Systematic Review of the Psychometric Properties of the Saint Louis University Mental Status (SLUMS) Examination.

OBJECTIVES: This systemic review qualitatively synthesizes existing psychometric support for the Saint Louis University Mental Status (SLUMS) Examination, a cognitive screening measure which presents as a free alternative to other widely used dementia screening measures including the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). METHODS: A total of 90 peer-reviewed articles on the SLUMS were identified from PsycINFO and PubMed databases. RESULTS: Sixty-eight records were identified and reviewed by the lead author for eligibility. Studies that included at least one psychometric property of the SLUMS (n = 20) were included in this review. CONCLUSIONS: Support for the SLUMS remains preliminary; however, it appears to have adequate validity, and adequate sensitivity and specificity in detecting cognitive impairment. Numerous shortcomings were identified, including lack of sufficient normative data, information on test-reliability, explored factor structure, and limited application of criterion measures (e.g., imaging studies, biomarkers). Research is needed to establish diverse normative samples and describe the reliability and validity of the SLUMS to strengthen the empirical support for its use. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Until its psychometric properties are better established the SLUMS should be used cautiously when screening for cognitive impairment.

Semantic clustering on common list-learning tasks: a systematic review of the state of the literature and recommendations for future directions.

INTRODUCTION: On some list-learning tasks, such as the California Verbal Learning Test (CVLT) or Hopkins Verbal Learning Test (HVLT), examinees have the opportunity to group words based on semantically related categories (i.e., semantic clustering). Semantic clustering (SC) is often considered the most efficient organizational strategy and adopting SC is presumed to improve learning and memory. In addition, SC is conceptualized as reflecting higher-order executive functioning skills. Although SC measures have intuitive appeal, to date, there are no comprehensive reviews of the SC literature base that summarize its psychometric utility. In this systematic review, we synthesize the literature to judge the validity of SC scores. METHOD: We conducted a systematic literature search for empirical articles reporting SC from the CVLT and HVLT. We qualitatively described the relationship of SC with other list-learning and cognitive test scores and clinical diagnoses, contrasting SC with serial clustering and total learning scores when possible. RESULTS: SC was inversely correlated with serial clustering. Higher SC was strongly associated with better learning and memory performances. When compared with cognitive tests, SC tended to have the strongest relationships with other memory measures and modest relationships with tests of executive functioning. SC had negligible to small relationships with most other cognitive domains. Traditional memory scores yielded stronger relationships to cognitive test performances than did SC. SC across clinical groups varied widely, but clinical groups tended to use SC less often than healthy comparison groups. CONCLUSION: Our comprehensive review of the literature revealed that SC is strongly related to measures of learning and memory on the CVLT and HVLT and is correlated with a wide range of cognitive functions. SC has been understudied in relevant populations and additional research is needed to test the degree to which it adds incremental validity beyond traditional measures of learning and memory.

Multidimensional imaging techniques for prediction of treatment response in major depressive disorder.

A large number of studies have attempted to use neuroimaging tools to aid in treatment prediction models for major depressive disorder (MDD). Most such studies have reported on only one dimension of function and prediction at a time. In this study, we used three different tasks across domains of function (emotion processing, reward anticipation, and cognitive control, plus resting state connectivity completed prior to start of medication to predict treatment response in 13-36 adults with MDD. For each experiment, adults with MDD were prescribed only label duloxetine (all experiments), whereas another subset were prescribed escitalopram. We used a KeyNet (both Task derived masks and Key intrinsic Network derived masks) approach to targeting brain systems in a specific match to tasks. The most robust predictors were (Dichter et al., 2010) positive response to anger and (Gong et al., 2011) negative response to fear within relevant anger and fear TaskNets and Salience and Emotion KeyNet (Langenecker et al., 2018) cognitive control (correct rejections) within Inhibition TaskNet (negative) and Cognitive Control KeyNet (positive). Resting state analyses were most robust for Cognitive control Network (positive) and Salience and Emotion Network (negative). Results differed by whether an -fwhm or -acf (more conservative) adjustment for multiple comparisons was used. Together, these results implicate the importance of future studies with larger sample sizes, multidimensional predictive models, and the importance of using empirically derived masks for search areas.

Intermediate: cognitive phenotypes in bipolar disorder.

BACKGROUND: Intermediate cognitive phenotypes (ICPs) are measurable and quantifiable states that may be objectively assessed in a standardized method, and can be integrated into association studies, including genetic, biochemical, clinical, and imaging based correlates. The present study used neuropsychological measures as ICPs, with factor scores in executive functioning, attention, memory, fine motor function, and emotion processing, similar to prior work in schizophrenia. METHODS: Healthy control subjects (HC, n=34) and euthymic (E, n=66), depressed (D, n=43), or hypomanic/mixed (HM, n=13) patients with bipolar disorder (BD) were assessed with neuropsychological tests. These were from eight domains consistent with previous literature; auditory memory, visual memory, processing speed with interference resolution, verbal fluency and processing speed, conceptual reasoning and set-shifting, inhibitory control, emotion processing, and fine motor dexterity. RESULTS: Of the eight factor scores, the HC group outperformed the E group in three (Processing Speed with Interference Resolution, Visual Memory, Fine Motor Dexterity), the D group in seven (all except Inhibitory Control), and the HM group in four (Inhibitory Control, Processing Speed with Interference Resolution, Fine Motor Dexterity, and Auditory Memory). LIMITATIONS: The HM group was relatively small, thus effects of this phase of illness may have been underestimated. Effects of medication could not be fully controlled without a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. CONCLUSIONS: Use of the factor scores can assist in determining ICPs for BD and related disorders, and may provide more specific targets for development of new treatments. We highlight strong ICPs (Processing Speed with Interference Resolution, Visual Memory, Fine Motor Dexterity) for further study, consistent with the existing literature.