Evaluation of a MOSFET radiation sensor for the measurement of entrance surface dose in diagnostic radiology.

A patient dosimetry system using MOSFET technology (Thomson and Neilson Electronics Ltd, Canada) is evaluated for entrance surface dose measurements in diagnostic radiology. The system sensitivity for the standard MOSFET detector coupled to a high sensitivity bias supply was measured to be 1 mV mGy-1. Response of a new high sensitivity dosemeter was measured to be 3 mV mGy-1. The minimum detectable entrance surface dose at which a single measurement can be made with less than 25% total uncertainty at the 95% confidence level was estimated to be 4 mGy for the standard dosemeter and 1.5 mGy for the new high sensitivity dosemeter. The dosemeters were found to be linear with absorbed dose in air, linear with dose rate and reproducible, although they showed some energy dependence across the diagnostic energy range. The system is also compared with thermoluminescent dosimetry (TLD) as a tool for the measurement of entrance surface dose in diagnostic radiology. MOSFET detectors are considered to have advantages over TLD dosemeters with the instant readout of entrance surface dose. These dosemeters do have the disadvantage that they are visible in radiographs, they have a finite shelf life and can only accumulate absorbed dose up to a limiting value after which the dosemeters can no longer be used.

Optimization of scanning parameters for CT colonography.

To determine the optimal collimation, pitch and reconstruction interval for CT colonography, 10 spherical polyps between 1 mm and 10 mm diameter and made of tissue equivalent material with a CT number of 40 Hounsfield units (HU) were placed in the colon of an anthropomorphic phantom. The phantom was scanned at slice thicknesses of 3 mm, 5 mm and 7 mm and pitches of 1.0, 1.3, 1.5, 1.7 and 2.0 on an IGE Hispeed advantage system. Images were reconstructed for each scanning parameter at the minimum intervals allowed along the z-axis. The optimum scanning protocol was assessed by measuring maximum contrast between the polyp and air, sensitivity for detection of each polyp along the z-axis, and relative radiation dose. In addition, images were reviewed separately by two radiologists who graded polyp conspicuity as: 0, not seen; 1, faintly seen; 2, well seen. It was found that varying the scanning parameters caused a marked alteration in the maximum contrast between each polyp and air. For example, for the 5 mm polyp, the range of contrasts from best to worst case was 910-490 HU. It was noted that with contrasts of less than 500 HU, polyps were only faintly seen. A slice thickness of 3 mm with a pitch of 2 offers optimal polyp conspicuity with a relatively low radiation dose, we conclude that scanning parameters can be optimized for threshold contrast, radiation dose and subjective conspicuity. We propose an optimal parameter of 3 mm slice thickness and pitch 2.