Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Surg Endosc ; 30(11): 4697-4720, 2016 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26905578

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There is currently a paucity of research comparing the clinical outcomes of single-incision laparoscopic colectomy (SILC) with those obtained with multiport laparoscopic colectomy (MLC). This meta-analysis aimed to examine whether SILC shows real benefits over MLC, especially in terms of feasibility, safety, and oncological adequacy. METHODS: A literature review of studies comparing SILC and MLC has been performed which looked at the following outcomes: mortality, morbidity, and oncological parameters of adequacy, as well as other potential benefits and drawbacks. Standardized mean difference for continuous variables and odds ratios for qualitative variables were calculated. RESULTS: Thirty studies comparing SILC and MLC were reviewed: two prospective randomized clinical trials (RCTs), eight prospective studies, and 20 retrospective comparative observational studies. Overall, in a cohort of 3502 patients who underwent surgery, SILC was used in 1068 cases (30.5 %) and MLC was used in 2434 cases (69.5 %). Mean intraoperative blood loss was significantly lower when the SILC procedure had been used (75.06 vs. 91.45 ml, P = 0.03); bowel function recovered significantly earlier in the SILC patients (1.96 vs. 2.15 days, P = 0.03); mean postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter in the SILC group (5.55 vs. 6.60 days, P = 0.0005); and length of skin incision was significantly shorter in SILC patients (3.98 vs. 5.28 cm, P = 0.01). However, in the latter four outcomes, evidence of heterogeneity was found. In contrast, MLC showed significantly better results when compared to SILC in terms of distal free margins (12.26 vs. 10.98 cm, P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: SILC could be considered as a safe and feasible alternative to MLC in experienced hands. Further evidence for this surgical procedure should be assessed in the form of high-quality RCTs, with additional focus on its use in low rectal cancer resection.


Asunto(s)
Colectomía/métodos , Enfermedades del Colon/cirugía , Laparoscopía/métodos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Pérdida de Sangre Quirúrgica , Mano , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Seguridad , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
World J Surg Oncol ; 13: 193, 2015 Jun 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26041024

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Evidence on the biological behavior and clinical courses of minimally invasive and widely invasive follicular thyroid carcinoma (MI-FTC, WI-FTC) is still debatable. The current study was conducted to identify differences between MI and WI tumors and those prognostic parameters influencing late outcome such as local recurrence and survival. METHODS: From January 1998 to October 2013, 71 patients were operated on in our department because of a FTC. A retrospective cohort study was carried out to compare 42 MI-FTC and 29 WI-FTC. The comparison involved evaluation of patient characteristics, tumor characteristics, tumor staging, and risk assessment. RESULTS: A diameter greater than 4.0 cm, the presence of vascular invasion, the TNM stage III-IVA, and the high risk at AMES system risk stratification were independent factors significantly related to the presence of a WI-FTC. The only independent predictor of recurrence and disease-free survival at 10-year follow-up was a tumor size greater than 4.0 cm. CONCLUSIONS: More attention must be paid in the postoperative tumor re-staging of those patients with tumor size larger than 4.0 cm, which was the only parameter predicting recurrence and influencing disease-free survival. Nevertheless, definitive recommendations cannot be made without a longer follow-up.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma Folicular/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos/métodos , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/diagnóstico , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Neoplasias de la Tiroides/cirugía , Tiroidectomía , Adenocarcinoma Folicular/secundario , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Invasividad Neoplásica , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Neoplasias de la Tiroides/patología , Adulto Joven
3.
Ann Ital Chir ; 83(4): 319-24, 2012.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22610079

RESUMEN

AIM: Diverticulitis free perforation still remains a major life-threatening condition. Herein we evaluate factors influencing prognosis of patients with perforated colonic diverticulitis and the current validity of Mannheim Peritonitis Index (MPI) in predicting mortality. MATERIAL OF STUDY: From January 2000 to October 2010, 39 patients were operated on for generalized peritonitis from perforated diverticulitis RESULTS: Five postoperative deaths (12.8%) related to septic shock occurred. A cross-sectional study between deceased and non-deceased patients was carried out. Deceased patients were significantly older than non-deceased (76.4 vs. 59.1 years,p=0.019); duration of symptoms was longer in deceased patients (102 vs. 26.9 hours, p=0.000); MPI was higher in deceased patients (31.4 vs. 21.2, p=0.000). Age, duration of symptoms and MPI were independent risk factors predicting poor prognosis. The highest sensitivity and specificity of MPI in predicting mortality was shown for a score higher than 27. CONCLUSIONS: MPI is still effective in predicting postoperative mortality. People who nurse older persons must pay higher attention to complaints in order to reduce the delay in hospitalization.


Asunto(s)
Diverticulitis del Colon/complicaciones , Diverticulitis del Colon/mortalidad , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Perforación Intestinal/etiología , Perforación Intestinal/mortalidad , Peritonitis/etiología , Peritonitis/mortalidad , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA