An International Commentary on Dysphagia and Dysphonia During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

COVID-19 has had an impact globally with millions infected, high mortality, significant economic ramifications, travel restrictions, national lockdowns, overloaded healthcare systems, effects on healthcare workers' health and well-being, and large amounts of funding diverted into rapid vaccine development and implementation. Patients with COVID-19, especially those who become severely ill, have frequently developed dysphagia and dysphonia. Health professionals working in the field have needed to learn about this new disease while managing these patients with enhanced personal protective equipment. Emerging research suggests differences in the clinical symptoms and journey to recovery for patients with COVID-19 in comparison to other intensive care populations. New insights from outpatient clinics also suggest distinct presentations of dysphagia and dysphonia in people after COVID-19 who were not hospitalized or severely ill. This international expert panel provides commentary on the impact of the pandemic on speech pathologists and our current understanding of dysphagia and dysphonia in patients with COVID-19, from acute illness to long-term recovery. This narrative review provides a unique, comprehensive critical appraisal of published peer-reviewed primary data as well as emerging previously unpublished, original primary data from across the globe, including clinical symptoms, trajectory, and prognosis. We conclude with our international expert opinion on what we have learnt and where we need to go next as this pandemic continues across the globe.

Electroglottographic study of seven semi-occluded exercises: LaxVox, straw, lip-trill, tongue-trill, humming, hand-over-mouth, and tongue-trill combined with hand-over-mouth.

INTRODUCTION: Semi-occluded vocal tract exercises (SOVTE) are often used in voice clinics. SOVTE change the acoustic vocal tract impedance in relation to the glottis impedance, improving voice quality. However, differences among SOVTE, such as the number of vibration sources into the vocal tract, are often disregarded by clinicians. Some SOVTE present single, whereas others double source. This study aims at investigating changes in voice production pattern for a series of SOVTE. A combined exercise (tongue-trill coupled with hand-over-mouth) was implemented to illustrate the effect of a secondary source of vibration in the vocal tract. METHOD: Twenty-three healthy volunteers performed a series of SOVTE: LaxVox, straw, lip-trill, tongue-trill, hand-over-mouth, humming, and tongue-trill combined with hand-over-mouth. Comfortable phonation served as control exercise. The dependent variables were electroglottography contact quotient (CQ), contact quotient range (CQr), fundamental frequency (F0), fundamental frequency range, and difference between the first formant frequency and F0 (F1 - F0). RESULTS: A significant difference for CQr scores compared with comfortable phonation was found for the combined tongue-trill with hand-over-mouth, lip-trill, LaxVox, and tongue-trill exercises. The F1 - F0 acoustic analysis showed significant differences in scores for exercises with one versus two sources of vibration. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: The results indicate that SOVTE should be divided into two groups, as follows: (a) steady (single sourced) with lower CQr and F1 - F0 difference (hand-over-mouth, humming, and straw) and (b) fluctuating (dual source) with larger CQr and F1 - F0 difference (tongue-trill, lip-trill, and LaxVox). Because of these differences, also different therapeutic effects can be expected. Tongue-trill combined with hand-over-mouth exhibited mixed effects of both the exercise groups.