RESUMEN
AIM: To evaluate the impact of haemophilia A without inhibitors on humanistic outcomes in patients and caregivers. Herein, we report a cross-sectional analysis of the baseline data of persons with haemophilia (PWH) participating in the prospective study HEMOLIFE. METHODS: These data are part of a prospective, observational, and multicentre study currently being conducted in 20 hospitals in Spain by haematologists. We included subjects 12 years or older diagnosed with haemophilia. The evaluations included the Maladjustment Scale, Haemophilia-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire for Adults (HaemoQol)/HaemoQol Short Form (Children), haemophilia-specific version of the Work Productivity and Impairment Questionnaire plus the Classroom Impairment Questionnaire (WPAI+CIQ:HS), Haemophilia Activity List (HAL)/Paediatric Haemophilia Activities List (pedHAL), visual analogue scale (VAS) for evaluating pain, Coping Pain Questionnaire-Reduced (CAD-R), and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). RESULTS: A total of 81 PWH were recruited at 18 centres; 66 PWH were ≥18 years (i.e., adults), and PWH 15 were <18 years (i.e., paediatric patients). Out of the 79 evaluable subjects, 16 (20%) showed an impact of haemophilia on daily life, and the areas most affected were "leisure time" (58% showed maladjustment) and "work/studies" (47% showed maladjustment). Patients reported a higher impact of haemophilia on quality of life (mean [SD] of the transformed score) in the dimensions of "sport" (49.4 [28.6]), "physical health" (40.5 [25.8]) and "future" (37.7 [28.9]). In adults, according to HAL scores, greater impairment of function was observed in "lying/sitting/kneeling/standing," "function of legs" and "leisure activities and sports," with mean normalized scores of 64.7, 65.1 and 69.0, respectively. Productivity was mostly impacted by presenteeism. The pain was infrequent and moderate. According to the HADS scores, nine (11.5%) patients had clinical anxiety and depression. CONCLUSION: PWH without inhibitors exhibited impairments in adjustment, quality of life and functionality, especially related to leisure and sports activities, and exhibit relevant levels of anxiety and depression.
Asunto(s)
Hemofilia A , Calidad de Vida , Humanos , Hemofilia A/psicología , Hemofilia A/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios Transversales , Adulto , Masculino , Calidad de Vida/psicología , Estudios Prospectivos , Adolescente , Persona de Mediana Edad , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto Joven , Femenino , Costo de Enfermedad , Niño , EspañaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: We aimed to evaluate the characteristics, clinical outcomes, and blood product transfusion (BPT) rates of patients undergoing cardiac transplant (CT) while receiving uninterrupted anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapy. METHODS: A retrospective, single-center, and observational study of adult patients who underwent CT was performed. Patients were classified into four groups: (1) patients without anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapy (control), (2) patients on antiplatelet therapy (AP), (3) patients on vitamin K antagonists (AVKs), and (4) patients on dabigatran (dabigatran). The primary endpoints were reoperation due to bleeding and perioperative BPT rates (packed red blood cells (PRBC), fresh frozen plasma, platelets). Secondary outcomes assessed included morbidity and mortality-related events. RESULTS: Of the 55 patients included, 6 (11%) received no therapy (control), 8 (15%) received antiplatelet therapy, 15 (27%) were on AVKs, and 26 (47%) were on dabigatran. There were no significant differences in the need for reoperation or other secondary morbidity-associated events. During surgery patients on dabigatran showed lower transfusion rates of PRBC (control 100%, AP 100%, AVKs 73%, dabigatran 50%, p = 0.011) and platelets (control 100%, AP 100%, AVKs 100%, dabigatran 69%, p = 0.019). The total intraoperative number of BPT was also the lowest in the dabigatran group (control 5.5 units, AP 5 units, AVKs 6 units, dabigatran 3 units; p = 0.038); receiving significantly less PRBC (control 2.5 units, AP 3 units, AVKs 2 units, dabigatran 0.5 units; p = 0.011). A Poisson multivariate analysis showed that only treatment on dabigatran reduces PRBC requirements during surgery, with an expected reduction of 64.5% (95% CI: 32.4%-81.4%). CONCLUSIONS: In patients listed for CT requiring anticoagulation due to nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, the use of dabigatran and its reversal with idarucizumab significantly reduces intraoperative BPT demand.
Asunto(s)
Anticoagulantes , Trasplante de Corazón , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/uso terapéutico , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Estudios de Seguimiento , Trasplante de Corazón/efectos adversos , Pronóstico , Transfusión Sanguínea , Factores de Riesgo , Anciano , Adulto , Dabigatrán/uso terapéutico , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & controlRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Activated prothrombin complex concentrate (aPCC) is a bypassing agent indicated to treat bleeds in patients with acquired hemophilia A (AHA). Nevertheless, its efficacy and safety in the real-world setting have not often been addressed. METHODS: We report the experience of Spanish reference centers for coagulation disorders and from acquired hemophilia Spanish Registry (AHASR) from August 2012 to February 2021. Follow-up period of 30 days after aPCC withdrawal. RESULTS: Thirty patients with a median age of 70 years old, suffering from 51 bleeds treated with aPCC were finally evaluated. As first-line treatment, aPCC stopped bleeding in 13 of 14 (92.9%) cases. aPCC as the second line after recombinant factor VIIa failure, stopped bleeding in all cases. In 17 patients, aPCC was used far from initial bleed control as prophylaxis of rebleeding with 94% effectiveness. No thromboembolic episodes were communicated. One patient developed hypofibrinogenemia, which did not prevent aPCC from halting bleeding. No other serious adverse events possibly or probably associated with aPCC were reported. CONCLUSIONS: This data support aPCC as hemostatic treatment in AHA with high effectiveness and excellent safety profile in acute bleeds and as extended use to prevent rebleedings, even in aging people with high cardiovascular risk.
Asunto(s)
Hemofilia A , Anciano , Humanos , Factores de Coagulación Sanguínea/uso terapéutico , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Factor IX/uso terapéutico , Factor VIII/uso terapéutico , Hemofilia A/complicaciones , Hemofilia A/tratamiento farmacológico , Hemorragia/etiología , Hemorragia/tratamiento farmacológico , Proteínas Recombinantes/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
Hemophilia, a congenital coagulopathy characterized by a deficiency in coagulation factor VIII (hemophilia A) or factor IX (hemophilia B), results in a tendency of bleeding proportional to the lacking factor. Most bleeds in patients with hemophilia occur in their joints and muscles, and because of these bleeding episodes, patients may end up developing musculoskeletal alterations resulting from hemophilic arthropathy, even receiving hemostatic treatment. The third edition of the World Federation of Hemophilia's Guidelines for the Management of Hemophilia defines 12 principles that encompass all the different types of multidisciplinary care required by people with hemophilia, one of these being clinical and epidemiological research. The expected number of patients with hemophilia across the world has been estimated at 1125â000, most of them undiagnosed, and the total number of patients with severe hemophilia at 418â000 males. Data available from medium and high-income countries show that the prevalence at birth (incidence) and the prevalence of hemophilia differ, which means that patients with hemophilia are at a disadvantage in terms of life expectancy as compared with the general population. In medium-to-high-income countries, the life expectancy disadvantage of patients with hemophilia A and B as compared with the rest of the population is 30% and 24%, respectively. This life expectancy disadvantage is much greater in countries with more limited access to treatments for hemophilia.
Asunto(s)
Hemofilia A , Hemofilia B , Hemostáticos , Humanos , Masculino , Factor IX/uso terapéutico , Factor VIII/uso terapéutico , Hemofilia A/terapia , Hemofilia A/tratamiento farmacológico , Hemofilia B/tratamiento farmacológico , Hemorragia/tratamiento farmacológico , Hemostáticos/uso terapéutico , FemeninoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Prophylaxis with emicizumab, a bispecific monoclonal antibody that mimics FVIII function, has shown encouraging results in clinical trials in terms of efficacy and safety. However, current experience is limited, and many areas of concern to clinicians have yet to be reviewed. AREAS COVERED: This paper reviews the experience of hemophilia A patients treated with emicizumab based on the results of clinical trials and real-life studies. The authors place special emphasis on issues such as the management of these patients in situations of hemorrhage and/or surgical interventions, joint health or laboratory monitoring. EXPERT OPINION: Treatment with emicizumab has been shown to improve joint health and reduce bleeding, of particular interest to patients with inhibitors and high bleeding rates. However, there are still concerns about its administration in neonates and previously untreated patients due to limited reported experience. Laboratory monitoring is not strictly necessary due to the stable pharmacokinetics emicizumab has been shown to exhibit, however, tests that globally assess hemostasis may be useful especially in cases of bleeding or surgery. The authors are also of the opinion that prophylaxis before minor surgery is not necessary and that major surgeries can be safely performed with additional prophylactic coagulation factor.Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04431726..