Modification of vascular and inflammation biomarkers after OGTT in overweight healthy and diabetic subjects.

We evaluated the effect of an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) on the level of biomarkers of vascular remodelling. We enrolled 256 Caucasian overweight healthy subjects (H) and 274 overweight type 2 diabetic patients (D). All patients underwent basal measurements of blood glucose (BG), nitrites/nitrates, adiponectin (ADP), matrix metalloproteinase-2 (MMP-2), and matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) before and after OGTT. Nitrites/nitrates decrease was present after 60, 90, 120, and 180 min in both groups. Nitrite/nitrate levels were decreased at baseline, after 30 and 60 min in D group compared to H group. ADP decrease was present after 90, 120, and 180 min, in both groups. ADP levels were lower in D group than in H group during OGTT. MMP-2 increase was present after 60, 90, and 120 min in H group, while MMP-2 increase was observed after 90, 120, and 180 min in D group. MMP-2 levels were higher in D group than in H group during OGTT. MMP-9 increase was present in H group after 60, 90, 120, and 180 min, while MMP-9 increase was observed after 90, 120, and 180 min in D group. MMP-9 levels were higher in D group than in H group during OGTT. Postprandial glycemia induces an acute increase in biomarkers of vascular remodelling.

Effects of a standardized oral fat load on vascular remodelling markers in healthy subjects.

The most adequate way to experimentally reproduce the post-prandial lipemia condition appears to be the administration of a standardized oral fat load (OFL) to fasting patients. We studied the effects of a standardized OFL on markers of vascular remodelling in healthy subjects. We enrolled 286 Caucasians aged >or= 18 of either sex. The OFL was given after a 12-h fast. Blood samples were drawn before and 3, 6, 9 and 12h after the fat load. The following parameters were evaluated: body mass index (BMI), blood glucose (BG), systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), lipid profile, nitrites and nitrates, adiponectin (ADP), metalloproteinase-2 (MMP-2) and metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9). High density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C) decrease was present in subjects after 6h. Triglycerides (Tg) change was observed after 6h. Nitrites/nitrates variation was observed after 6 and 9h during OFL. Adiponectin level was decreased after 6 and 9h during OFL. Both MMP-2 and MMP-9 levels were higher after 6h during OFL. We observed that nitrites/nitrates and ADP significantly decreased and MMP-2 and MMP-9 significantly increased after a standardized OFL. Other studies need to confirm the direct acute effects of post-prandial lipemia on vascular damage.

Effects of one year treatment of sibutramine on insulin resistance parameters in type 2 diabetic patients.

PURPOSE: Comparison of the effects of one year treatment with sibutramine compared to placebo on insulin resistance parameters, body weight, glycemic control, and lipid profile, in type 2 diabetic patients. METHODS: Two hundred and forty-six patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes mellitus in therapy with different oral hypoglycemic agents or insulin were enrolled in this study and randomised to take sibutramine 10 mg or placebo for one year. We evaluated at baseline, and after 3, 6, 9, and 12 months these parameters: homeostasis model assessment insulin resistance index (HOMA-IR), retinol binding protein-4 (RBP-4), resistin, visfatin, and high sensitivity-C reactive protein (Hs-CRP), body weight, body mass index (BMI), glycated hemoglobin (HbA(1c)), fasting plasma glucose (FPG), post-prandial plasma glucose (PPG), fasting plasma insulin (FPI), total cholesterol (TC), low density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C), high density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C), and triglycerides (T(g)). RESULTS: A faster decrease of HOMA-IR, resistin, and RBP-4 was recorded with sibutramine compared to the control group. We observed a significant decrease of Hs-CRP in both groups, and a faster improvement of HbA(1c), FPG and PPG with sibutramine compared to the control group; furthermore we recorded a decrease of FPI, TC, LDL-C, body weight, and BMI in the sibutramine group, but not in the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Sibutramine gave a faster improvement of insulin resistance parameters and glycemic control compared to placebo; furthermore sibutramine gave also an improvement of lipid profile, and body weight.

Orlistat and L-carnitine compared to orlistat alone on insulin resistance in obese diabetic patients.

Our study wants to evaluate the effects of one year treatment with orlistat plus L-carnitine compared to orlistat alone on body weight, glycemic and lipid control, and insulin resistance state in type 2 diabetic patients. Two hundred and fifty-eight patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) [glycated hemoglobin (HbA(1c)) > 8.0%] in therapy with different oral hypoglycemic agents or insulin were enrolled in this study and randomised to take orlistat 120 mg three times a day plus L-carnitine 2 g one time a day or orlistat 120 mg three times a day. We evaluated at baseline, and after 3, 6, 9, and 12 months these parameters: body weight, body mass index (BMI), HbA(1c), fasting plasma glucose (FPG), post-prandial plasma glucose (PPG), fasting plasma insulin (FPI), homeostasis model assessment insulin resistance index (HOMA-IR), total cholesterol (TC), low density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C), high density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C), triglycerides (Tg), retinol binding protein-4 (RBP-4), resistin, visfatin, high sensitivity-C reactive protein (Hs-CRP). We observed a faster, and better decrease of body weight, HbA(1c), FPG, PPG, LDL-C, HOMA-IR with orlistat plus L-carnitine compared to orlistat. A faster improvement of TC, Tg, FPI, resistin, RBP-4, visfatin, and Hs-CRP was reached with orlistat plus L-carnitine compared to orlistat. We can safely conclude that the association of orlistat plus L-carnitine was better than orlistat in improving body weight, glycemic and lipid profile, insulin resistance, and inflammatory parameters and no significant adverse events were recorded.

Oral fat load effects on inflammation and endothelial stress markers in healthy subjects.

The aim was to study the effect of a standardized oral fat load (OFL) on different inflammatory parameters in a large sample of adult healthy subjects (n = 286) of both sexes. The fat load was given between 08:00 and 09:00 h after a 12-h fast. Blood samples were drawn before and 3, 6, 9, and 12 h after the OFL. All patients underwent a measurement of body mass index (BMI), blood glucose (BG), systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), total cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), triglycerides (Tg), soluble intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (sICAM-1), interleukin-6 (IL-6), high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP), soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (sVCAM-1), soluble E-selectin (sE-selectin), and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha). Fasting plasma glucose (FPG) increase was +3.26% at 3 h, +4.35% at 6 h, +1.09% at 9 h while FPG decrease was -1.09% at 12 h. High-density lipoprotein cholesterol increase was +2.08% at 3 h, and at 12 h during OFL study; a significant HDL-C decrease was present in subjects after 6 h (-4.17%; P < 0.05 vs 0). A significant Tg change was observed after 6 h (+70.37%; P < 0.01 vs 0) and 9 h (+58.33%; P < 0.05 vs 0) respectively, and the increase was +22.22% at 3 h and +18.52% at 12 h. Total cholesterol increase was +0.52% after 3 h, +1.04% after 6 h, while after 12 h the decrease was -0.52%. Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol increase was +1.64% after 6 h with a decrease of -0.82% at 9 and 12 h. A significant sICAM-1, hsCRP, and sE-selectin variation was observed after 6 and 9 h, while a significant sVCAM-1 change occurred after 3, 6, and 9 h. Soluble ICAM-1 increase was +20.58% at 3 h, +34.10% at 6 h (P < 0.05 vs 0) +25.94% at 9 h (P < 0.01 vs 0), and +19.14% at 12 h; sVCAM-1 increase was +13.97% (P < 0.05 vs 0) at 3 h, +18.55% at 6 h (P < 0.01 vs 0), +12.02% at 9 h (P < 0.05 vs 0), and +8.70% at 12 h. High-sensitivity CRP increase was +36.36% at 3 h, +90.91% at 6 h (P < 0.01 vs 0), +63.64% at 9 h (P < 0.05 vs 0), and +36.36% at 12 h. Soluble E-selectin increase was +27.11% at 3 h, +51.90% at 6 h (P < 0.05 vs 0), +45.19% at 9 h (P < 0.01 vs 0), and +20.12% at 12 h. Interleukin-6 increase was +61.11% at 3 h (P < 0.05 vs 0), +83.33% at 6 h (P < 0.001 vs 0), +55.56% at 9 h (P < 0.01 vs 0), and +22.22% at 12 h. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha increase was +42.86% at 3 h (P < 0.05 vs 0), +71.43% at 6 h (P < 0.01 vs 0), (+50.00% at 9 h (P < 0.05 vs 0), and +28.57% at 12 h. We observed that the OFL induces a complex and massive systemic inflammatory response that includes IL-6, TNF-alpha, hsCRP, and cell adhesion molecules, even before Tg significantly rises.

Evaluation of metalloproteinase 2 and 9 levels and their inhibitors in combined dyslipidemia.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the distribution of matrix metalloproteinase-2 (MMP-2), matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9), and their specific inhibitors in a sample of patients affected by mild dyslipidemia but not yet treated with antihyperlipidemic drugs. METHODS: One hundred and sixty-eight Caucasian patients aged >or=18 yr of either sex with combined dyslipidemia and who had never previously taken lipid-lowering medications were evaluated. As a control population, we enrolled 179 Caucasian healthy subjects, aged >or=18 yr of either sex. We evaluated body mass index (BMI), fasting plasma glucose (FPG), fasting plasma insulin (FPI), homeostasis model assessment (HOMA index), systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), total cholesterol (TC), low density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C), high density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C), triglycerides (Tg), lipoprotein(a) Lp(a), plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1), homocysteine (Hct), fibrinogen (Fg), high sensitivity C-reactive protein (Hs-CRP), adiponectin (ADP), MMP-2, MMP-9, tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinase-1 (TIMP-1), and tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinase-2 (TIMP-2). RESULTS: TC, Tg, and LDL-C were higher (P < < 0.05, P < < 0.01 and P < < 0.05, respectively) in the dyslipidemic group, while HDL-C levels were lower (P < < 0.01) compared with the control group. Increases of PAI-1, Hct, Fg, and Hs-CRP (P < < 0.01, P < < 0.05, P < < 0.05, and P < < 0.05, respectively) were present in the dyslipidemic group, while ADP level was lower (P < < 0.01) in the dyslipidemic patients compared with controls. MMP-2, MMP-9, TIMP-1, and TIMP-2 levels were higher (P < < 0.0001) in the dyslipidemic group. CONCLUSIONS: Combined hyperlipidemic patients have increased levels of prothrombotic and microinflammatory parameters and higher levels of MMP-2, MMP-9, TIMP-1, and TIMP-2 than control subjects. The prognostic importance of this observation has to be evaluated in adequately designed prospective studies.

Effects of insulin therapy with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) in diabetic patients: comparison with multi-daily insulin injections therapy (MDI).

We compared the effects of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) and multi-daily insulin injections therapy (MDI) on glicemic control and on lipid profile in type 1 and type 2 diabetic patients. We divided the patients in two groups: in the first one (n=32) CSII was administered, in the second one (n=32) MDI was administered. HbA(1C) value was lower after 3, 6, 9, and 12 months with CSII compared to MDI. Fasting plasma glucose (FPG) value was lower with CSII after 3, 6, and 12 months compared to MDI. Post-prandial glucose (PPG) value was lower in the group with CSII after 3, 6, 9, and 12 months compared to MDI. A significant TC decrease was observed in the group treated with CSII at 9, and 12 months while a significant TC increase was observed with MDI at 6, and 12 months. A significant LDL-C decrease was obtained with CSII after 9, and 12 months while no significant changes were observed with MDI. A significant HDL-C increase was observed with CSII after 12 months. A significant Tg decrease was observed with CSII after 12 months while a significant Tg increase was observed with MDI at 6, and at 12 months. CSII therapy allows a faster and better achievement of the therapeutic target and also gives an improvement of the lipid profile.

Acarbose actions on insulin resistance and inflammatory parameters during an oral fat load.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of acarbose on inflammatory biomarkers and insulin resistance in diabetic patients before and after a standardized oral fat load (OFL). Ninety six patients were assigned to take acarbose 50mg three times a day and 92 to take placebo; after the first month acarbose was titrated to 100mg three times a day. We evaluated the following parameters at the baseline, and after 1, 2 and 7months: body mass index (BMI), glycemic control, fasting plasma insulin, post-prandial plasma insulin, homeostasis model assessment insulin resistance index (HOMA-IR), blood pressure, lipid profile, soluble intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (sICAM-1), interleukin-6 (IL-6), high-sensitivity C reactive protein (Hs-CRP), soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (sVCAM-1), and soluble E-selectin (sE-selectin). Furthermore, at the baseline and at the end of the study all patients underwent OFL, and an euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp to evaluate M value and total glucose requirement. Acarbose was better than placebo in improving glycemic and lipid profile, and HOMA-IR. Furthermore, acarbose gave a decrease of fasting plasma insulin, post-prandial insulin, s-ICAM-1, sVCAM-1, IL-6, and Hs-CRP, not observed with placebo, even if no significant differences between the two groups were observed. During the second OFL performed after the therapy with acarbose, we observed a significant decrease of all inflammatory parameters' peaks compared to the OFL administered at baseline. Acarbose was more effective than acarbose in reducing the post-OFL peaks of the various parameters included the inflammatory markers, after 7months of therapy.

Comparison between orlistat plus l-carnitine and orlistat alone on inflammation parameters in obese diabetic patients.

To evaluate the effects of 1-year treatment with orlistat plus L-carnitine compared to orlistat alone on body weight, glycemic and lipid control, and inflammatory parameters in obese type 2 diabetic patients. Two hundred and fifty-eight patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) [glycated hemoglobin (HbA(1c)) > 8.0%] in therapy with different oral hypoglycemic agents or insulin were enrolled in this study and randomized to take orlistat 120 mg three times a day plus L-carnitine 2 g one time a day or orlistat 120 mg three times a day. We evaluated the following parameters at baseline and after 3, 6, 9, and 12 months: body weight, body mass index (BMI), glycated hemoglobin (HbA(1c) ), fasting plasma glucose (FPG), postprandial plasma glucose (PPG), fasting plasma insulin (FPI), homeostasis model assessment insulin resistance index (HOMA-IR), total cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), triglycerides (Tg), adiponectin (ADN), leptin, tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), vaspin, and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (Hs-CRP). We observed a better decrease in body weight, glycemic profile, HOMA-IR, LDL-C, and ADN and a faster improvement in FPI, TC, Tg, leptin, TNF-α, Hs-CRP with orlistat plus L-carnitine compared to orlistat alone. We also recorded an improvement in vaspin with orlistat plus l-carnitine not reached with orlistat alone. Orlistat plus L-carnitine gave a better improvement in body weight, glycemic and lipid profile compared to orlistat alone; furthermore, a faster and better improvement in inflammatory parameters was observed with orlistat plus L-carnitine compared to orlistat alone.

Different actions of losartan and ramipril on adipose tissue activity and vascular remodeling biomarkers in hypertensive patients.

We planned a randomized, double blind clinical trial to evaluate whether an antihypertensive intervention at the proximal or distal level of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system could have different effects on a broad range of innovative cardiovascular risk biomarkers. A total of 288 hypertensive Caucasian patients (115 men and 113 women), aged ≥ 18 years, were enrolled in this study. They were randomized to take losartan 50 mg per day or ramipril 5 mg per day for 1 month and titrated up to 100 mg per day and 10 mg per day for 13 months, respectively. At baseline, 1, 2 and 14 months after therapy initiation, we evaluated the following parameters: body weight, body mass index (BMI), systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), fasting plasma glucose (FPG), M-value, adiponectin (ADN), resistin (r), retinol binding protein-4 (RBP-4), visfatin, vaspin, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (Hs-CRP), matrix metalloproteinase-2 (MMP-2) and matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9). No variation of body weight, BMI, FPG or vaspin was obtained with either treatment. We recorded a similar improvement in SBP, DBP and Hs-CRP with both treatments; however, losartan also increased M-value, ADN and visfatin, whereas ramipril did not. Furthermore, losartan decreased r, RBP-4, MMP-2 and MMP-9, whereas ramipril did not have any effect on these parameters. In conclusion, we observed that short-term treatment with losartan improved several metabolic parameters (M-value, ADN, RBP-4, r and visfatin) and decreased vascular remodeling biomarkers (MMP-2 and MMP-9) in hypertensive subjects, whereas ramipril did not.

Effects of combination of sibutramine and L-carnitine compared with sibutramine monotherapy on inflammatory parameters in diabetic patients.

The aim of the study was to evaluate the effects of 12-month treatment with sibutramine plus L-carnitine compared with sibutramine alone on body weight, glycemic control, insulin resistance, and inflammatory state in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients. Two hundred fifty-four patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes mellitus (glycated hemoglobin [HbA(1c)] >8.0%) in therapy with different oral hypoglycemic agents or insulin were enrolled in this study and randomized to take sibutramine 10 mg plus L-carnitine 2 g or sibutramine 10 mg in monotherapy. We evaluated at baseline and after 3, 6, 9, and 12 months these parameters: body weight, body mass index, HbA(1c), fasting plasma glucose, postprandial plasma glucose, fasting plasma insulin, homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance index, total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides, leptin, tumor necrosis factor-α, adiponectin, vaspin, and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein. Sibutramine plus L-carnitine gave a faster improvement of fasting plasma glucose, postprandial plasma glucose, lipid profile, leptin, tumor necrosis factor-α, and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein compared with sibutramine alone. Furthermore, there was a better improvement of body weight, HbA(1c), fasting plasma insulin, homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance index, vaspin, and adiponectin with sibutramine plus L-carnitine compared with sibutramine alone. Sibutramine plus L-carnitine gave a better and faster improvement of all the analyzed parameters compared with sibutramine alone without giving any severe adverse effect.

Sibutramine and L-carnitine compared to sibutramine alone on insulin resistance in diabetic patients.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of one year of treatment with sibutramine plus L-carnitine compared to sibutramine on body weight, glycemic control, and insulin resistance state in type 2 diabetic patients. METHODS: Two hundred and fifty-four patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) [glycated hemoglobin (HbA(1c)) >8.0%] in therapy with different oral hypoglycemic agents or insulin were enrolled in this study and randomised to take sibutramine 10 mg plus L-carnitine 2 g or sibutramine 10 mg in monotherapy. We evaluated at baseline, and after 3, 6, 9, and 12 months these parameters: body weight, body mass index (BMI), glycated hemoglobin (HbA(1c)), fasting plasma glucose (FPG), post-prandial plasma glucose (PPG), fasting plasma insulin (FPI), homeostasis model assessment insulin resistance index (HOMA-IR), total cholesterol (TC), low density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C), high density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C), triglycerides (Tg), retinol binding protein-4 (RBP-4), resistin, visfatin, high sensitivity-C reactive protein (Hs-CRP). RESULTS: There was a decrease in body weight, BMI, HbA(1c), FPI, HOMA-IR, and RBP-4 in both groups, even when the values obtained with sibutramine plus L-carnitine were lower than the values obtained in sibutramine group. There was a faster decrease of FPG, PPG, TC, LDL-C, resistin and Hs-CRP with sibutramine plus L-carnitine even when no differences between the two groups were obtained. Furthermore, only sibutramine plus L-carnitine improved Tg, and visfatin. CONCLUSION: Sibutramine plus L-carnitine gave a faster improvement of lipid profile, insulin resistance parameters, glycemic control, and body weight compared to sibutramine.

Comparison of orlistat treatment and placebo in obese type 2 diabetic patients.

AIM: To evaluate the effects of 1-year treatment with orlistat compared with placebo on different inflammatory parameters in type 2 obese diabetic patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two hundred and fifty-four type 2 diabetic patients were randomized to take orlistat 120 mg three times a day or placebo for 12 months. We evaluated at baseline and after 3, 6, 9 and 12 months: leptin, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha, adiponectin (ADN), vaspin and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (HS-CRP), body weight, waist circumference, body mass index (BMI), lipid profile, glycemic profile, fasting plasma insulin (FPI) and homeostasis model assessment insulin resistance index (HOMA-IR). RESULTS: Regarding inflammatory parameters, there was a significant improvement of ADN and TNF-alpha, and a faster decrease of leptin and HS-CRP in the orlistat group compared with the control group. We also recorded a significant reduction of body weight and BMI with orlistat, but not with placebo. A faster improvement of glycemic profile and FPI was obtained with orlistat compared with the controls. Also, there was a significant reduction of lipid profile with orlistat, not reached with placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Orlistat was more effective than placebo in ameliorating inflammatory parameters such as ADN and TNF-alpha, and anthropometric parameters.

Metabolic effect of repaglinide or acarbose when added to a double oral antidiabetic treatment with sulphonylureas and metformin: a double-blind, cross-over, clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the metabolic effects of acarbose and repaglinide in type 2 diabetic patients who are being treated with a sulphonylurea-metformin combination therapy. The primary endpoint of the study was to evaluate which add-on treatment between acarbose and repaglinide is more efficacious in reducing PPG. The second endpoint was to evaluate which of these two treatment is more efficacious in the global management of glucose homeostasis in the enrolled patients. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: After a 4-week run-in period with a sulphonylurea-metformin combination, 103 patients were randomised to receive in addition either repaglinide, up to 6 mg/day (2 mg three times a day) or acarbose, up to 300 mg/day (100 mg three times a day) with forced titration (independently of their glycaemic control, unless side-effects developed due to the drug dosage) for 15 weeks. The treatment was then crossed-over for further 12 weeks until the 27th week. We assessed body mass index (BMI), glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA(1c)), fasting plasma glucose (FPG), postprandial plasma glucose (PPG), fasting plasma insulin (FPI), postprandial plasma insulin (PPI), homeostatic model assessment (HOMA) index, systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), total cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and triglycerides (Tg), at baseline and at 1, 2, 15 and 27 weeks of treatment. RESULTS: Seven patients did not complete the study, comprising one patient who was lost to follow-up and a further six through side-effects (two in week 1, one in week 15 and three after cross-over) Side-effects were classified as nausea (one in acarbose group), gastrointestinal events (four in acarbose group), and hypoglycaemia (one in repaglinide group). After 15 weeks of therapy, the repaglinide-treated patients experienced a significant decrease in HbA(1c) (-1.1%, p < 0.05), FPG (-9.5%, p < 0.05), and PPG (-14.9%, p < 0.05), when compared to the baseline values. However, the same treatment was associated with a significant increase in body weight (+2.3%, p < 0.05), BMI (+3.3%, p < 0.05) and FPI (+22.5%, p < 0.05); The increase was reversed during the cross-over phase. After 15 weeks of therapy, the acarbose-treated patients experienced a significant decrease in body weight (-1.9%, p < 0.05), BMI (-4.1%, p < 0.05), HbA(1c) (-1.4%, p < 0.05), FPG (-10.7%, p < 0.05), PPG (-16.2%, p < 0.05), FPI (-16.1%, p < 0.05), PPI (-26.9%, p < 0.05), HOMA index (-30.1%, p < 0.05), when compared to the baseline values. All these changes were reversed during the cross-over study phase, except those relating to HbA(1c), FPG and PPG. The only changes that significantly differed when directly comparing acarbose- and repaglinide-treated patients were those relating to FPI (-16.1% vs. +22.5%, respectively, p < 0.05) and HOMA index (-30.1% vs. +2.7%, p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: In addition from having a similar effect to repaglinide on PPG, acarbose appeared to have a more comprehensive positive effect on glucose metabolism compared to repaglinide in this relatively small sample of type 2 diabetic patients when used as add-on therapy to sulphonylureas and metformin.

Modulation of adipokines and vascular remodelling markers during OGTT with acarbose or pioglitazone treatment.

Adipose tissue secretes biologically active mediators as adipokines. We evaluate the effect of pioglitazone and acarbose on adipokines and vascular remodelling markers during an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). Height and body weight, BMI, glycemic and lipid profile, blood pressure, Nitrites/nitrates, ADP, resistin, MMP-2, and MMP-9 were evaluated at titration beginning, after 3, 6 months, and at the study end in 473 type 2 diabetic patients. BMI and weight increased after full treatment with pioglitazone respect to acarbose. HbA(1c) decreased after titration period with pioglitazone compared to baseline and to acarbose, and after full treatment with pioglitazone compared to the end of titration period and to acarbose. FPG decreased after full treatment with pioglitazone compared to the end of titration period. PPG decreased with acarbose after titration period respect to baseline and after full treatment respect to the end of titration period. FPI and Homa index decreased after titration period with pioglitazone compared to baseline and to acarbose, and after full treatment with pioglitazone respect to the end of titration period and to acarbose. ADP increased after titration period with pioglitazone compared to baseline and to acarbose, and after full treatment with pioglitazone compared to the end of titration period and to acarbose. Resistin decreased after titration period with pioglitazone compared to baseline and to acarbose, and after full treatment with pioglitazone respect to acarbose. Pioglitazone improves glucose metabolism and insulin-resistance compared to acarbose in type 2 diabetic patients already treated with metformin and sulphonilureas.