Standardized assessment of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in breast cancer: an evaluation of inter-observer agreement between pathologists.

INTRODUCTION: In breast cancer, there is a growing body of evidence that tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) may have clinical utility and may be able to direct clinical decisions for subgroups of patients. Clinical utility is, however, not sufficient for warranting the implementation of a new biomarker in the routine practice, and evaluation of the analytical validity is needed, including testing the reproducibility of decentralized assessment of TILs. The aim of this study was to evaluate the inter-observer agreement of TILs assessment using a standardized method, as proposed by the International TILs Working Group 2014, applied to a cohort of breast cancers reflecting an average breast cancer population. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Stromal TILs were assessed using full slide sections from 124 breast cancers with varying histology, malignancy grade and ER- and HER2 status. TILs were estimated by nine dedicated breast pathologists using scanned hematoxylin-eosin stainings. TILs results were categorized using various cutoffs, and the inter-observer agreement was evaluated using the intraclass coefficient (ICC), Kappa statistics as well as individual overall agreements with the median value of TILs. RESULTS: Evaluation of TILs led to an ICC of 0.71 (95% CI: 0.65-0.77) corresponding to an acceptable agreement. Kappa values were in the range of 0.38-0.46 corresponding to a fair to moderate agreement. The individual agreements increased, when using only two categories ('high' vs. 'low' TILs) and a cutoff of 50-60%. DISCUSSION: The results of the present study are in accordance with previous studies, and shows that the proposed methodology for standardized evaluation of TILs renders an acceptable inter-observer agreement. The findings, however, indicate that assessment of TILs needs further refinement, and is in support of the latest St. Gallen Consensus, that routine reporting of TILs for early breast cancer is not ready for implementation in a clinical setting.

Peritubular capillary basement membrane changes in chronic renal allograft rejection: Comparison of light microscopic and ultrastructural observations.

Marked peritubular capillary basement membrane (PTCBM) multilayering, the ultrastructural feature of chronic antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) of kidney allografts, was found to correspond histologically to PTCs with thickened BMs; such PTCs have been suggested as a novel histological marker of chronic rejection. We investigated whether scoring of PTCBM thickening can substitute the ultrastructural search for PTCBM multilayering. The thickening was graded in PAS- and Jones-stained sections in 110 biopsies from recipients with a late dysfunction, all examined ultrastructurally for transplant capillaropathy (≥3 PTCs with ≥5 BM layers). Grade 0 indicated no thickening. Grade 1 and grade 2 were assigned when the PTCBMs were as thick as or thicker than those of the non-atrophic tubules, and duplication/chain-like lamination of the PTCBM was noted in ≤3 or ≥4 high-power fields, respectively. The series was enrolled in subgroups of those with and those without histopathological lesions of chronic rejection. Fifty-six biopsies displayed lesions of chronic ABMR. Transplant capillaropathy was demonstrated in 40 biopsies. Grade 2 thickening furnished a substantial interobserver concordance rate (κ = 0.803) and correlated with the transplant capillaropathy. Jones staining performed somewhat better in scoring than PAS staining. Grade 2 thickening was verified in 35 biopsies involving chronic ABMR, and in one control biopsy (sensitivity 61.4%, specificity 0.98). Grade 1 thickening was not suggestive of chronic ABMR at all. In conclusion, grade 2 thickening can be regarded as the histopathological lesion of chronic ABMR; however, electron microscopy remains the gold standard in the assessment of PTCBM changes.