Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
Asunto de la revista
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Middle East J Dig Dis ; 14(1): 77-84, 2022 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36619726

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The increasing prevalence of antibiotic-resistant strains of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) led to reduced success with traditional H. pylori treatments. This warrants further evaluation of other treatment options. One such treatment regimen of interest is nitazoxanide containing regimen. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy of the addition of nitazoxanide to clarithromycin-based triple therapy in patients with H. pylori infection. METHODS: In this single-center prospective observational trial, patients with H. pylori infection were treated with a regimen comprising of nitazoxanide 1000 mg, amoxicillin 2000 mg, clarithromycin 1000 mg, and esomeprazole 80 mg per day (NACE regimen) for14 days. Eradication of H. pylori infection was assessed 4 weeks after completion of therapy by using stool antigen assay. Treatment compliance and adverse effects were also evaluated. RESULTS: Out of 111 patients who entered into the study for final analysis, H. pylori eradication was achieved in 93.7% (104 out of 111) patients in per-protocol analysis and 90.4% (104 out of 115) patients in intention to treat analysis. The treatment regimen was well tolerated. CONCLUSION: The addition of nitazoxanide to standard clarithromycin-based triple therapy effectively eradicates H. pylori infection. This regimen is safe and well tolerated.

2.
Indian J Gastroenterol ; 38(4): 325-331, 2019 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31520370

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Resistance to commonly used antibiotics against Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) is increasing rapidly leading to lower success of traditional triple therapy to eradicate H. pylori infection. So, search for a new regimen as the first-line therapy of H. pylori infection is needed. AIM: In this study, we compared the efficacy of 14-day concomitant therapy and 14-day triple therapy for the eradication of H. pylori infection. METHOD: In this open-labeled prospective trial, patients with H. pylori infection were randomized to concomitant therapy (pantoprazole 80 mg, amoxicillin 2000 mg, clarithromycin 1000 mg, and metronidazole 1000 mg daily in divided doses) and triple therapy (pantoprazole 80 mg, amoxicillin 2000 mg, and clarithromycin 1000 mg daily in divided doses). Duration of treatment was 14 days. Gastric biopsy was done 10-12 weeks after completion of therapy to confirm H. pylori eradication. RESULT: The eradication rate achieved with the concomitant therapy was significantly greater than that obtained with the triple therapy. Per-protocol eradication rates of concomitant and triple therapy were 77% and 58.3% (p = 0.028), respectively. Intention-to-treat eradication rates of concomitant and triple therapy were 70.1% and 49.3% (p = 0.013), respectively. Both the treatment regimens were well tolerated. CONCLUSION: Although the rate of eradication of H. pylori infection with  concomitant therapy was higher than that with triple therapy, the rate of concomitant therapy was still less than expected.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Infecciones por Helicobacter/tratamiento farmacológico , Helicobacter pylori/efectos de los fármacos , Adulto , Amoxicilina/administración & dosificación , Claritromicina/administración & dosificación , Esquema de Medicación , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Infecciones por Helicobacter/microbiología , Humanos , Masculino , Metronidazol/administración & dosificación , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pantoprazol/administración & dosificación , Estudios Prospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
3.
JGH Open ; 3(6): 474-479, 2019 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31832547

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Although the mortality rate has declined in recent years, amoebic liver abscesses (ALAs) still carry a substantial risk of morbidity. Studies regarding the indicators of severity, complication, or prognosis of ALA are limited in number and heterogeneous in methodology and results. METHODS: Clinicodemographic profile, therapeutic modalities, and outcomes of indoor ALA patients admitted between January 2016 and October 2017 were analyzed. An analysis of possible prognostic factors associated with complications and interventional therapy in patients with ALA was performed retrospectively. RESULTS: Data of 198 patients with ALA (mean age: 45 ± 12.1; M:F ratio: 193:5) were analyzed. The volume of abscess (503.1 ± 391.2: 300.2 ± 305.8 mL), elevated liver enzymes, and duration of hospital stay (11.98 ± 5.75): 10.23 ± 4.1 days) were significantly (P < 0.05) higher in alcoholic, compared to nonalcoholic, individuals. On univariate analysis, older age, duration of alcohol consumption, smoking, leukocytosis, hyperbilirubinemia, hypoalbuminemia, hyponatremia, and a larger volume of abscess were found to be significantly (P < 0.05) associated with complications. On multivariate analysis, older age, duration of alcohol consumption, smoking, leukocytosis, hyperbilirubinemia, hypoalbuminemia, and hyponatremia were found to be significantly (P < 0.05) associated with complications. Male gender, hypoalbuminemia, and larger volume of abscess were significantly (P < 0.05) associated with interventional treatment. CONCLUSION: Older age, leukocytosis, hyperbilirubinemia, hypoalbuminemia, hyponatremia, chronic alcoholism, and smoking are independent factors significantly associated with complications in patients with ALA. Hypoalbuminemia, larger volume of abscess, and male gender are independent variables associated with the requirement of interventional therapy.

4.
JGH Open ; 2(6): 329-332, 2018 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30619947

RESUMEN

Pneumothorax is a very rare complication of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Here, we report two cases of pneumothorax following ERCP and sphincterotomy for choledocholithiasis. Patient was treated successfully with laprotomy and repair of a rent in the posterolateral wall of the second portion of duodenum. We also review the literature.

5.
JGH Open ; 2(5): 207-213, 2018 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30483591

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: There is variability in the fecal calprotectin (FCP) cut-off level for the prediction of ulcerative colitis (UC) disease activity and differentiation from irritable bowel disease (IBS-D). The FCP cut-off levels vary from country to country. AIMS: We aimed to assess FCP as a marker of disease activity in patients with UC. We determined the optimal FCP cut-off value for differentiating UC and IBS-D. METHODS: In a prospective study, we enrolled 76 UC and 30 IBS-D patients. We studied the correlation of FCP with disease activity/extent as well as its role in differentiating UC from IBS-D. We also reviewed literature regarding the optimal FCP cut-off level for the prediction of disease activity and differentiation from IBS-D patients. RESULTS: Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of FCP (cut-off level, 158 µg/g) for the prediction of complete mucosal healing (using Mayo endoscopic subscore) were 90, 85, 94.7, and 73.3%, respectively. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of FCP (cut-off level, 425 µg/g) for the prediction of inactive disease (Mayo Score ≤ 2) were 94.3, 88.7, 86.2, and 95.4%, respectively. We also found a FCP cut-off value of 188 µg/g for the differentiation of UC from IBS-D. CONCLUSIONS: The study reveals the large quantitative differences in FCP cut-off levels in different study populations. This study demonstrates a wide variation in FCP cut-off levels in the initial diagnosis of UC as well as in follow-up post-treatment. Therefore, this test requires validation of the available test kits and finding of appropriate cut-off levels for different study populations.

6.
JGH Open ; 2(6): 249-254, 2018 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30619933

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Data regarding the comparison of colonoscopic preparation regimens are still variable. We aimed to assess the adequacy and tolerability of two bowel preparation regimens for afternoon colonoscopy. METHODS: In a randomized, investigator-blinded trial, two preparation regimens [4-L split-dose polyethylene glycol-electrolytes (PEG-ELS) and 2-L PEG-ELS plus bisacodyl) were compared in terms of bowel cleansing efficacy and adverse effects. RESULTS: The mean (±SD) age (years) of the 4-L split-dose PEG-ELS group (N = 147) and the 2-L PEG-ELS plus bisacodyl (N = 155) were 44.09 (±15.62) (M:F : 2:1) and 44.12 years (±15.61) (M:F : 1.7:1), respectively. Percentage of patients with excellent and good preparation was higher in the 4-L split-dose PEG-ELS regimen compared with the 2-L PEG-ELS plus bisacodyl regimen (22.44 vs 17.41 and 44.21% vs 36.12%). Percentage of patients with fair and poor preparation was lower in 4-L split-dose PEG-ELS regimen compared with the 2-L PEG-ELS plus bisacodyl regimen (21.08% vs 27.74% and 12.24% vs 18.70%). In comparison with the 2-L PEG-ELS plus bisacodyl group, the incidences of abdominal pain (11% vs 15%), bloating (9% vs 12.24%), nausea/vomiting (8.38% vs 9.52%), and sleep disturbance (11% vs 12%) were slightly more common in the 4-L split-dose PEG-ELS group. There were no statistically significant differences between the two regimens with regard to bowel cleansing efficacy and adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: The 2-L PEG-ELS plus bisacodyl (10 mg) preparation is as efficacious as the 4-L split-dose PEG-ELS regimen for afternoon colonoscopy. Optimal preparation for colonoscopy can be achieved with the 2-L PEG-ELS plus bisacodyl regimen with slightly fewer adverse events and lower cost compared to the 4-L split-dose PEG-ELS regimen.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA