Bioequivalence Evaluation of Topical Metronidazole Products Using Dermal Microdialysis in New Zealand Rabbits.

Comparative assessment of cutaneous pharmacokinetics (cPK) by dermal microdialysis (dMD) appears to be suitable to evaluate the bioequivalence (BE) of topical dermatological drug products applied to the skin (TDDPs). Although dMD studies in the literature have reported inconclusive BE assessments, we have addressed several methodological deficiencies to improve dMD's capability to assess BE between reference (R) and approved generic (referred to as test (T)) gel and cream products of metronidazole (MTZ). The 90% confidence interval (CI) of the geometric mean ratios for the Ln(AUC0-24) and Ln(Cmax) endpoints was centered within the BE limits of 80-125%. The CIs extended outside this range as the proof-of-principle study was not statistically powered to demonstrate BE (N = 7 rabbits). A power analysis suggests that, with the variability observed in this study, 21 rabbits for the cream and 11 rabbits for the gel would be sufficient to support an evaluation of BE with the 2 probe replicates we used, and only 10 and 5 rabbits would be sufficient to power the study for the cream and gel, respectively, if 4 probe replicates are used for each treatment per rabbit. These results indicate that dMD when properly controlling variables can be used to support BE assessments for TDDPs.

Application of Confocal Raman Microscopy for the Characterization of Topical Semisolid Formulations and their Penetration into Human Skin Ex Vivo.

PURPOSE: The quality testing and approval procedure for most pharmaceutical products is a streamlined process with standardized procedures for the determination of critical quality attributes. However, the evaluation of semisolid dosage forms for topical drug delivery remains a challenging task. The work presented here highlights confocal Raman microscopy (CRM) as a valuable tool for the characterization of such products. METHODS: CRM, a laser-based method, combining chemically-selective analysis and high resolution imaging, is used for the evaluation of different commercially available topical acyclovir creams. RESULTS: We show that CRM enables the spatially resolved analysis of microstructural features of semisolid products and provides insights into drug distribution and polymorphic state as well as the composition and arrangement of excipients. Further, we explore how CRM can be used to monitor phase separation and to study skin penetration and the interaction with fresh and cryopreserved excised human skin tissue. CONCLUSION: This study presents a comprehensive overview and illustration of how CRM can facilitate several types of key analyses of semisolid topical formulations and of their interaction with their biological target site, illustrating that CRM is a useful tool for research, development as well as for quality testing in the pharmaceutical industry.

Research and Education Needs for Complex Generics.

Complex generics are generic versions of drug products that generally have complex active ingredients, complex formulations, complex routes of delivery, complex dosage forms, are complex drug-device combination products, or have other characteristics that can make it complex to demonstrate bioequivalence or to develop as generics. These complex products (i.e. complex generics) are an important element of the United States (U.S.) Food and Drug Administration's (FDA's) Generic Drug User Fee Amendments (GDUFA) II Commitment Letter. The Center for Research on Complex Generics (CRCG) was formed by a grant from the FDA to address challenges associated with the development of complex generics. To understand these challenges, the CRCG conducted a "Survey of Scientific Challenges in the Development of Complex Generics". The three main areas of questioning were directed toward which (types of) complex products, which methods of analysis to support a demonstration of bioequivalence, and which educational topics the CRCG should prioritize. The survey was open to the public on a website maintained by the CRCG. Regarding complex products, the top three selections were complex injectables, formulations, and nanomaterials; drug-device combination products; and inhalation and nasal products. Regarding methods of analysis, the top three selections were locally-acting physiologically-based pharmacokinetic modeling; oral absorption models and bioequivalence; and data analytics and machine learning. Regarding educational topics, the top three selections were complex injectables, formulations, and nanomaterials; drug-device combination products; and data analytics, including quantitative methods and modeling & simulation. These survey results will help prioritize the CRCG's initial research and educational initiatives.

Cutaneous Pharmacokinetics of Acyclovir Cream 5% Products: Evaluating Bioequivalence with an In Vitro Permeation Test and an Adaptation of Scaled Average Bioequivalence.

PURPOSE: The in vitro permeation test (IVPT) with a new statistical approach was investigated to evaluate the utility of an IVPT methodology as a sensitive tool to support a demonstration of bioequivalence (BE) for topical dermatological drug products. METHODS: IVPT experiments were performed utilizing ex vivo human skin. The initial screening tests involved four differently formulated acyclovir 5% creams: the U.S. Zovirax® as the reference product and the U.K. Zovirax®, Aciclovir 1A Pharma® and Aciclostad® as test products. Subsequently, a pivotal BE study was conducted comparing the two Zovirax® creams. The resulting data was used to evaluate BE of test (T) versus reference (R), T versus T, and R versus R, with an adaption of scaled average BE approach to address high variability in IVPT data. RESULTS: More acyclovir permeated into and through the skin from the two Zovirax® creams compared to the two non-Zovirax® creams. The U.S. Zovirax® cream showed a significantly higher Jmax and total amount permeated over 48 h, compared to the U.K. Zovirax® cream. The statistical analysis indicated that the test and reference products were not bioequivalent, whereas each product tested against itself was shown to be bioequivalent. CONCLUSIONS: The current study demonstrated that the IVPT method, with an appropriate statistical analysis of the results, is a sensitive and discriminating test that can detect differences in the rate and extent of acyclovir bioavailability in the skin from differently formulated cream products.

Variability of Skin Pharmacokinetic Data: Insights from a Topical Bioequivalence Study Using Dermal Open Flow Microperfusion.

PURPOSE: Dermal open flow microperfusion (dOFM) has previously demonstrated its utility to assess the bioequivalence (BE) of topical drug products in a clinical study. We aimed to characterize the sources of variability in the dermal pharmacokinetic data from that study. METHODS: Exploratory statistical analyses were performed with multivariate data from a clinical dOFM-study in 20 healthy adults evaluating the BE, or lack thereof, of Austrian test (T) and U.S. reference (R) acyclovir cream, 5% products. RESULTS: The overall variability of logAUC values (CV: 39% for R and 45% for T) was dominated by inter-subject variability (R: 82%, T: 91%) which correlated best with the subject's skin conductance. Intra-subject variability was 18% (R) and 9% (T) of the overall variability; skin treatment sites or methodological factors did not significantly contribute to that variability. CONCLUSIONS: Inter-subject variability was the major component of overall variability for acyclovir, and treatment site location did not significantly influence intra-subject variability. These results support a dOFM BE study design with T and R products assessed simultaneously on the same subject, where T and R treatment sites do not necessarily need to be next to each other. Localized variation in skin microstructure may be primarily responsible for intra-subject variability.

Statistical considerations and impact of the FDA draft guidance for assessing adhesion with transdermal delivery systems and topical patches for ANDAs.

Until 2016, a ratio of means (ROM) non-inferiority (NI) test was recommended in FDA product-specific guidances (PSGs) to evaluate adhesion performance for prospective generic transdermal delivery systems (TDS). However, the ROM NI test had low power for well-adhering TDS, which were becoming increasingly prevalent. Mathematical proof and simulation revealed that the low power wasn't because the non-normality of adhesion data violated the normality assumption of parametric methods; it was because the ROM NI test was coupled with an adhesion scale where scores approached 0 as adhesion got better. In June 2016, FDA published a draft general guidance on TDS adhesion and recommended a new statistical approach, replacing the ROM NI test with a difference-of-means (DOM) NI test, using the same scale and primary endpoint (mean adhesion scores). An analysis of 40 TDS adhesion studies submitted in ANDAs after the publication of the 2016 draft guidance suggests that, consistent with simulation results, the new statistical approach markedly improves the low power, and thereby reduces the sample size required by the old approach for moderately to well-adhering TDS, while retaining comparable power for poorly adhering TDS. The new statistical approach thus enhances the potential approvability and patient access to well-adhering generic TDS.

The Tritiated Water Skin Barrier Integrity Test: Considerations for Acceptance Criteria with and Without 14C-Octanol.

PURPOSE: A study was designed to assess barrier integrity simultaneously using separate compounds (probes) for polar and non-polar pathways through the skin, 3H2O and 14C-octanol, respectively; and to determine whether the two probe approach could better define barrier integrity. METHODS: A 5-min dose of water containing 3H2O and 14C -octanol was applied to ex vivo human skin mounted in Franz diffusion cells. The receptor solution was sampled at 30 min, analyzed for 3H and 14C content, and the correlation between water and octanol absorption was determined by statistical tests suitable for non-normally distributed data. This study was conducted on skin from 37 donors with from 3 to 30 replicate skin sections per donor (a total of 426 sections). RESULTS: The correlation between 3H2O and 14C-octanol absorption was low (Pearson correlation coefficient = 0.3485). The 3H2O absorption cutoff used in this study to select for a normal skin barrier rejected some sections in which 14C-octanol absorption was within normal limits and accepted others in which 14C-octanol absorption was abnormally high. The converse was true for 3H2O absorption when the 14C-octanol-based cutoff was used. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the 3H2O test or of similar tests that primarily assess the permeability of polar pathways through the skin may not necessarily provide information relevant to the absorption of highly lipophilic compounds. Octanol, or another molecule that more closely matches the physicochemical attributes of the test compound, may characterize properties of the skin barrier that are more relevant to compounds of low water solubility.

On the Road to Development of an in Vitro Permeation Test (IVPT) Model to Compare Heat Effects on Transdermal Delivery Systems: Exploratory Studies with Nicotine and Fentanyl.

PURPOSE: At elevated temperatures, the rate of drug release and skin permeation from transdermal delivery systems (TDS) may be higher than at a normal skin temperature. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of heat on the transdermal delivery of two model drugs, nicotine and fentanyl, from matrix-type TDSs with different formulations, using in vitro permeation tests (IVPT). METHODS: IVPT experiments using pig skin were performed on two nicotine and three fentanyl TDSs. Both continuous and transient heat exposures were investigated by applying heat either for the maximum recommended TDS wear duration or for short duration. RESULTS: Continuous heat exposure for the two nicotine TDSs resulted in different effects, showing a prolonged heat effect for one product but not the other. The Jmax enhancement ratio due to the continuous heat effect was comparable between the two nicotine TDS, but significantly different (p < 0.05) among the three fentanyl TDSs. The Jmax enhancement ratios due to transient heat exposure were significantly different for the two nicotine TDSs, but not for the three fentanyl TDSs. Furthermore, the transient heat exposure affected the clearance of drug from the skin depot after TDS removal differently for two drugs, with fentanyl exhibiting a longer heat effect. CONCLUSIONS: This exploratory work suggests that an IVPT study may be able to discriminate differences in transdermal drug delivery when different TDS are exposed to elevated temperatures. However, the clinical significance of IVPT heat effects studies should be further explored by conducting in vivo clinical studies with similar study designs.

Characterization of Temperature Profiles in Skin and Transdermal Delivery System When Exposed to Temperature Gradients In Vivo and In Vitro.

PURPOSE: Performance of a transdermal delivery system (TDS) can be affected by exposure to elevated temperature, which can lead to unintended safety issues. This study investigated TDS and skin temperatures and their relationship in vivo, characterized the effective thermal resistance of skin, and identified the in vitro diffusion cell conditions that would correlate with in vivo observations. METHODS: Experiments were performed in humans and in Franz diffusion cells with human cadaver skin to record skin and TDS temperatures at room temperature and with exposure to a heat flux. Skin temperatures were regulated with two methods: a heating lamp in vivo and in vitro, or thermostatic control of the receiver chamber in vitro. RESULTS: In vivo basal skin temperatures beneath TDS at different anatomical sites were not statistically different. The maximum tolerable skin surface temperature was approximately 42-43°C in vivo. The temperature difference between skin surface and TDS surface increased with increasing temperature, or with increasing TDS thermal resistance in vivo and in vitro. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the effective thermal resistance of skin in vivo and in vitro, the heating lamp method is an adequate in vitro method. However, the in vitro-in vivo correlation of temperature could be affected by the thermal boundary layer in the receiver chamber.

Cutaneous pharmacokinetics-based bioequivalence: A clinical dermal open flow microperfusion verification study using lidocaine and prilocaine combination topical products.

BACKGROUND: Using accurate, sensitive, reproducible and efficient in vivo cutaneous pharmacokinetics (PK)-based bioequivalence (BE) approaches can promote the development of topical generic drug products. A clinical dermal open flow microperfusion (dOFM) study has previously demonstrated the BE of topical drug products containing a hydrophilic drug. However, the utility of dOFM to evaluate the topical BE of drug products containing moderately lipophilic drugs, more representative of most topical drugs, has not yet been established. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the ability of a clinical dOFM study to assess BE of topical products containing two moderately lipophilic drugs that have only minor differences in chemical and physical properties. METHODS: The study included 20 healthy subjects. Four application sites on each thigh were treated with fixed dose lidocaine/prilocaine combination products, and dermal drug concentrations were monitored with two dOFM probes per application site for 12 h. A reference cream was compared to itself and to an approved generic cream (both serving as positive controls for BE), and to a gel (negative control). BE was established based on AUC0to12h and Cmax using the scaled-average-BE approach. Systemic exposure of both drugs was assessed throughout the study. RESULTS: BE was successfully demonstrated for the positive controls, and not for the negative control, for both drugs. The systemic exposure of both drugs was negligible. CONCLUSIONS: dOFM accurately demonstrated BE between bioequivalent topical creams, sensitively discriminated between different formulations and differentiated the cutaneous PK of both study drugs, even though they differ only slightly in chemical and physical properties. These results support the utility of dOFM as a cutaneous PK-based BE approach for topical lipophilic drugs, including lidocaine and prilocaine.

Determining topical product bioequivalence with stimulated Raman scattering microscopy.

Generic drugs are essential for affordable medicine and improving accessibility to treatments. Bioequivalence (BE) is typically demonstrated by assessing a generic product's pharmacokinetics (PK) relative to a reference-listed drug (RLD). Accurately estimating cutaneous PK (cPK) at or near the site of action can be challenging for locally acting topical products. Certain cPK approaches are available for assessing local bioavailability (BA) in the skin. Stimulated Raman scattering (SRS) microscopy has unique capabilities enabling continuous, high spatial and temporal resolution and quantitative imaging of drugs within the skin. In this paper, we developed an approach based on SRS and a polymer-based standard reference for the evaluation of topical product BA and BE in human skin ex vivo. BE assessment of tazarotene-containing formulations was achieved using cPK parameters obtained within different skin microstructures. The establishment of BE between the RLD and an approved generic product was successfully demonstrated. Interestingly, within the constraints of the current study design the results suggest similar BA between the tested gel formulation and the reference cream formulation, despite the differences in the formulation/dosage form. Another formulation containing polyethylene glycol as the vehicle was demonstrated to be not bioequivalent to the RLD. Compared to using the SRS approach without a standard reference, the developed approach enabled more consistent and reproducible results, which is crucial in BE assessment. The abundant information from the developed approach can help to systematically identify key areas of study design that will enable a better comparison of topical products and support an assessment of BE.

Understanding the impact of formulation design on microstructure and drug release from porous microparticle-based tretinoin topical gels.

For proportionally formulated intermediate strengths of a topical product, the relationship of drug release across multiple strengths of a given product is not always well understood. The current study aims to assess the proportionality of tretinoin release rates across multiple strengths of tretinoin topical gels when manufactured using two different methods to understand the impact of formulation design on drug product microstructure and tretinoin release rate. Two groups of tretinoin gels of 0.04 %, 0.06 %, 0.08 % and 0.1 % strengths were manufactured. Gels in Group I were prepared by incorporating 4-10 % g/g of 1 % w/w tretinoin-loaded microparticles into a gel base. Gels in Group II were manufactured using 10 % g/g of the microparticles that were loaded with increasing amounts (0.4-1 % w/w) of tretinoin. The two groups of gels were characterized by evaluating microstructure using a polarized microscope, rheology using an oscillatory rheometer, and drug release using Vison® Microette™ Hanson vertical diffusion cells. The microscopic images were used to discriminate between the two groups of gels based on the abundance of microparticles in the gel matrix observed in the images. This abundance increased across gels of Group I and was similar across gels of Group II. The rheology parameters, namely viscosity at a shear rate of 10 s-1, shear thinning rate, storage, and loss modulus, increased across gels of Group I, and were not significantly different across gels of Group II. The release rate of tretinoin from the drug products was proportional to the nominal strength of the drug product in both Group I and Group II, with a correlation coefficient of 0.95 in each case, although the absolute release rates differed. Overall, changing the formulation design of tretinoin topical gels containing porous microparticles may change the physicochemical and structural properties, as well as the drug release rate of the product. Further, keeping the formulation design consistent across all strengths of microparticle-based topical gels is important to achieve proportional release rates across multiple strengths of a given drug product.

Mechanistic modeling of drug products applied to the skin: A workshop summary report.

The development of a generic drug product involves demonstrating that there is no significant difference in the rate and extent to which the active ingredient becomes available at the site of action, relative to the reference listed drug product. This remains challenging for many locally acting topical dermatological products because measuring the concentration of the active ingredient at the site of action in the skin may not be straightforward, and, in most instances, there are no established relationships between skin and plasma pharmacokinetic profiles. In recent years, the Office of Generic Drugs of the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) established scientific research programs with the goal of enhancing patient access to high quality, affordable topical dermatological generics. A key strategy of these research programs was to leverage modeling and simulation methodologies that accelerate the development of these generics by facilitating alternative bioequivalence approaches for dermatological drug products. This report summarizes relevant insights and discussions from a 2021 FDA public workshop titled "Regulatory Utility of Mechanistic Modeling to Support Alternative Bioequivalence Approaches," which illustrated how mechanistic modeling and simulation approaches can be utilized (and have been used) to inform generic drug product development and regulatory decisions during the assessment of generic drug applications submitted to the FDA.

Regulatory utility of mechanistic modeling to support alternative bioequivalence approaches: A workshop overview.

On September 30 and October 1, 2021, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Center for Research on Complex Generics cosponsored a live virtual workshop titled "Regulatory Utility of Mechanistic Modeling to Support Alternative Bioequivalence Approaches." The overall aims of the workshop included (i) engaging the generic drug industry and other involved stakeholders regarding how mechanistic modeling and simulation can support their product development and regulatory submissions; (ii) sharing the current state of mechanistic modeling for bioequivalence (BE) assessment through case studies; (iii) establishing a consensus on best practices for using mechanistic modeling approaches, such as physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling and computational fluid dynamics modeling, for BE assessment; and (iv) introducing the concept of a Model Master File to improve model sharing between model developers, industry, and the FDA. More than 1500 people registered for the workshop. Based on a postworkshop survey, the majority of participants reported that their fundamental scientific understanding of mechanistic models was enhanced, there was greater consensus on model validation and verification, and regulatory expectations for mechanistic modeling submitted in abbreviated new drug applications were clarified by the workshop.

How Does the Food and Drug Administration Approve Topical Generic Drugs Applied to the Skin?

Approved generic drugs are therapeutically equivalent to a preidentified brand name product and are expected to have the same clinical effect and safety profile when administered to patients under conditions specified in the labeling. Availability of generic topical dermatologic drugs is expected to enhance patient access to such widely used drug products. Assessment of equivalence for a prospective generic product involves a systematic and rigorous comparative evaluation to ensure there is no significant difference in the rate and extent to which the active ingredients become available at the site of action for the prospective generic and corresponding brand name product.

The dose-duration effect on cutaneous pharmacokinetics of metronidazole from topical dermatological formulations in Yucatan mini-pigs.

Dermal microdialysis (dMD) permits the investigation of cutaneous pharmacokinetics (cPK) for topical dermatological drug products (TDDP). dMD involves probe implantation into the dermis and a sample collection system that restricts subjects' movements for the experimental duration. A truncated dose-duration, by TDDP removal at predetermined time-points, may help to adequately characterize the cPK in a relatively short time. The goals of this study were to: assess and compare the dose-duration effect on the dermal exposure of metronidazole (MTZ) containing TDDPs; and characterize MTZ dermal elimination following TDDP application and direct dermal delivery of MTZ utilizing a retrodialysis/microdialysis approach that we termed "dermal infusion." MTZ cream and gel were applied on three Yucatan mini-pigs for dose-durations of 6-hr, 12-hr, or 48-hr. The gel's dermal exposure was similar among the three dose-durations. Conversely, at the 6-hr dose-duration, the cream's dermal exposure was significantly lower than other cream dose-durations while also comparable to the gel. In comparison, the 12-hr and 48-hr cream exposures were not significantly different. Terminal-phase half-live differences between the MTZ TDDP's and dermal-infusion indicate flip/flop cPK. Truncating topical dose-duration may provide a valuable strategy to reduce experimental duration; however, dose-duration must be carefully selected if the goal is to discriminate between formulations.

Cutaneous Pharmacokinetic Approaches to Compare Bioavailability and/or Bioequivalence for Topical Drug Products.

The evaluation of bioequivalence (BE) involves comparing the test product to its reference product in a study whose fundamental scientific principles allow inferring of the clinical performance of the products. Several test methods have been discussed and developed to evaluate topical bioavailability (BA) and BE. Pharmacokinetics-based approaches characterize the rate and extent to which an active ingredient becomes available at or near its site of action in the skin. Such methodologies are considered to be among the most accurate, sensitive, and reproducible approaches for determining the BA or BE of a product.

Evaluation of in vitro/in vivo correlations for three fentanyl transdermal delivery systems using in vitro skin permeation testing and human pharmacokinetic studies under the influence of transient heat application.

The value of developing an in vitro/in vivo correlation (IVIVC) is substantial in biopharmaceutical drug development because once the model is developed and validated, an in vitro method may be used to efficiently assess and predict drug product performance in vivo. In this study, three bioequivalent, matrix-type, fentanyl transdermal delivery systems (TDS) were evaluated in vitro using an in vitro permeation test (IVPT) and dermatomed human skin, and in vivo in human pharmacokinetic (PK) studies under harmonized study designs to evaluate IVIVC. The study designs included 1 h of transient heat application (42 ± 2°C) at either 11 h or 18 h after TDS application to concurrently investigate the influence of heat on drug bioavailability from TDS and the feasibility of IVPT to predict the effects of heat on TDS in vivo. Level A (point-to-point) and Level C (single point) IVIVCs were evaluated by using PK-based mathematical equations and building IVIVC models between in vitro fraction of drug permeation and in vivo fraction of drug absorption. The study results showed that the three differently formulated fentanyl TDS have comparable (p > 0.05) heat effects both in vitro and in vivo. In addition, the predicted steady-state concentration (Css) from in vitro flux data and the observed Css in vivo showed no significant differences (p > 0.05). However, the effects of heat on enhancement of fentanyl bioavailability observed in vivo were found to be greater compared to those observed in vitro for all three drug products, resulting in a weak prediction of the impact of heat on bioavailability from the in vitro data. The results from the current work suggest that while IVPT can be a useful tool to evaluate the performance of fentanyl TDS in vivo with a relatively good predictability at a normal temperature condition and to compare the effect of heat on drug delivery from differently formulated TDS, additional testing measures would enhance the ability to predict the heat effects in vivo with a lower prediction error.

Multi-phase multi-layer mechanistic dermal absorption (MPML MechDermA) model to predict local and systemic exposure of drug products applied on skin.

Physiologically-based pharmacokinetic models combine knowledge about physiology, drug product properties, such as physicochemical parameters, absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion characteristics, formulation attributes, and trial design or dosing regimen to mechanistically simulate drug pharmacokinetics (PK). The current work describes the development of a multiphase, multilayer mechanistic dermal absorption (MPML MechDermA) model within the Simcyp Simulator capable of simulating uptake and permeation of drugs through human skin following application of drug products to the skin. The model was designed to account for formulation characteristics as well as body site- and sex- population variability to predict local and systemic bioavailability. The present report outlines the structure and assumptions of the MPML MechDermA model and includes results from simulations comparing absorption at multiple body sites for two compounds, caffeine and benzoic acid, formulated as solutions. Finally, a model of the Feldene (piroxicam) topical gel, 0.5% was developed and assessed for its ability to predict both plasma and local skin concentrations when compared to in vivo PK data.