Perspectives on Psoriasiform Adverse Events from Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: Lessons Learned from Our Practice.

Background: New oncologic therapies, including immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), have revolutionized the survival and prognosis of cancer patients. However, these therapies are often complicated by immune-related adverse effects (irAEs) that may impact quality of life and potentially limit their use. Among these adverse events are psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis that may develop de novo or flare under treatment with ICIs. Given the exceptional immune status of patients receiving ICIs, managing these conditions without interfering with the effect of the oncologic treatment may prove very challenging. Aim: To review the literature data on ICI-induced psoriasis exacerbation or development, to present our own experience, and to discuss the pathogenic mechanisms underlying this association and the optimal therapeutic approach for these patients. Case Reports: We report three cases of ICI-induced de novo psoriasis and two cases of ICI-induced psoriasis exacerbation that required systemic treatment. Oral acitretin treatment successfully controlled psoriasis lesions in three cases and allowed for the continuation of immunotherapy. Literature Review: We performed a medical literature search across several databases (PubMed, Medline, Google Scholar) using the search terms "immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced psoriasis/psoriasiform dermatitis/psoriasis arthritis". We identified and revised 80 relevant publications that reported 1102 patients with psoriasis and/or psoriasis arthritis induced or exacerbated by ICIs. We assessed the type of cancer, the therapeutic agent involved, the clinical form of psoriasis, the presence or absence of psoriatic arthritis, the personal and family history of psoriasis, the age, the gender, the time until onset or exacerbation of skin lesions, the specific treatment recommended, the need for ICI discontinuation, and the patient's outcome. Conclusions: As ICIs represent a fairly novel therapy, the association with several adverse effects is only now unraveling. Psoriasis exacerbation or onset following the initiation of immunotherapy is one such example, as more and more reports and case series are being published. Awareness of the relationship between psoriasis and treatment with ICIs, prompt recognition, and initiation of adequate skin-directed therapies are essential for the avoidance of skin lesions worsening, the need for systemic treatments that may interfere with ICIs' effects, or the discontinuation of the latter. In the absence of generally accepted guidelines, it is advisable to treat patients with severe, widespread psoriasis with drugs that do not impair the effects of immunotherapy and thus do not alter the patient's prognosis.

Challenges in the Diagnosis and Management of Giant Porokeratosis: A Case Report.

Porokeratosis encompasses a diverse group of dermatoses, both acquired and genetic, marked by a keratinization disorder. Porokeratosis of Mibelli (PKM) presents as solitary plaques or multiple papules/macules with central atrophy and raised hyperkeratotic borders. Here, we present a case of giant porokeratosis (GPK), a rare form often considered a morphological variant of PKM, with unique clinical and histopathological aspects. Our case involves a 29-year-old patient with a 15 × 10 cm irregular plaque on the dorsal aspect of the right hand. The patient was previously prescribed various topical treatments (retinoids, calcineurin inhibitors, and combinations of corticosteroids with vitamin D3 analogs) and systemic retinoids without improvement before presenting to our department. Due to the high risk of neoplastic transformation and the unavailability of imiquimod, the patient was recommended topical 5-fluorouracil treatment. The trajectory of the lesion under treatment revealed a favorable evolution, and the patient was subjected to regular monitoring every three months to assess the ongoing progress. Recognizing GPK as a high-risk variant is crucial for dermatologists, and it requires a personalized approach. Regular monitoring is advised to detect potential malignant transformations promptly. Future research holds promise for diagnostic advancements, refined treatment modalities, and a deeper understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying malignancy in porokeratosis.