RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to develop a 48-h mortality risk score, which included morphology data, for patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm presenting to an emergency department, and to assess its predictive accuracy and clinical effectiveness in triaging patients to immediate aneurysm repair, transfer or palliative care. METHODS: Data from patients in the IMPROVE (Immediate Management of the Patient With Ruptured Aneurysm: Open Versus Endovascular Repair) randomized trial were used to develop the risk score. Variables considered included age, sex, haemodynamic markers and aortic morphology. Backwards selection was used to identify relevant predictors. Predictive performance was assessed using calibration plots and the C-statistic. Validation of the newly developed and other previously published scores was conducted in four external populations. The net benefit of treating patients based on a risk threshold compared with treating none was quantified. RESULTS: Data from 536 patients in the IMPROVE trial were included. The final variables retained were age, sex, haemoglobin level, serum creatinine level, systolic BP, aortic neck length and angle, and acute myocardial ischaemia. The discrimination of the score for 48-h mortality in the IMPROVE data was reasonable (C-statistic 0·710, 95 per cent c.i. 0·659 to 0·760), but varied in external populations (from 0·652 to 0·761). The new score outperformed other published risk scores in some, but not all, populations. An 8 (95 per cent c.i. 5 to 11) per cent improvement in the C-statistic was estimated compared with using age alone. CONCLUSION: The assessed risk scores did not have sufficient accuracy to enable potentially life-saving decisions to be made regarding intervention. Focus should therefore shift to offering repair to more patients and reducing non-intervention rates, while respecting the wishes of the patient and family.
Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/mortalidad , Rotura de la Aorta/mortalidad , Técnicas de Apoyo para la Decisión , Procedimientos Endovasculares/métodos , Cuidados Paliativos/métodos , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Anciano , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/cirugía , Rotura de la Aorta/cirugía , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Mortalidad Hospitalaria/tendencias , Humanos , Masculino , Curva ROC , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Tasa de Supervivencia/tendencias , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Reino Unido/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The UK abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) screening programmes currently invite only men for screening because the benefit in women is uncertain. Perioperative risk is critical in determining the effectiveness of screening, and contemporary estimates of these risks in women are lacking. The aim of this study was to compare mortality following AAA repair between women and men in the UK. METHODS: Anonymized data from the UK National Vascular Registry (NVR) for patients undergoing AAA repair (January 2010 to December 2014) were analysed. Co-variables were extracted for analysis by sex. The primary outcome measure was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcome measures included mortality by 5-year age groups and duration of hospital stay. Logistic regression was performed to adjust for age, calendar time, AAA diameter and smoking status. NVR-based outcomes were checked against Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) data. RESULTS: A total of 23 245 patients were included (13·0 per cent women). Proportionally, more women than men underwent open repair. For elective open AAA repair, the in-hospital mortality rate was 6·9 per cent in women and 4·0 per cent in men (odds ratio (OR) 1·48, 95 per cent c.i. 1·08 to 2·02; P = 0·014), whereas for elective endovascular AAA repair it was 1·8 per cent in women and 0·7 per cent in men (OR 2·86, 1·72 to 4·74; P < 0·001); the results in HES were similar. For ruptured AAA, there was no sex difference in mortality within the NVR; however, in HES, for ruptured open AAA repair, the in-hospital mortality rate was higher in women (33·6 versus 27·1 per cent; OR 1·36, 1·16 to 1·59; P < 0·001). CONCLUSION: Women have a higher in-hospital mortality rate than men after elective AAA repair even after adjustment. This higher mortality may have an impact on the benefit offered by any screening programme offered to women.
Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/mortalidad , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/cirugía , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Factores de Edad , Rotura de la Aorta/mortalidad , Rotura de la Aorta/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos/mortalidad , Procedimientos Endovasculares/mortalidad , Femenino , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Sistema de Registros , Reino Unido/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The erosion of the early mortality advantage of elective endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) compared with open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm remains without a satisfactory explanation. METHODS: An individual-patient data meta-analysis of four multicentre randomized trials of EVAR versus open repair was conducted to a prespecified analysis plan, reporting on mortality, aneurysm-related mortality and reintervention. RESULTS: The analysis included 2783 patients, with 14 245 person-years of follow-up (median 5·5 years). Early (0-6 months after randomization) mortality was lower in the EVAR groups (46 of 1393 versus 73 of 1390 deaths; pooled hazard ratio 0·61, 95 per cent c.i. 0·42 to 0·89; P = 0·010), primarily because 30-day operative mortality was lower in the EVAR groups (16 deaths versus 40 for open repair; pooled odds ratio 0·40, 95 per cent c.i. 0·22 to 0·74). Later (within 3 years) the survival curves converged, remaining converged to 8 years. Beyond 3 years, aneurysm-related mortality was significantly higher in the EVAR groups (19 deaths versus 3 for open repair; pooled hazard ratio 5·16, 1·49 to 17·89; P = 0·010). Patients with moderate renal dysfunction or previous coronary artery disease had no early survival advantage under EVAR. Those with peripheral artery disease had lower mortality under open repair (39 deaths versus 62 for EVAR; P = 0·022) in the period from 6 months to 4 years after randomization. CONCLUSION: The early survival advantage in the EVAR group, and its subsequent erosion, were confirmed. Over 5 years, patients of marginal fitness had no early survival advantage from EVAR compared with open repair. Aneurysm-related mortality and patients with low ankle : brachial pressure index contributed to the erosion of the early survival advantage for the EVAR group. Trial registration numbers: EVAR-1, ISRCTN55703451; DREAM (Dutch Randomized Endovascular Aneurysm Management), NCT00421330; ACE (Anévrysme de l'aorte abdominale, Chirurgie versus Endoprothèse), NCT00224718; OVER (Open Versus Endovascular Repair Trial for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms), NCT00094575.
Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos/métodos , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Injerto Vascular/métodos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/mortalidad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos Estadísticos , Estudios Multicéntricos como Asunto , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Reoperación , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Stroke is an increasingly recognised complication following thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). The aim of this study was to systematically synthesise the published data on perioperative stroke incidence during TEVAR for patients with descending thoracic aneurysmal disease and to assess the impact of left subclavian artery (LSA) coverage on stroke incidence. METHODS: A systematic review of English and German articles on perioperative (in-hospital or 30 day) stroke incidence following TEVAR for descending aortic aneurysm was performed, including studies with ≥50 cases, using MEDLINE and EMBASE (2005-2015). The pooled prevalence of perioperative stroke with 95% CI was estimated using random effect analysis. Heterogeneity was examined using I2 statistic. RESULTS: Of 215 studies identified, 10 were considered suitable for inclusion. The included studies enrolled a total of 2594 persons (61% male) between 1997 and 2014 with a mean weighted age of 71.8 (95% CI 71.1-73.6) years. The pooled prevalence for stroke was 4.1% (95% CI 2.9-5.5) with moderate heterogeneity between studies (I2 = 49.8%, p = .04). Five studies reported stroke incidences stratified by the management of the LSA, that is uncovered versus covered and revascularised versus covered and not-revascularised. In cases where the LSA remained uncovered, the pooled stroke incidence was 3.2% (95% CI 1.0-6.5). There was, however, an indication that stroke incidence increased following LSA coverage, to 5.3% (95% CI 2.6-8.6) in those with a revascularisation and 8.0% (95% CI 4.1-12.9) in those without revascularisation. CONCLUSION: Stroke incidence is an important morbidity after TEVAR, and probably increases if the LSA is covered during the procedure, particularly in those without revascularisation.
Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta Torácica/cirugía , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología , Arteria Subclavia/cirugía , Anciano , Aneurisma de la Aorta Torácica/diagnóstico , Aneurisma de la Aorta Torácica/mortalidad , Aneurisma de la Aorta Torácica/fisiopatología , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/mortalidad , Procedimientos Endovasculares/mortalidad , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Prevalencia , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Accidente Cerebrovascular/diagnóstico , Accidente Cerebrovascular/mortalidad , Arteria Subclavia/fisiopatología , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Although women represent an increasing proportion of those presenting with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) rupture, the current prevalence of AAA in women is unknown. The contemporary population prevalence of screen-detected AAA in women was investigated by both age and smoking status. METHODS: A systematic review was undertaken of studies screening for AAA, including over 1000 women, aged at least 60 years, done since the year 2000. Studies were identified by searching MEDLINE, Embase and CENTRAL databases until 13 January 2016. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scoring system. RESULTS: Eight studies were identified, including only three based on population registers. The largest studies were based on self-purchase of screening. Altogether 1 537 633 women were screened. Overall AAA prevalence rates were very heterogeneous, ranging from 0·37 to 1·53 per cent: pooled prevalence 0·74 (95 per cent c.i. 0·53 to 1·03) per cent. The pooled prevalence increased with both age (more than 1 per cent for women aged over 70 years) and smoking (more than 1 per cent for ever smokers and over 2 per cent in current smokers). CONCLUSION: The current population prevalence of screen-detected AAA in older women is subject to wide demographic variation. However, in ever smokers and those over 70 years of age, the prevalence is over 1 per cent.
Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/epidemiología , Tamizaje Masivo , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/etiología , China/epidemiología , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , Factores de Riesgo , Fumar/efectos adversos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
Vitamin D plays a classical hormonal role in skeletal health by regulating calcium and phosphorus metabolism. Vitamin D metabolites also have physiological functions in nonskeletal tissues, where local synthesis influences regulatory pathways via paracrine and autocrine mechanisms. The active metabolite of vitamin D, 1α,25-dihydroxyvitamin D, binds to the vitamin D receptor that regulates numerous genes involved in fundamental processes of potential relevance to cardiovascular disease, including cell proliferation and differentiation, apoptosis, oxidative stress, membrane transport, matrix homeostasis, and cell adhesion. Vitamin D receptors have been found in all the major cardiovascular cell types including cardiomyocytes, arterial wall cells, and immune cells. Experimental studies have established a role for vitamin D metabolites in pathways that are integral to cardiovascular function and disease, including inflammation, thrombosis, and the renin-angiotensin system. Clinical studies have generally demonstrated an independent association between vitamin D deficiency and various manifestations of degenerative cardiovascular disease including vascular calcification. However, the role of vitamin D supplementation in the management of cardiovascular disease remains to be established. This review summarizes the clinical studies showing associations between vitamin D status and cardiovascular disease and the experimental studies that explore the mechanistic basis for these associations.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/metabolismo , Sistema Cardiovascular/metabolismo , Vitamina D/metabolismo , Animales , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/fisiopatología , Sistema Cardiovascular/fisiopatología , Suplementos Dietéticos , Humanos , Receptores de Calcitriol/metabolismo , Transducción de Señal , Vitamina D/uso terapéutico , Deficiencia de Vitamina D/tratamiento farmacológico , Deficiencia de Vitamina D/metabolismo , Deficiencia de Vitamina D/fisiopatologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The benefits of endovascular repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm remain controversial, without any strong evidence about advantages in specific subgroups. METHODS: An individual-patient data meta-analysis of three recent randomized trials of endovascular versus open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm was conducted according to a prespecified analysis plan, reporting on results to 90 days after the index event. RESULTS: The trials included a total of 836 patients. The mortality rate across the three trials was 31.3 per cent for patients randomized to endovascular repair/strategy and 34.0 per cent for those randomized to open repair at 30 days (pooled odds ratio 0.88, 95 per cent c.i. 0.66 to 1.18), and 34.3 and 38.0 per cent respectively at 90 days (pooled odds ratio 0.85, 0.64 to 1.13). There was no evidence of significant heterogeneity in the odds ratios between trials. Mean(s.d.) aneurysm diameter was 8.2(1.9) cm and the overall in-hospital mortality rate was 34.8 per cent. There was no significant effect modification with age or Hardman index, but there was indication of an early benefit from an endovascular strategy for women. Discharge from the primary hospital was faster after endovascular repair (hazard ratio 1.24, 95 per cent c.i. 1.04 to 1.47). For open repair, 30-day mortality diminished with increasing aneurysm neck length (adjusted odds ratio 0.69 (95 per cent c.i. 0.53 to 0.89) per 15 mm), but aortic diameter was not associated with mortality for either type of repair. CONCLUSION: Survival to 90 days following an endovascular or open repair strategy is similar for all patients and for the restricted population anatomically suitable for endovascular repair. Women may benefit more from an endovascular strategy than men and patients are, on average, discharged sooner after endovascular repair.
Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/cirugía , Rotura de la Aorta/cirugía , Procedimientos Endovasculares/métodos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/métodos , Humanos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To assess current knowledge for the management of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), based on the 1-year outcomes of 3 recent randomised trials. METHODS: An individual patient data meta-analysis of three recent randomised trials of endovascular versus open repair, including 817 patients, was conducted according to a pre-specified analysis plan, report all-cause mortality and re-interventions at 1 year after the index event. RESULTS: Mortality across the 3 trials at 1-year was 38.6% for the EVAR or endovascular strategy patient groups and 42.8% for the open repair groups, pooled odds ratio 0.84 (95% CI 0.63-1.11), p = .209. There was no evidence of heterogeneity in the odds ratios between trials. When the patients in the endovascular strategy group of the IMPROVE trial were restricted to those with proven rupture who were anatomically suitable for endovascular repair, the pooled odds ratio reduced slightly to 0.80 (95% CI 0.56-1.16), p = .240. CONCLUSIONS: After 1 year there is a consistent but non-significant trend for lower mortality for EVAR or an endovascular strategy. Taken together with the recent gains in health economic outcomes demonstrated at 1 year in the IMPROVE trial, the evidence suggests that endovascular repair should be used more widely for ruptured aneurysms.
Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/mortalidad , Rotura de la Aorta/mortalidad , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/mortalidad , Procedimientos Endovasculares/mortalidad , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/cirugía , Rotura de la Aorta/diagnóstico , Rotura de la Aorta/cirugía , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Oportunidad Relativa , Selección de Paciente , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The population-based effectiveness of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) versus open surgery for descending thoracic aortic aneurysm remains in doubt. METHODS: Patients aged over 50 years, without a history of aortic dissection, undergoing repair of a thoracic aortic aneurysm between 2006 and 2011 were assessed using mortality-linked individual patient data from Hospital Episode Statistics (England). The principal outcomes were 30-day operative mortality, long-term survival (5 years) and aortic-related reinterventions. TEVAR and open repair were compared using crude and multivariable models that adjusted for age and sex. RESULTS: Overall, 759 patients underwent thoracic aortic aneurysm repair, mainly for intact aneurysms (618, 81·4 per cent). Median ages of TEVAR and open cohorts were 73 and 71 years respectively (P < 0·001), with more men undergoing TEVAR (P = 0·004). For intact aneurysms, the operative mortality rate was similar for TEVAR and open repair (6·5 versus 7·6 per cent; odds ratio 0·79, 95 per cent confidence interval (c.i.) 0·41 to 1·49), but the 5-year survival rate was significantly worse after TEVAR (54·2 versus 65·6 per cent; adjusted hazard ratio 1·45, 95 per cent c.i. 1·08 to 1·94). After 5 years, aortic-related mortality was similar in the two groups, but cardiopulmonary mortality was higher after TEVAR. TEVAR was associated with more aortic-related reinterventions (23·1 versus 14·3 per cent; adjusted HR 1·70, 95 per cent c.i. 1·11 to 2·60). There were 141 procedures for ruptured thoracic aneurysm (97 TEVAR, 44 open), with TEVAR showing no significant advantage in terms of operative mortality. CONCLUSION: In England, operative mortality for degenerative descending thoracic aneurysm was similar after either TEVAR or open repair. Patients who had TEVAR appeared to have a higher reintervention rate and worse long-term survival, possibly owing to cardiopulmonary morbidity and other selection bias.
Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta Torácica/cirugía , Rotura de la Aorta/cirugía , Registro Médico Coordinado , Anciano , Aneurisma de la Aorta Torácica/mortalidad , Rotura de la Aorta/mortalidad , Causas de Muerte , Tratamiento de Urgencia/mortalidad , Procedimientos Endovasculares/mortalidad , Inglaterra/epidemiología , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Reoperación/mortalidad , StentsRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: A number of published economic evaluations of elective endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) versus open repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) have come to differing conclusions about whether EVAR is cost-effective. This paper reviews the current evidence base and presents up-to-date cost-effectiveness analyses in the light of results of four randomized clinical trials: EVAR-1, DREAM, OVER and ACE. METHODS: Markov models were used to estimate lifetime costs from a UK perspective and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) based on the results of each of the four trials. The outcomes included in the model were: procedure costs, surveillance costs, reintervention costs, health-related quality of life, aneurysm-related mortality and other-cause mortality. Alternative scenarios about complications, reinterventions and deaths beyond the trial were explored. RESULTS: Models based on the results of the EVAR-1, DREAM or ACE trials did not find EVAR to be cost-effective at thresholds used in the UK (up to £30,000 per QALY). EVAR seemed cost-effective according to models based on the OVER trial. These results seemed robust to alternative model scenarios about events beyond the trial intervals. CONCLUSION: These analyses did not find that EVAR is cost-effective compared with open repair in the long term in trials conducted in European centres. EVAR did appear to be cost-effective based on the OVER trial, conducted in the USA. Caution must be exercised when transferring the results of economic evaluations from one country to another.
Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/economía , Procedimientos Endovasculares/economía , Anciano , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/mortalidad , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/cirugía , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Procedimientos Endovasculares/mortalidad , Femenino , Costos de Hospital , Humanos , Masculino , Cadenas de Markov , Cuidados Posoperatorios/métodos , Calidad de Vida , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Análisis de Supervivencia , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Single-centre series of the management of patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) are usually too small to identify clinical factors that could improve patient outcomes. METHODS: IMPROVE is a pragmatic, multicentre randomized clinical trial in which eligible patients with a clinical diagnosis of ruptured aneurysm were allocated to a strategy of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) or to open repair. The influences of time and manner of hospital presentation, fluid volume status, type of anaesthesia, type of endovascular repair and time to aneurysm repair on 30-day mortality were investigated according to a prespecified plan, for the subgroup of patients with a proven diagnosis of ruptured or symptomatic AAA. Adjustment was made for potential confounding factors. RESULTS: Some 558 of 613 randomized patients had a symptomatic or ruptured aneurysm: diagnostic accuracy was 91·0 per cent. Patients randomized outside routine working hours had higher operative mortality (adjusted odds ratio (OR) 1·47, 95 per cent confidence interval 1·00 to 2·17). Mortality rates after primary and secondary presentation were similar. Lowest systolic blood pressure was strongly and independently associated with 30-day mortality (51 per cent among those with pressure below 70 mmHg). Patients who received EVAR under local anaesthesia alone had greatly reduced 30-day mortality compared with those who had general anaesthesia (adjusted OR 0·27, 0·10 to 0·70). CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that the outcome of ruptured AAA might be improved by wider use of local anaesthesia for EVAR and that a minimum blood pressure of 70 mmHg is too low a threshold for permissive hypotension.
Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/cirugía , Rotura de la Aorta/cirugía , Procedimientos Endovasculares/métodos , Atención Posterior/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/mortalidad , Rotura de la Aorta/mortalidad , Presión Sanguínea/fisiología , Procedimientos Endovasculares/mortalidad , Femenino , Fluidoterapia/estadística & datos numéricos , Tamaño de las Instituciones de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Transferencia de Pacientes/estadística & datos numéricos , Cuidados Preoperatorios/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To investigate and rank factors that influence endovascular treatment decisions by specialists for patients with descending thoracic aortic aneurysm (dTAA). METHODS: Specialists completed a diagrammatic survey describing uncertainty about the benefit of thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair (TEVAR) for dTAA with respect to age, sex, and aneurysm diameter. Subsequently, a detailed discrete choice experiment was designed. Specialists were recruited and asked to indicate treatment their preference (TEVAR or surveillance) in 25 hypothetical cases of dTAA, with variable patient attributes: age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade, aneurysm diameter, adequate landing zone distal to left subclavian artery (LSA), and length of aortic coverage. Data were analysed using multiple logistic regression. RESULTS: The diagrammatic survey, based on 50 respondents, showed that uncertainty about the benefits of TEVAR was greatest for patients aged 80-85 years (up to 47% of respondents were "unsure") and that uncertainty increased with increasing aneurysm diameter (for an 80-year-old man, 7% were unsure at 5.5 cm and 33% were unsure at 7.0 cm). Seventy-one specialists (mainly from Europe and North America, 86% vascular surgeons and 98% working in units offering TEVAR) completed the discrete choice experiment. Preference for TEVAR increased greatly with enlarging diameter: adjusted odds ratios (OR) >5.5-6.0 cm = 15.8 (95% confidence interval [CI] 9.83-25.40); >6.0-6.5 cm = 393.0 (95% CI 202.00-766.00); >6.5-7.0 cm = 1829.0 (95% CI 400.00-4,181.00). TEVAR was less likely to be preferred in patients older than 75 years (>75-80 years OR 0.32, 95% CI 0.21-0.49; >80-85 years = 0.18, 95% CI 0.11-0.28); in women (OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.37-0.74); in patients classified as ASA grade 4 (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.36-0.57); and in patients with aorta coverage >25 cm (OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.32-0.74). The proximal landing zone did not influence preference. CONCLUSION: Specialists' preferences for endovascular repair of degenerative dTAA vary widely, and demonstrate clinical uncertainty, especially in octogenarians, and a reluctance to offer TEVAR to women. Aneurysm diameter dominates treatment preferences, but patient fitness and length of aortic coverage (>25 cm) also were influential, although the landing zone distal to LSA was not.
Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta Torácica/cirugía , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Selección de Paciente , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Espera Vigilante , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Aneurisma de la Aorta Torácica/diagnóstico , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Femenino , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Disparidades en Atención de Salud , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Oportunidad Relativa , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores Sexuales , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , IncertidumbreRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Evaluation of variation in descending thoracic aortic aneurysm (dTAA) diameters measured on CT scans in different planes and by different observers and the potential impact on treatment decisions. METHODS: CT angiography of dTAA (N = 20) were assessed by three specialists, with measurements repeated after 1 month. Calliper measurements of maximum external diameters were made on unformatted images and perpendicular to the aneurysm centerline after image processing (corrected). Repeatability was assessed using Bland-Altman plots. RESULTS: Maximum corrected diameter measurements were smaller than axial measurements (66.3 ± 7.9 mm vs. 74.9 ± 20.9 mm, p < .001). Both intraobserver and interobserver variation were less for corrected than for axial measurements (mean intraobserver differences 5.0 ± 3.8 mm vs. 11.8 ± 9.3 mm, p < .001; mean interobserver differences 2.8 ± 2.5 mm versus 10.4 ± 14.0 mm, p < .001) and interobserver variation increased with aneurysm diameter for maximum axial but not corrected measurements. Using corrected rather than axial measurements could have changed treatment decisions in two patients (10%) using a treatment threshold diameter of 55 mm and 10 patients (50%) using a threshold of 65 mm. CONCLUSION: Corrected diameters were smaller than axial diameters, could be measured with higher repeatability, and were subject to less interobserver variability. Using corrected versus axial measurements would have changed management decisions in up to half of the cases in this study.
Asunto(s)
Aorta Torácica/diagnóstico por imagen , Aneurisma de la Aorta Torácica/diagnóstico por imagen , Aortografía/métodos , Tomografía Computarizada Multidetector , Interpretación de Imagen Radiográfica Asistida por Computador , Análisis de Varianza , Aneurisma de la Aorta Torácica/terapia , Humanos , Variaciones Dependientes del Observador , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Pronóstico , Reproducibilidad de los ResultadosRESUMEN
Different national screening programmes use a variety of surveillance intervals for patients identified with small abdominal aortic aneurysm. An individual patient meta-analysis of >15000 persons with small aneurysm has provided a strong scientific basis for safe surveillance frequency. In many screening programmes the number of surveillance visits for men could be reduced by up to half. The higher rate of aneurysm rupture in women leads to different recommendation for women.
Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Espera Vigilante , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/complicaciones , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/terapia , Rotura de la Aorta/etiología , Rotura de la Aorta/prevención & control , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Metaanálisis como Asunto , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Pronóstico , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores Sexuales , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
Aneurysm diameter measurement is quick and easy, but suffers from the pitfalls of being "too rough and ready". When semi-automated segmentation took 7-10 minutes to estimate volume, it was not a practical tool for busy, routine clinical practice. Today, the availability of automatic segmentation in seconds is bound to make volume measurement, along with 3D ultrasonography, the tools of the future. There can be no debate.
Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/patología , HumanosRESUMEN
It is very difficult to identify whether the use of the thermosensitive polymer LeGoo offers advantages over the use of clamps or clampless techniques for infra-inguinal bypass. This issue of the journal provides much additional information about the use of LeGoo. We have summarised all the available evidence. In a very heterogeneous patient population, with heterogeneous graft type and location, the primary technical success rate remains high at 90% [95%CI 83-99], the 3 months secondary graft patency is 71 [95%CI 58-84]% and limb salvage is 78% [95%CI 68-89]%. These promising early results need to be followed by extended follow up of the patients and standardised outcome reporting in the future.
Asunto(s)
Pérdida de Sangre Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Embolización Terapéutica/métodos , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/cirugía , Poloxámero/uso terapéutico , Injerto Vascular , Temperatura Corporal , Constricción , Embolectomía , Embolia/etiología , Embolia/fisiopatología , Embolia/cirugía , Embolización Terapéutica/efectos adversos , Embolización Terapéutica/mortalidad , Oclusión de Injerto Vascular/etiología , Oclusión de Injerto Vascular/fisiopatología , Oclusión de Injerto Vascular/cirugía , Humanos , Recuperación del Miembro , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/mortalidad , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/fisiopatología , Poloxámero/efectos adversos , Poloxámero/química , Reoperación , Resultado del Tratamiento , Injerto Vascular/efectos adversos , Injerto Vascular/mortalidad , Grado de Desobstrucción VascularRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To investigate population trends in thoracic aortic disease (dissections and aneurysms) in England and Wales, with focus on the impact of thoracic endovascular aortic repair on procedure numbers and age at repair. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Routine hospital statistics of England and Wales provided admission, procedure and mortality data from 1999 to 2010. All data were age-standardised, reported per 100,000 population, by age bands (>50 years or 50-74 years versus 75+ years) and gender. Only patients 50+ years were included, to focus on degenerative disease. RESULTS: Between 1999 and 2010 hospital admissions for total (ascending and descending) have risen steadily for thoracic aortic dissection (TAD) from 7.2 to 8.8 and thoracic aortic aneurysm (TAA) from 4.4 to 9.0, principally attributable to increased admissions in those 75+ years. Total mortality declined steadily over the same period, for TAD from 4.4 to 3.2 and for TAA from 10.4 to 7.5. Procedure rates have risen sharply, driven by the implementation of TEVAR from 2006, for type B dissection from 0.06 to 0.53 and for descending TAA from 0.76 to 1.89. All figures are per 100,000 population with P <0.005. CONCLUSION: Improvements in case ascertainment may have contributed to the increase in hospital admissions. The increased application of TEVAR, particularly for dissections, is mainly in those above 75 years and has not yet translated into an accelerated survival benefit.
Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta Torácica/cirugía , Disección Aórtica/cirugía , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Disección Aórtica/mortalidad , Disección Aórtica/patología , Aneurisma de la Aorta Torácica/mortalidad , Aneurisma de la Aorta Torácica/patología , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/mortalidad , Inglaterra/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Modelos Lineales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Admisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores Sexuales , Análisis de Supervivencia , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/mortalidad , Gales/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: A steady rise in mortality from abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) was reported in the 1980s and 1990 s, although this is now declining rapidly. Reasons for the recent decline in mortality from AAA rupture are investigated here. METHODS: Routine statistics for mortality, hospital admissions and procedures in England and Wales were investigated. All data were age-standardized. Trends in smoking, hypertension and treatment for hypercholesterolaemia (statins), together with regression coefficients for mortality, were available from public sources for those aged at least 65 years. Deaths from ruptured AAA avoided in this age group were estimated by using the IMPACT equation: deaths avoided = (deaths in index year) × (risk factor decline) × ß-coefficient. RESULTS: From 1997, deaths from ruptured AAA have decreased sharply, almost twofold in men. Hospital admissions for elective AAA repair have increased modestly (from 40 to 45 per 100,000 population), attributable entirely to more procedures in those aged 75 years and over (P < 0.001). Admissions for ruptured AAA have declined from 18.6 to 13.5 per 100,000 population, across all ages, with the proportion offered and surviving emergency repair unchanged. From 1997, mortality from ruptured aneurysm in those aged at least 65 years has fallen from 65.9 to 44.6 per 100,000 population. An estimated 8-11 deaths per 100,000 population were avoided by a reduced prevalence of smoking and a similar number from an increase in the number of elective AAA repairs. Estimates for the effects of blood pressure and lipid control are uncertain. CONCLUSION: The reduction in incidence of ruptured AAA since 1997 is attributable largely to changes in smoking prevalence and increases in elective AAA repair in those aged 75 years and over.
Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/mortalidad , Rotura de la Aorta/mortalidad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Inglaterra/epidemiología , Femenino , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Hipercolesterolemia/mortalidad , Hipertensión/mortalidad , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Fumar/mortalidad , Gales/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Surveillance is a common management strategy for small abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) (3.0-5.4 cm in diameter). Individual characteristics, other than diameter, may influence aneurysm growth or rupture rates. METHODS: Individual data were collated from 15 475 people under follow-up for a small aneurysm in 18 studies. The influence of co-variables (including demographics, medical and drug history) on aneurysm growth and rupture rates (analysed using longitudinal random-effects modelling and survival analysis with adjustment for aneurysm diameter) were summarized in an individual patient meta-analysis. RESULTS: The mean aneurysm growth rate of 2.21 mm/year was independent of age and sex. Growth rate was increased in smokers (by 0.35 mm/year) and decreased in patients with diabetes (by 0.51 mm/year). Mean arterial pressure had no effect and antihypertensive or other cardioprotective medications had only small, non-significant effects on aneurysm growth, consistent with the observation that calendar year of enrollment was not associated with growth rate. Rupture rates were almost fourfold higher in women than men (P < 0.001), were double in current smokers (P = 0.001) and increased with higher blood pressure (P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Follow-up schedules for individuals with a small AAA may need to consider diabetes and smoking, in addition to aneurysm diameter. The differing risk factors for growth and rupture suggest that a lower threshold for surgical intervention in women may be justified. No single drug used for cardiovascular risk reduction had a major effect on the growth or rupture of small aneurysms.