[DiaPat urine test for prostate cancer. Predictive value for results of transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsies]. / DiaPat-Prostatakarzinom-Urintest. Vorhersagekraft für das Ergebnis transrektal-sonographisch gesteuerter Prostatabiopsien.

BACKGROUND: A novel urine test for early detection of prostate cancer (PCA), distributed and marketed by the company DiaPat, is advertised by the statement "correct analysis in 9 of 10 cases." PATIENTS AND METHODS: The test separates urinary polypeptides by means of capillary electrophoresis and characterizes the peptides in a time-of-flight mass spectrometer. The DiaPat test was performed on the urine of 18 men prior to multiple ultrasound-guided prostate biopsies. RESULTS: Sixteen of the 18 samples met the requirements for sample quality as established by the manufacturer. Eight of these 16 urine samples had been collected from patients in whom biopsies consecutively detected PCA; the remaining eight patients had benign biopsy results. Among the eight patients with detected PCA, the urine test yielded a low probability for PCA in three cases and a high probability in five. Within the group of eight patients with benign biopsy results, the urine test predicted a high probability for PCA in five men and a low probability in three. For the given PCA incidence of 50% within the investigated population, the DiaPat test correctly predicted biopsy results in one half of the population, whereas prediction in the remaining half was incorrect. CONCLUSION: Unless reliable validation of the DiaPat urine test for PCA is available, no clinical consequences should be drawn from the test results.

27 years of a single burn centre experience with Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis: analysis of mortality risk for causative agents.

INTRODUCTION: Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) are life threatening unwanted side effects, mainly from medication. Pathophysiology is still being debated. The disease usually requires treatment in burn units. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a retrospective study over 27 years we evaluated 72 patients admitted with SJS, SJS/TEN and TEN to our burns unit. Patients were evaluated for age, gender, total body surface area (TBSA) involved, causing agents, blood transfusion, dialysis, steroid administration, intubation, length of intensive care stay and death rate. Participants were grouped according to TBSA from 0 to 10, 11 to 30, and 31 to 100% and also into causing agent. Statistical analysis was done using a step-wise regression analysis. Because of small sample sizes for each drug group the percentage of related death rates for each drug group was calculated. RESULTS: The highest incidence of SJS and TEN was in the age group of 61-70 years. Overall mortality was 38%, mainly due to sepsis. For each subgroup SJS/TEN overlap had the highest mortality. The highest mortality for causing agents was found from antibiotic treatment, the lowest from using non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Most transfusions were done in the antibiotic group also the group underwent the highest number of dialysis events. Step-wise regression analysis identified dialysis, mechanical ventilation and age over 65 years as mortality high risk factors. CONCLUSION: When SJS/TEN is caused by antibiotics suspicion of developing a fatal sepsis should be high. Patients' medical condition when initiating therapy with a potential causing agent also might influence medical outcome.

[Carcinoid tumor of the testis]. / Insuläres Karzinoid des Hodens.

A 69-year-old man presented with a 2.4 cm painless mass in his right testis. Inguinal orchiectomy was performed. Histologically a carcinoid tumor of the testis was diagnosed. These neuroendocrine, noninvasive tumors are very rare, representing 0.23% of all testicular neoplasms. In 10% these tumors are associated with carcinoid syndrome and in 20% with metastatic disease.

[Duplex ureteral stenting for intrinsic and extrinsic ureteral strictures: an effective and elegant alternative]. / Die Duplex-Doppel-J-Schiene bei intrinsischen und extrinsischen Harnleiterengen : Eine effektive und elegante Alternative.

BACKGROUND: Duplex or twin ureteral stenting has previously been described as a viable option for patients where single double-J ureteral stenting has failed in order to avoid nephrostomies or further surgical intervention. We assessed a series of 20 patients at our institution after unsuccessful primary single ureteral stenting where parallel ureteral stents were inserted. METHODS: Between 2003 and 2009, 20 patients underwent double-J ureteral stenting for ureteral compression or ureteral strictures. After failure of single stenting two ureteral stents were consecutively inserted into the ureter in a parallel fashion after dilating the ureter up to 14 F. The second stent was passed over a hydrophilic guidewire while holding the first stent secure to prevent dislocation. RESULTS: In all patients the insertion of two parallel stents was technically possible. In 8 of 12 patients with extrinsic tumor compression the stents provided sufficient drainage (67%). When the stricture was due to surgery or radiation two of three patients were successfully diverted with twin stents. In five patients with a ureteral stricture due to malignant disease the stenting did not provide sufficient drainage and a nephrostomy had to be placed after a mean duration of 19 days. Two of those patients were later managed with a pyelovesical bypass. Three patients were later managed with a ureterocystoneostomy (psoas hitch). In four of five patients with benign disease a long-term management was feasible. The patient with retroperitoneal fibrosis developed immediate hydronephrosis and severe flank pain and ultimately underwent an ileal ureter replacement. In three patients with a benign ureteral stenosis after stone therapy, hysterectomy, or colon ureter replacement, a temporary duplex stenting sufficiently resolved the hydronephrosis for spontaneous urine passage. In one patient the duplex stenting prevented a kidney stone from dislocating into the ureter during lithotripsy. CONCLUSIONS: Duplex or twin (double) ureteral stenting is a valid option in selected patients to avoid the placement of a nephrostomy. Severe stenosis may however demand a nephrostomy insertion or more invasive procedures in the later course. For certain benign ureteral strictures a therapeutic dilating effect of the two ureteral stents that makes further intervention unnecessary can be discussed.