Phase I/IIa trial of the mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor ridaforolimus (AP23573; MK-8669) administered orally in patients with refractory or advanced malignancies and sarcoma.

BACKGROUND: Ridaforolimus is an inhibitor of mTOR with evidence of antitumor activity in an I.V. formulation. This multicenter, open-label, 3 + 3 design nonrandomized, dose-escalation, phase I/IIa trial was conducted to determine the safety, pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic parameters, maximum tolerated dose, and antitumor activity of oral ridaforolimus. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with metastatic or unresectable solid tumors refractory to therapy were eligible. Seven different continuous and intermittent dosing regimens were examined. RESULTS: One hundred and forty-seven patients were enrolled in this study among which 85 were patients with sarcoma. Stomatitis was the most common DLT observed. The dosing regimen, 40 mg QD × 5 days/week, provided the best combination of cumulative dose, dose density, and cumulative exposure, and was the recommended dosing regimen for subsequent clinical development. PK was nonlinear, with less than proportional increases in day-1 blood AUC0-∞ and Cmax, particularly with doses >40 mg. The terminal half-life estimate of ridaforolimus (QD × 5 40 mg) was 42.0 h, and the mean half-life ∼30-60 h. The clinical benefit rate, (complete response, partial response, or stable disease for ≥4 months was 24.5% for all patients and 27.1% for patients with sarcoma. CONCLUSION: Oral ridaforolimus had an acceptable safety profile and exhibited antitumor activity in patients with sarcoma and other malignancies. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT00112372.

Mortality associated with irinotecan plus bolus fluorouracil/leucovorin: summary findings of an independent panel.

PURPOSE: To review and assign attribution for the causes of early deaths on two National Cancer Institute-sponsored cooperative group studies involving irinotecan and bolus fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (IFL). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The inpatient, outpatient, and research records of patients treated on Cancer and Leukemia Group B protocol C89803 and on North Center Cancer Treatment Group protocol N9741 were reviewed by a panel of five medical oncologists not directly involved with either study. Each death was categorized as treatment-induced, treatment-exacerbated, or treatment-unrelated. RESULTS: The records of 44 patients who experienced early deaths on C89803 (21 patients) or N9741 (23 patients) were reviewed. Patients treated with irinotecan plus bolus 5-FU/leucovorin had a three-fold higher rate of treatment-induced or treatment-exacerbated death than patients treated on the other arm(s) of the respective studies. For C89803, these rates were 2.5% (16 of 635) for IFL versus 0.8% (five of 628) for bolus weekly 5-FU and leucovorin. For N9741, these rates were 3.5% (10 of 289) for IFL, 1.1% (three of 277) for oxaliplatin plus bolus and infusional 5-FU and leucovorin, and 1.1% (three of 275) for oxaliplatin plus irinotecan. Multiple gastrointestinal toxicities that often occurred together were characterized into a gastrointestinal syndrome. Sudden, unexpected thromboembolic events were characterized as a vascular syndrome. The majority of deaths in both studies were attributable to one or both of these syndromes. CONCLUSION: Close clinical monitoring, early recognition of toxicities and toxicity syndromes, aggressive therapeutic intervention, and withholding therapy in the presence of unresolved drug-related toxicities is recommended for patients receiving IFL or other intensive chemotherapy regimens.

Combined therapies for squamous-cell carcinoma of the esophagus, a Southwest Oncology Group Study (SWOG-8037).

Conservative treatment of esophageal cancer with radiation therapy has afforded few long-term survivors. In order to improve outcome, patients with locoregional disease were treated using a combined modality approach. Patients were treated with chemotherapy consisting of a 96-hour continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), 1,000 mg/m2/d, days 1 to 4 and days 29 to 32; cisplatin 75 mg/m2, day 1 and 29; and radiation 3,000 rad, days 1 to 19. In the absence of progressive disease, patients underwent esophagectomy. One hundred twenty-eight patients were registered of whom 113 were eligible and 106 were evaluable. Toxicity included gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms, mucositis, and myelosuppression. One hundred two patients completed chemoradiotherapy. Following its completion, 11 patients refused surgery, six were considered poor surgical risks, and 14 had progressive disease. Of the remaining 71 patients, 16 had unresectable disease, 13 had residual disease which was incompletely resected, 24 had disease which could be completely resected, and 18 were without disease on pathologic examination. The overall operability rate was 63% and the overall resectability rate, 49%. Surgical mortality was 11%. Eighty-nine of 113 eligible patients have died, with a median survival of 12 months and a 2-year survival of 28%. The median postsurgical survival for all 71 patients was 14 months and was 32 months for those patients attaining complete remission (CR). Combined modality therapy remains an investigational approach. Attempts should be directed at increasing response rate to initial therapy. A randomized comparison between combined modality treatment and radiation therapy is necessary to definitively determine the usefulness of this more aggressive approach.

Phase Ib trial of bryostatin 1 in patients with refractory malignancies.

A Phase Ib trial of bryostatin 1, a macrocyclic lactone and protein kinase C (PKC) activator, was conducted in patients with refractory nonhematological malignancies with the primary goal of determining whether down-regulation of peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMNC) PKC activity could be achieved in vivo in humans. Patients (four patients/cohort) received bryostatin 1 (25 microg/m2) as a 1-h infusion weekly three times every 4 weeks, but to study the schedule dependence of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, the first dose was administered according to one of three schedules: (a) a 1-h infusion; (b) a 24-h infusion; or (c) a split course (12.5 microg/m2 as a 30-min infusion) on days 1 and 4. Conventional toxicities (grades I-III) included myalgias, fever, anemia, fatigue, phlebitis, and headache; in addition, two patients in cohort 3 experienced transient elevations in liver function tests, although these patients had preexisting liver metastases. No objective clinical responses were encountered. Effects on PBMNC PKC activity were heterogeneous. Several patients in cohorts 1 and 2 experienced significant declines in activity (approximately 50%) that were sustained in some cases for periods of > or = 72 h. Comparison of 72-h with baseline values for all three patient cohorts combined revealed a trend toward PKC down-regulation (P = 0.06; signed rank test). For each schedule, plasma bryostatin 1 levels were below the level of detection of a platelet aggregation-based bioassay (3-4 nm). Bryostatin 1 administration failed to produce consistent alterations in lymphocyte immunophenotypic profiles, interleukin 2-induced proliferation, or cytotoxicity, although two of three samples from patients in cohort 3 did show significant posttreatment increases in proliferation. Moreover, in some patients, bryostatin 1 treatment increased lymphokine-activated killer cell activity. These findings indicate that bryostatin 1 doses of 25 microg/m2 can induce in vivo PBMNC PKC down-regulation in at least a subset of patients and raise the possibility that higher bryostatin 1 doses may be more effective in achieving this effect.

Phase I clinical trial of pyrazoloacridine NSC366140 (PD115934).

The pyrazoloacridine (PZA) analogue NSC366140 (PD115934) entered clinical trial based on unique preclinical characteristics including solid tumor selectivity in vitro, marked antitumor activity in vivo against murine solid tumors, selectivity against noncycling cells, and activity against multidrug-resistant tumor cells. After identification of the pre-clinical efficacy and an acceptable toxicity profile, a Phase I study of PZA was carried out. A total of 28 patients was entered and received a total of 67 treatment courses. The drug was administered via a 1-h infusion every 21 days. The starting dose was 30 mg/m2 with 2-fold dose escalations through 480 mg/m2. The next dose escalation was 50%, to 720 mg/m2. Grade I through grade IV toxicities were observed. Since no dose-limiting toxicities were observed at 480 mg/m2, and up to grade IV toxicities were observed at 720 mg/m2, an intermediate dose, 600 mg/m2, was evaluated. Dose-limiting toxicities at 720 mg/m2 were hematological (grade III and IV neutropenia) in four of six patients and neurological (up to grade III cerebral toxicities, including restlessness, dizziness, agitation/anxiety, personality changes, and nightmares, as well as myoclonus) in three of six patients treated. The pharmacokinetic parameters which helped predict these toxicities included area under the curve and peak plasma level. Pharmacokinetic studies showed interpatient variations in all parameters studied. The mean area under the curve levels of PZA at the highest two dose levels in patients were near the level detected in mice at their maximum tolerated total dose. The recommended starting dose for Phase II trials using this schedule is 600 mg/m2.

Adjuvant continuous infusion 5-FU, whole-abdominal radiation, and tumor bed boost in high-risk stage III colon carcinoma: a Southwest Oncology Group Pilot study.

PURPOSE: Results of a combined modality adjuvant pilot program of low-dose continuous-infusion 5-fluorouracil, whole-abdominal radiation, and tumor bed boost in patients with colon cancer with involved nodes and serosal involvement are presented. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Forty-one eligible patients with completely resected T3N1-2M0 colon cancer (modified Astler-Coller C2) were treated with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) at a dose of 200 mg/m2/day by continuous infusion and 30 Gy of concomitant whole-abdominal radiation in 1 Gy fractions. An additional 16 Gy boost to the tumor bed was administered in 1.6 Gy fractions. After completion of combined modality treatment and a 21-day rest period, patients received 4 days of 5-FU at a dose of 1000 mg/m2 by continuous infusion every 28 days for nine cycles. RESULTS: Five-year disease-free and overall survival estimates were 58 and 67%, respectively, for all T3N1-2 patients. Five-year disease-free and overall survival estimates for the 19 patients with four or fewer nodes were both 61%. Five-year disease-free survival and overall survival estimates for the 20 patients with more than four involved nodes were 55% and 74%, respectively (the exact number of involved nodes were unknown for two patients). Disease-free and overall survival estimates for patients treated with 5-FU and radiation compare favorably to the 5-FU plus levamisole arm of the intergroup adjuvant colon study (Int 0035/SWOG 8591) in patients with more than four positive nodes where the 5-year disease-free and overall survival estimates were 35% and 39%, respectively. Disease-free and overall survival estimates for patients with four or fewer nodes in the 5-FU plus levamisole arm of the intergroup study were 64 and 68%, which is not markedly different from results obtained with radiation and 5-FU in the current study. There were no treatment-related fatalities. Seventeen percent of patients had severe and 7% had life-threatening toxicity of any kind. One patient had an acute partial bowel obstruction and two patients had chronic low grade enteritis. CONCLUSION: Continuous infusion 5-FU and whole-abdominal radiation with tumor bed boost should be further investigated in a larger trial of T3N1-2 colon cancer.

Response rates--an evolution.

The documented frequency of response of cancers to common chemotherapy agents and combinations appears to have decreased over the decades. Multiple reasons exist for this decline including: changes in eligibility and evaluability criteria; changes in the type of patients entered onto trial; and, altered criteria for response and methods for response assessment. The disinclination to publish negative results also permits a bias in a favor of overestimating a drug's efficacy. Circumspection now is advised in assessing data from older trials.

Phase I clinical and pharmacokinetic study of cyclophosphamide administered by five-day continuous intravenous infusion.

A total of 14 patients, 7 male and 7 female, received in all 21 evaluable courses of cyclophosphamide administered by 5-day continuous infusion. Cyclophosphamide doses were escalated from 300 to 400 mg/m2 per day for 5 days and repeated every 21-28 days. The patient population had a median age of 55 years (range 38-76) and a median Karnofsky performance status of 80 (range 60-100). Only 1 patient had not received prior therapy; 5 patients had received only prior chemotherapy, 1 had received only prior radiotherapy, and 7 had received both. Tumor types were gastric (1), lung (2), colon (4), urethral adenocarcinoma (1), cervical (2), chondrosarcoma (1), melanoma (1), uterine leiomyosarcoma (1), and pancreatic (1). The dose-limiting toxicity was granulocytopenia, with median WBC nadir of 1700/microliter (range 100-4800) in 8 heavily pretreated patients treated at 350 mg/m2 per day for 5 days. One patient without heavy prior treatment received two courses at 400 mg/m2 and had WBC nadirs of 800/microliter and 600/microliter. WBC nadirs occurred between days 9 and 21 (median 14). Drug-induced thrombocytopenia occurred in only one patient (350 mg/m2 per day, nadir 85,000/microliter). Neither hyponatremia nor symptomatic hypo-osmolality was observed. Radiation-induced hemorrhagic cystitis may have been worsened in one patient. Nausea and vomiting were mild. Objective remissions were not observed. The maximum tolerated dose for previously treated patients is 350 mg/m2 per day for 5 days. This dose approximates the doses of cyclophosphamide commonly used with bolus administration. Plasma steady-state concentrations (Css) of cyclophosphamide, measured by gas liquid chromatography, were 2.09-6.79 micrograms/ml. Steady state was achieved in 14.5 +/- 5.9 h (mean +/- SD). After the infusion, cyclophosphamide disappeared from plasma monoexponentially, with a t 1/2 of 5.3 +/- 3.6 h. The area under the curve of plasma cyclophosphamide concentrations versus time (AUC) was 543 +/- 150 micrograms/ml h and reflected a cyclophosphamide total-body clearance (CLTB) of 103 +/- 31.6 ml/min. Plasma alkylating activity, assessed by p-nitrobenzyl-pyridine, remained steady at 1.6-4.3 micrograms/ml nor-nitrogen mustard equivalents. Urinary excretion of cyclophosphamide and alkylating activity accounted for 9.3% +/- 7.6% and 15.1% +/- 2.0% of the administered daily dose, respectively. The t1/2 and AUC of cyclophosphamide associated with the 5-day continuous infusion schedule are similar to those reported after administration of cyclophosphamide 1500 mg/m2 as an i.v. bolus.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

GM-CSF, carboplatin, doxorubicin: a phase I study.

Dose intensification has the potential to increase the response frequency of chemosensitive tumors to chemotherapy. G-CSF and GM-CSF offer the possibility of dose-intensifying chemotherapy without prohibitive myelosuppression. A phase I study was undertaken to identify the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of carboplatin that could be administered with a fixed dose of doxorubicin, 60 mg/m2, administered every 28 days. Further escalation of the carboplatin dose was then attempted, with the concomitant addition of GM-CSF 10 mg/kg per day on days 1-21. We had 21 patients, 13 with prior therapy, who were eligible. In all, 60 courses of therapy were delivered, all with doxorubicin and with carboplatin doses of 250 mg/m2, 325 mg/m2 and 400 mg/m2. At carboplatin 400 mg/m2 and doxorubicin 60 mg/m2, thrombocytopenia was dose limiting. The addition of GM-CSF did not allow further escalation. Of the 6 patients treated with carboplatin 400 mg/m2, doxorubicin 60 mg/m2, and GM-CSF, grade 4 granulocytopenia and thrombocytopenia were seen in 4 and 5 patients, respectively. The severity of thrombocytopenia was related to the calculated carboplatin AUC and also to baseline platelet count and prior therapy. In addition, the interaction of GM-CSF and chemotherapy, especially carboplatin-based, may be more complex than originally anticipated.

Weekly lometrexol with daily oral folic acid is appropriate for phase II evaluation.

PURPOSE: Lometrexol [(6R)-5,10-dideaza-5,6,7,8-tetrahydrofolate] is the prototype folate antimetabolite that targets the de novo purine synthesis pathway. Early phase I trials were confounded by cumulative myelosuppression that prevented repetitive administration. Subsequent preclinical and clinical studies suggested that coadministration of folic acid might favorably modulate lometrexol toxicity without eliminating potential antitumor activity. We set out to determine if concurrent folic acid would allow administration of lometrexol on a weekly schedule, and, if so, to identify an appropriate dose combination for phase II trials. Pharmacokinetic and metabolism studies were undertaken in an attempt to improve our understanding of lometrexol pharmacodynamics. METHODS: Patients with advanced cancer received daily oral folic acid beginning 7 days before lometrexol and continuing for 7 days beyond the last lometrexol dose. Lometrexol was administered by short i.v. infusion weekly for 8 weeks. Scheduled lometrexol doses were omitted for toxicity of more than grade 2 present on the day of treatment, and dose-limiting toxicity was prospectively defined in terms of frequency of dose omission as well as the occurrence of severe toxic events. Plasma and whole blood total lometrexol contents (lometrexol plus lometrexol polyglutamates) were measured in samples taken just prior to each lometrexol dose. RESULTS: A total of 18 patients were treated at five lometrexol dose levels. The maximum tolerated dose was identified by frequent dose omission due to thrombocytopenia and mucositis. The recommended phase II dose combination is lometrexol 10.4 mg/m(2) per week i.v. with folic acid 3 mg/m(2) per day orally. One patient with melanoma experienced a partial response, and three patients, two with melanoma and one with renal cell carcinoma, experienced stable disease. Lometrexol was not detectable in any predose plasma sample tested. The total red blood cell content of lometrexol increased over several weeks and then appeared to plateau. CONCLUSIONS: Weekly administration of lometrexol is feasible and well-tolerated when coadministered with daily oral folic acid. The nature of the interaction between natural folates and lometrexol that renders this schedule feasible remains unclear. A definition of dose-limiting toxicity that incorporated attention to dose omissions allowed efficient identification of a recommended phase II dose that reflects the maximum feasible dose intensity for a weekly schedule. Lometrexol is a promising, anticancer agent.

Randomized clinical trial of mitomycin-C with or without pretreatment with WR-2721 in patients with advanced colorectal cancer.

The use of mitomycin for metastatic colorectal cancer has been limited by mitomycin's myelosuppressive potential. The objective of this randomized study was to determine whether WR-2721 would decrease the hematologic toxicity of mitomycin in patients with colorectal cancer resistant to fluorouracil-based therapy. Ninety-seven patients with refractory colorectal cancer were randomized to receive either mitomycin 20 mg/m2 only or the same dose of mitomycin after pretreatment with WR-2721, 910 mg/m2. The principal toxicity in both groups was thrombocytopenia. The platelet nadirs were lower in patients receiving single-agent mitomycin (P = 0.026). Surprisingly, no clinical complete or partial responses were noted in either group, and survival was not different between the two groups. Thus, while WR-2721 decreased the thrombocytopenia associated with mitomycin therapy, mitomycin was ineffective in the treatment of refractory colorectal carcinoma.

Phase I study of monoclonal antibody-ricin A chain immunoconjugate Xomazyme-791 in patients with metastatic colon cancer.

The immunoconjugate XMMCO-791/RTA consists of ricin A chain bound to a murine monoclonal antibody MoAb 791T. This monoclonal antibody (MoAb) binds to a glycoprotein of 72 kD, which is expressed on human colorectal carcinoma, ovarian carcinoma, and osteogenic sarcoma. XMMCO-791/RTA was tested in a Phase I trial with proposed dose escalation steps of 0.02, 0.04, 0.15, and 0.2 mg/kg per day. Twelve patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma were treated at 0.02, 0.03, and 0.04 mg/kg per day dose levels administered over 1 hour on days 1-5. Study-related toxicities were hypotension (6 patients); greater than 10% weight gain (6 patients); peripheral edema (9 patients); fever (4 patients); confusion (3 patients); diarrhea (3 patients); proteinuria, as identified by dipstick (3 patients), greater than 0.6 mg/dl decrease in serum albumin (11 patients); greater than 25% decrease in oncotic pressure (10 patients), and a decrease in ionized calcium (8 patients). Six patients received a second course of treatment. HAMA levels developed in 9 patients and titers increased with number of courses administered. Decreased overall toxicity, in comparison to the first course, was noted, but one patient had an allergic-type response (hypotension, crushing chest pain, diaphoresis) after the test dose of the second course (HAMA level > 10,000 IgG). Life-threatening toxicity in the form of fluid shift, resulting in noncardiac pulmonary edema and third-spacing occurred after course 1 in 1 of 3 patients at the 0.04 mg/kg per day level. No further dose escalation was attempted and no antitumor activity was seen.

Colon cancer: medical therapy.

Fluorouracil is the major chemotherapy agent currently available for colon cancer. It is utilized alone or in combination in a variety of schedules, though the optimal schedule has not yet been identified. In addition to the use for metastatic disease, fluorouracil also is useful for adjuvant treatment or in combination with radiation therapy for treatment of locoregional disease.

Small cell carcinoma of the lung: influence of age on treatment outcome.

Two hundred twenty-three patients between 29 and 78 years of age with small cell cancer of the lung were studied in serial protocols at the University of Maryland Cancer Center from 1975 to 1982. Each of these patients received chemotherapy consisting of doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, and etoposide. In this paper we explore age and its interaction with the patient's extent of disease as it relates to clinical outcome variables such as the achievement of a complete response (CR), survival times, and various measures of toxicity. Preliminary evidence is found to suggest that an age-extent of disease interaction affects both the probability of obtaining a CR and the length of survival. Patients of all ages can benefit from treatment of small cell carcinoma of the lung, with CR as the treatment goal. However, increased toxicity and early death remain as barriers to successful treatment of the elderly.

Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia in patients with solid tumors without acquired immune deficiency syndrome.

Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia (PCP) developed in two patients with solid tumors without acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS). In patients with neoplastic solid tumors, as in those with hematologic malignancies, Pneumocystis is a possible cause of pneumonia. Management protocols evaluating pulmonary infiltrates in this patient population must include tests for PCP.

Hepatoma/merbarone. A Southwest Oncology Group study.

Sixteen eligible patients with hepatocellular carcinoma, previously untreated, received merbarone 1000 mg/m2/d for five consecutive days every 21 days. No complete or partial response to treatment was obtained. Seven patients had grade 4 granulocytopenia. One patient died with renal failure. Merbarone in this dose and schedule was ineffective in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma.

SWOG 8825: melphalan GM-CSF: a phase I study.

The use of intravenous melphalan at higher doses is limited by severe myelosuppression. It was postulated that GM-CSF would permit the use of higher dose melphalan with only moderate myelosuppression easily manageable in an outpatient setting. Therefore, a phase I study of intravenous melphalan utilizing GM-CSF (recombinant granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor) support was initiated. Intravenous melphalan at doses of 15-45 mg/m2 was administered every 28 days. GM-CSF was utilized at doses of 10-20 micrograms/kg/day subcutaneously Days 2-21 on a 28-day cycle. Twenty-five patients received 53 courses of therapy. The dose-limiting toxicities were severe or life-threatening granulocytopenia and thrombocytopenia. Utilizing 20 micrograms/kg/day GM-CSF, the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of melphalan is 30 mg/m2 and, with 10 mg/kg/day GM-CSF, the maximum tolerated melphalan dose is only 20 mg/m2. One patient with ovarian cancer achieved a partial response. Because the reported MTD of intravenous melphalan without GM-CSF is 30 mg/m2, GM-CSF has not allowed sufficient escalation of the intravenous melphalan dose for routine outpatient use.

A dose-intensive regimen of 5-fluorouracil for the treatment of metastatic colorectal carcinoma.

5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) was delivered in a dose-intensive schedule to 23 patients with metastatic or unresectable colorectal carcinoma. The schedule consisted of bolus single-dose 5-FU therapy 400 to 500 mg followed by 4-day infusion of 5-FU, 600 to 800 mg/m2/day, followed by a 17-day to 24-day infusion of 200 to 250 mg/m2/day. Partial remissions were seen in 22% of all eligible patients. Significant toxicity, including mucositis, diarrhea, and hand-foot syndrome, necessitated dose reductions in most patients. The authors conclude that 5-FU given in this moderately intensive schedule is associated with a moderate level of response, as easily achieved with more conventional schedules or with 5-FU-leucovorin combinations. Tumor responsiveness to dose intensive 5-FU regimens may be limited.

Leucovorin, 5-fluorouracil, and gemcitabine: a phase I study.

Gemcitabine is a chemotherapy agent with efficacy in the treatment of lung, pancreas, bladder and breast cancer. It inhibits DNA synthesis by interfering with cytidine triphosphate production and also inhibits the activity of ribonucleotide reductase. Gemcitabine may potentiate fluorouracil's inhibition of thymidylate synthase. This inhibition would be expected to be sequence dependent, occurring only if gemcitabine were administered following fluorouracil (5FU). The combination of leucovorin, 5-FU, and gemcitabine was assessed in this phase I trial. Eligibility requirements included refractory solid tumor malignancy; adequate hematologic, renal and hepatic reserve; no prior therapy with the combination of leucovorin and 5FU, or with gemcitabine; ECOG performance status 0-2, and signed informed consent. Eleven men and nine women were eligible. The median age was 52.5 years and the median performance status was 1. All but three patients had prior chemotherapy. The starting doses were leucovorin 20 mg/m2, 5FU 255 mg/m2 and gemcitabine 600 mg/m2. 5FU and gemcitabine were escalated in tandem to 340 mg/m2 and 800 mg/m2 and thereafter to 425 mg/m2 and 1000 mg/m2, respectively. Gemcitabine administration always followed that of 5FU by 30 minutes. The median number of cycles was 2 (range 1-32). Two patients at the starting dose had disease progression within the first cycle with one death on day 28. One patient with cholangiocarcinoma had a partial response and remained on study for 40 months. There were no other responses. The maximum tolerated dose is leucovorin 20 mg/m2, 5FU 340 mg/m2, and gemcitabine 800 mg/m2. The impact of drug sequence remains undetermined.

CCNU, vincristine, methotrexate, and procarbazine treatment of relapsed small cell lung carcinoma.

Thirty-two patients with refractory relapsed small cell carcinoma of the lung (SCCL) were treated with a combination of CCNU (lomustine), vincristine, methotrexate, and procarbazine (COMP); 29 were evaluable for response. Nine patients (31%) had responses: five complete responses (CR) and four partial responses. Patients with CR had a median survival of 11 months (range, 51/2-141/2) from the start of COMP. Patients with less than CR had a median survival of approximately 3 months (range, less than 1-7). The comparison of CR versus less than CR is significant (P = 0.003). Patients achieving CR usually had limited disease and four of the five who achieved CR survived greater than 6 months. The regimen was well-tolerated, but myelosuppression was seen in all patients. COMP appears to be a useful combination in patients with relapsed SCCL. Aggressive retreatment should be considered in relapsed patients with this disease since some may achieve a second CR, with the associated potential survival benefit.