Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Bone Rep ; 17: 101623, 2022 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36213624

RESUMEN

The differences in bone nanomechanical properties between cortical (Ct) and trabecular (Tb) bone remain uncertain, whereas knowing the respective contribution of each compartment is critical to understand the origin of bone strength. Our purpose was to compare bone mechanical and intrinsic properties of Ct and Tb compartments, at the bone structural unit (BSU) level, in iliac bone taken from a homogeneous untreated human population. Among 60 PMMA-embedded transiliac bone biopsies from untreated postmenopausal osteoporotic women (64 ± 7 year-old), >2000 BSUs were analysed by nanoindentation in physiological wet conditions [indentation modulus (elasticity), hardness, dissipated energy], by Fourier transform infrared (FTIRM) and Raman microspectroscopy (mineral and organic characteristics), and by X-ray microradiography (degree of mineralization of bone, DMB). BSUs were categorized based on tissue age, osteonal (Ost) and interstitial (Int) tissues location and bone compartments (Ct and Tb). Indentation modulus was higher in Ct than in Tb BSUs, both in Ost and Int. dissipated energy was higher in Ct than Tb, in Int BSUs. Hardness was not different between Ct and Tb BSUs. In Ost or Int BSUs, mineral maturity (conversion of non-apatitic into apatitic phosphates) was higher in Ct than in Tb, as well as for collagen maturity (Ost). Mineral content assessed as mineral/matrix (FTIRM and Raman) or as DMB, was lower in Ct than in Tb. Crystallinity (FTIRM) was similar in BSUs from Ct and Tb, and slightly lower in Ct than in Tb when measured by Raman, indicating that the crystal size/perfection was quite similar between Ct and Tb BSUs. The differences found between Ost and Int tissues were much higher than the difference found between Ct and Tb for all those bone material properties. Multiple regression analysis showed that Indentation modulus and dissipated energy were mainly explained by mineral maturity in Ct and by collagen maturity in Tb, and hardness by mineral content in both Ct and Tb. In conclusion, in untreated human iliac bone, Ct and Tb BSUs exhibit different characteristics. Ct BSUs have higher indentation modulus, dissipated energy (Int), mineral and organic maturities than Tb BSUs, without difference in hardness. Although those differences are relatively small compared to those found between Ost and Int BSUs, they may influence bone strength at macroscale.

2.
Bone ; 153: 116107, 2021 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34260980

RESUMEN

Bone quality is altered mainly by osteoporosis, which is treated with modulators of bone quality. Knowledge of their mechanisms of action is crucial to understand their effects on bone quality. The goal of our study was to compare the action of alendronate (ALN) and strontium ranelate (SrRan) on the determinants of bone quality. The investigation was performed on over 60 paired human iliac biopsies. Paired samples correspond to biopsies obtained from the same patient, one before treatment (baseline) and one after 12 months of treatment, in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Vibrational spectroscopy (Raman and FTIRM) and nanoindentation were used to evaluate the effect of both drugs on bone quality at the ultrastructural level. Outcomes measured by vibrational spectroscopy and nanoindentation are sensitive to bone age. New bone packets are distinguished from old bone packets. Thus, the effect of bone age is distinguished from the treatment effect. Both drugs modify the mineral and organic composition in new and old bone in different fashions after 12 months of administration. The new bone formed during ALN administration is characterized by an increased mineral content, carbonation and apatite crystal size/perfection compared to baseline. Post-translational modifications of collagen are observed through an increase in the hydroxyproline/proline ratio in new bone. The proteoglycan content is also increased in new bone. SrRan directly modulates bone quality through its physicochemical actions, independent of an effect on bone remodeling. Strontium cations are captured by the hydrated layer of the mineral matrix. The mineral matrix formed during SrRan administration has a lower carbonate content and crystallinity after 12 months than at baseline. Strontium might create bonds (crosslinks) with collagen and noncollagenous proteins in new and old bone. The nanomechanical properties of bone were not modified with either ALN or SrRan, probably due to the short duration of administration. Our results show that ALN and SrRan have differential effects on bone quality in relation to their mechanism of action.


Asunto(s)
Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea , Osteoporosis Posmenopáusica , Alendronato/uso terapéutico , Biopsia , Densidad Ósea , Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/uso terapéutico , Matriz Ósea , Femenino , Humanos , Ilion , Osteoporosis Posmenopáusica/tratamiento farmacológico , Posmenopausia , Tiofenos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA