Relation of atrial refractoriness to upper and lower limits of vulnerability for atrial fibrillation/flutter following implantable ventricular defibrillator shocks.

BACKGROUND: Implantable ventricular cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) shocks can cause atrial fibrillation/flutter (AF). This study investigated the pathogenesis of AF after ICD shocks in a canine model. METHODS AND RESULTS: The study was conducted in 8 dogs. In 5 dogs (group 1), truncated exponential (8 ms, 78% tilt) monophasic and biphasic shocks were delivered through a bipolar epicardial (patch) or endocardial lead. After the last S1 of atrial pacing at a cycle length of 350 ms, shocks of 0.1 to 7.6 A (0.005 to 27.7 J) were delivered, timed to the atrial effective refractory period (AERP). Ventricular defibrillation thresholds were also determined. In 3 dogs (group 2), the effect of the open versus closed chest technique on AF induction was tested in the endocardial biphasic shock configuration. AF was induced in all 8 dogs and in all waveforms and configurations. Mean AF duration was 11.5+/-6 s, with a mean ventricular rate of 184+/-37 bpm. Ventricular shocks could induce AF only if they were timed between an AERP of -60 to 40 ms, -40 to 60 ms, -40 to 60 ms, and -20 to 60 ms in the epicardial monophasic, epicardial biphasic, endocardial monophasic, and endocardial biphasic configurations, respectively. The mean+/-SD of the upper limit of vulnerability (ULV) for AF induction (in J) was 5. 2+/-0.6, 3.5+/-0.4, 5.2+/-1.2, and 2.5+/-0.1 for the epicardial monophasic, epicardial biphasic, endocardial monophasic, and endocardial biphasic configurations, respectively (P<0.05). The lower limit of vulnerability (LLV) was 0.8+/-0.1, 0.8+/-0.1, 0.9+/-0, and 0.6+/-0 for the epicardial monophasic, epicardial biphasic, endocardial monophasic, and endocardial biphasic configurations, respectively (P=NS). The ventricular defibrillation threshold (in J) for all wave forms and configurations was higher than the ULV (P<0. 05). CONCLUSIONS: (1) An atrial LLV and ULV exist for ventricular ICD shock-induced AF; (2) the shock-induced AF is related to both shock intensity and its timing to AERP; and (3) avoiding this atrial window of vulnerability may minimize the risk of post-ICD shock AF.

Recurrence of symptomatic ventricular arrhythmias in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillator after the first device therapy: implications for antiarrhythmic therapy and driving restrictions. CARE Group.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to investigate whether clinical or electrophysiologic characteristics could predict initial and subsequent implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapy. BACKGROUND: Identification of markers to predict subsequent ICD therapy and symptoms after the first event could affect patient management. METHODS: We analyzed baseline and follow-up data on 125 ICD patients followed for 408+/-321 days. Medications and ICD programming were not changed after first ICD therapy. RESULTS: Implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy occurred in 58 patients (46%). Clinical features were as follows: mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) 29%+/-15%; coronary artery disease 84%; presenting arrhythmia with sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (SMVT) in 68%. In a multivariate analysis the relative risk for ICD therapy in patients presenting with SMVT versus cardiac arrest (CA) was 2.57 (range, 1.32 to 5.01), and for patients with LVEF < or =25%, 1.95 (1.11 to 3.45), respectively (p < 0.05). Implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy was not predicted by any other variable. Forty-six patients had second ICD therapy. Mean time to second ICD therapy was only 66+/-93 days compared with 138+/-168 days for first ICD therapy (p < 0.05). No predictor for second ICD therapy was found. Regarding symptoms, impaired consciousness during initial ICD therapy was predicted only by SMVT cycle length <250 ms at electrophysiologic testing. In contrast, symptoms were similar between first and second ICD therapy (p = 0.0001). Of note, ventricular tachycardia cycle length preceding first and second ICD therapy was similar (r = 0.76, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: First ICD therapy tends to occur in patients presenting with SMVT and LVEF < or =25%. Subsequent therapy occurs sooner and is unpredictable, suggesting that antiarrhythmic drug therapy should be considered after the first symptomatic ICD therapy. Symptoms during first ICD therapy predict subsequent symptoms, and patients presenting with SMVT and asymptomatic first ICD therapy are at very low risk for future syncopal ICD therapy.

Parasympathetic and sympathetic alterations of Mobitz type II heart block.

This study examined the effects of changes in parasympathetic and sympathetic tone on the cycle length at which Mobitz type II second degree atrioventricular (AV) block occurred. Four patients who had electrocardiographic evidence of type II AV block and confirmation of block in the His-Purkinje system during electrophysiologic study were evaluated. These patients received intravenous atropine (1.0 to 2.4 mg), propranolol (0.15 mg/kg body weight) or isoproterenol (1 and 2 micrograms/min) alone or in combination. In two of three patients receiving propranolol, the atrial pacing cycle length at which 1:1 His-Purkinje conduction occurred was prolonged relative to control (from 360 to 470 ms and 440 to 590 ms, respectively). In contrast, atropine in the presence of beta-adrenergic blockade shortened the cycle length at which 1:1 His-Purkinje conduction occurred in three of four patients receiving the drug (470 to 390, 630 to 570 and 590 to 560 ms, respectively). Isoproterenol also improved His-Purkinje conduction in the one patient receiving this drug. No agent affected the duration of the HV interval during spontaneous sinus rhythm or right atrial pacing. Thus, drugs that alter autonomic tone influence abnormal His-Purkinje conduction minimally during sinus rhythm but, importantly, may modulate the atrial pacing cycle length at which type II AV block occurs.

Amiodarone: electrophysiologic actions, pharmacokinetics and clinical effects.

Interest in amiodarone has increased because of its remarkable efficacy as an antiarrhythmic agent. The purpose of this report is to review what is known about the electrophysiologic actions, hemodynamic effects, pharmacokinetics, alterations of thyroid function, response to treatment of supraventricular and ventricular tachyarrhythmias and adverse effects of amiodarone. Understanding the actions of amiodarone and its metabolism will provide more intelligent use of the drug and minimize the development of side effects. The mechanism by which amiodarone suppresses cardiac arrhythmias is not known and may relate to prolongation of refractoriness in all cardiac tissues, suppression of automaticity in some fibers, minimal slowing of conduction in fast channel-dependent tissue, or to interactions with the autonomic nervous system, alterations in thyroid metabolism or other factors. Amiodarone exerts definite but fairly minor negative inotropic effects that may be offset by its vasodilator actions. Amiodarone has a reduced clearance rate, large volume of distribution, low bioavailability and a long half-life that may last 2 months in patients receiving short-term therapy. Therapeutic serum concentrations range between 1.0 and 3.5 micrograms/ml. The drug suppresses recurrences of cardiac tachyarrhythmias in a high percent of patients, in the range of 80% or more for most supraventricular tachycardias and in about 66% of patients with ventricular tachyarrhythmias, sometimes requiring addition of a second antiarrhythmic agent. Side effects, particularly when high doses are used, may limit amiodarone's usefulness and include skin, corneal, thyroid, pulmonary, neurologic, gastrointestinal and hepatic dysfunction. Aggravation of cardiac arrhythmias occurs but serious arrhythmias are caused in less than 5% of patients. Amiodarone affects the metabolism of many other drugs and care must be used to reduce doses of agents combined with amiodarone.

Intracardiac recording by catheter electrode of accessory pathway depolarization.

At electrophysiologic study in a patient with the Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome, intracardiac catheter recordings demonstrated a deflection that occurred 30 ms before ventricular activation. The rapid deflection was present during ventricular preexcitation but not during normal atrioventricular conduction. All QRS complexes were preexcited to varying degrees during atrial fibrillation, yet the deflection consistently preceded ventricular activation by 30 ms. This deflection most likely represents the rare recording of a Kent bundle depolarization with an intracardiac electrode catheter.

Determination of the earliest site of ventricular activation in Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome: application of digital continuous loop two-dimensional echocardiography.

Surgical and transcatheter ablation of accessory atrioventricular (AV) connections (Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome) requires accurate localization of the accessory pathway. In a canine model of endocardial pacing, a continuous loop two-dimensional echocardiographic technique was developed for determining the earliest site of ventricular activation. This technique was then used to localize accessory AV connections in patients. Echocardiographic images were acquired on videotape and converted to a digital continuous loop format, from which the earliest site of systolic motion was determined. In six dogs, using six distinct endocardial sites, two blinded observers accurately identified the earliest site of ventricular activation in 31 (86%) of 36 and 32 (89%) of 36 locations. Determination of the earliest site of ventricular activation with the continuous loop digital technique was superior to standard analog analysis in overall accuracy (p less than 0.02) and in intraobserver variability (p less than 0.004). After validation of this technique, 21 patients with 22 accessory AV connections with anterograde conduction were studied. The earliest site of mechanical activity was determined during sinus (10 patients) or atrial paced (11 patients) rhythms by two blinded observers and compared with electrophysiologic mapping and surface electrocardiograms. Digitally processed echocardiograms correctly localized the earliest site of ventricular activation in 18 of 22 connections and predicted an adjacent location in the remaining 4.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Amiodarone: risk factors for recurrence of symptomatic ventricular tachycardia identified at electrophysiologic study.

Ventricular tachycardia induced by programmed electrical stimulation during amiodarone therapy often does not preclude a good clinical response. The purpose of this study was to determine whether use of discriminant analysis could distinguish patients who remained asymptomatic from those who subsequently developed symptomatic ventricular tachycardia or cardiac arrest. Studies were performed in 37 patients with sustained ventricular tachycardia who still had ventricular tachycardia induced during programmed electrical stimulation during amiodarone therapy. The mean follow-up time was 14.1 +/- 1.3 months (+/- SEM). Twenty-three patients remained asymptomatic, whereas 14 patients had symptomatic recurrence of their ventricular tachycardia. In patients with recurrence of arrhythmia compared with asymptomatic patients, administration of amiodarone caused a longer ventricular effective refractory period (296 +/- 8 versus 271 +/- 7 ms, p less than 0.05) and a greater change in corrected QT [QTc] interval (90 +/- 18 versus 44 +/- 9 ms, p less than 0.02), but no difference in the decrease in premature ventricular complexes after treatment with amiodarone. During amiodarone therapy, nonbundle branch reentrant repetitive ventricular responses were induced by a single ventricular extrastimulus during sinus rhythm in 9 of 14 patients with recurrent arrhythmias compared with 2 of 21 asymptomatic patients (p = 0.001). Also, less aggressive pacing techniques were required to induce ventricular tachycardia in 9 of 14 symptomatic patients compared with 4 of 23 asymptomatic patients (p less than 0.02).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Electrophysiologic effects and clinical efficacy of oral propafenone therapy in patients with ventricular tachycardia.

The effects of the antiarrhythmic agent propafenone were evaluated in 25 patients with recurrent symptomatic ventricular tachycardia. Oral propafenone was given to a maximal dose of 300 mg every 8 hours. Ten of the 25 patients developed side effects or had inadequate suppression of spontaneous ventricular arrhythmias during propafenone therapy. Electrophysiologic studies were performed before and during drug therapy on the 15 patients who had a satisfactory clinical response. Propafenone increased the PR interval from 168 +/- 46 to 188 +/- 25 ms (p less than 0.007), the HV interval from 47 +/- 10 to 65 +/- 13 ms (p less than 0.005), the shortest atrial pacing cycle length to maintain 1:1 atrioventricular (AV) nodal conduction from 385 +/- 44 to 436 +/- 42 ms (p less than 0.005), the ventricular effective refractory period from 231 +/- 17 to 255 +/- 19 ms (p less than 0.001) and the ventricular functional refractory period from 260 +/- 15 to 278 +/- 17 ms (p less than 0.002). Before propafenone therapy, all 15 patients had ventricular tachycardia induced by programmed ventricular stimulation. During propafenone treatment, 12 patients still had ventricular tachycardia induced, and the tachycardia cycle length significantly increased from 236 +/- 44 to 374 +/- 103 ms (p less than 0.001). Ten patients were considered to have satisfactory electrophysiologic response to propafenone on the basis of either the inability to initiate ventricular tachycardia or a marked increase in ventricular tachycardia cycle length associated with lack of symptoms during the induced tachycardia. These patients were discharged receiving propafenone.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Inhibition of premature ventricular extrastimuli by subthreshold conditioning stimuli.

The purpose of this study was to determine whether trains of subthreshold high frequency conditioning stimuli (333 Hz, 1 ms duration, 2 ms interval) delivered to the canine ventricle inhibited the response to a premature stimulus (S2) more effectively than did a single subthreshold conditioning stimulus. It was found that trains of conditioning stimuli (mean 1.21 mA) inhibited the response to S2 152 ms beyond expiration of the ventricular effective refractory period, whereas a single conditioning stimulus inhibited S2 only 20 ms or less beyond the ventricular effective refractory period. In late diastole, trains of conditioning stimuli failed to inhibit S2 when the train of stimuli caused ventricular depolarization or the latter occurred in response to the next sinus impulse. Trains of conditioning stimuli did not induce ventricular arrhythmias. Lidocaine or autonomic blockade did not alter the response to trains of conditioning stimuli. Trains of conditioning stimuli or a single conditioning stimulus inhibited the response to S2 only when they were delivered at the same electrode site. By lengthening the ventricular effective refractory period, trains of conditioning stimuli could prevent or terminate tachycardias, but this possibility is constrained, at present, by the spatial limitations of the technique.

Implantable defibrillator event rates in patients with unexplained syncope and inducible sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias: a comparison with patients known to have sustained ventricular tachycardia.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the clinical significance of inducible ventricular tachyarrhythmias among patients with unexplained syncope. BACKGROUND: Induction of sustained ventricular arrhythmias at electrophysiology study in patients with unexplained syncope and structural heart disease is usually assigned diagnostic significance. However, the true frequency of subsequent spontaneous ventricular tachyarrhythmias in the absence of antiarrhythmic medications is unknown. METHODS: In a retrospective case-control study, the incidence of implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD) therapies for sustained ventricular arrhythmias among patients with unexplained syncope or near syncope (syncope group, n = 22) was compared with that of a control group of patients (n = 32) with clinically documented sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT). Sustained ventricular arrhythmias were inducible in both groups and neither group received antiarrhythmic medications. All ICDs had stored electrograms or RR intervals. Clinical variables were similar between groups except that congestive cardiac failure was more common in the syncope group. RESULTS: Kaplan-Meier analysis of the time to first appropriate ICD therapy for syncope and control groups produced overlapping curves (p = 0.9), with 57 +/- 11% and 50 +/- 9%, respectively, receiving ICD therapy by one year. In both groups, the induced arrhythmia was significantly faster than spontaneous arrhythmias, but the cycle lengths of induced and spontaneous arrhythmias were positively correlated (R = 0.6, p < 0.0001). During follow-up, three cardiac transplantations and seven deaths occurred in the syncope group, and two transplantations and five deaths occurred in the control group (36-month survival without transplant 52 +/- 11% and 83 +/- 7%, respectively, p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with unexplained syncope, structural heart disease and inducible sustained ventricular arrhythmias, spontaneous sustained ventricular arrhythmias occur commonly and at a similar rate to patients with documented sustained VT. Thus, electrophysiologic testing in unexplained syncope can identify those at risk of potentially life-threatening tachyarrhythmias, and aggressive treatment of these patients is warranted.

Clinical efficacy and electrophysiologic effects of cibenzoline therapy in patients with ventricular arrhythmias.

Cibenzoline, a new antiarrhythmic agent, was tested in 26 patients who had symptomatic ventricular tachycardia (24 patients) or premature ventricular complexes (2 patients) unresponsive to conventional drugs. Cibenzoline was given orally every 8 hours to maximal doses of 65 mg in 2 patients, 81.25 mg in 22 patients and 97.5 mg in 2 patients. Cibenzoline abolished spontaneous episodes of ventricular tachycardia in 8 of 16 patients with ventricular tachycardia during a 72 hour control electrocardiographic recording, and 7 of 22 patients had greater than 83% decrease in premature ventricular complexes compared with control. The PR interval increased 14% (p less than 0.001), QRS duration increased 17% (p less than 0.001), QT interval did not change and mean ejection fraction in 10 patients did not change. Electrophysiologic studies were performed on 10 patients in the control period and during maximal cibenzoline dosage. Cibenzoline did not affect electrophysiologic properties of the atrium or atrioventricular (AV) node. It prolonged the ventricular effective (223 +/- 16 to 241 +/- 22 ms, p less than 0.02) and functional (247 +/- 18 to 264 +/- 25 ms, p less than 0.02) refractory periods. At control electrophysiologic studies, ventricular tachycardia was induced in 9 of 10 patients (mean cycle length 210 +/- 31 ms). Cibenzoline therapy prevented ventricular tachycardia induction in two patients, and in the other seven patients the mean ventricular tachycardia cycle length increased from 210 to 260 ms. The one patient with no ventricular arrhythmia induced during the control study still had no arrhythmia induced while receiving cibenzoline.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Arrhythmogenic effects of antiarrhythmic drugs: a study of 506 patients treated for ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation.

Antiarrhythmic therapy in 506 consecutive patients undergoing 1,268 antiarrhythmic drug trials for ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation was reviewed for evidence of arrhythmogenic drug effect defined as the occurrence of a new form of ventricular tachyarrhythmia temporally associated with initiation of drug therapy or dosage increase. Arrhythmogenic effects occurred in 6.9% of patients and 3.4% of drug trials. This ranged from a high of 11.8% caused by encainide to none occurring with procainamide, tocainide or beta-adrenergic blocking drugs. The incidence of arrhythmogenesis was significantly greater in patients whose presenting arrhythmia was sustained ventricular tachycardia than it was in those who presented with nonsustained ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation (p = 0.02). Decreased systolic function measured echocardiographically at the base of the left ventricle was associated with an increased incidence of arrhythmogenic effects (p = 0.006) whereas global left ventricular ejection fraction was not. Age, gender, cardiac diagnosis, location of prior myocardial infarction and New York Heart Association functional class for heart failure were not related to the occurrence of drug-induced arrhythmias. These findings emphasize the need for in-hospital cardiac monitoring during initiation of antiarrhythmic drug therapy for ventricular tachyarrhythmias.

New observations on atrial fibrillation before and after surgical treatment in patients with the Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome.

The records of 342 patients who received surgical treatment for the Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome between 1968 and 1986 were reviewed to evaluate the characteristics of atrial fibrillation. The patients were classified into two groups according to the presence (n = 166) or absence (n = 176) of documented episodes of atrial fibrillation preoperatively. The mean follow-up duration was 6 years (range 2 to 20). As compared with reports based on smaller patient groups and shorter follow-up, the study revealed several new findings. 1) During follow-up, nine patients in the atrial fibrillation group developed recurrent atrial fibrillation after a successful operation; five of these nine patients did not have associated heart disease. 2) All three patients with a history of atrial fibrillation and an accessory pathway conducting in the anterograde direction only had a successful surgical procedure and no postoperative atrial fibrillation. 3) The cycle length of atrioventricular (AV) reciprocating tachycardia was significantly shorter in the atrial fibrillation group (304 +/- 42 ms, mean +/- SD) than in the no-atrial fibrillation group (321 +/- 54 ms, p less than 0.005), and the cycle length of AV reciprocating tachycardia that degenerated into atrial fibrillation (289 +/- 26 ms) was shorter than that for the AV reciprocating tachycardia without subsequent atrial fibrillation (316 +/- 51 ms, p less than 0.005). 4) Sustained atrial fibrillation was induced in 30% of patients without a history of atrial fibrillation. 5) Atrial fibrillation occurred in four patients with an accessory pathway that conducted only in the retrograde direction.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Pharmacokinetic and electrophysiologic interactions of amiodarone and procainamide.

The effects of amiodarone on the pharmacokinetic and electrophysiologic properties of procainamide were examined in eight patients treated for recurrent ventricular arrhythmias who received intravenous procainamide, 6 to 15 mg/kg, at control and after 1 to 2 weeks of oral amiodarone treatment. Compared with control, procainamide plasma clearance decreased from 0.43 +/- 0.12 L/kg-hr to 0.33 +/- 0.12 L/kg-hr (P less than 0.01), plasma elimination half-life increased from 3.77 +/- 0.64 hours to 5.21 +/- 0.42 hours (P less than 0.01), and volume of distribution was unchanged from 2.31 +/- 0.74 L/kg to 2.47 +/- 0.90 L/kg during amiodarone treatment. As single agents, intravenous procainamide and oral amiodarone produced equivalent increases in QRS duration, rate-corrected QT interval, right ventricular effective refractory period, and cycle length of induced ventricular tachycardia. After the addition of intravenous procainamide to amiodarone the QRS duration, rate-corrected QT interval, and, in six of eight patients, ventricular tachycardia cycle length were significantly increased compared with control or either drug alone, suggesting additive electrophysiologic effect. However, acceleration of induced ventricular tachycardia occurred in one patient with combined treatment, suggesting a potential for adverse electrophysiologic interactions. These findings indicate that amiodarone has pharmacokinetic and electrophysiologic interactions with procainamide and suggest that the intravenous dose of procainamide be reduced by 20% to 30% during concurrent drug administration.

Value and limitations of clinical electrophysiologic study in assessment of patients with unexplained syncope.

We assessed the value of clinical electrophysiologic study using intracardiac recording and programed electrical stimulation in 34 patients who had unexplained syncope and/or presyncope. All patients had normal electrocardiograms, and no abnormality was detected by clinical examination, ambulatory electrocardiographic recording, or treadmill testing. The electrophysiologic results were diagnostic in four patients (11.8 percent) and led to appropriate therapy that totally relieved symptoms. The results were abnormal but not diagnostic in two patients (5.8 percent) and normal in the remaining 28 patients (82.4 percent). The patients were followed for a mean period of 15 months (range two to 44) after electrophysiologic testing. Sixteen patients (47 percent) had no further episodes in the absence of any intervention. In four patients (11.8 percent), a definitive diagnosis was made during follow-up. In seven patients, permanent pacing was instituted empirically with relief of syncope. Two patients continued to have syncopal spells. We conclude that the diagnostic yield of electrophysiologic testing is low in a patient population that has no electrocardiographic abnormality or clinical evidence of cardiac disease. Empirical permanent pacing in patients with symptoms continuing after our study appeared to be beneficial, but this result is difficult to evaluate because of the high incidence of spontaneous remission in this group. Persistent attempts to document electrocardiographic abnormalities during a typical episode of symptoms appears to be the only definitive way to confirm or exclude an arrhythmic cause of the symptoms.

Management of atrial fibrillation: therapeutic options and clinical decisions.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common, sustained tachyarrhythmia seen in clinical practice. Although it is not immediately life threatening, AF can cause troublesome symptoms and poses a risk of stroke. The patient's clinical status is often complicated by the presence of other cardiovascular or concomitant diseases. As a result, management of the patient with AF involves many questions and choices, all of which must be individualized. There are 3 general strategies for the management of patients with AF, including (1) restoration and maintenance of sinus rhythm, (2) control of ventricular rate, and (3) prevention of stroke. More than 1 strategy may be appropriate in some patients. Furthermore, either pharmacologic or nonpharmacologic options can be chosen in certain situations. Although some data from randomized clinical trials are available to aid in clinical decision-making, only the benefits of anticoagulation are supported by substantial evidence. This article explores practical approaches to several management issues and scenarios for which there are limited relevant clinical data. These include: (1) patient selection for ventricular rate control and assessment of treatment, (2) choice of antiarrhythmic drug for maintenance of sinus rhythm, (3) inpatient versus outpatient initiation of therapy, (4) definition of antiarrhythmic drug success, (5) methods of transthoracic direct cardioversion, and (6) prediction and prevention of AF after cardiac surgery.

Proarrhythmia during drug treatment of supraventricular tachycardia: paradoxical risk of sinus rhythm for sudden death.

The purpose of this review is to summarize available data concerning proarrhythmia during drug therapy for supraventricular tachycardia. Patients were included in this review if 4 elements of treatment were available from the citation: (1) presence or absence of heart disease; (2) type of supraventricular tachycardia; (3) type of antiarrhythmic drug; and (4) type of proarrhythmic event. Citations spanning the years 1922-1995 yielded 56 reports and 195 events meeting the inclusion criteria. Atrial fibrillation was the most common arrhythmia and occurred alone in 76% of patients. Heart disease was present in 96% of patients. Proarrhythmic events were associated with 8 antiarrhythmic drugs in a total of 195 administered regimens. An adverse arrhythmic event was reported most frequently with quinidine (72%). Torsades de pointes was the most common of the documented proarrhythmic events (61%). Although supraventricular tachycardias are rarely in themselves life-threatening, symptoms may be disabling for many patients, and their lifestyle may be measurably improved by the maintenance of sinus rhythm. An algorithm is presented that takes into account the factors that predispose to proarrhythmia; it attempts to minimize the risk of treating these patients with antiarrhythmic drugs.

Electrophysiologic and antiarrhythmic properties of bepridil.

Bepridil has been shown to block both slow- and fast-channel activity in the heart. Electrophysiologic studies in man demonstrate that oral and intravenous bepridil prolongs sinus cycle length, PR interval and QT interval, without apparently changing the QRS interval. In addition, the drug depresses atrioventricular (AV) nodal conduction, resulting in an increased AH interval. Refractoriness in the AV node, atrium and ventricle is increased. There is usually little or no change in the HV interval. The antiarrhythmic properties of bepridil have been noted in patients with supraventricular tachycardia, ventricular premature complexes (VPCs) and sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT). In 17 patients, intravenous bepridil was compared with either verapamil or ajmaline. AV nodal reentrant tachycardia was terminated in all patients with bepridil and verapamil. However, ajmaline was somewhat more effective than bepridil in patients with AV reentry (8 of 8 versus 5 of 8). In 12 of these 17 patients, oral bepridil (500 mg/day for 3 days) suppressed the induction of tachycardia or slowed its rate. In 3 studies of oral bepridil for VPCs, the drug was effective in 68%, 69% and 70% of patients. Another group of studies evaluated bepridil in a total of 30 patients with sustained VT. Intravenous bepridil terminated VT in 17 of 26 patients. The induction of VT by programmed ventricular stimulation was also prevented in 7 of 17 patients. Although torsade de pointes has been reported, its incidence appears to be low.

Perspectives and controversies in atrial fibrillation.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained arrhythmia in humans. The 3 basic tenets of therapy are (1) restoration and maintenance of sinus rhythm; (2) ventricular rate control; and (3) prevention of thromboembolism. Maintenance of sinus rhythm appears preferable to rate control alone in patients with significant symptoms caused by AF. Complete suppression of AF with drug therapy for >6 months is unusual, but it is not the sole criterion of success. As with other chronic cardiac disorders such as angina and heart failure, a marked reduction in frequency and duration of episodes of AF will likely translate into an excellent clinical outcome. The major risk of antiarrhythmic drug therapy is ventricular proarrhythmia, which is seen most frequently in patients with substantial left ventricular dysfunction. Torsade de pointes is the most frequent proarrhythmia that occurs with antiarrhythmic agents that prolong ventricular repolarization and the QT interval. To minimize the risk of proarrhythmia, antiarrhythmic drugs are started in-hospital in patients with significant heart disease, and agents are selected based on certain patient characteristics. For example, the drugs initially selected for patients with heart failure and coronary artery disease are amiodarone and sotalol, respectively. Two approaches may be used to decrease the thromboembolic risk associated with cardioversion of AF to sinus rhythm. In the conventional method, warfarin is given (INR 2.0-3.0) for 3 weeks before and at least 4 weeks after cardioversion. An alternative approach employs transesophageal echocardiography to rule out left atrial thrombi before cardioversion. Both methods appear reasonable and safe, and I prefer the conventional and transesophageal echocardiography-guided approaches for outpatients and in-hospital patients, respectively.

Antiarrhythmic therapy for asymptomatic ventricular arrhythmias.

The rationale for treatment of patients with nonsustained asymptomatic ventricular arrhythmias is the theoretical benefit of preventing more serious ventricular arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death. Because of the high costs involved and the serious side effects, such as proarrhythmia, associated with this therapy, the decision to treat this patient group for a potential protective effect must be weighed carefully. Risk factors identifying those patients most likely to have further complications include the presence of heart disease and left ventricular dysfunction, and the relative severity of these conditions. Those patients who fit into high-risk groups are the ones most likely to benefit, although this benefit is still unproved. If antiarrhythmic therapy is given, it is recommended that it be started in the hospital and that the efficacy of treatment be assessed by serial electrophysiologic-pharmacologic testing or noninvasive means. Empiric treatment, especially started out-of-hospital, is discouraged because it is least likely to benefit the patient and most likely to cause harm.