Management of Uterine Fibroids: A Focus on Uterine-sparing Interventional Techniques.

Uterine fibroids occur in approximately 50% of women over the age of 40 years, and an estimated 50% of those are symptomatic. Menorrhagia is the most common symptom and the primary indication for treatment, although bulk symptoms often occur and can be treated. Pharmacotherapy is typically inadequate unless it can be expected to successfully bridge to menopause or allow for a less-invasive intervention. However, hormonal therapies have risks. Hysterectomy is still the most commonly performed procedure for symptomatic fibroids and has the lowest rate of reintervention (compared with myomectomy or uterine artery embolization [UAE]), but rates of more serious complications are higher and patient satisfaction and ability to return to normal activities may also be less favorable. Myomectomy is not necessarily less morbid than hysterectomy and may have a greater failure rate than UAE. Techniques and devices vary with little standardization, and operator experience is crucial to success. The largest studies of UAE show very low rates of serious complications and rapid recovery. UAE significantly improves symptoms related to uterine fibroids in 85%-90% of patients. Herein, this article will discuss the nature of fibroids and their diagnosis, pharmacotherapy, surgical treatment, and nonsurgical interventional treatment, including UAE and magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound. (©) RSNA, 2016.

Pectus excavatum with delayed diagnosis of implant tear on MRI apparently causing recurrent postoperative seromas: A case report.

Seroma formation is the most common early postoperative complication after pectus excavatum repair, but later seromas are rare. While many seromas eventually resorb or decrease in size after aspiration, our case demonstrates recurrent seroma formation as a late complication of pectus excavatum repair in a patient with an implant tear. Postoperative seromas can result in prolonged chest wall pain, large chest wall masses, and increased mass effect on the heart with potential risk for resultant right ventricular outflow obstruction. This case report illustrates a solid silicone implant tear. Though rare, early recognition may help to decrease the likelihood of recurrent postoperative seromas.

Comparison of comfort and image quality with two endorectal coils in MRI of the prostate.

PURPOSE: To prospectively evaluate comfort and image quality of prostate MRI using two different endorectal (ER) coils. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty consecutive patients were prospectively randomized to receive prostate MRI using either a prostate endocoil (PEC) or colorectal endocoil (CEC). Patients and operators were surveyed with regard to endocoil placement. Four Body MRI trained radiologists rated image quality for each examination and additional selected blinded coronal T2 weighted images. RESULTS: Average patient discomfort (on a 0-10 pain scale) was greater with the PEC (5.0 for PEC and 2.7 for CEC) with a statistically significant difference (P < 0.03). Ability to identify the neurovascular bundle (NVB) was 5.8 times more likely to be rated excellent with the CEC compared with the PEC (P < 0.003). Image quality with CEC was 3.5 times more highly rated (P < 0.04). In particular, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) with the CEC was 3.0 times more highly rated than with the PEC (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The smaller CEC was better tolerated by patients than the traditional PEC, and resulted in at least equivalent, and in some instances improved image quality. This may result in fewer aborted cases and lead to decreased procedural intolerance to endorectal coil MRI.

Efficacy of a checklist-style structured radiology reporting template in reducing resident misses on cervical spine computed tomography examinations.

The increasing use of medical checklists to promote patient safety raises the question of their utility in diagnostic radiology. This study evaluates the efficacy of a checklist-style reporting template in reducing resident misses on cervical spine CT examinations. A checklist-style reporting template for cervical spine CTs was created at our institution and mandated for resident preliminary reports. Ten months after implementation of the template, we performed a retrospective cohort study comparing rates of emergent pathology missed on reports generated with and without the checklist-style reporting template. In 1,832 reports generated without using the checklist-style template, 25 (17.6%) out of 142 emergent findings were missed. In 1,081 reports generated using the checklist-style template, 13 (11.9%) out of 109 emergent findings were missed. The decrease in missed pathology was not statistically significant (p = 0.21). However, larger differences were noted in the detection of emergent non-fracture findings, with 17 (28.3%) out of 60 findings missed on reports without use of the checklist template and 5 (9.3%) out of 54 findings missed on reports using the checklist template, representing a statistically significant decrease in missed non-fracture findings (p = 0.01). The use of a checklist-style structured reporting template resulted in a statistically significant decrease in missed non-fracture findings on cervical spine CTs. The lack of statistically significant change in missed fractures was expected given that residents' search patterns naturally include fracture detection. Our findings suggest that the use of checklists in structured reporting may increase diagnostic accuracy.

Radiation protection in interventional radiology: survey results of attitudes and use.

PURPOSE: To assess attitudes of interventional radiologists toward personal radiation protection and the use of radiation protection devices. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Invitations to an anonymous online survey that comprised eight questions focused on operator attitudes toward radiation protection devices were sent via e-mail to the active membership of the Society of Interventional Radiology (SIR): a total of 3,158 e-mail invitations. A single reminder e-mail was sent. RESULTS: There were 504 survey responders (16% response rate). Reported radiation safety device use included lead apron (99%), thyroid shield (94%), leaded eyeglasses (54%), ceiling-suspended leaded shield (44%), rolling leaded shields (12%), ceiling-suspended/rolling lead-equivalent apron (4%), radiation-attenuating sterile surgical gloves (1%), and sterile lead-equivalent patient-mounted drape (4%). Reasons commonly cited for not using certain devices were comfort (eyewear), ease of use (mounted shields), and lack of availability (rolling/hanging shields and patient-mounted shields). CONCLUSIONS: Interventionalists have an array of tools from which to choose for personal radiation protection; however, for a variety of reasons related to lack of availability or choice, these tools are not universally employed. Further study may be of value to clarify why comfort was cited most often as the primary barrier to the use of protective eyewear and difficulty of use was cited as the primary barrier to use of mounted shields (despite reporting that concern for radiation-induced injury to the eye is paramount). It may also be of interest to further study why certain devices with demonstrable protection effects are not readily available, such as rolling/hanging and patient-mounted shields.

Percutaneous screw-reinforced cement osteoplasty for palliation of postremission pain in larger lytic sacro-acetabular iliac cavities.

We present 2 cases of palliative percutaneous screw fixation for refractory pain from periacetabular residual cavities, after clinical remission, from osteolytic iliac masses involving the cortices of the sacroiliac joint (SIJ). Two patients-1 with a treated 8 cm breast metastasis and another with a treated 14 cm plasmacytoma-were selected for osseous stabilization based on imaging criteria and physical signs of iliac deformability and SIJ dysfunction. Neither lesion exhibited active malignancy following systemic therapy or discrete fracture. Following computed tomography-guided screw fixation across the mass and SIJ, with surrounding cement osteoplasty, to reduce mechanical stress on abnormal bone, both patients reported pain resolution beyond 1-year. This technique may be a suitable palliation even for large treated pelvic metastastic cavities and in the absence of fracture.

The use of ACR Appropriateness Criteria: a survey of radiology residents and program directors.

PURPOSE: Assess the utilization of American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria (ACR-AC) among radiology residency program directors (PDs) and residents. METHODS: Radiology PD and resident survey. RESULTS: Seventy-four percent (46/62) of PDs promote ACR-AC in education (P<.05), and 84% (317/376) of residents have read at least a few (P<.05). Seventy-four percent (74/100) of first-year residents compared to 56.8% (157/276) of second- to fourth-year residents report at least occasional faculty reference of ACR-AC (P<.05). ACR-AC are well regarded (P<.05), but 40% believe that they are perplexing. CONCLUSION: There is widespread resident awareness of ACR-AC and integration into resident training. However, faculty are only beginning to teach with them, and radiologists are not citing them with clinicians.

State of structured reporting in radiology, a survey.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To survey North American radiologists on current practices in structured reporting and language. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An e-mail invitation was sent to the Association of University Radiologists membership (comprising 910 members) to participate in an online survey that addressed development, use, and experience of structured reporting, language, and imaging classification or reporting systems and personal dictation styles. RESULTS: Of the 910 members e-mailed, 265 (29.1%) responded, 90.6% of whom were from academic teaching hospitals. There were no significant differences in responses based on group size or region of practice. Of all the respondents, 51.3% come from groups that developed structured reporting for at least half of their reports and only 10.9% for none. A significantly fewer 13% of respondents used rigid unmodifiable structures or checklists rather than adaptable outlines; 59.5% respondents report being satisfied or very satisfied with their structured reports, whereas a significantly fewer 13% report being dissatisfied or very dissatisfied. Structured reports were reportedly significantly more likely to be required, appreciated, and to decrease errors in departments using many structured reports compared to groups with less widespread use. CONCLUSIONS: Most academic radiology departments are using or experimenting with structured reports. Although radiologist satisfaction with standardization is significant, there are strong opinions about their limitations and value. Our survey suggests that North American radiologists are invested in exploring structured reporting and will hopefully inform future study on how we define a standard report and how much we can centralize this process.

An endovascular simulation exercise among radiology residents: comparison of simulation performance with and without practice.

PURPOSE: The purpose was to compare resident endovascular simulator performance with and without prior simulation. METHODS: Radiology residents were guided through a practice simulation and lectured on endovascular therapy, then randomized to simulate femoral arterial intervention with or without prior iliac simulation. Simulator measurements, performance grading and resident surveys were recorded. RESULTS: Prior simulation of iliac intervention significantly improved resident performance. In particular, it resulted in less catheter placement without a wire (P=.01), shorter time to proper catheter positioning (P=.045) and use of oblique digital subtraction angiography (P=.035). Survey respondents valued the experience. CONCLUSION: Endovascular simulator training improves simulation skills. Improvement of real-world performance and generalizability remain to be shown.

Introducing radiology report checklists among residents: adherence rates when suggesting versus requiring their use and early experience in improving accuracy.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To retrospectively compare resident adherence to checklist-style structured reporting for maxillofacial computed tomography (CT) from the emergency department (when required vs. suggested between two programs). To compare radiology resident reporting accuracy before and after introduction of the structured report and assess its ability to decrease the rate of undetected pathology. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We introduced a reporting checklist for maxillofacial CT into our dictation software without specific training, requiring it at one program and suggesting it at another. We quantified usage among residents and compared reporting accuracy, before and after counting and categorizing faculty addenda. RESULTS: There was no significant change in resident accuracy in the first few months, with residents acting as their own controls (directly comparing performance with and without the checklist). Adherence to the checklist at program A (where it originated and was required) was 85% of reports compared to 9% of reports at program B (where it was suggested). When using program B as a secondary control, there was no significant difference in resident accuracy with or without using the checklist (comparing different residents using the checklist to those not using the checklist). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that there is no automatic value of checklists for improving radiology resident reporting accuracy. They also suggest the importance of focused training, checklist flexibility, and a period of adjustment to a new reporting style. Mandatory checklists were readily adopted by residents but not when simply suggested.

Hepatobiliary rim sign: new implications for acute and complicated cholecystitis.

PURPOSE: The role of a 'rim sign' in increasing specificity for acute cholecystitis and sensitivity for complicated acute cholecystitis has been substantiated in many small retrospective studies. We sought to corroborate this correlation in a large population, as we have encountered doubt among surgeons about the emergent implications of this sign. METHODS: We performed a small pilot interobserver reliability test with five nuclear medicine physicians from outside institutions. A total of 2881 consecutive hepatobiliary scans performed over 12 years for evaluation of acute cholecystitis were retrospectively reviewed. Available pathological (reference standard) and surgical reports were reviewed for all cases of acute cholecystitis (on scintigraphy) with a rim sign and for an equivalent set without a rim sign. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant interobserver agreement on the presence of a rim sign. There was a 32.4% incidence of acute cholecystitis, based on scintigraphy, and a 10.1% incidence of rim signs. Of 63 pathologic specimens from rim-sign-positive cases, 19 (30.2%) showed acute cholecystitis and 44 (69.8%) showed chronic cholecystitis. Six (9.5%) cases were complicated. Among 55 pathologic specimens from the acute scintigraphy cases without a rim sign, 21 (38.2%) showed acute cholecystitis and 34 (61.8%) showed chronic cholecystitis. There were eight (14.5%) complicated cases. CONCLUSION: There was no interobserver reliability in the identification of a rim sign. There was almost no difference in the incidence of pathologically acute, chronic, or complicated acute cholecystitis among scintigraphically acute cases with or without a rim sign, approximately two-thirds to three-quarters of which were chronic on pathological evaluation.

Tc-99m sestamibi parathyroid gland scintigraphy: added value of Tc-99m pertechnetate thyroid imaging for increasing interpretation confidence and avoiding additional testing.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the benefit of adding a pertechnetate parathyroid scan (dual-isotope imaging) in the interpretation of sestamibi dual-phase parathyroid scintigraphy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: One hundred and sixteen dual Tc-99m sestamibi (MIBI) and Tc-99m pertechnetate subtraction parathyroid studies, performed between January 2000 and February 2006, were retrospectively reviewed. Dual-phase technetium sestamibi examinations were initially interpreted, with blinding to the technetium pertechnetate findings. Subsequently, technetium pertechnetate scan findings were added, and changes in interpretation were recorded. RESULTS: By adding Tc-99m pertechnetate imaging, the interpretation of 17 scans (17/116=14.6%) was substantially altered. This included 5 scans (4%) that changed from negative to positive and 9 scans (8%) that changed from equivocal to positive, excluding ectopic tissue and directing minimally invasive surgery, without the need for further imaging, such as ultrasound, in 12% of cases. One examination changed from positive to negative. In addition, 2 scans changed from equivocal to negative, necessitating further preoperative imaging for the evaluation of additional pathology such as thyroid nodules and lymph nodes and the consideration of hyperplasia. Among the remaining 99 patients, Tc-99m pertechnetate scans may also have contributed to the diagnosis in the 66 positive Tc-99m MIBI scans by increasing confidence in the interpretation and obviating additional imaging. Ten cases remained equivocal. CONCLUSION: By adding Tc-99m pertechnetate imaging, scan interpretation was changed in 14.6% of cases, and interpretation confidence was enhanced in all but 10 remaining equivocal cases. The addition of a dual-isotope subtraction also eliminated the need for additional testing, such as ultrasound, in 12% of our cases. Increased confidence in interpretation that comes with dual-isotope subtraction may come at the cost of slight lengthening of imaging time but likely simplifies preoperative localization and decreases intraoperative time for many patients with primary hyperparathyroidism.

Fibular flap reconstruction of the cervical spine for repair of osteoradionecrosis.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Although cervical spine reconstruction with osteocutaneous fibular flap microvascular grafting has been described, simultaneous reconstruction of the cervical vertebral column and laryngectomy have not been described. PURPOSE: To present a unique case of combined cervical spine and laryngectomy reconstruction. STUDY DESIGN: Case report. METHODS: We modified a previously reported procedure reconstituting the cervical spine and pharynx with a single fibular flap in a case of posterior pharyngeal ulceration and osteomyelitis/osteoradionecrosis without spinal deformity. RESULTS: We present a case of simultaneous cervical stabilization and pharynx reconstruction with a fibular graft in a life-saving treatment of osteoradionecrosis complicated by acute cervical kyphosis and spinal cord compression in a 55-year-old patient with extensive head and neck cancer history and recent recurrence of hypopharyngeal cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Rigid anterior plate fixation and subsequent posterior fixation were required after corpectomy and total laryngectomy in our patient with extensive surgical scarring and radiation history because of severe spinal deformity secondary to osteoradionecrosis. We achieved successful preservation of neurologic function and resolution of pain.