Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
ESMO Open ; 9(5): 103450, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38744099

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: An improved understanding of which gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (GOA) patients respond to both chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) is needed. We investigated the predictive role and underlying biology of a 44-gene DNA damage immune response (DDIR) signature in patients with advanced GOA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Transcriptional profiling was carried out on pretreatment tissue from 252 GOA patients treated with platinum-based chemotherapy (three dose levels) within the randomized phase III GO2 trial. Cross-validation was carried out in two independent GOA cohorts with transcriptional profiling, immune cell immunohistochemistry and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) (n = 430). RESULTS: In the GO2 trial, DDIR-positive tumours had a greater radiological response (51.7% versus 28.5%, P = 0.022) and improved overall survival in a dose-dependent manner (P = 0.028). DDIR positivity was associated with a pretreatment inflamed tumour microenvironment (TME) and increased expression of biomarkers associated with ICI response such as CD274 (programmed death-ligand 1, PD-L1) and a microsatellite instability RNA signature. Consensus pathway analysis identified EGFR as a potential key determinant of the DDIR signature. EGFR amplification was associated with DDIR negativity and an immune cold TME. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate the importance of the GOA TME in chemotherapy response, its relationship to DNA damage repair and EGFR as a targetable driver of an immune cold TME. Chemotherapy-sensitive inflamed GOAs could benefit from ICI delivered in combination with standard chemotherapy. Combining EGFR inhibitors and ICIs warrants further investigation in patients with EGFR-amplified tumours.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Daño del ADN , Neoplasias Esofágicas , Neoplasias Gástricas , Humanos , Adenocarcinoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Adenocarcinoma/inmunología , Adenocarcinoma/genética , Neoplasias Gástricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Gástricas/inmunología , Neoplasias Gástricas/genética , Neoplasias Esofágicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Esofágicas/inmunología , Neoplasias Esofágicas/genética , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/farmacología , Microambiente Tumoral/inmunología , Biomarcadores de Tumor/metabolismo , Receptores ErbB/metabolismo
2.
J Hosp Infect ; 148: 189-219, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38609760

RESUMEN

The first British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) and Healthcare Infection Society (HIS)-endorsed faecal microbiota transplant (FMT) guidelines were published in 2018. Over the past 5 years, there has been considerable growth in the evidence base (including publication of outcomes from large national FMT registries), necessitating an updated critical review of the literature and a second edition of the BSG/HIS FMT guidelines. These have been produced in accordance with National Institute for Health and Care Excellence-accredited methodology, thus have particular relevance for UK-based clinicians, but are intended to be of pertinence internationally. This second edition of the guidelines have been divided into recommendations, good practice points and recommendations against certain practices. With respect to FMT for Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI), key focus areas centred around timing of administration, increasing clinical experience of encapsulated FMT preparations and optimising donor screening. The latter topic is of particular relevance given the COVID-19 pandemic, and cases of patient morbidity and mortality resulting from FMT-related pathogen transmission. The guidelines also considered emergent literature on the use of FMT in non-CDI settings (including both gastrointestinal and non-gastrointestinal indications), reviewing relevant randomised controlled trials. Recommendations are provided regarding special areas (including compassionate FMT use), and considerations regarding the evolving landscape of FMT and microbiome therapeutics.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Clostridium , Trasplante de Microbiota Fecal , Trasplante de Microbiota Fecal/métodos , Humanos , Infecciones por Clostridium/terapia , Reino Unido , Clostridioides difficile , COVID-19/terapia , Recurrencia , Gastroenterología/normas , Gastroenterología/métodos , SARS-CoV-2 , Sociedades Médicas
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA