In the skin lesions of patients with mycosis fungoides, the number of MRGPRX2-expressing cells is increased and correlates with mast cell numbers.

Background: Mycosis fungoides (MF) is an indolent T-cell lymphoma that mainly affects the skin and presents with itch in more than half of the patients. Recently, the expression of Mas-related G protein-coupled receptor X2 (MRGPRX2), a receptor of mast cell (MC) responsible for the IgE-independent non-histaminergic itch, has been shown in lesional skin of patients with pruritic skin diseases, including chronic urticaria, prurigo, and mastocytosis. As of yet, limited knowledge exists regarding the MRGPRX2 expression in the skin of patients with MF. Objectives: To investigate the number of MRGPRX2-expressing (MRGPRX2+) cells in the skin of patients with MF and its correlation with clinical and laboratory characteristics of the disease. Methods: MRGPRX2 was analyzed in lesional and non-lesional skin of MF patients and healthy skin tissues by immunohistochemistry. Co-localization of MRGPRX2 with the MC marker tryptase was assessed by immunofluorescence. Public single-cell RNAseq data was reanalyzed to identify the MRGPRX2 expression on the distinct cell types. Results: In lesional skin of MF patients, MRGPRX2+ cell number was higher than in non-lesional skin and healthy control skin (mean:15.12 vs. 6.84 vs. 5.51 cells/mm2, p=0.04), and correlated with MC numbers (r=0.73, p=0.02). MC was the primary cell type expressing MRGPRX2 in MF patients. The ratio of MRGPRX2+ MCs to MRGPRX2+ cells in lesional and non-lesional skin correlated with the severity of disease (r=0.71, p=0.02 and r=0.67, p=0.03, respectively). Conclusions: Our findings point to the role of MRGPRX2 and MC in the pathogenesis of MF that should be investigated in further studies.

Mast cells and tryptase are linked to itch and disease severity in mycosis fungoides: Results of a pilot study.

Introduction: In mycosis fungoides (MF), the most common cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, itch is a frequent clinical symptom. Whether mast cells (MCs), eosinophils (Eos) or their mediators play a role in MF-associated itch or disease severity is controversially discussed. Here, we explored the role of MC and Eo numbers in the skin as well as blood levels of their mediators in disease severity and itch. Methods: In 10 patients with MF and 10 matched control subjects we assessed disease severity, itch, and quality of life impairment using dedicated tools such as the mSWAT, ItchyQoL and DLQI. We analyzed skin biopsies and measured serum levels of tryptase, a mast cell mediator, as well as of the eosinophil products eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) and major basic protein (MBP). Results: The presence of chronic itch, in four of 10 patients, was associated with significantly higher disease severity (mSwat), larger body surface area affected, and stronger QoL impairment (Itchy-Qol, DLQI). Serum levels of tryptase, but not ECP and MBP, were linked with patient-reported disease severity, body surface area affected, and the presence of itch. Three of the four patients with chronic itch, but none of the six patients without, had tryptase levels above >6µg/l. Numbers of MCs in the papillary dermis were higher in MF skin lesions then in non-lesional skin of MF patients and skin of healthy controls. Discussion: The MC-mediator tryptase, in MF, is linked to disease activity and impact, most prominently to itch. Our findings call for larger studies that explore the role of MCs, tryptase and other MC mediators as drivers of itch and their role in MF pathogenesis.

A novel histopathological scoring system to distinguish urticarial vasculitis from chronic spontaneous urticaria.

BACKGROUND: Urticarial vasculitis (UV) is defined by long-lasting urticarial lesions combined with the histopathologic findings of leukocytoclastic vasculitis. As one of the major unmet needs in UV, diagnostic criteria are rather vague and not standardized. Moreover, there seems to be considerable overlap with chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU), particularly for the normocomplementemic variant of UV. Therefore, this study aimed to develop a diagnostic scoring system that improves the histopathologic discrimination between UV and CSU. METHODS: Lesional skin sections of patients with clinical and histopathologic diagnosis of UV (n = 46) and CSU (n = 51) were analyzed (blinded to the diagnosis) for the following pre-defined criteria: presence of leukocytoclasia, erythrocyte extravasation, fibrin deposits, endothelial cell swelling, ectatic vessels, blurred vessel borders, dermal edema, intravascular neutrophil, and eosinophil numbers and numbers of dermal neutrophils, macrophages and mast cells. RESULTS: The greatest differences between UV and CSU samples were observed for leukocytoclasia (present in 76% of UV vs. 3.9% of CSU samples; p < 0.0001), erythrocyte extravasation (present in 41.3% of UV vs. 2.0% of CSU samples; p < 0.0001), and fibrin deposits (present in 27.9% of UV vessels vs. 9.7% of CSU vessels; p < 0.0001). Based on these findings, we developed a diagnostic score, the urticarial vasculitis score (UVS), which correctly assigned 37 of 46 cases of UV and 49 of 51 cases of CSU to the previously established diagnosis. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that the UVS, a combined quantitative assessment of the three criteria leukocytoclasia, fibrin deposits and extravasated erythrocytes, distinguishes UV from CSU in skin histopathology. The UVS, if validated in larger patient samples, may help to improve the diagnostic approach to UV.