RESUMEN
Understanding patient goals and preferences is critical in the context of complex conditions such as chronic pain. This need may be especially pronounced for Black patients, who experience significant health and healthcare disparities. The primary aim of this study was to describe the treatment goals and preferences of Black veterans with chronic musculoskeletal pain who were enrolled in the intervention arm of a randomized controlled trial testing a coaching intervention. In the coaching sessions, participants (n = 106) identified their most important pain-related treatment goals and preferences. Participants' top treatment goals were to improve physical functioning (61%), increase engagement in valued activities (45%), and reduce pain intensity (37%). Most participants (73%) preferred non-pharmacological treatments (eg, physical therapy, exercise, acupuncture, yoga). The 17% of participants who identified medications as a preferred treatment demonstrated higher levels of depression and anxiety compared to those who did not. Approximately 42% and 21% of participants stated a preference to avoid pharmacological and surgical pain treatments, respectively. Black patients with chronic pain prioritize improving physical functioning and pain intensity in service of increasing their engagement in exercise, work, relationships, and leisure activities. Also, in the current study, patients expressed a clear preference for non-pharmacological pain treatments. Future research should investigate ways to improve communication of goals and preferences with providers and facilitate access to non-pharmacological treatments for Black patients with chronic pain. PERSPECTIVE: This article describes the treatment goals and preferences of Black veterans with chronic pain. Most patients prioritized goals to improve physical functioning, pain severity, and participation in valued activities. Patients primarily preferred non-pharmacological treatments. This emphasizes the need for clear communication with Black patients regarding pain-related goals and non-pharmacological treatment options.
Asunto(s)
Negro o Afroamericano , Dolor Crónico , Dolor Musculoesquelético , Prioridad del Paciente , Veteranos , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Masculino , Dolor Crónico/terapia , Dolor Crónico/etnología , Femenino , Dolor Musculoesquelético/terapia , Dolor Musculoesquelético/etnología , Negro o Afroamericano/etnología , Anciano , Adulto , Objetivos , Manejo del Dolor/métodosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Disorganized symptoms show associations with metacognitive deficits in psychosis. However, the magnitude of this relationship is unclear. This meta-analysis aimed to 1) quantify relationships between metacognition and both disorganized symptoms and disorganized speech; and 2) examine moderators of these relationships (e.g., metacognition type, neurocognition). METHOD: A literature search was conducted using PsycINFO, Web of Science, PubMed, and EMBASE databases. English-language studies measuring disorganized symptoms and metacognition (i.e., introspective accuracy, metacognitive beliefs, or metacognitive capacity) in psychosis were included. Random effects meta-analyses were conducted using Pearson's r. RESULTS: Meta-analysis of 20 studies (n = 1490) resulted in a significant negative medium correlation between disorganized symptoms and metacognition (r = -0.332, 95 % CI [-0.423, -0.235]). Magnitude was moderated by metacognition type. A significant negative small correlation between disorganized speech and metacognition (r = -0.173, 95 % CI [-0.254, -0.089], n = 1470) was observed, with no significant moderators. CONCLUSIONS: Results clarify the magnitude of the relationships between metacognition and both disorganized symptoms and disorganized speech. Significant relationships may indicate conceptual links, yet the different magnitudes may reflect a distinction between disorganized symptoms and speech. The moderator finding highlights that metacognitive capacity has an especially strong link to disorganized symptoms and underscores the need for careful distinction between types of metacognition in future work.