Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed) ; 77(3): 234-242, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés, Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38476000

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: The optimal timing of coronary angiography in patients admitted with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTEACS) as well as the need for pretreatment are controversial. The main objective of the IMPACT-TIMING-GO registry was to assess the proportion of patients undergoing an early invasive strategy (0-24hours) without dual antiplatelet therapy (no pretreatment strategy) in Spain. METHODS: This observational, prospective, and multicenter study included consecutive patients with NSTEACS who underwent coronary angiography that identified a culprit lesion. RESULTS: Between April and May 2022, we included 1021 patients diagnosed with NSTEACS, with a mean age of 67±12 years (23.6% women). A total of 87% of the patients were deemed at high risk (elevated troponin; electrocardiogram changes; GRACE score>140) but only 37.8% underwent an early invasive strategy, and 30.3% did not receive pretreatment. Overall, 13.6% of the patients underwent an early invasive strategy without pretreatment, while the most frequent strategy was a deferred angiography under antiplatelet pretreatment (46%). During admission, 9 patients (0.9%) died, while major bleeding occurred in 34 (3.3%). CONCLUSIONS: In Spain, only 13.6% of patients with NSTEACS undergoing coronary angiography received an early invasive strategy without pretreatment. The incidence of cardiovascular and severe bleeding events during admission was low.


Asunto(s)
Síndrome Coronario Agudo , Angiografía Coronaria , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Síndrome Coronario Agudo/terapia , Angiografía Coronaria/efectos adversos , Estudios Prospectivos , España/epidemiología , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/efectos adversos , Factores de Tiempo
2.
Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther ; 21(11): 747-761, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37869793

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Small aortic annulus (SAA) poses a challenge in the management of patients with severe aortic stenosis requiring aortic valve replacement - both surgical and transcatheter - since it has been associated with worse clinical outcomes. AREAS COVERED: This review aims to comprehensively summarize the available evidence regarding the management of aortic stenosis in patients with SAA and discuss the current controversies as well as future perspectives in this field. EXPERT OPINION: It is paramount to agree in a common definition for diagnosing and properly treating SAA patients, and for that purpose, multidetector computer tomography is essential. The results of recent trials led to the expansion of transcatheter aortic valve replacement among patients of all the surgical-risk spectrum, and the choice of treatment (transcatheter, surgical) should be based on patient comorbidities, anatomical characteristics, and patient preferences.


Asunto(s)
Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas , Prótesis Valvulares Cardíacas , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter , Humanos , Válvula Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagen , Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter/métodos , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/diagnóstico , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Diseño de Prótesis
3.
JACC Case Rep ; 2(9): 1291-1296, 2020 Jul 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32835270

RESUMEN

Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) triggers a hypercoagulable state with a high incidence of thrombotic complications. We have noted a higher than expected incidence of stent thrombosis in these patients. (Level of Difficulty: Intermediate.).

4.
JACC Case Rep ; 2020 May 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32838331

RESUMEN

The Publisher regrets that this article is an accidental duplication of an article that has already been published, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccas.2020.05.024. The duplicate article has therefore been withdrawn. The full Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal can be found at https://www.elsevier.com/about/our-business/policies/article-withdrawal.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA