RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The authors' goal was to examine the extent to which perceived stigma affected treatment discontinuation in young and older adults with major depression. METHOD: A two-stage sampling design identified 92 new admissions of outpatients with major depression. Perceived stigma was assessed at admission. Discontinuation of treatment was recorded at 3-month follow-up. RESULTS: Although younger patients reported perceiving more stigma than older patients, stigma predicted treatment discontinuation only among the older patients. CONCLUSIONS: Patients' perceptions of stigma at the start of treatment influence their subsequent treatment behavior. Stigma is an appropriate target for intervention aimed at improving treatment adherence and outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Atención Ambulatoria , Trastorno Depresivo/psicología , Pacientes Desistentes del Tratamiento , Pacientes Desistentes del Tratamiento/estadística & datos numéricos , Estereotipo , Adolescente , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Intervalos de Confianza , Trastorno Depresivo/diagnóstico , Trastorno Depresivo/terapia , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oportunidad Relativa , Pacientes Desistentes del Tratamiento/psicología , ProbabilidadRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The rates of antidepressant recommendation and use were determined in outpatients with major depression receiving services in mental health clinics. Site of service and the patients' sociodemographic and clinical characteristics were investigated as possible predictors. METHOD: Patients admitted to six outpatient clinics were recruited through a two-stage sampling procedure. Patients with major depressive disorder (N = 124) according to the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV--Patient Edition were assessed at admission and 3 months later. RESULTS: Drug therapy was recommended for most patients (71%), and minimal use (at least 1 week) was recorded for 59% of the subjects. White patients were nearly three times as likely to receive a recommendation for antidepressants. Antidepressant recommendation was also associated with severity of depressed mood, recent medication use, and clinic type. Recent antidepressant use was the only variable that predicted whether the patient actually took the recommended medication. CONCLUSIONS: Many patients with depression seeking treatment at community mental health clinics do not receive antidepressant drug therapy. The offer of medication is predicted by patient ethnicity, clinic type, and symptom severity. Minority patients are less likely to be offered antidepressant treatment.
Asunto(s)
Atención Ambulatoria , Antidepresivos/uso terapéutico , Trastorno Depresivo/tratamiento farmacológico , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Cooperación del Paciente , Adolescente , Adulto , Atención Ambulatoria/estadística & datos numéricos , Instituciones de Atención Ambulatoria/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicios Comunitarios de Salud Mental/estadística & datos numéricos , Trastorno Depresivo/diagnóstico , Trastorno Depresivo/psicología , Utilización de Medicamentos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Grupos Minoritarios , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud , Probabilidad , Escalas de Valoración Psiquiátrica , Clase SocialRESUMEN
The quality of the therapeutic alliance was compared in sessions of psychodynamic-interpersonal and cognitive-behavioral therapy, and the alliance's relationship to various session impacts was investigated. As part of the Sheffield Psychotherapy Project 2 (D. A. Shapiro, M. Barkham, A. Rees, G. E. Hardy, S. Reynolds, & M. Startup, 1994), 57 clients diagnosed with major depression received 16 sessions of either psychodynamic-interpersonal or cognitive-behavioral therapy. Coders used the Working Alliance Inventory to rate 1 high-impact and 1 low-impact session from each client. Results indicated significantly greater alliance scores for cognitive-behavioral therapy sessions on the whole. Also, for the samples as a whole, high-impact sessions were characterized by higher alliance scores than those for low-impact sessions, and alliance was positively related to therapists' ratings of session depth and smoothness and to clients' ratings of mood.
Asunto(s)
Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual , Conducta Cooperativa , Trastorno Depresivo/terapia , Apego a Objetos , Relaciones Profesional-Paciente , Terapia Psicoanalítica , Adulto , Análisis de Varianza , Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual/normas , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Observación , Evaluación de Procesos, Atención de Salud , Terapia Psicoanalítica/normas , Análisis de Regresión , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
Using the Coding System of Therapeutic Focus, this exploratory study was a comparative process analysis of clinically significant sessions obtained from 22 master cognitive-behavior and 14 master psychodynamic-interpersonal therapists. Therapists were nominated by experts in each of these orientations, and clients were seen in a naturalistic setting for problems with anxiety, depression, or both. Relatively few between-groups differences emerged with this master therapist sample. However, regardless of theoretical orientation, several differences were found between those portions of the session labeled by therapists as being clinically significant and those viewed as less significant. As these findings are different from those obtained in a previous study of the therapeutic focus in interventions carried out within the context of a controlled clinical trial, some of the possible factors contributing to these differences are noted.
Asunto(s)
Psicoterapia , Adulto , Análisis de Varianza , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Evaluación de Procesos, Atención de Salud , Psicoterapia/métodos , Psicoterapia/normasRESUMEN
The ability of several process variables to predict therapy outcome was tested with 30 depressed clients who received cognitive therapy with or without medication. Two types of process variables were studied: 1 variable that is unique to cognitive therapy and 2 variables that this approach is assumed to share with other forms of treatment. The client's improvement was found to be predicted by the 2 common factors measured: the therapeutic alliance and the client's emotional involvement (experiencing). The results also indicated, however, that a unique aspect of cognitive therapy (i.e., therapist's focus on the impact of distorted cognitions on depressive symptoms) correlated negatively with outcome at the end of treatment. Descriptive analyses that were conducted to understand this negative correlation suggest that therapists sometimes increased their adherence to cognitive rationales and techniques to correct problems in the therapeutic alliance. Such increased focus, however, seems to worsen alliance strains, thereby interfering with therapeutic change.
Asunto(s)
Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual/métodos , Trastorno Depresivo/terapia , Adulto , Antidepresivos Tricíclicos/uso terapéutico , Terapia Combinada , Trastorno Depresivo/psicología , Femenino , Humanos , Imipramina/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud , Inventario de Personalidad , Relaciones Profesional-Paciente , PronósticoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Symptoms that were risk factors for hospital readmission among psychiatric inpatients diagnosed as having bipolar affective disorder were evaluated. METHODS: Subjects were 100 persons consecutively admitted to a psychiatric inpatient unit at a university-affiliated hospital who met Research Diagnostic Criteria for bipolar I or II disorder or schizoaffective disorder, manic type. Patients were assessed using the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia-Lifetime Version (SADS-L) and the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) within one week of discharge, and their hospitalization status was documented by monthly phone contacts over a period of 15 months. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients (24 percent) were rehospitalized within six months of discharge, and 44 (44 percent) were readmitted within 15 months. Survival analysis using the Cox proportional hazard regression model demonstrated that patients with high scores on a BPRS-derived mania factor were at significantly decreased risk of rehospitalization, whereas those scoring high on a factor consistent with neurovegetative depression were at significantly increased risk. A greater number of previous psychiatric admissions and younger age were also associated with significantly increased risk of rehospitalization. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that patients with bipolar disorder presenting with a depressive episode characterized by prominent neurovegetative features should be treated more aggressively with both pharmacotherapy and intensive outpatient services to reduce the relatively high risk of rehospitalization that appears to be associated with this type of depression.
Asunto(s)
Trastorno Bipolar , Servicios de Salud Mental/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicio de Psiquiatría en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermedad Aguda , Adolescente , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Trastorno Bipolar/diagnóstico , Trastorno Bipolar/psicología , Trastorno Bipolar/rehabilitación , Escalas de Valoración Psiquiátrica Breve , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Hospitales Universitarios , Humanos , Masculino , Admisión del Paciente , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Estudios Retrospectivos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Estados UnidosAsunto(s)
Trastorno Depresivo/enfermería , Trastorno Depresivo/terapia , Psiquiatría Geriátrica/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermería Psiquiátrica/métodos , Derivación y Consulta/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Trastorno Depresivo/diagnóstico , Femenino , Evaluación Geriátrica , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Medición de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
Psychiatric distress is substantially prevalent among elderly individuals, particularly in the primary care and institutional settings, where most older persons receive mental health care. Barriers to care from providers include negative attitudes and stigmatization and poor recognition by general health care professionals. When psychiatric disorders are recognized, the intensity and duration of treatment provided is generally below standards for adequacy. Further research can determine the impact of patient, caregiver, and provider factors on treatment provision and on patient adherence to treatment. Assessment of factors influencing the treatment process are needed to ensure that treatments provided in the real world approximate the efficacy established in controlled clinical trials.
Asunto(s)
Anciano/psicología , Servicios de Salud Mental/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicios de Salud Mental/normas , Humanos , Trastornos Mentales/diagnóstico , Trastornos Mentales/psicologíaRESUMEN
The prospect of using psychotherapy integration to enhance therapeutic efficacy increases as clinical discussion and empirical inquiry mount. The authors review briefly the historical origins of integrative thought, discuss the new receptivity with which it is being met, and examine the clinical use of an integrative framework, using progress in the treatment of panic disorder as an example of the potential of integrative treatment strategies.
RESUMEN
Studies have suggested that family burden adversely affects clinical outcome in the major mental disorders. Logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the effect of family burden reported at baseline (acute model), or 7 months (stabilization model), on the risk of having a subsequent affective episode, in a sample of 264 patients with Research Diagnostic Criteria-diagnosed bipolar illness. Higher levels of baseline burden and a depressive index episode significantly increased the risk for a major episode at 7 months. Higher 7-month burden significantly increased the risk for a major episode at 15 months among patients with relatively low 7-month BPRS symptom levels. Caregiver burden reported at times of symptom relapse and during stabilization predicts subsequent adverse clinical outcomes among patients with bipolar disorder and suggests a need for family support.
Asunto(s)
Trastorno Bipolar/diagnóstico , Cuidadores/psicología , Salud de la Familia , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Trastorno Bipolar/psicología , Escalas de Valoración Psiquiátrica Breve/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Escalas de Valoración Psiquiátrica/estadística & datos numéricos , Recurrencia , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
This study measured distinctions made by a sample of clergy and mental health professionals in response to three categories of presenting problems with religious content: mental disorder, religious or spiritual problem, and "pure" religious problem. A national, random sample of rabbis (N = 111) and clinical psychologists (N = 90) provided evaluations of three vignettes: schizophrenia, mystical experience, and mourning. The participants evaluated the religious etiology, helpfulness of psychiatric medication, and seriousness of the presenting problems. The rabbis and psychologists distinguished between the three diverse categories of presenting problems and concurred in their distinctions. The results provide empirical evidence for the construct validity of the new DSM-IV category religious or spiritual problem (V62.89). Use of the V code allows for more subtle distinctions among the variety of problems that persons bring to clergy and mental health professionals. These distinctions may also provide a foundation for the initiation of co-professional consultation.
Asunto(s)
Clero/psicología , Trastornos Mentales/diagnóstico , Psicología Clínica , Religión y Psicología , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Clero/estadística & datos numéricos , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Pesar , Humanos , Relaciones Interprofesionales , Trastornos Mentales/clasificación , Trastornos Mentales/tratamiento farmacológico , Misticismo/psicología , Competencia Profesional , Psicología Clínica/estadística & datos numéricos , Psicotrópicos/uso terapéutico , Derivación y Consulta , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Muestreo , Esquizofrenia/diagnóstico , Esquizofrenia/tratamiento farmacológico , Psicología del Esquizofrénico , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Terminología como AsuntoRESUMEN
Studies of the primary care treatment of depressed elderly patients are constrained by limited time and space and by subject burden. Research assessments must balance these constraints with the need for obtaining clinically meaningful information. Due to the wide-ranging impact of depression, assessments should also focus on suicidality, hopelessness, substance abuse, anxiety, cognitive functioning, medical comorbidity, functional disability, social support, personality, service use and satisfaction with services. This paper describes considerations concerning the assessment selection process for primary care studies, using the PROSPECT (Prevention of Suicide in Primary Care Elderly: Collaborative Trial) study as an example. Strategies are discussed for ensuring that data are complete, valid and reliable.
Asunto(s)
Trastorno Depresivo/diagnóstico , Evaluación Geriátrica , Atención Primaria de Salud , Prevención del Suicidio , Actividades Cotidianas , Anciano , Envejecimiento , Personas con Discapacidad , Servicios de Salud para Ancianos/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Personalidad , Apoyo Social , Suicidio/psicologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Family members of patients with schizophrenia frequently report burdens associated with caring for their relatives. AIMS: We evaluate the impact of illness beliefs on the burden reported by family care-givers of people with bipolar illness. METHOD: The multivariate relationships between patient symptomatology and family illness beliefs and report of burden were examined at baseline among care-givers of 266 patients with Research Diagnostic Criteria-diagnosed bipolar illness who were subsequently followed for 15 months. RESULTS: At baseline, 93% of care-givers reported moderate or greater distress in at least one burden domain. As a group, care-giver illness beliefs (illness awareness, perception of patient and family control) explained an additional 18-28% of variance in burden experienced beyond the effects of the patient's clinical state and history. CONCLUSIONS: Care-givers of patients with bipolar illness report widespread burden that is influenced by beliefs about the illness.