted an observational retrospective study through two propensity score-based analyses using a nationwide database between January 2013 and December 2019. We classified patients into early implantation (VA ECMO on the day of primary percutaneous coronary intervention [PCI]) and delayed implantation (VA ECMO beyond the day of PCI) groups. We classified patients into low- or high-volume groups based on the median hospital volume. RESULTS: During the study period 649 VA ECMO were implanted across 20 French hospitals. Mean age was 57.1 ± 10.4 years, 80% were male. Overall, 90-day mortality was 64.3%. Patients in the early implantation group (n = 479, 73.8%) did not show a statistical difference in 90-day mortality than in the delayed group (n = 170, 26.2%) (HR: 1.18; 95% CI 0.94-1.48; p = 0.153). The mean number of VA ECMO implanted during the study period by low-volume centers was 21.3 ± 5.4 as compared to 43.6 ± 11.8 in high-volume centers. There was no significant difference in 90-day mortality between high-volume and low-volume centers (HR: 1.00; 95% CI: 0.82-1.23; p = 0.995). CONCLUSIONS: In this real-world nationwide study, we did not find a significant association between early VA ECMO implantation as well as high-volume centers and lower mortality in AMI-related refractory cardiogenic shock.


Asunto(s)
Oxigenación por Membrana Extracorpórea , Infarto del Miocardio , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Femenino , Choque Cardiogénico/diagnóstico , Choque Cardiogénico/epidemiología , Choque Cardiogénico/etiología , Oxigenación por Membrana Extracorpórea/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversos , Infarto del Miocardio/complicaciones , Infarto del Miocardio/diagnóstico , Infarto del Miocardio/terapia , Mortalidad Hospitalaria
18.
Vaccine ; 41(25): 3796-3800, 2023 06 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37198017

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Preventive measures applied during the COVID-19 pandemic have modified the age distribution, the clinical severity and the incidence of Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) hospitalisations during the 2020/21 RSV season. The aim of the present study was to estimate the impact of these aspects on RSV-associated hospitalisations (RSVH) costs stratified by age group between pre-COVID-19 seasons and 2020/21 RSV season. METHODS: We compared the incidence, the median costs, and total RSVH costs from the national health insurance perspective in children < 24 months of age during the COVID-19 period (2020/21 RSV season) with a pre-COVID-19 period (2014/17 RSV seasons). Children were born and hospitalised in the Lyon metropolitan area. RSVH costs were extracted from the French medical information system (Programme de Médicalisation des Systémes d'Information). RESULTS: The RSVH-incidence rate per 1000 infants aged < 3 months decreased significantly from 4.6 (95 % CI [4.1; 5.2]) to 3.1 (95 % CI [2.4; 4.0]), and increased in older infants and children up to 24 months of age during the 2020/21 RSV season. Overall, RSVH costs for RSVH cases aged below 2 years old decreased by €201,770 (31 %) during 2020/21 RSV season compared to the mean pre-COVID-19 costs. CONCLUSIONS: The sharp reduction in costs of RSVH in infants aged < 3 months outweighed the modest increase in costs observed in the 3-24 months age group. Therefore, conferring a temporal protection through passive immunisation to infants aged < 3 months should have a major impact on RSVH costs even if it results in an increase of RSVH in older children infected later in life. Nevertheless, stakeholders should be aware of this potential increase of RSVH in older age groups presenting with a wider range of disease to avoid any bias in estimating the cost-effectiveness of passive immunisation strategies.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Infecciones por Virus Sincitial Respiratorio , Virus Sincitial Respiratorio Humano , Lactante , Niño , Humanos , Anciano , Preescolar , Palivizumab/uso terapéutico , Infecciones por Virus Sincitial Respiratorio/epidemiología , Antivirales/uso terapéutico , Pandemias , COVID-19/epidemiología , Hospitalización
19.
Intensive Care Med ; 49(3): 313-323, 2023 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36840798

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The mobilization of most available hospital resources to manage coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) may have affected the safety of care for non-COVID-19 surgical patients due to restricted access to intensive or intermediate care units (ICU/IMCUs). We estimated excess surgical mortality potentially attributable to ICU/IMCUs overwhelmed by COVID-19, and any hospital learning effects between two successive pandemic waves. METHODS: This nationwide observational study included all patients without COVID-19 who underwent surgery in France from 01/01/2019 to 31/12/2020. We determined pandemic exposure of each operated patient based on the daily proportion of COVID-19 patients among all patients treated within the ICU/IMCU beds of the same hospital during his/her stay. Multilevel models, with an embedded triple-difference analysis, estimated standardized in-hospital mortality and compared mortality between years, pandemic exposure groups, and semesters, distinguishing deaths inside or outside the ICU/IMCUs. RESULTS: Of 1,870,515 non-COVID-19 patients admitted for surgery in 655 hospitals, 2% died. Compared to 2019, standardized mortality increased by 1% (95% CI 0.6-1.4%) and 0.4% (0-1%) during the first and second semesters of 2020, among patients operated in hospitals highly exposed to pandemic. Compared to the low-or-no exposure group, this corresponded to a higher risk of death during the first semester (adjusted ratio of odds-ratios 1.56, 95% CI 1.34-1.81) both inside (1.27, 1.02-1.58) and outside the ICU/IMCU (1.98, 1.57-2.5), with a significant learning effect during the second semester compared to the first (0.76, 0.58-0.99). CONCLUSION: Significant excess mortality essentially occurred outside of the ICU/IMCU, suggesting that access of surgical patients to critical care was limited.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , COVID-19/epidemiología , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Pandemias , Hospitalización , Cuidados Críticos , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Estudios Retrospectivos
20.
Ann Surg Open ; 3(4): e229, 2022 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37600282

RESUMEN

To determine the influence of hospital bed turnover rate (BTR) on the occurrence of complications following minor or major digestive surgery. Background: Performance improvement in surgery aims at increasing productivity while preventing complications. It is unknown whether this relationship can be influenced by the complexity of surgery. Methods: A nationwide retrospective cohort study was conducted, based on generalized estimating equation modeling to determine the effect of hospital BTR on surgical outcomes, adjusting for patient mix and clustering within 631 public and private French hospitals. All patients who underwent minor or major digestive surgery between January 1, 2013 and December 31, 2018 were included. Hospital BTR was defined as the annual number of stays per bed for digestive surgery and categorized into tertiles. The primary endpoint was a composite measurement of events occurring within 30 days after surgery: inpatient death, extended intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and reoperation. Results: Rate of adverse events was 2.51% in low BTR hospitals versus 2.25% in high BTR hospitals for minor surgery, and 16.79% versus 16.83% for major surgery. Patients who underwent minor surgery in high BTR hospitals experienced lower complications (odds ratio [OR], 0.89; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.81-0.97; P = 0.009), mortality (OR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.78-0.98, P = 0.02), ICU admission (OR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.70-0.99; P = 0.03), and reoperation (OR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.85-0.97; P = 0.002) compared to those in low BTR hospitals. Such differences were not consistently observed among patients admitted for major surgery. Conclusions: High turnover of patients in beds is beneficial for minor procedures, but questionable for major surgeries.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA