Nonvascularized Bone Graft Reconstruction of the Irradiated Murine Mandible: An Analogue of Clinical Head and Neck Cancer Treatment.

Nonvascularized bone grafts (NBGs) represent a practical method of mandibular reconstruction that is precluded in head and neck cancer patients by the destructive effects of radiotherapy. Advances in tissue-engineering may restore NBGs as a viable surgical technique, but expeditious translation demands a small-animal model that approximates clinical practice. This study establishes a murine model of irradiated mandibular reconstruction using a segmental iliac crest NBG for the investigation of imperative bone healing strategies. Twenty-seven male isogenic Lewis rats were divided into 2 groups; control bone graft and irradiated bone graft (XBG). Additional Lewis rats served as graft donors. The XBG group was administered a fractionated dose of 35Gy. All rats underwent reconstruction of a segmental, critical-sized defect of the left hemi-mandible with a 5 mm NBG from the iliac crest, secured by a custom radiolucent plate. Following a 60-day recovery period, hemi-mandibles were evaluated for bony union, bone mineralization, and biomechanical strength (P < 0.05). Bony union rates were significantly reduced in the XBG group (42%) compared with controls (80%). Mandibles in the XBG group further demonstrated substantial radiation injury through significant reductions in all metrics of bone mineralization and biomechanical strength. These observations are consistent with the clinical sequelae of radiotherapy that limit NBGs to nonirradiated patients. This investigation provides a clinically relevant, quantitative model in which innovations in tissue engineering may be evaluated in the setting of radiotherapy to ultimately provide the advantages of NBGs to head and neck cancer patients and reconstructive surgeons.

Histologic Improvements in Irradiated Bone Through Pharmaceutical Intervention in Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis.

PURPOSE: Despite the relative surgical ease and reduced donor-site morbidity of distraction osteogenesis (DO) in comparison with free tissue transfer, DO is currently precluded as a reconstructive option for head and neck cancer (HNC) patients because of the destructive effects of radiotherapy (XRT). This study investigates the ability of a novel combined therapy (CT) of radioprotective amifostine (AMF) and angiogenic deferoxamine (DFO) to mitigate XRT-induced bone injury in a murine model of DO. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty male Sprague-Dawley rats were divided into 5 groups: DO (primary control), XRT (secondary control), AMF, DFO, and CT. With the exclusion of the DO group, all rats were administered a fractionated, human-equivalent XRT dose of 35 Gy, comparable with 70 Gy administered to HNC patients clinically. All groups underwent mandibular osteotomy and distraction to 5.1 mm. After euthanasia administration on postoperative day 40, the mandibles were sectioned and stained with Gomori trichrome. Osteocyte number, bone volume, and osteoid volume were compared between all groups by analysis of variance (P < .05). RESULTS: All rats survived and were included in the final analysis. The XRT group exhibited substantial bone injury, evidenced by a decreased osteocyte number and bone volume, as well as an increase in immature osteoid volume, compared with DO controls. The AMF, DFO, and CT groups showed significant increases in osteocyte proliferation compared with the XRT group and were not statistically different from the DO group. Notably, the CT group showed remediation of XRT-induced impairment of bone maturation and exhibited significantly greater bone volume and reduced osteoid volume in comparison with all groups. CONCLUSIONS: Combined AMF and DFO treatment showed the capacity to remediate the deleterious effects of XRT, restore cellularity to nonirradiated levels, and surpass all groups in mature bone formation. Although further investigations of AMF and DFO are warranted, this study provides preliminary support for the potential use of DO in HNC patients through pharmaceutical facilitation of irradiated bone healing.

Topical Deferoxamine Alleviates Skin Injury and Normalizes Atomic Force Microscopy Patterns Following Radiation in a Murine Breast Reconstruction Model.

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer is most commonly managed with a combination of tumor ablation, radiation, and/or chemotherapy. Despite the oncologic benefit of these treatments, the detrimental effect of radiation on surrounding tissue challenges the attainment of ideal breast reconstruction outcomes. The purpose of this study was to determine the ability of topical deferoxamine (DFO) to reduce cutaneous ulceration and collagen disorganization following radiotherapy in a murine model of expander-based breast reconstruction. METHODS: Female Sprague-Dawley rats (n = 15) were divided into 3 groups: control (expander), XRT (expander + radiation), and DFO (expander + radiation + deferoxamine [DFO]). Expanders were placed in a submusculocutaneous plane in the right upper back and ultimately filled to 15 mL. Radiation was administered via a fractionated dose of 28 Gy. Deferoxamine was delivered topically for 10 days following radiation. After a 20-day recovery period, skin ulceration and dermal type I collagen organization were analyzed. RESULTS: Compared with control, the XRT group demonstrated a significant increase in skin ulceration (3.7% vs 43.3%, P = 0.00) and collagen fibril disorganization (26.3% vs 81.8%, P = 0.00). Compared with the XRT group, treatment with topical DFO resulted in a significant reduction in ulceration (43.3% vs 7.0%, P = 0.00) and fibril disorganization (81.8% vs 15.3%, P = 0.00). There were no statistical differences between the control and DFO groups in skin ulceration or collagen disorganization. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests topical DFO is capable of reducing skin ulceration and type I collagen fibril disorganization following radiotherapy. This novel application of DFO has potential to enhance expander-based breast reconstruction outcomes and improve quality of life for women suffering the devastating effects of breast cancer.

Bone marrow stem cells assuage radiation-induced damage in a murine model of distraction osteogenesis: A histomorphometric evaluation.

The purpose of this study is to determine if intraoperatively placed bone marrow stem cells (BMSCs) will permit successful osteocyte and mature bone regeneration in an isogenic murine model of distraction osteogenesis (DO) following radiation therapy (XRT). Lewis rats were split into three groups, DO only (Control), XRT followed by DO (xDO) and XRT followed by DO with intraoperatively placed BMSCs (xDO-BMSC). Coronal sections from the distraction site were obtained, stained and analyzed via statistical analysis with analysis of variance (ANOVA) and subsequent Tukey or Games-Howell post-hoc tests. Comparison of the xDO-BMSC and xDO groups demonstrated significantly improved osteocyte count (87.15 ± 10.19 vs. 67.88 ± 15.38, P = 0.00), and empty lacunae number (2.18 ± 0.79 vs 12.34 ± 6.61, P = 0.00). Quantitative analysis revealed a significant decrease in immature osteoid volume relative to total volume (P = 0.00) and improved the ratio of mature woven bone to immature osteoid (P = 0.02) in the xDO-BMSC compared with the xDO group. No significant differences were found between the Control and xDO-BMSC groups. In an isogenic murine model of DO, BMSC therapy assuaged XRT-induced cellular depletion, resulting in a significant improvement in histological and histomorphometric outcomes.

Changes in Skin Vascularity in a Murine Model for Postmastectomy Radiation.

BACKGROUND: Postmastectomy radiation causes persistent injury to the breast microvasculature, and the prevailing assumption is that longer delays before breast reconstruction allow for recovery of blood supply. This study uses a murine model to examine the effects of radiation on skin vascularity to help determine when radiation-induced effects on the microvasculature begin to stabilize. STUDY DESIGN: Isogenic Lewis rats were divided into 2 groups: radiation therapy (XRT) (n = 24) and control (n = 24). The XRT rats received a breast cancer therapy human dose-equivalent of radiation to the groin, whereas control rats received no radiation. Animals were sacrificed at 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks after completion of radiation. The vasculature was injected with Microfil, and groin skin was harvested for radiomorphometric analysis by microcomputed tomography. One-way analysis of variance with post hoc Tukey tests was used to determine significance between groups. RESULTS: Augmentation in vascularity was observed in the XRT group at 4 weeks after radiation compared to the control group (P = 0.045). Vessel number was decreased at 12 weeks (P = 0.002) and at 16 weeks (P = 0.001) in the XRT rats compared to control rats. Vessel separation in the XRT group was higher than that in the control group at 12 weeks (P = 0.009) and 16 weeks (P = 0.001). There was no change in vessel number and separation between weeks 12 and 16. CONCLUSIONS: A period of augmented skin vascularity is seen after radiation injury followed by decreased vascularity which demonstrates stabilization at approximately 12 weeks in this murine model. This model can be used to further study breast flap vascularity and the optimization of the timing of delayed breast reconstruction.

A Histomorphometric Analysis of Radiation Damage in an Isogenic Murine Model of Distraction Osteogenesis.

PURPOSE: The devastation radiation therapy (XRT) causes to endogenous tissue in patients with head and neck cancer can be a prohibitive obstacle in reconstruction of the mandible, demanding a better understanding of XRT-induced damage and options for reconstruction. This study investigated the cellular damage caused by radiation in an isogenic murine model of mandibular distraction osteogenesis (DO). The authors posited that radiation would result in fewer osteocytes, with increased empty lacunae and immature osteoid. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty Lewis rats were randomly assigned to a DO group (n = 10) or a XRT/DO group (n = 10). These groups underwent an osteotomy and mandibular DO across a 5.1-mm gap. XRT was administered to the XRT/DO group at a fractionated human equivalent dose of 35 Gy before surgery. Animals were sacrificed on postoperative day 40 and mandibles were harvested and sectioned for histologic analysis. RESULTS: Bone that underwent radiation showed a significantly decreased osteocyte count and complementary increase in empty lacunae compared with non-XRT bone (P = .019 and P = .000). In addition, XRT bone exhibited increased immature osteoid and decreased mature woven bone compared with nonradiated bone (P = .001 and P = .003, respectively). Furthermore, analysis of the ratio of immature osteoid to woven bone volume exhibited a significant increase in the XRT bone, further showing the devastating damage from XRT (P = .001). CONCLUSION: These results clearly show the cellular diminution that occurs as a result of radiation. This foundational study provides the groundwork on which to investigate cellular therapies in an immuno-privileged model of mandibular DO.

Prevention of radiation-induced bone pathology through combined pharmacologic cytoprotection and angiogenic stimulation.

Pathologic fractures and associated non-unions arising in previously irradiated bone are severely debilitating diseases. Although radiation is known to have deleterious effects on healthy tissue cellularity and vascularity, no clinically accepted pharmacologic interventions currently exist to target these destructive mechanisms within osseous tissues. We utilized amifostine-a cellular radioprotectant-and deferoxamine-an angiogenic stimulant-to simultaneously target the cellular and vascular niches within irradiated bone in a rat model of mandibular fracture repair following irradiation. Rats treated with combined therapy were compared to those undergoing treatment with singular amifostine or deferoxamine therapy, nontreated/irradiated animals (XFx) and non-treated/non-irradiated animals (Fx). 3D angiographic modeling, histology, Bone Mineral Density Distribution and mechanical metrics were utilized to assess therapeutic efficacy. We observed diminished metrics for all outcomes when comparing XFx to Fx alone, indicating the damaging effects of radiation. Across all outcomes, only the combined treatment group improved upon XFx levels, normalized all metrics to Fx levels, and was consistently as good as, or superior to the other treatment options (p<0.05). Collectively, our data demonstrate that pharmacologically targeting the cellular and vascular environments within irradiated bone prevents bone injury and enhances fracture healing.