Foreign doctors in Norwegian psychiatry ­ is there a need for a mentoring scheme?

BACKGROUND: In line with other Western countries, the number of foreign doctors in Norway has greatly increased in recent years. Inadequate language skills and cultural differences may give rise to challenges. The objective of this study was to investigate the views of Norwegian specialty registrars in psychiatry with regard to a mentoring scheme for foreign doctors and how such a support scheme ought to be designed. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Data were collected in focus-group interviews with specialty registrars in psychiatry. Altogether 24 Norwegian and 16 foreign doctors participated in a total of five focus groups. Thematic analysis was used as methodology. RESULTS: One consistent finding pertained to the differing views on the need for a mentoring scheme among the Norwegian and foreign doctors respectively. The foreign doctors perceived few problems in terms of language and culture, while their Norwegian colleagues had occasionally experienced considerable problems in this respect. Moreover, obstacles in terms of attitude to a mentoring scheme were revealed among the foreign doctors, as well as differing opinions regarding the organisation of such a scheme, especially in terms of its voluntariness and having peers as mentors (horizontal organisation) versus having superiors as mentors (vertical organisation). INTERPRETATION: The differences in attitude to a mentoring scheme are partly caused by perception of the problem's extent and partly by varying norms and values among foreign and Norwegian doctors respectively. We propose that various forms of mentoring scheme be tested in a pilot project, in which the foreign doctors are actively involved.

Mortality and health-related quality of life in prevalent dialysis patients: Comparison between 12-items and 36-items short-form health survey.

BACKGROUND: To assess health- related quality of life (HRQOL) with SF-12 and SF-36 and compare their abilities to predict mortality in chronic dialysis patients, after adjusting for traditional risk factors. METHODS: The Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) with the embedded SF-12 was applied in 301 dialysis patients cross-sectionally. Physical and mental component summary (PCS-36, MCS-36, PCS-12, and MCS-12) scores were calculated. Clinical and demographic data were collected. Mortality (followed for up to 4.5 years) was analyzed with Kaplan Meier plots and Cox proportional hazards, after censoring for renal transplantation. Exclusion factors were observation time <2 months (n = 21) and missing component summary scores (n = 10 for SF-36; n = 28 for SF-12), thus 252 patient were included in the analyses. RESULTS: In 252 patients (60.2 ± 15.5 years, 65.9% males, dialysis vintage 9.0, IQR 5.0-23.0 months), mortality during follow-up was 33.7%.(85 deaths). Significant correlations were observed between PCS-36 and PCS-12 (ρ = 0.93, p < 0.001) and between MCS-36 and MCS-12 (ρ = 0.95, p < 0.001). Mortality rate was highest in patients in the lowest quartile of PCS-12 (χ² = 15.3, p = 0.002) and PCS-36 (χ² = 16.7, p = 0.001). MCS was not associated with mortality. Adjusted hazard ratios for mortality were 2.5 (95% CI 1.0-6.3, PCS-12) and 2.7 (1.1 - 6.4, PCS-36) for the lowest compared with the highest ("best perceived") quartile of PCS. CONCLUSION: Compromised HRQOL is an independent predictor of poor outcome in dialysis patients. The SF-12 provided similar predictions of mortality as SF-36, and may serve as an applicable clinical tool because it requires less time to complete.

Anxiety and depressive disorders in dialysis patients: association to health-related quality of life and mortality.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the associations between depressive/anxiety disorders (DAs), perceived health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and mortality in dialysis patients. METHODS: Patients were assessed for depressive and DAs with the Structured Clinical Interview for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. The HRQOL was assessed with the Medical Outcome Short Form 36 (MOS SF-36), and the Beck Depression Inventory and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale were also applied. Sociodemographic, clinical and laboratory data were also collected. RESULTS: Patients with depressive disorders reported more impaired HRQOL on four of the eight subscales, while those with a depressive disorder comorbid with DA reported more impairment on all MOS SF-36 subscales compared to those without any psychiatric disorder. During the observation period, 50% of those with depression, 28% of those with anxiety and 33% of patients with DA disorder died. A survival analysis did not indicate that patients with depressive or DAs had a higher mortality than patients without such disorders. CONCLUSION: Dialysis patients with depressive disorders reported impaired HRQOL, whereas those with DAs did not. Patients with DA reported the most serious HRQOL impairment. No evidence was obtained to support the hypothesis that depressive and DAs contributed to compromised survival in dialysis patients. In patients with depression, DAs should also be assessed as they significantly contribute to impaired HRQOL.

Renal transplant acceptance status, health-related quality of life and depression in dialysis patients.

Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and depression in chronic dialysis patients, accepted (n = 122) or rejected (n = 93) for renal transplantation (Tx), were compared, whereas dialysis patients with pending acceptance status (n = 86) were followed for a median time of 3.6 years to assess whether HRQOL or depression predicted the likelihood of receiving a transplant. Clinical significant depression was present in 30% of the study patients. Less depression and better HRQOL were associated with being on the waiting list for Tx after adjusting for comorbidity, age, gender and dialysis vintage. During follow-up, 55% of the dialysis patients in the group with pending acceptance were transplanted. The likelihood of receiving a renal graft was based on comorbidity and not on impaired HRQOL or depression. Follow-up studies should investigate whether improved renal health after Tx translates into further improvement of HRQOL and less depression. Whether clinical depression and impaired HRQOL will impact graft survival needs to be explored.

Screening for anxiety and depression in dialysis patients: comparison of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and the Beck Depression Inventory.

OBJECTIVE: Although anxiety and depression are frequent comorbid disorders in dialysis patients, they remain underrecognized and often untreated. The aim of the study was to evaluate the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) and a truncated version of the BDI, the Cognitive Depression Index (CDI), as screening tools for anxiety and depression in dialysis patients. METHODS: A total of 109 participants (69.7% males), from four dialysis centers, completed the self-report symptom scales HADS and BDI. Depression and anxiety disorders were diagnosed with the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I disorders (SCID-I). The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value, overall agreement, kappa and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were assessed. RESULTS: Depressive disorders were found in 22% of the patients based on the SCID-I, while anxiety disorders occurred in 17%. The optimal screening cut-off score for depression was ≥ 7 for the HADS depression subscale (HADS-D), ≥ 14 for the HADS-total, ≥ 11 for the CDI and ≥ 17 for the BDI. The optimal screening cut-off for anxiety was ≥ 6 for the HADS anxiety subscale (HADS-A) and ≥ 14 for the HADS-total. At cut-offs commonly used in clinical practice for depression screening (HADS-D: 8; BDI: 16), the BDI performed slightly better than HADS-D. CONCLUSION: The BDI, CDI and HADS demonstrated acceptable performance as screening tools for depression, as did the HADS-A for anxiety, in our sample of dialysis patients. The recommended cut-off scores for each instrument were: ≥ 17 for BDI, ≥ 11 for CDI, ≥ 7 for HADS depression subscale, ≥ 6 for HADS anxiety subscale and ≥ 14 for HADS total. The CDI did not perform better than the BDI in our study. Lower cut-off for the HADS-A than recommended in medically ill patients may be considered when screening for anxiety in dialysis patients.

Psychiatric disorders, body mass index and C-reactive protein in dialysis patients.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to identify the prevalence of depression, anxiety and somatoform disorders in dialysis patients according to dialysis modality and to compare dialysis patients with and without psychiatric comorbidity regarding clinical characteristics, health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and markers of nutrition and inflammation. METHODS: One hundred and nine patients were assessed for depression, anxiety and somatoform disorder with the Structured Clinical Interview for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition. The Short Form 36 was used. Sociodemographic, clinical and laboratory data were collected. RESULTS: About one third, 30.3%, had a current psychiatric disorder regardless of dialysis modality (depression, 22%; anxiety, 17%; somatoform disorders, 1%), and these reported more impairment on HRQoL dimensions. In the multivariate analysis, significant correlations between psychiatric comorbidity and C-reactive protein (CRP≥6 mmol/L) [odds ratio (OR), 3.6; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.3-9.9; P=.015] and body mass index (BMI≤21 kg/m(2)) (OR, 4.2; 95% CI, 1.4-12.7; P=.011) were observed. CONCLUSION: Depressive and anxiety disorders were common in dialysis patients and were associated with impaired HRQoL, while prevalence of somatoform disorders was low. A strong correlation between psychiatric comorbidity, CRP and BMI indicates that special attention should be given to patients with CRP≥6 mmol/L and BMI≤21 kg/m(2).