Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
Breast J ; 24(1): 74-77, 2018 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28597470

RESUMEN

Male breast cancer (MBC) comprises <1% of all breast cancers in the United States. MBC is typically treated with total mastectomy while the majority of female breast cancer is treated with breast conservation therapy combined with various forms of radiation. One method that has developed over the last two decades is the use of intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) as a type of accelerated partial breast irradiation to direct the treatment field to the tumor bed. Since overall prognosis and systemic therapy recommendations for MBC are similar to breast cancer in women, we describe the first case of MBC treated with BCS and IORT. Our patient is a 62-year-old male who was found to have a right breast 1.6 cm palpable mass at the 10:00 position 1 cm radially from the nipple. Core biopsy demonstrated invasive ductal carcinoma, moderately differentiated, estrogen and progesterone receptor positive, and Her 2 Negative. The patient had a strong desire for breast conservation, and needed to minimize daily radiation treatments due to his work schedule. After discussion among our multidisciplinary tumor board, we felt this patient to be suitable for BCS and IORT given his age, favorable tumor subtype, size, and clinically early stage breast cancer. A right axillary sentinel lymph node biopsy and central lumpectomy was performed. The INTRABEAM device (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Oberkochen, Germany) was utilized for radiation delivery. The patient had negative margins on his final pathology. The postoperative course was uneventful and at the 6 month follow-up visit there were no issues and he had an excellent cosmetic outcome. BCS and IORT is an option in appropriately selected male patients with favorable subtype early stage breast cancer.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama Masculina/radioterapia , Neoplasias de la Mama Masculina/cirugía , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/radioterapia , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/cirugía , Neoplasias de la Mama Masculina/patología , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/patología , Terapia Combinada/métodos , Humanos , Cuidados Intraoperatorios/métodos , Masculino , Mastectomía Segmentaria/métodos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Biopsia del Ganglio Linfático Centinela , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
J Neurooncol ; 133(2): 409-417, 2017 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28447278

RESUMEN

Meningeal hemangiopericytoma (m-HPC) is a rare tumor of the central nervous system (CNS), which is distinguished clinically from meningioma by its tendency to recur and metastasize. The histological classification and grading scheme for m-HPC is still evolving and few studies have identified tumor features that are associated with metastasis. All patients at our institution with m-HPC were assessed for patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics associated with survival, recurrence, and metastasis. New findings were validated using the SEER database. Twenty-seven patients were identified in our institutional records with m-HPC with a median follow-up time of 85 months. Invasiveness was the strongest predictor of decreased overall survival (OS) and decreased metastasis-free survival (MFS) (p = 0.004 and 0.001). On subgroup analysis, bone invasion trended towards decreased OS (p = 0.056). Bone invasion and soft tissue invasion were significantly associated with decreased MFS (p = 0.001 and 0.012). An additional 315 patients with m-HPC were identified in the SEER database that had information on tumor invasion and 263 with information on distant metastasis. Invasion was significantly associated with decreased survival (HR = 5.769, p = 0.007) and metastasis (OR 134, p = 0.000) in the SEER data. In this study, the authors identified a previously unreported tumor characteristic, invasiveness, as the strongest factor associated with decreased survival and metastasis. The association of invasion with decreased survival and metastasis was confirmed in a separate, larger, publicly available database. Invasion may be a useful parameter in the histological grading and clinical management of hemangiopericytoma of the CNS.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias del Sistema Nervioso Central/mortalidad , Neoplasias del Sistema Nervioso Central/secundario , Hemangiopericitoma/mortalidad , Hemangiopericitoma/secundario , Invasividad Neoplásica/fisiopatología , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Neoplasias Óseas/patología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Invasividad Neoplásica/patología , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estudios Retrospectivos
3.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys ; 92(1): 107-12, 2015 May 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25863758

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The role of consolidative radiation therapy (RT) for stage III and IV diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) in the era of rituximab is not well defined. There is evidence that some patients with bulky disease may benefit, but patient selection criteria are not well established. We sought to identify a subset of patients who experienced a high local failure rate after receiving rituximab-based chemotherapy alone and hence may benefit from the addition of consolidative RT. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Two hundred eleven patients with stage III and IV DLBCL treated between August 1999 and January 2012 were reviewed. Of these, 89 had a complete response to systemic therapy including rituximab and received no initial RT. Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards regression were performed, with local recurrence (LR) as the primary outcome. RESULTS: The median follow-up time was 43.9 months. Fifty percent of patients experienced LR at 5 years. In multivariate analysis, tumor ≥ 5 cm and stage III disease were associated with increased risk of LR. The 5-year LR-free survival was 47.4% for patients with ≥ 5-cm lesions versus 74.7% for patients with <5-cm lesions (P=.01). In patients with <5-cm tumors, the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) was ≥ 15 in all patients with LR. The 5-year LR-free survival was 100% in SUV<15 versus 68.8% in SUV ≥ 15 (P=.10). CONCLUSIONS: Advanced-stage DLBCL patients with stage III disease or with disease ≥ 5 cm appear to be at an increased risk for LR. Patients with <5-cm disease and SUVmax ≥ 15 may be at higher risk for LR. These patients may benefit from consolidative RT after chemoimmunotherapy.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Linfoma de Células B Grandes Difuso/tratamiento farmacológico , Linfoma de Células B Grandes Difuso/radioterapia , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Anticuerpos Monoclonales de Origen Murino/administración & dosificación , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Ciclofosfamida/administración & dosificación , Citarabina/administración & dosificación , Doxorrubicina/administración & dosificación , Etopósido/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Linfoma de Células B Grandes Difuso/mortalidad , Linfoma de Células B Grandes Difuso/patología , Masculino , Metotrexato/administración & dosificación , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/mortalidad , Estadificación de Neoplasias/métodos , Selección de Paciente , Prednisona/administración & dosificación , Recurrencia , Análisis de Regresión , Riesgo , Rituximab , Insuficiencia del Tratamiento , Carga Tumoral , Vincristina/administración & dosificación , Adulto Joven
4.
J Thorac Oncol ; 10(3): 462-71, 2015 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25384064

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Use of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) in non-small-cell lung cancer remains controversial. Limited data indicate that PORT may benefit patients with involved N2 nodes. This study evaluates this hypothesis in a large retrospective cohort treated with chemotherapy and contemporary radiation techniques. METHODS: The National Cancer Data Base was queried for patients diagnosed 2004-2006 with resected non-small-cell lung cancer and pathologically involved N2 (pN2) nodes also treated with chemotherapy. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards model was used to assess factors associated with overall survival (OS). Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) using the propensity score was used to reduce selection bias. OS was compared between patients treated with versus without PORT using the adjusted Kaplan-Meier estimator and weighted log-rank test based on IPTW. RESULTS: Two thousand and one hundred and fifteen patients were eligible for analysis. 918 (43.4%) received PORT, 1197 (56.6%) did not. PORT was associated with better OS (median survival time 42 months with PORT versus 38 months without, p = 0.048). This effect was significant in multivariable and IPTW Cox models (hazard ratio: 0.87, 95% confidence interval: 0.78-0.98, p = 0.026, and hazard ratio: 0.89, 95% confidence interval: 0.79-1.00, p = 0.046, respectively). No interaction was seen between the effects of PORT and number of involved lymph nodes (p = 0.615). CONCLUSIONS: PORT was associated with better survival for patients with pN2 nodes also treated with chemotherapy. No interaction was seen between benefit of PORT and number of involved nodes. These findings reinforce the benefit of PORT for N2 disease in modern practice using the largest, most recent cohort of chemotherapy-treated pN2 patients to date.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/mortalidad , Bases de Datos Factuales , Neoplasias Pulmonares/mortalidad , Ganglios Linfáticos/patología , Neoplasias/cirugía , Radioterapia Adyuvante/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/patología , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/radioterapia , Terapia Combinada , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Neoplasias Pulmonares/radioterapia , Escisión del Ganglio Linfático , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Clasificación del Tumor , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Neoplasias/patología , Cuidados Posoperatorios , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasa de Supervivencia
5.
Radiat Oncol ; 9: 187, 2014 Aug 26.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25154893

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Locoregional tumor failure (LRF) after definitive chemoradiation for patients with stage III NSCLC remains unacceptably high. This analysis sought to further define where LRF occurs relative to radiation dose received and pre-treatment PET scan-defined maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax). METHODS: This was a retrospective study analyzing patients with stage III NSCLC treated with definitive radiation between 2006 and 2011. LRF was defined as failure within the ipsilateral lung, hilum or mediastinum. The CT simulation scan with the radiation dose distribution was registered to the CT or PET/CT documenting LRF. The region of LRF was contoured, and the dose to 95% of the volume (D95) of LRF was extracted. The pre-treatment SUVmax was also extracted for the anatomic region of LRF. RESULTS: Sixty-one patients were identified. Median follow-up time was 19.1 months (range 2.37-76.33). Seventy four percent of patients were treated with 3-D conformal technique (3DCRT), 15% were treated with Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT), and 11% were treated with a combination of 3DCRT and IMRT. Median prescribed radiation dose for all patients was 66 Gy (39.6-74). Concurrent chemotherapy was delivered in 90% of patients. Twenty-two patients (36%) developed a LRF, with a total of 39 anatomic regions of LRF identified. Median time to LRF was 11.4 months (3.5-44.6). Failures were distributed as follows: 36% were in-field failures, 27% were out-of-field failures, 18% were in-field and out-of-field failures, and 18% were in-field and marginal (recurrences within the field edge) failures. There were no isolated marginal failures. Of the patients that developed a LRF, 73% developed a LRF with an in-field component. Sixty-two percent of LRFs were nodal. The median pre-treatment SUVmax for the anatomic region of LRF for patients with an in-field failure was 13. The median D95 of in-field LRF was 63 Gy. CONCLUSIONS: LRF after definitive chemoradiation are comprised primarily of in-field failures, though out-of field failures are not insignificant. Marginal failures are rare, indicating field margins are appropriate. Although radiation dose escalation to standard radiation fields has not yielded success, using PET parameters to define high-risk regions remains worthy of further investigation.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/radioterapia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/radioterapia , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/epidemiología , Radioterapia Conformacional , Radioterapia de Intensidad Modulada , Adulto , Anciano , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/patología , Quimioradioterapia , Femenino , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Imagen Multimodal , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Dosificación Radioterapéutica , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA