RESUMEN
Purpose: Our primary aim was to evaluate intraocular cytokines (IC) before and after dexamethasone in diabetic macular edema (DME). Our secondary aim was to study the early and late effects of single dexamethasone implant in DME. Methods: This before and after comparative study was conducted at the Department of Ophthalmology and Centre for Nanosciences at a quaternary referral center in Kerala, India, from September 2016 to September 2018. Patients underwent complete ophthalmological examination and cytokine analysis before and after dexamethasone implant. Levels of cytokines at baseline and repeat sample were studied. Results: Twenty-seven eyes (21 patients) were divided into two groups depending on time from baseline to second injection. Group 1 included patients with <3 months between the two samples - 12 (44.4%). Group 2 included patients with >3 months between the two samples -15 (55.6%). Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT) improved significantly post-dexamethasone in group 1, but not in group 2. Interleukin (IL)-4, IL-6, IL-10, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), IL-1ß, interferon-gamma inducible protein-10 (IP-10), monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1), and IL-2 decreased post-injection in group 1. But cytokines increased post-dexamethasone in group 2, except IL-10. When compared to baseline, IL-6 reduced to half in group 1 (P-value 0.814) and it tripled in group 2 ( P-value 0.009). The level of VEGF in the first and second samples was not different in either group. Conclusion: Our study suggests that dexamethasone acts more on IC than VEGF in DME. This is significant in the first 3 months with a rebound effect on IL-6 after 3 months. Our study also suggests that repeat injection of DEX in DME should be done at 3 months to prevent deterioration of visual acuity (VA) and worsening of CMT.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Retinopatía Diabética , Edema Macular , Humanos , Edema Macular/diagnóstico , Edema Macular/tratamiento farmacológico , Edema Macular/etiología , Glucocorticoides/uso terapéutico , Dexametasona/uso terapéutico , Retinopatía Diabética/complicaciones , Retinopatía Diabética/diagnóstico , Retinopatía Diabética/tratamiento farmacológico , Factor A de Crecimiento Endotelial Vascular , Interleucina-10/uso terapéutico , Citocinas/metabolismo , Interleucina-6/uso terapéutico , Implantes de Medicamentos , Inyecciones IntravítreasRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To determine the relationship between diabetic retinopathy (DR) and diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN), and their associated risk factors. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis on 500 patients who attended the Endocrinology department at a quaternary health care center in Kerala between November 2017 and April 2018. Patients above the age of 30 years with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) were included. They underwent a detailed medical history, dilated fundus examination for DR, assessment and grading of DPN, and blood investigations. Among these, 49 randomly selected patients without DR had peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) and ganglion cell inner plexiform layer (GCIPL) assessed by optical coherence tomogram. RNFL and GCIPL changes in different grades of neuropathy were evaluated. RESULTS: Out of 500 patients, 303 (60.6%) were males and 197 (39.4%) were females. Prevalence of DR was 48% and DPN 71.8%. Risk factors for the development of DR included duration of DM >15 years, HbA1c (glycated hemoglobin) greater than 6.5%, serum creatinine more than 1.5 mg/dl, and the presence of DPN. There was a statistically significant association between DR and DPN. There was significant thinning of GCIPL in patients with moderate to severe neuropathy without DR. CONCLUSION: There is a significant association between DR and DPN and their severities. There are early changes in inner retinal layers of diabetic patients without microvascular changes of DR. These neurodegenerative changes parallel DPN in the course of DM. Our study stresses the importance of multidisciplinary approach in the management of diabetes and its complications.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Neuropatías Diabéticas , Retinopatía Diabética , Adulto , Estudios Transversales , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicaciones , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/diagnóstico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiología , Neuropatías Diabéticas/diagnóstico , Neuropatías Diabéticas/epidemiología , Retinopatía Diabética/complicaciones , Retinopatía Diabética/diagnóstico , Retinopatía Diabética/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Tomografía de Coherencia ÓpticaRESUMEN
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical profile, visual, anatomical and survival outcome of patients with endogenous endophthalmitis. Methods: Retrospective chart review of consecutive cases with endogenous endophthalmitis presenting from 2009-2016. Results: In our study, 41 eyes of 34 patients were included. Most common co-morbidity associated with endogenous endophthalmitis was Diabetes Mellitus (70.7%) and most common infective foci was UTI (73.2%). Among the culture positive cases, fungi and bacteria were evenly distributed, 76.93% were Gram positive bacteria and 23.07% were Gram negative. Fungal endogenous endophthalmitis was more commonly seen in immunosuppressed state (72.7%) and bilateral cases (66.7%). The mean presenting vision (log MAR) of patients who died during the study were poor compared to those who survived (P = 0.014) Poor mean visual acuity at presentation was associated with more death (P = 0.014). Eyes with poor presenting vision, fungal isolates, culture positivity and immune suppression had poor visual and survival outcome. Poor visual outcome was observed more frequently in eyes with Aspergillus infection (85.7%) compared to Candida (75%) and bacteria (58.3%). Evisceration was done for 5 out of 41 eyes (12.2%). Vitrectomy rate was 53.7% in our study, with 40% of them showing overall improvement in vision. Conclusion: Endogenous endophthalmitis is a sight threatening condition associated with high mortality particularly when caused by Aspergillus spp. in immunocompromised patients. Contrary to the prior published reports of endogenous endophthalmitis outside India, we found an equal distribution of fungal and bacterial organisms among our cases, with predominance of Aspergillus among fungal isolates and Gram-positive organism among bacteria. Fungal infections, especially with Aspergillus spp., resulted in poor visual and survival outcome.