iPad-assisted percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL): a matched pair analysis compared to standard PCNL.

PURPOSE: To compare iPad-assisted (Apple Inc., Cupertino, USA) percutaneous access to the kidney to the standard puncturing technique for percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). METHODS: For the iPad-assisted PCNL, a computed tomography is performed prior to surgery, using fiducial radiopaque markers. The important anatomical structures (i.e. kidney, stones) are segmented using specific software enabling the superimposition of images semi-transparently on the iPad by marker-based navigation. Twenty-two patients underwent an iPad-assisted percutaneous puncture of the kidney for PCNL. Twenty-two patients of the clinical database from the Urological Department SLK Hospital Heilbronn, who underwent the standard puncturing technique, were matched to these patients. Matching criteria were age, gender, stone volume, body mass index, stone site and the absence of anatomical variation. Puncture time, radiation exposure and number of attempts for a successful puncture were evaluated. All procedures were performed by two experienced urologists. The standard puncturing method consisted of a combination of ultrasound and fluoroscopy guidance. Chi-square and t test were used to ensure that there was no difference in the matching criteria between the groups. To compare the two methods, U test, Kruskal-Wallis and Chi-square test were used. RESULTS: Examination of radiation exposure showed a significant difference between the two groups in favour of the standard puncturing method (p < 0.01) and puncture time (p = 0.01). However, there was no significant difference in puncturing attempts (p = 0.45). CONCLUSION: The iPad-assisted navigation, with the objective being to puncture the renal collecting system, represents a new technique (IDEAL criteria 2b), which proved to be applicable in clinical practice, but still has potential for technical improvement.

Aquablation of the prostate: single-center results of a non-selected, consecutive patient cohort.

PURPOSE: Aquablation of the prostate using the AquaBeam™ system promises equivalent functional outcomes, reduced learning curve, and improved sexual function compared to transurethral prostate resection as shown in prospective randomized trials. This prospective cohort study aims to evaluate if published results can be transferred into the clinical routine in a non-selected patient collective. METHODS: This study includes all patients treated between September 2017 and June 2018 with Aquablation of the prostate. Patients have been evaluated prospectively for the perioperative course and early follow-up. Besides voiding parameter and symptom score, TRUS-volume change, ejaculatory function, and adverse events have been recorded. RESULTS: 118 consecutive patients have been treated in the given time. Aquablation could be carried out successfully in all patients. IPSS, QoL, Qmax, and PVR improved significantly after the procedure and continued to improve during 3-month follow-up. Mean OR time was 20 min, TRUS volume decreased by 65%, and 73% of the patients retained antegrade ejaculation. Thirteen adverse events (> Clavien-Dindo I) occurred in 10 patients. CONCLUSION: The surgical ablation of the prostate using Aquablation achieved significant and immediate improvement of functional voiding parameters Qmax and PVR as well as symptomatic improvement of IPSS and QoL. Aquablation seems to be safe and effective with a low perioperative complication profile even in a non-selected group of patients.

[COVID-19 in european urology : Which lessons have we learned?] / COVID-19 in der europäischen Urologie : Was haben wir bisher gelernt?

The coronavirus has challenged all medical systems worldwide. Herein both waves of COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) in spring and autumn 2020 differ principally. Whereas Europe was hit by the first wave more or less unprepared, which was aggravated by the high virulence of COVID-19, the second wave is characterized by a much higher contagiosity of the virus with very high incidences. On the other hand the virus has attenuated, which is reflected by the significantly lower incidence-related mortality rate. However, the overall increasing number of infected patients represents again a great challenge for the medical management of the disease. France and Spain are doing better in comparison to Germany and Italy this time. The absolute number of deaths per week is higher than during the peak of the first wave. However, urologists in these countries have also experienced greater restrictions in their activities in the second shutdown than in Germany, where there is only a reduction of beds to between 75 and 90%. Mostly all levels are operated. Of importance for Germany, however, is the plateau on a high level for several weeks probably due to the reduced efficacy of a light lock-down. This finally resulted in a total lock-down in mid-December 2020. Subsequently in Germany some hospitals are also reaching their limits with similar consequences for the departments of urology facing a 50% reduction of beds and operating only level III and IV indications. Nevertheless, the management of urologic patients during the COVID-19 pandemic is carried out in Europa on a high standard. Therefor the risk of secondary harm to our patients is expected to be rather minimal in the long run.

[Endoscopic enucleation of the prostate]. / Endoskopische Enukleation der Prostata.

The spectrum of surgical procedures for the minimally invasive treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) has significantly increased over the last two decades. The simple suprapubic prostatectomy (subtotal prostatectomy, SP) has largely lost relevance in current practice. On the other hand, transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) has been further standardized and potentially made safer by the introduction of the bipolar technique and low-pressure systems.Transurethral (endoscopic) enucleation techniques (endoscopic enucleation of the prostate, EEP) are increasingly competing with the current gold standard TURP and are replacing SP for treatment of larger adenomas. This approach is especially related to the rapid development of laser technology, which has sustainably changed the face of modern BPH treatment in a similar way to stone therapy. This has been incorporated in the clinical patient management, clinical studies and standardization of numerous surgical techniques that are systematically described in this article. Additionally, efforts have also been made to use other energy sources, such as bipolar current in EEP. With respect to scientific objectivity, high-quality clinical trials are regularly published which further strengthen the position of EEP.

[Urological infections and antibiotic management in geriatric patients]. / Urologische Infektionen und Antibiotikamanagement bei geriatrischen Patienten.

Both the demographic shift and progress in medicine are resulting in an increasingly longer life expectancy. It is presumed that a mean age of 90 years will be achieved within the next decade in many countries. Thus, geriatric medicine, which is committed to the specific needs of older, often frail and frequently comorbid patients, is becoming increasingly more important. The prevalence of infections of the genitourinary tract increases with age, simultaneously, a critical and conscious use of antibiotics is required in terms of antimicrobial treatment. The intention of the present review is to make the reader aware of the specific characteristics of urinary tract infections and asymptomatic bacteriuria in the older patient population in terms of epidemiology, spectrum of pathogens and resistance as well as the indications for and performance of antimicrobial treatment.

[Endosopic organ-sparing treatment of urothelial tumors of the upper urinary tract: indications and results]. / Endoskopische organerhaltende Therapie von Urotheltumoren des oberen Harntraktes : Indikation und Ergebnisse.

In addition to radical nephrourterectomy with removal of the bladder cuff, which is still the gold standard in the therapy of urothelial tumors of the upper urinary tract, various percutaneous and transurethral endoscopic methods are now well established for organ-sparing therapies due to technical improvements in endoscopy. Although these were originally only used with selective indications, if radical nephrourterectomy were not coupled with an unreasonable postoperative morbidity (e.g. dialysis-dependence after removal of a tumor-carrying single kidney), organ-sparing therapy attempts are increasingly more recommended, even by extended indications. Analysis of the current literature shows that organ-sparing is strived for, especially with small (<1.5 cm) solitary urothelial tumors with low grade malignancy and without muscle invading growth. Although tumor-specific survival with 69-100% is comparable to nephrourterectomy, organ-sparing treatment appears more inclined to tumor recurrence (relapse rate 23-90%). These data must, however, be interpreted with caution because they originate from retrospective single center studies with low patient numbers, very different patient collectives and mostly relatively short follow-up time periods. Prospective randomized multicenter studies with large patient collectives and long follow-up times are not yet available. After organ-sparing therapy of urothelial tumors of the upper urinary tract, it is important to have life-long follow-up with imaging and endoscopy, in order to initiate an early second therapy in the case of a relapse.

[Robots in urology-an analysis of current and future devices]. / Der Roboter in der Urologie ­ eine Analyse aktueller und zukünftiger Gerätegenerationen.

The monopoly of robotic surgical devices of the last 15 years will end in 2019 when key patents of Intuitive Surgical expire. Thus, we can expect an interesting competitive situation in the coming years. Based on personal experience with robot-assisted surgery since 2001, we conducted a search of the current literature together with a search of relevant patents in this field. Finally, we visited the websites of manufacturers of existing and future robotic surgical devices with possible applications in urology. Such devices have to prove that they meet the high-quality standard of the current Da Vinci series (SI, X, XI). For this purpose, we propose to classify the main features of the different devices, such as type of console (closed/open), arrangement of robotic arms (single/multiple carts/attached to operating room table), type of three-dimensional videosystem (by mirror/ocular/using polarizing glasses) or degrees of freedom (DOF) of end effectors (5 vs. 7 DOF). In the meantime, there are also robotic systems used in endourology: Avicenna Roboflex® and the AquaBeam® system for robot-assisted aquablation therapy of the prostate. While Roboflex® improves the ergonomics of flexible ureteroscopy-similar to the Da Vinci robot, AquaBeam® may for the first time eliminate the surgeon, who might only be needed to manage severe postoperative bleeding.

[Bladder neck sclerosis following prostate surgery : Which therapy when?] / Blasenhalssklerose nach Prostataeingriffen : Wann welche Therapie?

Secondary bladder neck sclerosis represents one of the more frequent complications following endoscopic, open, and other forms of minimally invasive prostate surgery. Therapeutic decisions depend on the type of previous intervention (e.g., radical prostatectomy, TURP, HoLEP, radiotherapy, HIFU) and on associated complications (e.g., incontinence, fistula). Primary treatment in most cases represents an endoscopic bilateral incision. No specific advantages of any type of the applied energy (i.e., mono-/bipolar HF current, cold incision, holmium/thulium YAG laser) could be documented. Adjuvant measures such as injection of corticosteroids or mitomycin C have not been helpful in clinical routine. In case of first recurrence, a transurethral monopolar or bipolar resection can usually be performed. Recently, the ablation of the scared tissue using bipolar vaporization has been recommended providing slightly better long-term results. Thereafter, surgical reconstruction is strongly recommended using an open, laparoscopic, or robot-assisted approach. Depending on the extent of the bladder neck sclerosis and the underlying prostate surgery, a Y-V/T-plasty, urethral reanastomosis, or even a radical prostatectomy with new urethravesical anastomosis should be performed. Stent implantation should be reserved for patients who are not suitable for surgery. The final palliative measure is a cystectomy with urinary diversion or a (continent) cystostomy.

[Surgical positioning techniques in urology : Tips and tricks]. / Lagerungstechniken in der Urologie : Tipps und Tricks.

Correct positioning of patients during preoperative preparations is essential for success of the intervention to avoid any positioning trauma and to provide the best access to the targeted structures. The appropriate positioning (and optimal performance) means that complications are avoided and also makes an essential contribution to the smooth course of the surgical intervention. A correct position is essential particularly in urology because the organs assigned to the discipline of urology are anatomically mostly difficult to reach. A further important function of the correct positioning technique is the avoidance of injuries to the patient. This article summarizes the most common positioning techniques in urological interventions with special emphasis on the explanation of practical advice, helpful tips and possible complications that can enable even junior surgeons to correctly perform the appropriate positioning technique.

[Shock wave lithotripsy in Germany: Results of a nationwide survey]. / Stoßwellenlithotripsie in Deutschland: Ergebnisse einer deutschlandweiten Umfrage.

BACKGROUND: Following its introduction in the 1980s extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) became the gold standard for therapy of ureteral and renal calculi. The research data published during the last decade suggest a paradigm shift to endourological techniques. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to compare whether the suggested loss of status for SWL corresponds with actual real-life treatment in Germany. A further aim was to assess the quality of SWL therapy in German hospitals. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The board of the German Society for Shock Wave Lithotripsy (DGSWL) sent a questionnaire to 306 urological departments in Germany, which encompassed medical, technical and organizational topics in the therapy of ureteral and renal calculi. A total of 99 (33%) questionnaires were returned. CONCLUSION: With the exception of a few departments, non-invasive SWL still plays a major role in the treatment of urolithiasis and a loss of the gold standard status is not in sight. The performance of SWL in German hospitals is carried out at a high level of quality. To maintain and optimize this status a structured SWL training and adherence to clinical practice guidelines are needed.

Retroperitoneal and pelvic extraperitoneal laparoscopy: an international perspective.

OBJECTIVES: To assess technical preferences and current practice trends of retroperitoneal and pelvic extraperitoneal laparoscopy. METHODS: A questionnaire survey of 36 selected urologic laparoscopic centers worldwide was performed. RESULTS: Twenty-four centers (67%) responded. Overall, 3988 laparoscopic procedures were reported: transperitoneal approach (n = 2945) and retroperitoneal/extraperitoneal approach (n = 1043). Retroperitoneoscopic/extraperitoneoscopic procedures included adrenalectomy (n = 74), nephrectomy (n = 299), ureteral procedures (n = 166), pelvic lymph node dissection (n = 197), bladder neck suspension (n = 210), varix ligation (n = 91), and lumbar sympathectomy (n = 6). Mean number of total laparoscopic procedures performed in 1995 per center was 41 (range 5 to 86). Major complications occurred in 49 (4.7%) patients and included visceral complications in 26 (2.5%) patients and vascular complications in 23 (2.2%). Open conversion was performed in 69 (6.6%) patients, electively in 41 and emergently in 28 (visceral injuries, n = 16; vascular injuries, n = 1 2). Retroperitoneoscopy/extraperitoneoscopy is gaining in acceptance worldwide: in 1993, the mean estimated ratio of transperitoneal laparoscopic cases versus retroperitoneoscopic/ extraperitoneoscopic cases per center was 74:26; however, in 1996 the ratio was 49:51. CONCLUSIONS: Retroperitoneoscopy and pelvic extraperitoneoscopy are important adjuncts to the laparoscopic armamentarium in urologic surgery. The overall major complication rate associated with retroperitoneoscopy/extraperitoneoscopy was 4.7%.

Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. The European experience.

Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy is technically difficult but oncologically effective. The operation should be performed in centers with expertise. Hemostasis can be achieved using bipolar coagulation and fibrin glue-coated cellulose. Further studies will determine whether less invasive alternatives (focused ultrasound, cryotherapy) will meet the high standard of open (or laparoscopic) nephron-sparing surgery for small renal cell carcinoma.

Retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephropexy.

Laparoscopic nephropexy is a suitable and clinically established procedure for the treatment of symptomatic nephroptosis. The availability of a minimally invasive therapy can facilitate decisions regarding the indication after careful selection of patients.

Retroperitoneoscopic and laparoscopic suturing: tips and strategies for improving efficiency.

BACKGROUND: The difficulties of minimally invasive reconstructive surgery, laparoscopically or retroperitoneoscopically, are caused by spatial limitation and fixed trocar positions and, therefore, restricted movement and handling of the instruments. In addition to a standardization of the technique, continual training, and improved instrument technologies, optimization of the geometry of reconstructive surgery, such as angles and distances between the working ports or the camera and needle position, are imperative to providing an optimal clinical performance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After designing a standardized suturing technique and conducting an experimental analysis of the geometric factors important in reconstructive surgery, we transferred these results to our clinical setting. A series of 116 reconstructive laparoscopic and retroperitoneoscopic procedures (nephropexy, pyeloplasty, bladder neck suspension, and radical prostatectomy) were analyzed according to the technical realization and quality of reconstruction. Trocar and table positions were adjusted according to our preliminary results, as were the position of the instruments and camera. RESULTS: The trocar and instrument positions are critical for the clinical outcome of reconstructive surgery. Continual training in a standardized suturing technique, together with the clinical application of the important geometric rules, can reduce surgery time by 50%. The time required for suturing single knots could be decreased even more: as much as 75%, thus ensuring efficient and safe reconstructive surgery. CONCLUSION: Reconstructive procedures such as pyeloplasty or radical prostatectomy can be standardized and performed in an acceptable amount of time with adequate quality when adhering to a standardized technique and the important geometric rules. Improved performance in terms of time and quality will increase the acceptance of these procedures, which can help to solve the problem associated with a low total number of indications for laparoscopy and retroperitoneoscopy.

Retroperitoneal laparoscopic lymph node dissection for staging non-seminomatous germ cell tumors before and after chemotherapy.

We describe our experience with laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in 19 patients with non-seminomatous germ cell tumors. Twelve patients had stage I disease with no clinical evidence (CT-scan, ultrasound, tumor markers) of metastases; 7 patients (stage IIb=2, stage IIc=5) had residual tumor after chemotherapy but with negative tumor markers. A laparoscopic dissection was used to asses more fully the pathologic status of the relevant retroperitoneal lymph nodes of both groups. The patient was positioned and trocars introduced at sites similar to that used for transperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy (flank position, five ports - 3 x 10 mm; 2 x 5 mm). After reflecting the colon anteromedially, the landmarks of the lymph node dissection were isolated-namely the ureter, aorta, inferior vena cava, and both renal veins. The lymph node dissection included the paracaval, interaorto-caval, upper preaortic, and right common iliac zonal nodes for right-sided tumors, and paraaortic, upper preaortic zones for left-sided tumors. Retrieval of the lymph nodal chains was accomplished using a small organ bag. The mean duration of the procedure was 298 (range 150-405) minutes. In only one patient was a lymph node positive for tumor (stage I). Otherwise nodes showed extensive necrosis (after chemotherapy). No intraoperative complications were encountered but three patients developed a delayed complication (ureteral stenosis, pulmonary embolism, and retrograde ejaculation, respectively). Whereas we completed the dissection in each patient with stage I tumors, the laparoscopic procedure was more difficult in patients with stage II tumors after chemotherapy. In two patients with stage IIb disease laparoscopic lymphadenectomy was successful. In four other patients parts of the dissection had to be done after conversion to an open (conventional) operation using a small incision (suprainguinal or pararectal); in one patient the laparoscopic approach was abandoned and converted to an open operation. In the post-chemotherapy group the outcome depended primarily on the tumor bulk prior to drug treatment. In two patients in whom all residual necrotic tissue was removed laparoscopically they had "minor" disease (stage IIb); the others had stage IIc tumors. Our preliminary experience suggests that a modified laparoscopic lymph node dissection is feasible for stage I tumors and in selected patients with marker negative residual tumor after chemotherapy (stage IIb).

[Retroperitoneoscopy--experiences with the first cases]. / Retroperitoneoskopie--Erfahrungen mit den ersten 200 Fällen.

UNLABELLED: A retroperitoneal access is most commonly applied for open procedures in urology. With introduction of the balloon dissecting technique, this anatomical route could also be used for laparoscopic surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 12/1992 to 10/1997, a total of 200 retroperitoneoscopic procedures have been performed in 197 patients (age 4-82 years): 78 nephrectomies, 50 renal cyst resections, 14 nephropexies, 11 ureterolyses, 8 retroperitoneal lymph-node dissections, 8 renal biopsies, 6 adrenalectomies, 6 heminephrectomies, 6 pyeloplasties, 5 ureterolithotomies, 6 ureterocutaneostomies and 2 others. Thirty-eight patients (19%) had undergone previous abdominal surgery; 22 (11%) had had kidney and ureter operations. Dissection of the retroperitoneal space was done with a balloon catheter in 14 or a balloon trocar system in 93 cases, and in the last 93 patients digital dissection with the index finger proved to be sufficient. RESULTS: We classified 76 as simple (i.e., renal biopsy, renal cyst resections, ureterocutaneostomy) and 102 as difficult (i.e. adrenalectomy, nephrectomy, nephropexy) and 22 (11%) as very difficult operations (i.e., pyeloplasty, heminephrectomy, lymphadenectomy). There has been a significant learning curve during the first 50 cases as reflected by increased operating time and complications and the conversion rate to open surgery. After that, the OR times mainly depended on the difficulty of the procedure, averaging 45-100 min for an easy retroperitoneoscopy, 95-185 min for a difficult and 185-240 min for a very difficult operation. In the last 50 cases, the complications, conversion and reintervention rate have become comparable to open surgery (2, 4 and 2%). CONCLUSIONS: After more than 200 cases of retroperitoneoscopy, the access technique has been significantly simplified. The procedure is standardized, safe and reproducible.

[The future of laparoscopic surgery in urology]. / Die Zukunft der laparoskopischen Chirurgie in der Urologie.

Laparoscopy has followed the typical phases in the development of any new operative technique. We have now begun to realize its limitation and are beginning to standardize the procedures and specify their indications. Since laparoscopy predominantly reduces the trauma of access, the development of a total operative trauma score has assisted us in determining the impact of specific laparoscopic procedures compared to their open alternatives. Laparoscopy is responsible for less blood loss, less postoperative pain, a shorter hospital stay and a very small scar, all of which accounts for its popularity among patients. A rational combination of laparoscopy, endoscopy and open surgery to treat urological diseases should be developed in the future.

[Techniques for bladder neck suspension with osseous screw fixation]. / Blasenhalssuspensionstechniken mit ossärer Schraubenfixation.

We investigated the technical feasibility and clinical results of bone fixation techniques in combination with needle suspension for correction of female stress urinary incontinence. In our experience the screw-like bone anchor, which is drilled into the public tubercle, represents a minimally invasive but very stable and reliable technique. However, the needle suspension fixed to the bone anchor turned out to be critical. Even though the suspension was fixed in the paraurethral tissue with a deep Z-stitch between the bladder neck and the midurethra, the 1-year recurrence rate was 76%. Our data showed that the suspension sutures pull through the paraurethral tissue because there is no paravesical scar formation as in open procedures. Modifications of the suspension technique (four-point suspension, simultaneous laparoscopic or digital dissection of the paravesical space, combination with sling procedures) revealed significantly improved short-term results. Therefore we conclude that after improvement of the suspension technique the bone anchor will represent a valid option for minimally invasive fixation of a bladder neck suspension.

[Retroperitoneoscopy. Technique and experiences with the first 100 patients]. / Retroperitoneoskopie. Technik und Erfahrungen mit den ersten 100 Patienten.

Retroperitoneoscopic procedures were already being performed in the late 1970s. The clinical breakthrough of retroperitoneoscopy, however, was initiated in 1992 by the balloon-dissecting technique of Gaur, together with the experience gained with transperitoneal laparoscopic procedures in the upper retroperitoneum. We have modified the balloon-dissecting technique into a hydraulic video-optically controlled balloon dissection of the retroperitoneal space, and this procedure was recently further simplified. From December 1992 to December 1995 we performed 100 retroperitoneoscopic procedures in 98 patients (aged 4-82 years). Twenty-two patients had undergone previous abdominal surgery, 16 patients had been operated on for kidney and ureter problems. We performed 28 simple procedures (6 renal biopsies, 17 renal cyst resections, 4 ureterocutaneostomies, 1 foreign body retrieval), 65 difficult operations (47 nephrectomies, 5 nephroureterectomies, 5 nephropexies, 4 ureterolithotomies, 2x ureterolysis). There were also 9 complicated cases (5 heminephrectomies, 2 tumor nephrectomies, 2 dismembered pyeloplasties). Operating time, complications and conversion rate to open surgery mainly depended on the difficulty of the procedure and the personal learning curve, resulting in 50-90 min, 0% and 3.8%, respectively, for an easy retroperitoneoscopy, 90-210 min, 12% and 9.2% respectively for a difficult operation, and 180-390 min, 22% and 11%, respectively, for a very difficult procedure. Excluding the 17 patients with complications or conversion (unclear anatomy, extremely difficult dissection), the mean postoperative need for analgesics was 0.7 vials, and the mean hospital stay was 4.7 days. We have now passed most of our learning curve, and retroperitoneoscopy has become a standardized procedure that is a part of the training program for the experienced urologist.