Treatment Perception and Utilization of Dental Care During Pregnancy Among Women Visiting Antenatal Clinics in King Abdulaziz Medical City & Primary Healthcare, National Guard, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

Objectives To identify how readily accessible dental care is to a sample of pregnant women in King Abdulaziz Medical City (KAMC), Jeddah, and to determine any potential obstacles to receiving dental care while pregnant. Methodology Female patients visiting antenatal clinics in KAMC in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia were the target group for this cross-sectional study. The age range was limited to childbearing age (18-48 years old). Both pregnant and non-pregnant women were established in obstetrics and gynecology clinics. The pattern of dental service use and attitude toward dental treatment during pregnancy were assessed using a self-administered questionnaire. Other data were gathered, such as demographics, education, employment status, and the number of live births. Results This study included 361 participants in the survey with an 80% response rate. A large proportion of participants was in the age group of 19 to 35 years old (75.07%; p-value < 0.0001), holding undergraduate degrees (58.17%; p-value < 0.0001), housewives (77.56%; p-value < 0.0001), married (99.45%; p-value < 0.0001), non-pregnant women (75.07%; p-value < 0.0001), and have three or more children (42.94%; p-value < 0.0001). About two-thirds of the participants reported using private hospitals for their dental services (65.37%; p-value < 0.0001), while 22.03% (p-value < 0.0001) of the participants reported visiting a dentist in the last six months and 7.2% (p-value < 0.0001) visited a dentist during pregnancy. In terms of awareness questions, 72.02% (p-value < 0.0001) reported that if the mother did not eat well, the baby takes calcium from the mother's teeth, 43.77% (p-value < 0.0001) reported brushing teeth at least three times a day, and 42.94% (p-value < 0.0001) of women reported that they do not have an idea about what they need to do if a pregnant woman needs treatment that requires taking X-rays. Similar patterns were observed in other awareness answers. Conclusion Based on the study's findings, there is a significantly low rate of dental care utilization in the sample of pregnant women. We conclude that educated women are more likely to maintain good oral hygiene and are more satisfied with their oral health. However, a large proportion of participants reported dental problems during their pregnancy. In general, a lack of knowledge about the safety of dental care during pregnancy is the main obstacle to seeking dental care. Limitations The selected sample was from antenatal clinics in KAMC & Primary Healthcare, National Guard, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. As a result, the findings of this study cannot be applied to the total female population of Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Because the information was self-reported, which is a common issue with self-administered questionnaires, and because participation in the study was voluntary and participant confidentiality was maintained, there is a low chance that the data may be subject to recall or response bias.

Dizziness in Saudi Arabia: An epidemiologic study.

Introduction: Dizziness is one of the most common and recurring complaints in adults presenting at the clinic. However, its prevalence in the population of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia remains unclear. We aimed to examine the prevalence and correlates of dizziness in a large sample of the Saudi population. Methods: In this is cross-sectional study, we used an electronic survey, which was completed by 1.478 respondents, with a response rate of 84% across five regions of Saudi Arabia. The online survey was launched on the Qualtrics website and distributed via social media channels to obtain heterogeneous responses. The study included adults aged ≥18 years who resided in Saudi Arabia during data collection. We used t-test and chi-square test for descriptive analysis and multiple logistic regression model to assess prevalence and predictors of dizziness. Results: More than half of the participants were aged between 26 years and 45 years (58.66%). Of the participants, 42.97% reported having dizziness at the time of taking the survey. Women were less likely than men to report dizziness (OR = 0.65; CI, 0.49, 0.87; p = 0.003). A description of the type of dizziness by age revealed that vertigo slightly decreased with age. Unclear vision with movement or blurry vision was common in young adults, whereas imbalance was common in older adults. A multiple regression model adjusted for demographic characteristics revealed a statistically significant association between dizziness and age group. Participants in the age group of 46-55 years were 1.83 times more likely to report dizziness compared to those aged >65 years (odds ratio = 1.83; confidence interval, 0.62, 5.41; p = 0.0009). Discussion: Dizziness is a common complaint in Saudi Arabia. Future studies should elucidate the risk factors for and mechanisms of dizziness to help prevent falls and reduced quality of life.

Perspective of adults in Saudi Arabia toward complementary and alternative medicine use for autism spectrum disorder: a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) is a high-prevalence neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by communicational, social, and behavioral challenges. Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) is a group of practices and products that fall outside the realm of conventional medicine practiced worldwide. Traditional CAM is a health practice that comes from a particular culture, such as the use of Zamzam water and black seeds in Saudi Arabia. CAM comprises widely utilized practices in Saudi Arabia for children of various ages and adults. In many cases, CAM is used to treat ASD. The aim of this study is to investigate the perspectives of adults in Saudi Arabia toward CAM for treating ASD. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted by distributing an online questionnaire to adults in different regions of Saudi Arabia. RESULTS: A total of 4,311 adults participated in this study; 66.8% were females and 33.2% were male. Half of the participants reported that they knew about ASD (54.7%). More than half of the participants indicated that CAM-including art therapy (69.0%), physical exercise (67.0%), and limiting the use of electronic (55.4%)-could help in ASD management. Around half of the respondents indicated a belief that traditional treatment cannot help in treating ASD (53.9%). Only 20.0% of the respondents thought that ASD could be entirely treated using CAM therapies. The most common source of knowledge about CAM was social media and the internet (58.6%). CONCLUSIONS: The majority of participants in this study did not believe that ASD could be treated entirely using CAM. In addition, fewer than half of the participants believed that CAM therapies could improve different aspects of ASD, such as behavioral issues. The study highlighted the need for awareness among residents of Saudi Arabia regarding specific treatments for ASD.

Predictors of fall-related injuries due to common consumer products among elderly adult emergency department visits in the United States during 2007-2017.

Falls are the leading cause of injuries and death among the elderly in the United States (U.S.). This study examined unintentional fall related-injuries and potential associations between various consumer products. Data was analyzed from the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) of hospital emergency department (ED) visits for unintentional injuries among the elderly between 2007 and 2017. Multiple logistic regression was used to examine the association between consumer products and fall-related injury ED visits. A total of 537,703 injury-related ED visits were analyzed. Two-thirds of visits were fall-related. Of those, 33% were among those 85 years and older, 62.5% occurred at home, 37.6% had head trauma, and 28.7% resulted in hospitalization. Flooring materials accounted for 29.1% of injuries. Ladders were significantly associated with fall-related injuries (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 5.48, 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.72-6.36), followed by flooring materials (AOR 3.09, 95% CI 2.60-3.67), and porches and balconies (AOR 2.61, 95% CI 2.30-2.96). Several common consumer products are associated with fall-related injuries among the elderly. Increased awareness and education are critical.

Marijuana users are likely to report opioid misuse among adults over 50 years in representative sample of the United States (2002-2014).

Background: In the wake of the rising rate of prescription opioid misuse, there has been increased public health interest in the possibility that cannabis might help to curb or prevent opioid use disorder. Previous studies were limited to young adult marijuana use population. Little is known about whether in older adult population, marijuana use is associated with a different type of nonmedical use opioids. We examined the association between marijuana use and nonmedical prescription opioids dependence and use among older adults.Methods: The National Survey on Drug Use and Health is a nationally U.S. representative cross-sectional survey. We analyzed data for 75,949 adults aged ≥ 50 who participated in the year 2002-2014.Results: Within the overall population, 3.8% of the older adults reported past-year marijuana use (estimate 3.5 million older adults Americans). Past-year marijuana use was very common (25%-37%) among nonmedical opioid dependence respondents compared to those who did not report nonmedical opioid dependence and use (3.5%-3.7%). Past-year marijuana user was significantly associated with an increase in odds of reporting opioid dependence (AOR 9.6 95% CI = 5.8-15.7), and past-year nonmedical use opioids (AOR 6.4 95% CI = 5.2-7.8). Illicit drug heroin was the most prevalent nonmedical used opioid (AOR 6.3 95% CI = 5.0-7.9), compared to codeine (AOR 4.5 95% CI = 3.5-5.7), hydrocodone (AOR 4.9 95% CI = 3.8-6.4), methadone or tramadol (AOR 4.9 95% CI = 2.0-12.3).Conclusion: Policymakers and healthcare providers should remain mindful that older adult marijuana users regardless of initial legitimate medical needs are likely to report nonmedical opioid use including illicit drug heroin.

Frequency of cannabis use and alcohol-associated adverse effects in a representative sample of U.S. adolescents and youth (2002-2014) a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: While the link between frequent cannabis use and alcohol use disorders is well documented, it is not clear whether alcohol drinkers who use cannabis less frequently are also vulnerable to alcohol use disorders. We estimate the association of frequency of past 12-months cannabis use with alcohol-associated adverse effects variables in the same time frame: alcohol dependence, heavy drinking, driving under alcohol influence, alcohol-related interpersonal problems, use after interpersonal problems, alcohol-related risky behaviors, and alcohol-related legal problems. METHODS: We analyzed data from U.S. individuals aged 12 to 25 years who participated in annual, cross-sectional U.S. National Surveys on Drug Use and Health from 2002 to 2014. Logistic regression models were used to examine the association of cannabis use with six alcohol-associated adverse effects variables. Frequency of cannabis use served as the primary independent variable, and were divided into four categories: frequent use (21-30 days per month), less frequent use (1-20 days per month), no use over the past 12 months, and no lifetime cannabis use. Alcohol dependence and six alcohol-associated adverse effects variables served as our primary outcomes. RESULTS: The study included 465,090 respondents aged 12 to 25 years, among all past-year cannabis users, (47.5%) were less frequent (1-20 days/month) users. Less frequent cannabis use was highest among male, 15-25-year-olds, and non-Hispanic white 11.8, 84 and 10.6%, respectively. In adjusted models, past-year less frequent cannabis use (1-20 days/month) was significantly associated with past-year alcohol dependence (adjusted odds ratio aOR 5.57, 95% confidence interval (CI) 5.5-6.4); heavy drinking in the past-year (aOR 3.41, 95% CI 3.2-3.5); alcohol-related interpersonal problems in the past-year (aOR 7.33, 95% CI 7.0-7.5); use after interpersonal problems (aOR 5.17, 95% CI 4.8-5.5); alcohol-related risky behaviors (aOR 7.29, 95% CI 7.0-7.5), and, driving under influence of alcohol (aOR 7.19, 95% CI 6.9-7.4). No cannabis use past-year were more likely to report alcohol dependence (aOR 2.81, 95% CI 2.6-3) compared with no lifetime cannabis use. CONCLUSION: These findings indicated that within the general population, not only frequent cannabis user (21-30 days per month) but even less frequent cannabis use (1-20 days/month) was significantly associated with past-year alcohol dependence and alcohol-associated adverse effects than no lifetime cannabis use. These adverse alcohol-related outcomes associated with less frequent cannabis use, should be taken under careful consideration in alcohol use disorder treatment setting and policy planning.